ANALYSIS AND TEXTUAL RESEARCH OF THE SEISMOGENIC STRUCTURE OF THE QIN-LONG EARTHQUAKE IN 600 A.D.
-
摘要: 据史料记载，公元600年秦陇地区发生了一次大地震。关于此次地震的震中位置、震级、震中烈度和发震构造长期存在争议。根据在陇县固关一带发现的地震崩塌体，同时结合史料考证、卫星影像判读、野外调查、探槽开挖、年龄测试等手段，研究认为：公元600年秦陇地震的发震构造为六盘山东麓断裂南段固关段；秦陇地震震中在陇县固关镇一带，震级为6
$ {}^{3}\!\!\diagup\!\!{}_{4}\; $ -
关键词:
- 公元600年秦陇地震 /
- 发震构造 /
- 地震考证 /
- 六盘山东麓断裂南段 /
- 青藏高原东北缘
Abstract: According to Chinese historical records, an earthquake struck the ancient Qin-Long area in 600 A.D., and caused serious social impact. The epicenter, earthquake magnitude, epicentral intensity, and seismogenic structure of this earthquake have long been disputed. In this study, based on the earthquake collapses found in Guguan town, Longxian county, combined with multiple research methods including historical data verification, satellite images interpretation, field observation, geologic trench excavation, age dating, it shows that the seismogenic structure of the earthquake is the Guguan segment of east Liupanshan fault, and the epicenter should be located near Guguan town, Longxian county. Its magnitude was around 6$ {}^{3}\!\!\diagup\!\!{}_{4}\; $ -
-
表 1 14C样品年龄测试结果
Table 1. Results of the AMS 14C age dating
样品编号 实验室号 经度(E) 纬度(N) 物质 d13C/‰ 14C年龄/
a BP校正年龄/
a BP采样点 QSGP2-1 Beta-373491 106.6598° 34.9614° 有机沉积 -23.2 1650±30 1610~1525 前山沟漫滩堆积 QSGP3-2 Beta-373492 106.6598° 34.9614° 有机沉积 -23.6 6810±40 7690~7585 前山沟漫滩堆积 QSG2 Beta-364993 106.6674° 34.9572° 有机沉积 -23.2 1970±30 2000~1880 前山沟漫滩堆积 QSG3 Beta-364994 106.6674° 34.9572° 有机沉积 -23.3 2680±30 2680~2760 前山沟漫滩堆积 DZTC4C1 Beta-439222 106.9736° 34.9418° 有机沉积 -22.4 3300±30 3590~3455 探槽DTC4层⑤顶部 DZTC4C2 Beta-430697 106.9736° 34.9418° 有机沉积 -23.7 1180±30 1025~1005 探槽DTC4层⑥底部 注：样品由美国Beta实验室进行测试分析 
下载: 导出CSV
-
谢毓寿, 蔡美彪.中国地震历史资料汇编:第一卷[M].北京:科学出版社, 1983, 1~238.
XIE Yushou, CAI Meibiao. Chinese historical seismic data compilation, first volume[M]. Beijing:Science Press, 1983, 1~238. (in Chinese)
郑文俊, 袁道阳, 张培震, 等.青藏高原东北缘活动构造几何图像、运动转换与高原扩展[J].第四纪研究, 2016, 36(4):775~788. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=dsjyj201604001
ZHENG Wenjun, YUAN Daoyang, ZHANG Peizhen, et al. Tectonic geometry and kinematic dissipation of the active faults in the northeastern Tibetan Plateau and their implications for understanding northeastward growth of the plateau[J]. Quaternary Sciences, 2006, 36(4):775~788. (in Chinese with English abstract) http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=dsjyj201604001
戴华光, 贾云鸿, 苏向洲, 等.青藏高原东北缘最新构造变形的初步研究[J].地质力学学报, 1996, 2(4):15~20. http://journal.geomech.ac.cn/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=19960472&flag=1
DAI Huaguang, JIA Yunhong, SU Xiangzhou, et al. Preliminary study on the latest tectonic deformations along northeast margin of the Qinghai Tibetan Plateau[J]. Journal of Geomechanics, 1996, 2(4):15~20. (in Chinese with English abstract) http://journal.geomech.ac.cn/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=19960472&flag=1
张岳桥, VERGELY P, MERCIER J L.华北地区上新世至第四纪断裂作用型式与左旋扩展[J].地质力学学报, 1999, 5(3):40~46. http://journal.geomech.ac.cn/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=19990337&flag=1
ZHANG Yueqiao, VERGELY P, MERCIER J L. Pliocene-quaternary faulting pattern and left-slip propagation tectonics in North China[J]. Journal of Geomechanics, 1999, 5(3):40~46. (in Chinese with English abstract) http://journal.geomech.ac.cn/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=19990337&flag=1
施炜, 张岳桥, 马寅生, 等.六盘山盆地形成和改造历史及构造应力场演化[J].中国地质, 2006, 33(5):1066~1074. http://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?filename=dizi200605017&dbname=CJFD&dbcode=CJFQ
SHI Wei, ZHANG Yueqiao, MA yinsheng, et al. Formation and modification history of the Liupanshan basin on the southwestern margin of the Ordos block and tectonic stress field evolution[J]. Geology in China, 2006, 33(5):1066~1074. (in Chinese with English abstract) http://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?filename=dizi200605017&dbname=CJFD&dbcode=CJFQ
顾功叙.中国地震目录:(公元前1831——公元1969年)[M].北京:科学出版社, 1983, 1~910.
GU Gongxu. Chinese seismic catalogue (1831 B. C. -1969 A. D.)[M]. Beijing:Science Press, 1983, 1~910.(in Chinese)
国家地震局兰州地震研究所.陕甘宁青四省(区)强地震目录[M].西安:陕西科学技术出版社, 1985, 10.
Lanzhou Institute of Seismology, China Earthquake Administration. Catalogue of strong earthquakes in Shaanxi, Gansu, Ningxia and Qinghai provinces or region[M]. Xi'an:Shaanxi Science and Technology Press, 1985, 10. (in Chinese)
国家地震局震害防御司.中国历史强震目录[M].北京:地震出版社, 1995, 6~13.
Earthquake Disaster Prevention Department, SSB. Catalogue of Chinese strong historical earthquakes[M]. Beijing:Seismological Press, 1995, 6~13. (in Chinese)
史志刚, 袁道阳, 李廷栋, 等.公元600年秦陇地震考证与发震构造探讨[J].科技导报, 2013, 31(12):48~52. doi: 10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2013.12.008
SHI Zhigang, YUAN Daoyang, LI Tingdong, et al. Textual research of A.D. 600 Qin-Long earthquake and discussion on its seismogenic structure[J]. Science & Technology Review, 2013, 31(12):48~52. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2013.12.008
师亚芹. 鄂尔多斯西南缘六盘山-宝鸡断裂带最新活动性及大震危险性[R]. 北京: 国家自然科学基金委员会, 2016.
http://www.cqvip.com/QK/83599X/201521/666755023.html SHI Yaqin. The latest activity and seismic risk of Liupanshan-Baoji fault zone at SW margin of Ordos Block[R]. Beijing: National nature science foundation of China, 2016. (in Chinese with English abstract)
Tocher D. Earthquake energy and ground breakage[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 1958, 48(2):147~153. https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/ssa/bssa/article-abstract/48/2/147/115843/earthquake-energy-and-ground-breakage
陈达生.地震引起的地表破裂长度与震级之间的经验关系[J].华北地震科学, 1984, 2(2):26~32. https://www.wenkuxiazai.com/doc/32e518c78bd63186bcebbc27.html
CHEN Dasheng. The empirical relationship between the length of the surface rupture caused by earthquake and the magnitude[J]. North China Earthquake Sciences, 1984, 2(2):26~32. (in Chinese) https://www.wenkuxiazai.com/doc/32e518c78bd63186bcebbc27.html
沈建文, 邱瑛, 赵志贺.震级-破裂长度关系与断层破裂模型[J].地球物理学报, 1990, 33(2):242~248. http://www.cqvip.com/QK/94718X/199002/228526.html
SHEN Jianwen, QIU Ying, ZHAO Zhihe. Rupture length magnitude relationship and fault-rupture model[J]. Acta Geophysica Sinica, 1990, 33(2):242~248. (in Chinese with English abstract) http://www.cqvip.com/QK/94718X/199002/228526.html
叶文华, 徐锡伟, 汪良谋.中国西部强震的地表破裂规模与震级、复发时间间隔关系的研究[J].地震地质, 1996, 18(1):37~44. http://www.cqvip.com/QK/95728X/199601/2092157.html
YE Wenhua, XU Xiwei, WANG Liangmou. Quantitative relationship between surface rupture parameter, earthquake magnitude and recurrence interval for surfacerupturing-earthquakes in west China[J]. Seismology and Geology, 1996, 18(1):37~44. (in Chinese with English abstract) http://www.cqvip.com/QK/95728X/199601/2092157.html
鄢家全, 张志中, 王健, 等.中国历史地震烈度表研究[J].地震学报, 2011, 33(4):515~531. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=dizhen201104011
YAN Jiaquan, ZHANG Zhizhong, WANG Jian, et al. A study on seismic intensity scale of Chinese historical earthquakes[J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 2011, 33(4):515~531. (in Chinese with English abstract) http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=dizhen201104011
朱书俊.确定历史地震震级的方法讨论[J].西北地震学报, 1984, 6(4):101~107. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZBDZ198404018.htm
ZHU Shujun. Discussion of the method on detemining the magnitude of historical earthquakes[J]. Northwestern Seismological Journal, 1984, 6(4):101~107. (in Chinese with English abstract) http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZBDZ198404018.htm
-
图(9)
表(1)
计量
- 文章访问数: 2801
- PDF下载数: 29
- 施引文献: 0