中国地质科学院地质力学研究所
中国地质学会
主办

海原-六盘山断裂带现今地震危险性的数值模拟分析

蒋锋云, 季灵运, 赵强. 2021. 海原-六盘山断裂带现今地震危险性的数值模拟分析. 地质力学学报, 27(2): 230-240. doi: 10.12090/j.issn.1006-6616.2021.27.02.022
引用本文: 蒋锋云, 季灵运, 赵强. 2021. 海原-六盘山断裂带现今地震危险性的数值模拟分析. 地质力学学报, 27(2): 230-240. doi: 10.12090/j.issn.1006-6616.2021.27.02.022
JIANG Fengyun, JI Lingyun, ZHAO Qiang. 2021. Numerical simulation of the present seismic risk of the HaiyuanLiupanshan fault zone. Journal of Geomechanics, 27(2): 230-240. doi: 10.12090/j.issn.1006-6616.2021.27.02.022
Citation: JIANG Fengyun, JI Lingyun, ZHAO Qiang. 2021. Numerical simulation of the present seismic risk of the HaiyuanLiupanshan fault zone. Journal of Geomechanics, 27(2): 230-240. doi: 10.12090/j.issn.1006-6616.2021.27.02.022

海原-六盘山断裂带现今地震危险性的数值模拟分析

  • 基金项目:
    中国地震局地震星火计划攻关项目(XH20083);中国地震局震情跟踪面上项目(2020020203)
详细信息
    作者简介: 蒋锋云(1978-), 男, 高级工程师, 固体地球物理专业。E-mail: jfy080628@163.com
    通讯作者: 季灵运(1982-), 男, 研究员, 大地测量专业。E-mail: dinsar010@163.com
  • 中图分类号: P315

Numerical simulation of the present seismic risk of the HaiyuanLiupanshan fault zone

  • Fund Project: This research is financially supported by the Spark Programs of China Earthquake Administration (Grant No.XH20083), and Seismic Tracking General Program of China Earthquake Administration (Grant No.2020020203)
More Information
  • 基于正交各向异性理论表征断层的变形行为,将平行断层面的剪切模量和周围介质剪切模量的比值作为反演参数,以海原-六盘山断裂附近现今GPS观测地壳水平运动速度场作为约束,通过构建三维有限元模型,采用遗传算法,反演了海原-六盘山断裂平行断层面的剪切模量分布。结果显示:六盘山断裂中南段平行断层面剪切模量与周围介质接近,且沿断层面地震动活动较为稀疏,反映六盘山断裂两侧近场差异变形较小,和汶川地震前龙门山断裂的情况类似,可能断裂带处于强闭锁状态。整个狭义的海原断裂带平行断层面剪切模量比周围介质要小的多,在0.4以下,且0~5 km要比深部大,可能反映了1920年海原8.5级地震之后,该断裂仍然处于震后调整状态。西段金强河断裂、毛毛山断裂、老虎山断裂浅部0~5 km剪切模量较小,而在5~20 km剪切模量相对较高,结合沿断层面地震活动分布特征,认为金强河、毛毛山断裂浅部可能存在蠕滑,而深部5~20 km存在应变能积累特征,具有强震发生的背景,而老虎山断裂由地表至深部地震活动较为密集,可能存在贯通性蠕滑,强震发生的可能性较小。

  • 加载中
  • 图 1  研究区构造特征及历史强震

    Figure 1. 

    图 2  有限元模型及网格划分

    Figure 2. 

    图 3  研究区GPS观测速度场(1999—2016年)

    Figure 3. 

    图 4  目标函数收敛过程

    Figure 4. 

    图 5  模拟速度场和GPS观测结果的对比

    Figure 5. 

    图 6  残差及其统计分析

    Figure 6. 

    图 7  模拟结果和观测结果分别计算的应变率场

    Figure 7. 

    图 8  反演得到的断层剪切模量与周围介质剪切模量的比值(0~1之间)

    Figure 8. 

  • CHEN J H, LIU Q Y, LI S C, et al., 2005. Crust and upper mantle S-wave velocity structure across Northeastern Tibetan Plateau and Ordos block[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 48(2): 333-342. (in Chinese with English abstract) http://www.oalib.com/paper/1567657

    DUAN X B, 1997. Geographical distribution of earthquake focal depth in China[J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 19(6): 590-599. (in Chinese)

    FIALKO Y, SANDWELL D, AGNEW D, et al., 2002. Deformation on nearby faults induced by the 1999 hector mine earthquake[J]. Science, 297(5588): 1858-1862. doi: 10.1126/science.1074671

    GAUDEMER Y, TAPPONNIER P, MEYER P, et al., 1995. Partitioning of crustal slip between linked, active faults in the eastern Qilian Shan, and evidence for a major seismic gap, the 'Tianzhu gap', on the western Haiyuan Fault, Gansu (China)[J]. Geophysical Journal International, 120(3): 599-645. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.1995.tb01842.x

    HAO M, LI Y H, QING S L, 2017. Spatial and temporal distribution of slip rate deficit across Haiyuan-Liupan Shan Fault zone constrained by GPS data[J]. Seismology and Geology, 39(3): 471-484. (in Chinese with English abstract) http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-DZDZ201703003.htm

    HE J K, LU S J, WANG W M, 2013. Three-dimensional mechanical modeling of the GPS velocity field around the northeastern Tibetan plateau and surrounding regions[J]. Tectonophysics, 584: 257-266. doi: 10.1016/j.tecto.2012.03.025

    HERGERT T, HEIDBACH O, 2010. Slip-rate variability and distributed deformation in the Marmara Sea fault system[J]. Nature Geoscience, 3(2): 132-135. doi: 10.1038/ngeo739

    JIA S X, ZHANG X K, 2008. Study on the crust phases of deep seismicsounding experiments and fine crust structures in the northeast margin of Tibetan Plateau[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 51(5): 1431-1443. (in Chinese with English abstract) http://www.oalib.com/paper/1568190

    JOLIVET R, LASSERRE C, DOIN M P, et al., 2012. Shallow creep on the Haiyuan Fault (Gansu, China) revealed by SAR Interferometry[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 117(B6): B06401. http://smartsearch.nstl.gov.cn/paper_detail.html?id=8389751782cfcae3829cbf7335ce8dd1

    LASKE G, MASTERS G, MA Z T, et al., 2013. Update on CRUST1.0-A 1-degree Global Model of Earth's Crust[Z]//EGU General Assembly 2013. Vienna, Austria.

    LI J Y, ZHANG J, LIU J F, et al., 2019. Crustal tectonic framework of china and its formation processes: constraints from stuctural deformation[J]. Journal of Geomechanics, 25(5): 678-698. (in Chinese with English abstract) http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTotal-DZLX201905006.htm

    LI Q, JIANG Z S, WU Y Q, et al., 2014. Inversion of locking and distribution of slip deficit in Haiyuan-Liupan fault zone using GPS data[J]. Geomatics and information Science of Wuhan University, 39(5): 575-580. (in Chinese with English abstract) http://www.researchgate.net/publication/286990679_Inversion_of_locking_and_distribution_of_slip_deficit_in_Haiyuan-Liupan_fault_zone_using_GPS_data

    LI Y C, SHAN X J, QU C Y, et al., 2016. Fault locking and slip rate deficit of the Haiyuan-Liupanshan fault zone in the northeastern margin of the Tibetan Plateau[J]. Journal of Geodynamics, 102: 47-57. doi: 10.1016/j.jog.2016.07.005

    LI Y J, CHEN L W, YE J Y, 2009. Application and development of numerical simulation in stress field evolvement and seismology[J]. Progress in Geophysics, 24(2): 418-431. (in Chinese with English abstract) http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-DQWJ200902009.htm

    M7 Special Working Group, 2012. Study on the mid-to long-term potential of large earthquakes on the Chinese continent[M]. Beijing: Seismological Press. (in Chinese)

    MILDON Z K, ROBERTS G P, WALKER J P F, et al., 2019. Coulomb pre-stress and fault bends are ignored yet vital factors for earthquake triggering and hazard[J]. Nature Communications, 10: 2744. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-10520-6

    Quark Studio, 2002. Finite element analysis basics ANSYS and MATLAB[M]. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press. (in Chinese)

    REINOZA C, JOUANNE F, AUDEMARD F A, et al., 2015. Geodetic exploration of strain along the El Pilar Fault in northeastern Venezuela[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 120(3): 1993-2013. doi: 10.1002/2014JB011483

    SCHOLZ C H, 1990. The mechanics of earthquakes and faulting[M]. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    SCHOLZ C H, 1998. Earthquakes and friction laws[J]. Nature, 391(6662): 37-42. doi: 10.1038/34097

    SHEN Z K, WANG M, ZENG Y H, et al., 2015. Optimal interpolation of spatially discretized geodetic data[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 105(4): 2117-2127. doi: 10.1785/0120140247

    SHI F Q, SHAO Z G, ZHAN W, et al., 2018a. Numerical modeling of the shear modulus and stress state of active faults in the northeastern margin of the Tibetan Plateau[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 61(9): 3651-3663. (in Chinese with English abstract) http://www.researchgate.net/publication/329981106_Numerical_modeling_of_the_shear_modulus_and_stress_state_of_active_faults_in_the_northeastern_margin_of_the_Tibetan_plateau

    SHI F Q, ZHU L, LI Y J, et al., 2018b. Characterization of fault deformation behavior based on orthotropic theory[J]. Journal of Seismological Research, 41(1): 64-72. (in Chinese with English abstract) http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-DZYJ201801008.htm

    WANG M, SHEN Z K, 2020. Present-day crustal deformation of continental china derived from gps and its tectonic implications[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 125(2): e2019JB018774. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2019JB018774

    WANG S D, SHI Y Q, REN F W, 2018. Analysis and textual research of the seismogenic structure of the Qin-Long earthquake in 600 A. D[J]. Journal of Geomechanics, 24(2): 157-168. (in Chinese with English abstract) http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTotal-DZLX201802062.htm

    XU X W, WU X Y, YU G H, et al., 2017. Seismo-Geological Signatures for Identifying M ≥ 7. 0 earthquake Risk areas and their premilimary application in mainland China[J]. Seismology and Geology, 39(2): 219-275. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    ZHANG G M, WANG S Y, LI L, et al., 2002. Focal depth research of earthquakes in Mainland China: implication for tectonics[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 47(12): 969-974. (in Chinese with English abstract) https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02907562

    ZHANG H S, GAO R, TIAN X B, et al., 2015. Crustal S wave velocity beneath the northeastern Tibetan plateau inferred from teleseismic P wave receiver functions[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 58(11): 3982-3992. (in Chinese with English abstract) http://www.researchgate.net/publication/286875857_Crustal_Swave_velocity_beneath_the_northeastern_Tibetan_plateau_inferred_from_teleseismic_Pwave_receiver_functions

    ZHANG P Z, DENG Q D, ZHANG G M, et al., 2003. Active tectonic blocks and strong earthquakes in the continent of China[J]. Science in China Series D: Earth Sciences, 46(2): 13-24. http://www.zhangqiaokeyan.com/academic-journal-foreign_other_thesis/020414997685.html

    ZHANG P Z, DENG Q D, ZHANG Z Q, et al., 2013. Active faults, earthquake hazards and associated geodynamic processes in continental China[J]. Scientia Sinica (Terrae), 43(10): 1607-1620. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.1360/zd-2013-43-10-1607

    ZHENG W J, ZHANG P Z, YUAN D Y, et al., 2019. Basic characteristics of active tectonics and associated geodynamic processes in continental China[J]. Journal of Geomechanics, 25(5): 699-721. (in Chinese with English abstract) http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTotal-DZLX201905007.htm

    陈九辉, 刘启元, 李顺成等, 2005. 青藏高原东北缘-鄂尔多斯地块地壳上地幔S波速度结构. 地球物理学报, 48(2): 333-342. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0001-5733.2005.02.015

    段星北, 1997. 中国地震震源深度的地理分布[J]. 地震学报, 19(6): 590-599. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZXB706.004.htm

    郝明, 李煜航, 秦姗兰, 2017. 基于GPS数据的海原-六盘山断裂带滑动速率亏损时空分布[J]. 地震地质, 39(3): 471-484. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2017.03.003

    嘉世旭, 张先康, 2008. 青藏高原东北缘深地震测深震相研究与地壳细结构[J]. 地球物理学报, 51(5): 1431-1443. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0001-5733.2008.05.016

    夸克工作室, 2002. 有限元分析基础篇ANSYS与Matlab[M]. 北京: 清华大学出版社.

    李锦轶, 张进, 刘建峰, 等, 2019. 中国地壳结构构造与形成过程: 来自构造变形的约束[J]. 地质力学学报, 25(5): 678-698. https://journal.geomech.ac.cn/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?flag=1&file_no=20190505&journal_id=dzlxxb

    李强, 江在森, 武艳强, 等, 2014. 利用GPS资料反演海原-六盘山断裂带闭锁程度与滑动亏损分布[J]. 武汉大学学报·信息科学版, 39(5): 575-580. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-WHCH201405014.htm

    李玉江, 陈连旺, 叶际阳, 2009. 数值模拟方法在应力场演化及地震科学中的研究进展[J]. 地球物理学进展, 24(2): 418-431. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-2903.2009.02.007

    M7专项工作组, 2012. 中国大陆大地震中长期危险性研究[M]. 北京: 地震出版社.

    石富强, 邵志刚, 占伟, 等, 2018a. 青藏高原东北缘活动断裂剪切模量及应力状态数值模拟[J]. 地球物理学报, 61(9): 3651-3663. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQWX201809014.htm

    石富强, 朱琳, 李玉江, 等, 2018b. 基于正交各向异性理论表征断层的变形行为[J]. 地震研究, 41(1): 64-72. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZYJ201801008.htm

    王师迪, 师亚芹, 任凤文, 2018. 公元600年秦陇地震发震构造分析及考证研究[J]. 地质力学学报, 24(2): 157-168. https://journal.geomech.ac.cn/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?flag=1&file_no=20180202&journal_id=dzlxxb

    徐锡伟, 吴熙彦, 于贵华, 等, 2017. 中国大陆高震级地震危险区判定的地震地质学标志及其应用[J]. 地震地质, 39(2): 219-275. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2017.02.001

    张国民, 汪素云, 李丽, 等, 2002. 中国大陆地震震源深度及其构造含义[J]. 科学通报, 47(9): 663-668. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0023-074X.2002.09.004

    张洪双, 高锐, 田小波, 等, 2015. 青藏高原东北缘地壳S波速度结构及其动力学含义: 远震接收函数提供的证据[J]. 地球物理学报, 58(11): 3982-3992. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQWX201511009.htm

    张培震, 邓起东, 张国民, 等, 2003. 中国大陆的强震活动与活动地块[J]. 中国科学: 地球科学, 33(S1): 12-20. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JDXK2003S1001.htm

    张培震, 邓起东, 张竹琪, 等, 2013. 中国大陆的活动断裂、地震灾害及其动力过程[J]. 中国科学: 地球科学, 43(10): 1607-1620. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JDXK201310005.htm

    郑文俊, 张培震, 袁道阳, 等, 2019. 中国大陆活动构造基本特征及其对区域动力过程的控制[J]. 地质力学学报, 25(5): 699-721. https://journal.geomech.ac.cn/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?flag=1&file_no=20190506&journal_id=dzlxxb

  • 加载中

(8)

计量
  • 文章访问数:  1614
  • PDF下载数:  64
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
收稿日期:  2020-11-30
修回日期:  2021-02-02
刊出日期:  2021-04-28

目录