中国地质调查局西安地质调查中心主办
高级检索

克拉玛依克百断槽火山岩岩石组合、层位归属及地质意义：来自古66井的约束

,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  , 

文章导航 > 西北地质 > 2024 > 57(5): 209-223

上一篇

下一篇

王玉伟, 李永军, 王盼龙, 王韬, 黄家瑄, 张新远, 郑孟林, 张越迁. 2024. 克拉玛依克百断槽火山岩岩石组合、层位归属及地质意义：来自古66井的约束. 西北地质, 57(5): 209-223. doi: 10.12401/j.nwg.2023197
引用本文: 王玉伟, 李永军, 王盼龙, 王韬, 黄家瑄, 张新远, 郑孟林, 张越迁. 2024. 克拉玛依克百断槽火山岩岩石组合、层位归属及地质意义：来自古66井的约束. 西北地质, 57(5): 209-223. doi: 10.12401/j.nwg.2023197
shu
WANG Yuwei, LI Yongjun, WANG Panlong, WANG Tao, HUANG Jiaxuan, ZHANG Xinyuan, ZHENG Menglin, ZHANG Yueqian. 2024. Volcanic Rock Assemblage, Stratigraphic Attribution and Geological Significance of Volcanic Reservoir in Kebai Fault-trough in Karamay: Constraints from Well Gu 66. Northwestern Geology, 57(5): 209-223. doi: 10.12401/j.nwg.2023197
Citation: WANG Yuwei, LI Yongjun, WANG Panlong, WANG Tao, HUANG Jiaxuan, ZHANG Xinyuan, ZHENG Menglin, ZHANG Yueqian. 2024. Volcanic Rock Assemblage, Stratigraphic Attribution and Geological Significance of Volcanic Reservoir in Kebai Fault-trough in Karamay: Constraints from Well Gu 66. Northwestern Geology, 57(5): 209-223. doi: 10.12401/j.nwg.2023197
shu

克拉玛依克百断槽火山岩岩石组合、层位归属及地质意义：来自古66井的约束

  • 1.

    中国石油新疆油田分公司勘探事业部，新疆 克拉玛依　834000

  • 2.

    中国石油新疆油田分公司勘探开发研究院，新疆 克拉玛依　834000

  • 3.

    长安大学地球科学与资源学院，陕西 西安　710054

  • 基金项目: 国家科技重大专项“新疆北部深层区域构造格架、沉积演化与有利区带评价”（2017ZX05008-006-003-001），国家重点研发计划“深地资源勘查开采重点专项”（2018YFC060400），中国石油天然气股份有限公司科学研究与技术开发项目“北疆海相泥盆-石炭系油气地质研究”（2022DJ0507），中石油前瞻性基础研究项目“地层不整合油气藏成藏主控因素与关键要素定量评价技术研究”（2021DJ0405）联合资助。
详细信息
    作者简介: 王玉伟（1980−），男，高级工程师，长期从事油气勘探工作。E−mail：wyuwei1@petrochina.com.cn
    通讯作者: 李永军（1961−），男，教授，博士生导师，长期从事地质学教学及相关研究工作。E−mail：yongjunl@chd.edu.cn。

  • 中图分类号: P618.13；TE122.2

Volcanic Rock Assemblage, Stratigraphic Attribution and Geological Significance of Volcanic Reservoir in Kebai Fault-trough in Karamay: Constraints from Well Gu 66

  • 1.

    Xinjiang Oilfield Exploration Division, Xinjiang Oilfield Company, PetroChina, Karamay 834000, Xinjiang, China

  • 2.

    Research Institute of Exploration and Development, Xinjiang Oilfield Company, PetroChina, Karamay 834000, Xinjiang, China

  • 3.

    School of Earth Science and Resources, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710054, Shaanxi, China

More Information

    摘要

  • 克百断槽始于克拉玛依市北的克北断裂，NE向延伸并被大侏罗沟断裂、盆缘断裂、克-百断裂围限。火山岩储层是该断槽内的主要储层，其层位时代无据、层序不清、归属不明。笔者通过对克百断槽古66井242.14～800.18 m井段详细的岩心编录、测井曲线岩电识别及关键层位火山岩锆石U-Pb年代学研究，结果表明：古66井242.14～800.18 m井段是被两层陆源粗碎屑岩（标志层）分隔的3套火山岩建造，于玄武安山岩中获得（304±3）Ma和（303±2）Ma的LA-ICP-MS锆石U-Pb年龄，其岩石组合、时代、层序、地层厚度均与井北缘哈山一带哈拉阿拉特组建组剖面C2h1～C2h3岩段总体可对比。古66井所处的克百断槽是一个四周被断层围限的相对独立火山岩型储层断槽油气藏，这一油气藏新类型丰富了西准噶尔盆内油气藏类型。同时，该断槽具有向南西延伸的构造条件、储层类型和圈闭样式，因而是后续扩大油气勘探的新靶区。

    The Kebai fault-trough originates from the Kebei fault at the southwest end and extends northeastward, intersected by the Dazhuluogou fault, which begins in the northern region of Karamay City. It is bounded by the basin-edge fault on its northwest edge and the Kebai fault on its southeast edge. The primary reservoirs within this fault-trough are composed of volcanic rock. However, the stratigraphic allocation, age, and sequence of these volcanic rocks remain uncertain. This study employs a comprehensive approach involving detailed core logging, lithodensity identification using well logging curves, and zircon U-Pb dating of key volcanic rock layers within the interval of 242.14～800.18 m in the well Gu 66, located within the Kebai fault-trough. The results of our investigation reveal the following insights: The interval from 242.14～800.18 m in the well Gu 66 encompasses three distinct sets of volcanic rock formations, interspersed by two layers of terrestrial clastic rocks functioning as marker beds. Through zircon LA-ICP-MS U-Pb dating, we determined ages of 304±3 Ma and 303±2 Ma for the andesite in the well Gu 66. The rock composition, ages, stratigraphy, and thickness of these formations show notable similarity to the C2h1～C2h3 sections of the Hala’alate Formation profile situated in the northern edge of the Hashan region. The Kebai fault-trough, hosting the well Gu 66, represents a distinctive fault-trough characterized by volcanic rock reservoirs, enclosed by surrounding fault structures. This novel type of hydrocarbon reservoir expands the repertoire of oil and gas reservoir types found in the western Junggar. Furthermore, the fault-trough exhibits structural attributes, reservoir characteristics, and trap styles that extend southwestward, rendering it a promising new target area for forthcoming oil and gas exploration.

    • HTML全文
  • 加载中

  • 图 1  研究区构造位置图（a）（据王韬等，2022修）、克拉玛依–乌尔禾地区地质简图（b）、克百断槽过古66-金3-金龙3井和过古34-555井地震剖面（c）及克百断槽和推测储油断槽示意图（d）

    Figure 1. 

    下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片

    图 2  古66井代表性火山岩手标本及镜下特征

    Figure 2. 

    下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片

    图 3  古66井242.14～800.18 m井段岩心综合地层柱状图

    Figure 3. 

    下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片

    图 4  古66井玄武安山岩代表性锆石CL图像、U-Pb年龄图及Th-U图

    Figure 4. 

    下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片

    图 5  古66井与哈拉阿拉特山建组剖面哈拉阿拉特组柱状对比图（据佟丽莉，2023修）

    Figure 5. 

    下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片

    图 6  克百断槽石炭纪火山岩储层地质年代频率分布直方图（年龄数据引自李涤，2016；王韬等，2022；佟丽莉，2023、本研究及部分未发表数据）

    Figure 6. 

    下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片

    图 7  克-百油田区泥盆系—石炭系不同层位试油气统计图

    Figure 7. 

    下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片

    表 1  准噶尔盆地西北缘石炭纪地层格架表

    Table 1.  Carboniferous stratigraphic framework of the northwestern margin of the Junggar basin

    组岩石组合时代依据
    阿腊德依克赛组C2al “下碎屑岩上火山岩”层序（下段以正常沉积岩为主，上段以火山岩为主）。上段火山岩中熔岩总体多于火山碎屑岩 Athyriscircularis，Roemeriporellajunggarensis，Linoproductuscora，Neospiriferfasciger；
    （303.8±2.4） Ma（向坤鹏等，2015a）
    哈拉阿拉特组C2h 下部以气孔状玄武岩为主，向上见安山岩，上部以玄武质角砾岩、集块岩为主。以深灰色、灰绿色区别于红色调的成吉思汗山组。本组与包古图组、希贝库拉斯组的区别是层序上总休下熔岩上火山碎屑岩；火山喷发旋回极为发育与有别于成吉思汗山组火山岩 Balakhoniasilimica sp.，Kotorginella tentoria，Stenoscismamazhalaica，Rhomobopora sp.
    Declinognathoduscf. noduliferous；
    （306.9±5.5 ）Ma和（304.5±3.1）Ma（李甘雨等，2015）
    成吉思汗山组C2c 宏观露头以“暗红色、紫褐色”色调最为特色，正常沉积的细、粗碎屑岩均有发现。本组有别于包古图组、希贝库拉斯组的一个重要特征是灰岩层相对较厚，产出较为稳定，且多有生物化石，火山岩相对较发育，岩性以玄武岩为主 Choristites sp.，Pseudotimania sp.；LA-ICP-MS锆石U-Pb年龄319～310 Ma（向坤鹏等，2013；Zhi et al., 2020）
    希贝库拉斯组C1x 以粗碎屑类为主，主要岩石组合为岩屑粗砂岩、含砾粗岩、含砾凝灰质砂岩，局地见细砾岩，偶见砾岩夹层或砾岩透镜体，本组区别于包古图组的主要标志是“粗”并且“三无”（无火山熔岩、无灰岩、无硅质岩） 碎屑锆石年龄最年轻值322 Ma（孙羽等，2014）
    包古图组
    C1b    		 以细碎屑岩为主，这是有别于区内其他各组重要标志，主要岩石组合为粉砂岩、细砂岩、凝灰岩，基本层序多为厘米级小层序，火山熔岩（以（玄武）安山岩为主，局地有玄武岩，硅质岩、灰岩均呈夹层状产于包古图组内 Gigantoproductuscf. edelburgensis，Linoproductuspraelongatus，Asterpylorus sp.，Rotiphyllumsokolovi
    LA-ICP-MS锆石U-Pb年龄347～328 Ma（安芳等，2009；佟丽莉等，2009；郭丽爽等，2010；Zhi et al., 2021b）
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 2  古66井玄武安山岩LA-ICP-MS锆石U-Pb分析结果统计表

    Table 2.  LA-ICP-MS zircon U-Pb analysis results of basaltic andesite in well Gu 66

    样号同位素比值同位素年龄232Th
    （10−6）    		238U
    （10−6）    		Th/U
    207Pb/206Pb207Pb/235U206Pb/238U207Pb/206Pb207Pb/235U206Pb/238U
    比值σ比值σ比值σ年龄σ年龄σ年龄σ
    G66-4-2TW
    4-2TW-1 0.0533 0.0012 0.3550 0.0066 0.0483 0.0008 342 19 308 5 304 5 307 535 0.57
    4-2TW-2 0.0536 0.0012 0.3581 0.0071 0.0485 0.0008 353 20 311 5 305 5 327 427 0.77
    4-2TW-3 0.0539 0.0012 0.3516 0.0067 0.0474 0.0008 366 19 306 5 298 5 513 508 1.01
    4-2TW-4 0.0517 0.0013 0.3430 0.0073 0.0482 0.0008 270 22 299 6 303 5 129 222 0.58
    4-2TW-5 0.0524 0.0014 0.3526 0.0083 0.0488 0.0009 304 25 307 6 307 5 69.5 143 0.48
    4-2TW-6 0.0529 0.0012 0.3557 0.0071 0.0488 0.0008 326 20 309 5 307 5 112 276 0.41
    4-2TW-7 0.0537 0.0012 0.3567 0.0066 0.0482 0.0008 360 19 310 5 303 5 359 589 0.61
    4-2TW-8 0.0534 0.0011 0.3568 0.0065 0.0485 0.0008 347 18 310 5 305 5 353 565 0.63
    4-2TW-9 0.0521 0.0012 0.3521 0.0067 0.0490 0.0008 292 19 306 5 308 5 446 465 0.96
    4-2TW-10 0.0520 0.0012 0.3413 0.0066 0.0477 0.0008 284 20 298 5 300 5 288 324 0.89
    4-2TW-11 0.0533 0.0011 0.3554 0.0065 0.0484 0.0008 341 18 309 5 305 5 324 567 0.57
    4-2TW-12 0.0523 0.0011 0.3439 0.0064 0.0478 0.0008 297 19 300 5 301 5 350 475 0.74
    4-2TW-13 0.0535 0.0013 0.3577 0.0073 0.0485 0.0008 350 21 310 5 305 5 162 341 0.48
    4-2TW-14 0.0537 0.0013 0.3533 0.0076 0.0477 0.0008 360 22 307 6 300 5 133 214 0.62
    4-2TW-15 0.0530 0.0012 0.3520 0.0070 0.0482 0.0008 330 20 306 5 303 5 261 267 0.98
    4-2TW-16 0.0530 0.0014 0.3551 0.0082 0.0486 0.0009 329 24 309 6 306 5 102 133 0.77
    4-2TW-17 0.0530 0.0011 0.3503 0.0064 0.0479 0.0008 330 19 305 5 302 5 281 467 0.60
    4-2TW-18 0.0515 0.0017 0.3373 0.0099 0.0475 0.0009 265 36 295 8 299 5 54.5 78.9 0.69
    4-2TW-19 0.0514 0.0012 0.3405 0.0072 0.0481 0.0008 257 22 298 5 303 5 132 193 0.69
    4-2TW-20 0.0522 0.0012 0.3518 0.0071 0.0489 0.0008 294 21 306 5 308 5 159 277 0.57
    4-2TW-21 0.0541 0.0014 0.3543 0.0080 0.0475 0.0008 376 24 308 6 299 5 127 209 0.61
    4-2TW-22 0.0537 0.0016 0.3506 0.0092 0.0474 0.0009 358 29 305 7 298 5 101 124 0.82
    4-2TW-23 0.0531 0.0011 0.3554 0.0063 0.0486 0.0008 333 18 309 5 306 5 412 622 0.66
    4-2TW-24 0.0528 0.0011 0.3491 0.0064 0.0480 0.0008 320 19 304 5 302 5 341 430 0.79
    4-2TW-25 0.0521 0.0011 0.3424 0.0061 0.0477 0.0008 289 18 299 5 300 5 445 616 0.72
    G66-10-6TW
    10-6TW-1 0.0521 0.0015 0.3475 0.0087 0.0484 0.0008 290 29 303 7 305 5 118 138 0.85
    10-6TW-2 0.0516 0.0019 0.3435 0.0116 0.0483 0.0009 268 46 300 9 304 5 74.9 92.9 0.81
    10-6TW-3 0.0524 0.0015 0.3490 0.0083 0.0484 0.0008 301 27 304 6 304 5 163 172 0.95
    10-6TW-4 0.0532 0.0014 0.3513 0.0073 0.0479 0.0007 337 22 306 6 302 5 139 197 0.70
    10-6TW-5 0.0514 0.0013 0.3454 0.0071 0.0488 0.0008 258 22 301 5 307 5 221 285 0.78
    10-6TW-6 0.0532 0.0019 0.3551 0.0111 0.0484 0.0008 338 40 309 8 305 5 60.9 82.9 0.73
    10-6TW-7 0.0519 0.0015 0.3461 0.0084 0.0484 0.0008 279 28 302 6 305 5 144 147 0.98
    10-6TW-8 0.0496 0.0013 0.3357 0.0074 0.0491 0.0008 174 25 294 6 309 5 120 212 0.57
    10-6TW-9 0.0527 0.0012 0.3520 0.0066 0.0485 0.0007 315 19 306 5 305 5 374 353 1.06
    10-6TW-10 0.0522 0.0015 0.3450 0.0081 0.0480 0.0008 294 27 301 6 302 5 130 134. 0.97
    10-6TW-11 0.0532 0.0020 0.3526 0.0120 0.0481 0.0009 336 46 307 9 303 5 44.3 54.6 0.81
    10-6TW-12 0.0522 0.0016 0.3505 0.0089 0.0487 0.0008 295 30 305 7 306 5 247 227 1.09
    10-6TW-13 0.0522 0.0012 0.3484 0.0066 0.0484 0.0007 293 20 303 5 305 5 299 384 0.78
    10-6TW-14 0.0531 0.0019 0.3480 0.0113 0.0475 0.0008 334 43 303 9 299 5 75.3 99.1 0.76
    10-6TW-15 0.0518 0.0013 0.3446 0.0067 0.0483 0.0007 276 21 301 5 304 5 400 360 1.11
    10-6TW-16 0.0523 0.0016 0.3475 0.0090 0.0482 0.0008 298 31 303 7 304 5 65.7 114 0.58
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 3  准噶尔盆地西北缘哈山一带哈拉阿拉特组岩石组合特征统计表（据李甘雨等，2016）

    Table 3.  Rock assemblage characteristics of Hala’alate Formation in Hala'alate Mountain area of northwestern Junggar Basin

    组岩性段岩性标志锆石U-Pb年龄
    哈拉阿拉
    特组（C2h）    		 C2h7 以灰色杏仁状玄武安山质角砾岩、含角砾岩屑凝灰岩为主，顶部见沉凝灰岩夹层 （304±3.5） Ma
    C2h6 灰绿色安山质-英安质岩屑凝灰岩为主，玄武岩、安山岩多呈夹层状出露 （304±4.3） Ma
    C2h5 灰绿色安山质-英安质岩屑凝灰岩为主，玄武岩、安山岩多呈夹层状出露
    C2h4 灰褐色火山角砾岩、角砾凝灰岩为主，少量岩屑晶屑凝灰岩、玄武岩和安山岩，灰岩透镜体
    C2h3 深灰色火山角砾岩为主，少量角砾凝灰岩、岩屑晶屑凝灰岩、火山集块岩，见少量流纹岩
    C2h2 灰黑色玄武岩为主，少量细砂岩和细砾岩、玄武安山岩 （305.9±2.0） Ma
    C2h1 深灰色安山岩为主，夹火山角砾岩、凝灰岩及杂色砾岩，可见少量流纹岩 （306.0±2.0） Ma
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 4  克-百油田区泥盆系—石炭系不同层位试油气结果统计表

    Table 4.  Oil and gas testing results in different layers of the Devonian-Carboniferous in the Kebai oilfield area

    井号井深（m）试油岩性层位井号井深（m）试油岩性层位
    古66662～686干层安山岩C2h24332122～2144油层火山角砾岩C2al
    518～538干层火山角砾岩C2h22047～2059油层泥岩C2al
    472～496干层含砾砂岩C2h31976～1992间喷油层火山角砾岩C2al
    326～348油层砾岩C2h31765～1831间喷油层砂岩C2al
    古1311654～1670干层角砾熔岩C2h3古99884.4～904.4油层凝灰岩C1b
    1600～1616干层角砾熔岩C2h3795.4～835.4油层气孔杏仁玄武岩C1b
    1546～1560干层角砾熔岩C2h3767.4～779.4干层砂岩C1b
    古811180～1206油层凝灰岩C2h1731～746干层砂岩C1b
    1135～1163油层凝灰岩C2h1古961212～1218油层砂岩C2al
    1098～1108油层玄武岩C2h11235～1244干层砂岩C2al
    1078～1086油层火山集块岩C1b1330～1350干层砂岩C2al
    1060～1086油层凝灰岩C1b1408～1423油层砾岩C2al
    古31470～480干层砂岩C1b1533～1554干层砂岩C2al
    430～480干层砂岩C1b1565～1589水层砂岩C2al
    258～280水层砂岩C1b4382566～2588干层火山角砾岩C2h2
    白171694～1724油层气孔杏仁玄武岩C2h32420～2438干层角砾凝灰岩C2h2
    1814～1834油层含角砾玄武岩C2h31742～1778水层玄武岩C2h3
    九浅9482～508水层凝灰岩D3h1975～1987干层凝灰岩C2h3
    256～270水层砂岩D3h1469～1487油水同层玄武岩C2h3
    白291911～2149油层火山集块岩C2h41385～1410油层玄武岩C2h3
    980～1200油层火山角砾岩C2h6白291911～2149油层火山集块岩C2h4
    克95831～851干层砂岩C2h5980～1200油层气孔杏仁玄武岩C2h6
    893～904水层砂岩C2h5克95831～851干层砂岩C2h5
    白杨14592～4620水层玄武安山岩C2h1893～904水层粉砂岩C2h5
    4290～4325油层凝灰岩C2h3金龙32925～2935稠油层火山角砾岩C2h1
    3246～3258水层凝灰岩C2h6+75813257～3277干层火山角砾岩C2h7
    2726～2828水层砂岩C2al2342～2361气层凝灰岩C2al
    古501637～1652干层火山角砾岩D3h3025～3044干层砂泥岩C2al
    1535～1550干层火山角砾岩D3h2278～2294气层砂岩C2al
    1370～1402干层砂岩C1b2241～2257气层砂岩C2al
    1031～1050干层砂岩C1b2342～2360气层砂岩C2al
    830～870干层砂岩C1b2415～2434干层角砾凝灰岩C2al
    白919575～597油层角砾凝灰岩C1b2341～2360气层砂岩C2al
    古151114～1125干层砂岩C1b4208～4212干层玄武岩C2al
    1046～1065干层砂岩C1b3442～3488油水同层玄武岩C2al
    1880～1910水层砂泥岩C1b3281～3286油水同层火山角砾岩C2al
    1670～1730干层砂岩C1b
    1544～1571干层玄武岩C1b
    下载: 导出CSV
    • 参考文献(46)
  • [1]

    安芳, 朱永峰. 新疆西准噶尔包古图组凝灰岩锆石SHRIMP年龄及其地质意义[J]. 岩石学报, 2009, 25(6): 1437-1445

    AN Fang, ZHU Yongfeng. SHRIMP U-Pb zircon ages of tuff in Baogutu Formation and their geological significances[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2009, 25(6): 1437-1445.

    [2]

    陈荣灿. 克拉玛依油田古16井区石炭系火山岩储层评价[D]. 成都: 西南石油学院, 2003

    CHEN Rongcan. Evaluation of Volcanic Reservoir in Gu 16th Well Area, Kramay Oil-field[D]. Chengdu: Southwest Petroleum Institute, 2003.

    [3]

    陈宪. 准噶尔盆地西北缘哈山地区石炭系火山岩储层特征研究[D]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2017

    CHEN Xian. Characteristics of Carboniferous volcanic reservoirs in Hashan Area, northwest margin of Junggar Basin [D]. Changchun: Jilin University, 2017.

    [4]

    陈江新, 徐倩, 李永军, 等. 车排子地区车47井石炭系划分及对比[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2022, 43(4): 410-416

    CHEN Jiangxin, XU Qian, LI Yongjun, et al. Stratigraphic Division and Correlation of Carboniferous Strata in Well Che 47 in Chepaizi Area[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2022, 43(4): 410-416.

    [5]

    郭丽爽, 刘玉琳, 王政华, 等. 西准噶尔包古图地区地层火山岩锆石LA-ICP-MS U-Pb年代学研究[J]. 岩石学报, 2010, 26(2): 471-477

    GUO Lishuang, LIU Yuling, WANG Zhenghua, et al. The zircon U-Pb LA-ICP-MS geochronology of Volcanic rocks in Baogutu areas, western Junggar[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2010, 26(2): 471-477

    [6]

    何登发, 陈新发, 况军, 等. 准噶尔盆地石炭系油气成藏组合特征及勘探前景[J]. 石油学报, 2010, 31(1): 1-11 doi: 10.7623/syxb201001001

    HE Dengfa, CHEN Xinfa, KUANG Jun, et al. Characteristics and exploration potential of Carboniferous hydrocarbon plays in Junggar Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2010, 31(1): 1-11. doi: 10.7623/syxb201001001

    [7]

    蒋志斌, 黄家瑄, 李永军, 等. 克拉玛依油田424井2 140~3 551.63 m井段层序、年代学新证及“盆−山”地层对比[J]. 西北地质, 2023, 56(2): 1-9 doi: 10.12401/j.nwg.2022044

    JIANG Zhibin, HUANG Jiaxuan, LI Yongjun, et al. New Evidence on the Stratigraphy and Chronology of 2 140~3 551.63 m Well 424 Section in Karamay Oilfield and “Basin-Mountain” Stratigraphic Comparison[J]. Northwestern Geology, 2023, 56(2): 1-9. doi: 10.12401/j.nwg.2022044

    [8]

    靳军, 王剑, 杨召, 等. 准噶尔盆地克——百断裂带石炭系内幕储层测井岩性识别[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(2): 85-92

    JIN Jun, WANG Jian, YANG Zhao, et al. Well logging identification of Carboniferous volcanic inner buried-hill reservoirs in Kebai fault zone in Junggar Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2018, 30(2): 85-92.

    [9]

    孔垂显, 邱子刚, 秦军, 等. 准噶尔盆地西北缘石炭系火山岩储层特征研究[J]. 特种油气藏, 2017, 24(6): 28-32

    KONG Chuixian, QIU Zigang, QIN Jun, Study on the Characteristics of Carboniferous Volcanic Reservoir along the Northwestern Margin of Junggar Basin[J]. Special Oil and Gas Reservoirs, 2017, 24(6): 28-32.

    [10]

    匡立春, 薛新克, 邹才能, 等. 火山岩岩性地层油藏成藏条件与富集规律——以准噶尔盆地克—百断裂带上盘石炭系为例[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2007(3): 285-290 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0747.2007.03.003

    KUANG Lichun, XUE Xinke, ZOU Caineng, et al. Oil accumulation and concentration regularity of volcanic lithostratigraphic oil reservoir: A case from upper-plate Carboniferous of KA-BAI fracture zone, Junggar Basin[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2007(3): 285-290. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0747.2007.03.003

    [11]

    李晨, 季汉成, 靳军, 等. 准噶尔盆地克—百断裂带上盘石炭系内幕火山岩储集层特征及展布[J]. 古地理学报, 2017, 19(4): 677-691 doi: 10.7605/gdlxb.2017.04.053

    LI Chen, JI Hancheng, JIN Jun, et al. Characteristics and distribution of inside volcanic reservoirs of the Carboniferous in upper-plate of Ke-Bai fault zone in Junggar Basin[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2017, 19(4): 677-691. doi: 10.7605/gdlxb.2017.04.053

    [12]

    李涤. 准噶尔盆地及邻区石炭纪构造格架与沉积充填演化[D]. 北京, 中国地质大学(北京), 2016

    LI Di. Carboniferous tectonic framework and sedimentary filling evolution in the Junggar Basin and adjacent area, NW China [D]. Beijing, China University of Geosciences, 2016.

    [13]

    李甘雨, 李永军, 王冉, 等. 西准噶尔哈拉阿拉特山一带晚石炭世赞岐岩的发现及其地质意义[J]. 岩石学报, 2017, 33(1): 16-30

    LI Ganyu, LI Yongjun, WANG Ran, et al. The discovery and significance of Late Carboniferous sanukitoids in Hala’alate mountain, West Junggar[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2017, 33(1): 16-30.

    [14]

    李甘雨, 李永军, 王冉, 等. 西准噶尔哈拉阿拉特组火山岩LA-ICP-MS锆石U-Pb年龄[J]. 西北地质, 2015, 48(3): 12-21 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6248.2015.03.002

    LI Ganyu, LI Yongjun, WANG Ran, et al. Zircon LA-ICP-MS U-Pb Dating of Volcanics in Hala'alate Formation of Western Junggar[J]. Northwestern Geology, 2015, 48(3): 12-21. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6248.2015.03.002

    [15]

    李甘雨, 李永军, 向坤鹏, 等. 西准噶尔哈拉阿拉特组的重新厘定及区域对比[J]. 地层学杂志, 2016, 40(1): 76-84 doi: 10.19839/j.cnki.dcxzz.2016.01.009

    LI Ganyu, LI Yongjun, XIANG Kunpeng, et al. Revision and regional correlation of the Hal’alate formation in western Junggar basin[J]. Journal of Stratigraphy, 2016, 40(1): 76-84. doi: 10.19839/j.cnki.dcxzz.2016.01.009

    [16]

    李军. 准噶尔盆地西北缘石炭系火山岩油藏储层分布规律及控制因素研究[D]. 北京: 中国地质大学(北京), 2008

    LI Jun. The Study on Distribution Characteristics and Controlling Factors of Carboniferous Volcanic Reservoir of the Northwestern Margin, Junggar Basin[D]. Beijing: China University of Geosciences, 2008.

    [17]

    李艳广, 靳梦琪, 汪双双, 等. LA–ICP–MS U–Pb定年技术相关问题探讨[J]. 西北地质, 2023, 56(4): 274-282 doi: 10.12401/j.nwg.2023104

    LI Yanguang, JIN Mengqi, WANG Shuangshuang, et al. Exploration of Issues Related to the LA–ICP–MS U–Pb Dating Technique[J]. Northwestern Geology, 2023, 56(4): 274-282. doi: 10.12401/j.nwg.2023104

    [18]

    李永军, 佟丽莉, 张兵, 等. 论西准噶尔石炭系希贝库拉斯组与包古图组的新老关系[J]. 新疆地质, 2010, 28(2): 130-136 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8845.2010.02.003

    LI Yongjun, TONG Lili, ZHANG Bing, et al. On the old and new relationship between Xibeikulasi Formation and Baogutu Formation of the Carboniferous system, West Jaggar[J]. Xinjiang Geology, 2010, 28(2): 130-136. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8845.2010.02.003

    [19]

    李永军, 李卫东, 杨高学, 等. 新疆东西准噶尔泥盆系-石炭系建组剖面及区域对比[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 2021

    LI Yongjun, LI Weidong, YANG Gaoxue, et al. Formation section and regional comparison of the Devonian-Carboniferous in the east and west Junggar, Xinjiang[M]. Beijing: Geological Publishing House, 2021.

    [20]

    柳双权, 张顺存, 戴龙, 等. 准噶尔盆地石炭系火山岩优质储层特征及主控因素[J]. 兰州大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 50(6): 786-794 doi: 10.13885/j.issn.0455-2059.2014.06.004

    LIU Shuangquan, ZHANG Shuncun, DAI Long, et al. Characteristics and main controlling factors of high quality carboniferous volcanic reservoirs in Junggar Basin[J]. Journal of Lanzhou University (Natural Sciences), 2014, 50(6): 786-794. doi: 10.13885/j.issn.0455-2059.2014.06.004

    [21]

    刘凯, 张新远, 李永军, 等. 新疆油田百72井火山地层层序、时代及其与后山层型剖面对比[J]. 西北地质, 2023, 56(04): 40-48 doi: 10.12401/j.nwg.2023035

    LIU Kai, ZHANG Xinyuan, LI Yongjun, et al. Volcanic Stratigraphic Sequence, Age and Comparison with Mountain Layer Type Profile of Bai 72 Well in Xinjiang Oilfield[J]. Northwestern Geology, 2023, 56(04): 40-48. doi: 10.12401/j.nwg.2023035

    [22]

    马尚伟, 陈春勇, 罗静兰, 等. 准噶尔盆地西泉地区石炭系火山岩有利储层主控因素研究[J]. 高校地质学报, 2019, 25(2): 197-205 doi: 10.16108/j.issn1006-7493.2018087

    MA Shangwei, CHEN Chunyong, LUO Jinglan, et al. Research of Major Controlling Factors on Favorable Reservoir of the Carboniferous Volcanic Rocks in Xiquan Area, Junggar Basin[J]. Geological Journal of China Universities, 2019, 25(2): 197-205. doi: 10.16108/j.issn1006-7493.2018087

    [23]

    彭湘萍, 李永军, 李卫东, 等. 西准哈拉阿拉特山一带阿腊德依克赛组层序、化石组合及沉积环境[J]. 新疆地质, 2016, 34(3): 297-301 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8845.2016.03.001

    PENG Xiangping, LI Yongjun, LI Weidong, et al. The stratigraphic sequence, fossil assemblage and sedimentary environment of Aladeyikesai formation in Hala’alate mountain, west Junggar[J]. Xinjiang Geology, 2016, 34(3): 297-301. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8845.2016.03.001

    [24]

    孙羽, 李永军, 佟丽莉, 等. 西准噶尔希贝库拉斯组整合于包古图组之上的确认[J]. 新疆地质, 2014, 32(2): 153-157

    SUN Yu, LI Yongjun, TONG Lili, et al. The Affirmance of Xibeikulasi Formation Conformable above Baogutu Formation in West Junggar[J]. Xinjiang Geology, 2014, 32(2): 153-157.

    [25]

    佟丽莉, 李永军, 张兵, 等. 新疆西准噶尔达尔布特断裂带南包古图组安山岩LA-ICP-MS锆石U-Pb测年及地质时代[J]. 新疆地质, 2009, 27(3): 226-230 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8845.2009.03.006

    TONG Lili, LI Yongjun, ZHANG Bing, et al. Zircon LA-ICP-MS U-Pb dating and geologic age of the Baogutu Formation andesite in the south of Daerbute Faulted zone, western Junggar[J]. Xinjiang Geology, 2009, 27(3): 226-230. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8845.2009.03.006

    [26]

    佟丽莉. 新疆乌尔禾哈拉阿拉特组火山岩年代学、地球化学特征及岩石成因[D]. 西安: 长安大学, 2023.

    TONG Lili. The chronology, geochemical characteristics and petrogenesis of volcanic rocks of Hala'alate Formation in Urho, Xinjiang[D]. Xi’an: Chang’an University, 2023.

    [27]

    王韬, 徐倩, 李永军, 等. 车排子油田南部火山岩地质时代及成因[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2022, 43(2): 160-168

    WANG Tao, XU Qian, LI Yongjun, et al. Geological Age and Petrogenesis of Volcanic Rocks in Southern Chepaizi Oilfield[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2022, 43(2): 160-168.

    [28]

    向坤鹏, 李永军, 徐磊, 等. 新疆西准噶尔白碱滩一带成吉思汗山组的建立及地质意义[J]. 西北地质, 2013, 46(2): 63-68 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6248.2013.02.008

    XIANG Kunpeng, LI Yongjun, XU Lei, et al. The definition of Chengjisihanshan formation and its significances in Baijiantan region, west Junggar, Xinjiang[J]. Northwestern Geology, 2013, 46(2): 63-68. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6248.2013.02.008

    [29]

    向坤鹏, 李永军, 李钊, 等. 新疆西准噶尔哈拉阿拉特山火山岩LA ICP-MS锆石U-Pb年龄、地球化学特征及意义[J]. 地质学报, 2015a, 89(5): 843-855 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0001-5717.2015.05.002

    XIANG Kunpeng, LI Yongjun, LI Zhao, et al. LA ICP-MS Zircon Age and Geochemistry of the Aladeyikesai Formation Volcanic Rocks in the Halaalate Mountain of West Junggar, Xinjiang, and Their Tectonic Significance[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2015, 89(5): 843-855. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0001-5717.2015.05.002

    [30]

    向坤鹏. 新疆西准噶尔包古图-哈拉阿拉特山一带石炭纪沉积盆地分析及构造意义[D]. 西安: 长安大学, 2015b.

    XIANG Kunpeng. Carboniferous sedimentary basin analysis and significance in the Baogutu-Halaalate Mountain, Western Junggar, Xinjiang[D]. Xi’an: Chang’an University, 2015.

    [31]

    于洪洲. 准西北缘哈山地区石炭系火山岩储层特征及影响因素[J]. 地质力学学报, 2019, 25(2): 206-214 doi: 10.12090/j.issn.1006-6616.2019.25.02.019

    YU Hongzhou. Characteristics and influencing factors of Carboniferous volcanic reservoirs in Hashan area, northwestern margin of the Junggar basin[J]. Journal of Geomechanics, 2019, 25(2): 206-214. doi: 10.12090/j.issn.1006-6616.2019.25.02.019

    [32]

    张明玉. 克拉玛依六区—九区石炭系火山岩油藏岩性识别与岩相划分[J]. 海相油气地质, 2009, 14(3): 31-36 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9854.2009.03.004

    ZHANG Mingyu. Lithology and Lithofacies Classification of Carboniferous Volcanic Rock Reservoir at Block-6 to Block-9 in Karamay Oil Field, Junggar Basin[J]. Marine origin Petroleum Geology, 2009, 14(3): 31-36. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9854.2009.03.004

    [33]

    张越迁, 陈中红, 唐勇, 等. 准噶尔盆地克—百断裂带火山岩储层特征研究[J]. 沉积学报, 2014, 32(4): 754-765 doi: 10.14027/j.cnki.cjxb.2014.04.015

    ZHANG Yueqian, CHEN Zhonghong, TANG Yong, et al. Characteristics of Volcanic Reservoirs in Kebai Fault Zone of Northwestern Junggar Basin, China[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2014, 32(4): 754-765. doi: 10.14027/j.cnki.cjxb.2014.04.015

    [34]

    赵飞, 罗静兰, 张有平, 等. 克拉玛依油田六、七、九区石炭系火山岩储集层特征及其控制因素[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2010, 40(1): 48-55 doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.2010.01.020

    ZHAO Fei; LUO Jinglan, ZHANG Youping, et al. Investigation on Characteristics and Controlling Factors of Carboniferous Volcanic Reservoir in the 6th, the 7th and the 9th Areas of Karamay Oil Field[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2010, 40(1): 48-55. doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.2010.01.020

    [35]

    支倩. 新疆东、西准噶尔上石炭统典型剖面对比研究[D]. 西安: 长安大学, 2018

    ZHI Qian. A comparative study on the upper Carboniferous standard stratotype-section profiles in the eastern and western Junggar, Xinjiang, NW China[D]. Xi’an: Chang’an University, 2018.

    [36]

    支倩, 李永军, 段丰浩, 等. 新疆西准噶尔乌尔禾地区早二叠世A1型花岗岩成因及其地质意义[J]. 地质学报, 2021a, 95(8): 2453-2470 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0001-5717.2021.08.013

    ZHl Qian, LI Yongjun, DUAN Fenghao, et al. Petrogenesis and its geological implications of Early Permian A1-type granite in Urho area, Western Junggar, Xinjiang[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2021, 95(8): 2453-2470. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0001-5717.2021.08.013

    [37]

    Fan Cunhui, Li Hu, Qin Qirong, et al. Formation mechanisms and distribution of weathered volcanic reservoirs: A case study of the carboniferous volcanic rocks in Northwest Junggar Basin, China[J]. Energy Science & Engineering, 2020, 8(8): 2841-2858.

    [38]

    Hoskin P W O, Black L P. Metamorphic zircon formation by solid-state recrystallization of protolith igneous zircon[J]. Journal of Metamorphic Geology, 2000, 18(4): 423-439. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1314.2000.00266.x

    [39]

    Li Ganyu, Li Yongjun, Wang Xuance, et al. Identifying late Carboniferous sanukitoids in Hala’alate Mountain, Northwest China: new constraint on the closing time of remnant ocean basin in West Junggar[J]. International Geology Review, 2017, 59(9): 1116-1130. doi: 10.1080/00206814.2016.1193773

    [40]

    Ludwig K R I. 3.00: A geochronological toolkit for Microsoft Excel[J]. Berkeley Geochronology Center Special Publication, 2003, 4: 1-70.

    [41]

    Mao Zhiguo, Zhu Rukai, Luo Jinglan, et al. Reservoir characteristics, formation mechanisms and petroleum exploration potential of volcanic rocks in China[J]. Petroleum Science, 2015, 12(1): 54-66. doi: 10.1007/s12182-014-0013-6

    [42]

    YANG Zhi, ZHU Aiguo, CHEN Yanhui, et al. The characteristics of Carboniferous volcanic lithofacies and volcanic reservoirs of Kebai Fault Belt, northwestern Junggar Basin[J]. Geological Journal, 2021, 56(8), 4280-4292. doi: 10.1002/gj.4162

    [43]

    Zhi Qian, Li Yongjun, Yang Gaoxue, et al. The discovery of 310 Ma back-arc basin basalt in the West Junggar, Xinjiang, NW China and its geological significance[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica (English Edition), 2019, 93(2): 496-498. doi: 10.1111/1755-6724.13848

    [44]

    Zhi Qian, Li Yongjun, Duan Fenghao, et al. Geochemical, Sr-Nd-Pb and zircon U-Pb-Hf isotopic constraints on the Late Carboniferous back-arc basin basalts from the Chengjisihanshan Formation in West Junggar, NW China[J]. Geological Magazine, 2020, 157(11): 1781-1799. doi: 10.1017/S0016756820000059

    [45]

    Zhi Qian, Li Yongjun, Duan Fenghao, et al. Geochronology and geochemistry of early carboniferous basalts from baogutu formation in west Junggar, northwest china: evidence for a back-arc extension[J]. International Geology Review, 2021b, 63(12): 1521-1539. doi: 10.1080/00206814.2020.1783704

    [46]

    Zhu Danping, Liu Xuewei, Guo Shaobin. Reservoir Formation Model and Main Controlling Factors of the Carboniferous Volcanic Reservoir in the Hong-Che Fault Zone, Junggar Basin[J]. Energies, 2020, 13(22): 6114. doi: 10.3390/en13226114

    • 相关文章
  • 施引文献
  • 资源附件(0)
  • 加载中

图(7)

表(4)

计量
  • 文章访问数:  528
  • PDF下载数:  88
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
收稿日期:  2023-05-06
修回日期:  2023-11-10
录用日期:  2023-11-13
刊出日期:  2024-10-20

目录

    版权所有：中国地质调查局发展研究中心 copyright @2020
    返回