内蒙古北山地区哈日阿玛岛弧花岗岩地球化学、年代学特征及其地质意义

王慧, 张欢, 潘志龙, 王硕, 何娇月, 张金龙, 侯德华, 马梦玲, 刘亚芳. 内蒙古北山地区哈日阿玛岛弧花岗岩地球化学、年代学特征及其地质意义[J]. 地质与资源, 2021, 30(2): 103-117. doi: 10.13686/j.cnki.dzyzy.2021.02.001
引用本文: 王慧, 张欢, 潘志龙, 王硕, 何娇月, 张金龙, 侯德华, 马梦玲, 刘亚芳. 内蒙古北山地区哈日阿玛岛弧花岗岩地球化学、年代学特征及其地质意义[J]. 地质与资源, 2021, 30(2): 103-117. doi: 10.13686/j.cnki.dzyzy.2021.02.001
WANG Hui, ZHANG Huan, PAN Zhi-long, WANG Shuo, HE Jiao-yue, ZHANG Jin-long, HOU De-hua, MA Meng-ling, LIU Ya-fang. GEOCHEMISTRY AND GEOCHRONOLOGY OF HARIAMA ISLAND ARC GRANITOIDS IN BEISHAN AREA OF INNER MONGOLIA: Geological Implication[J]. Geology and Resources, 2021, 30(2): 103-117. doi: 10.13686/j.cnki.dzyzy.2021.02.001
Citation: WANG Hui, ZHANG Huan, PAN Zhi-long, WANG Shuo, HE Jiao-yue, ZHANG Jin-long, HOU De-hua, MA Meng-ling, LIU Ya-fang. GEOCHEMISTRY AND GEOCHRONOLOGY OF HARIAMA ISLAND ARC GRANITOIDS IN BEISHAN AREA OF INNER MONGOLIA: Geological Implication[J]. Geology and Resources, 2021, 30(2): 103-117. doi: 10.13686/j.cnki.dzyzy.2021.02.001

内蒙古北山地区哈日阿玛岛弧花岗岩地球化学、年代学特征及其地质意义

  • 基金项目:
    中国地质调查局项目"内蒙古1:5万基东、尖山、蒜井子、三道明水等四幅区域地质矿产调查"(编号12120113056500);"内蒙古1:5万西林陶勒、梧桐井、石桩子井、石板井幅区域地质矿产调查"(编号12120114064101)
详细信息
    作者简介: 王慧(1987-), 女, 硕士, 工程师, 从事岩矿鉴定、地球化学测试与分析工作, 通信地址 河北省廊坊市曙光道32号, E-mail//420015843@qq.com
    通讯作者: 张欢(1987-), 男, 硕士, 工程师, 从事区域地质矿产调查工作, 通信地址 河北省廊坊市曙光道32号, E-mail//13731610167@139.com
  • 中图分类号: P597;P542

GEOCHEMISTRY AND GEOCHRONOLOGY OF HARIAMA ISLAND ARC GRANITOIDS IN BEISHAN AREA OF INNER MONGOLIA: Geological Implication

More Information
  • 哈日阿玛岛弧花岗岩出露于北山造山带公婆泉岛弧带内,与奥陶纪-志留纪公婆泉组弧火山岩伴生,包含闪长岩、石英闪长岩、斜长花岗岩、英云闪长岩等.LA-ICP-MS锆石U-Pb测年表明闪长岩、英云闪长岩分别就位于430.9±4.7 Ma和452.5±3.2 Ma,为晚奥陶世-早志留世.岩石地球化学分析结果显示,这些花岗岩属钙碱性、准铝质-弱过铝质I型花岗岩.岩石样品Mg#值界于44.58~51.85,Rb/Sr比值0.025~0.282,Nb/Ta比值0.068~14.01,Zr/Hf比值13.05~34.00.稀土元素总量(包含Y元素)为59.87×10-6~118.56×10-6,球粒陨石标准化稀土配分曲线均呈现明显的右倾型,轻稀土富集,(La/Yb)N为3.11~23.86,Eu异常不明显.在微量元素原始地幔标准化图中,富集大离子亲石元素Rb、Ba、Th、U、K以及中等不相容元素Ce、La、Hf,亏损高场强元素Nb、Ta、P、Ti,具岛弧花岗岩特征,显示来自地壳的岩浆与来自深部的亏损地幔岩浆混溶.结合其他地质、地球化学证据,认为哈日阿玛花岗岩形成于岛弧环境,为红柳河-牛圈子-洗肠井古洋盆向北俯冲的结果,并最晚在晚奥陶世晚期已经开始俯冲,该洋盆闭合时限应晚于早志留世.

  • 加载中
  • 图 1  北山地区公婆泉原石板井——带地质简图(据文献[24])

    Figure 1. 

    图 2  哈日阿玛花岗岩地质简图

    Figure 2. 

    图 3  哈日阿玛花岗岩野外露头及显微照片

    Figure 3. 

    图 4  哈日阿玛花岗岩TAS分类图解 (据文献[27])

    Figure 4. 

    图 5  哈日阿玛花岗岩SiO2-k2O关系图解 (据文献[28])

    Figure 5. 

    图 6  哈日阿玛花岗岩A/CNk-A/Nk图解 (据文献[29])

    Figure 6. 

    图 7  哈日阿玛花岗岩Na2O-k2O关系图解 (据文献[30])

    Figure 7. 

    图 8  哈日阿玛花岗岩稀土元素配分曲线图 (据文献[31])

    Figure 8. 

    图 9  哈日阿玛花岗岩微量元素原始地幔标准化图 (据文献[32])

    Figure 9. 

    图 10  哈日阿玛闪长质糜棱岩、英云闪长岩锆石CL图像及测年结果

    Figure 10. 

    图 11  哈日阿玛闪长质糜棱岩、英云闪长岩锆石U-Pb年龄谐和图

    Figure 11. 

    图 12  岩石构造环境判别Ta-Yb图解 (据文献[41])

    Figure 12. 

    图 13  岩石Rb-(Y+Nb)图解(据文献[42])

    Figure 13. 

    表 1  哈日阿玛花岗岩主量元素分析结果

    Table 1.  Contents of major elements in Hariama granite

    样品编号 PM10YQ1 PM10YQ2 PM10YQ3 PM10YQ4 PM10YQ5 JDYQ12
    岩石名称 闪长质糜棱岩 斜长花岗岩 斜长花岗岩 石英闪长岩 斜长花岗岩 英云闪长岩
    SiO2 57.52 69.22 68.35 60.55 69.08 61.99
    Al2O3 14.66 15.87 15.35 16.90 15.53 16.35
    TiO2 0.52 0.34 0.49 0.78 0.40 0.63
    Fe2O3 3.09 0.99 1.37 2.06 1.12 1.83
    FeO 5.15 1.22 1.75 3.26 1.60 3.31
    CaO 5.57 3.13 3.51 5.48 3.77 6.00
    MgO 4.37 0.95 1.45 2.96 1.31 2.98
    K2O 3.05 1.24 1.99 1.90 1.57 1.77
    Na2O 2.44 4.68 4.02 3.80 4.32 3.39
    MnO 0.14 0.04 0.06 0.10 0.06 0.11
    P2O5 0.11 0.08 0.11 0.16 0.11 0.16
    H2O+ 2.27 1.27 0.84 1.16 0.45 0.82
    H2O- 0.29 0.25 0.15 0.23 0.18 0.14
    LOI 3.12 2.13 1.39 1.90 1.00 1.28
    总和 99.76 99.88 99.86 99.85 99.88 99.80
    测试单位: 河北省区域地质调查院实验室. 含量单位: %.
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 2  哈日阿玛花岗岩微量、稀土元素分析结果

    Table 2.  Contents of trace elements and Rees in Hariama granite

    样品编号 PM10YQ1 PM10YQ2 PM10YQ3 PM10YQ4 PM10YQ5 JDYQ12
    岩石名称 闪长质糜棱岩 斜长花岗岩 斜长花岗岩 石英闪长岩 斜长花岗岩 英云闪长岩
    V 228 31.0 44.3 109 28.3 102
    Cr 44.2 7.07 12.4 7.27 7.94 18.2
    Co 25.4 4.89 7.42 16.0 5.68 26.2
    Ni 11.3 4.17 5.44 1.96 3.89 21.0
    Rb 81.3 9.4 20.4 59.6 10.6 18.1
    Sr 289 383 409 677 320 462
    Zr 55.7 96.4 115 97.9 106 164
    Nb 2.48 4.35 6.80 8.65 4.72 0.35
    Cs 1.19 0.47 0.66 2.08 0.93 2.05
    Ba 1020 282 424 321 204 685
    Hf 1.64 3.81 8.83 2.94 6.19 9.73
    Ta 0.27 0.37 0.72 0.62 0.44 5.15
    Pb 7.58 17.6 10.0 14.5 9.07 10.1
    Th 4.49 5.83 2.84 4.13 3.42 6.99
    U 1.12 0.63 0.70 1.87 0.61 1.84
    Y 14.24 5.22 11.97 12.20 9.38 16.66
    La 10.10 21.85 6.40 9.89 23.69 18.98
    Ce 21.81 37.99 15.01 20.69 42.47 39.18
    Pr 2.83 4.21 2.40 2.98 4.90 5.02
    Nd 12.48 14.27 11.34 12.74 17.53 20.71
    Sm 2.88 2.16 2.94 2.74 2.95 4.47
    Eu 0.93 0.76 0.95 1.03 0.95 1.25
    Gd 2.83 1.97 2.64 2.72 2.84 3.52
    Tb 0.46 0.23 0.42 0.42 0.37 0.55
    Dy 2.72 1.11 2.32 2.39 1.78 3.35
    Ho 0.55 0.20 0.43 0.45 0.32 0.68
    Er 1.75 0.64 1.32 1.38 1.03 1.65
    Tm 0.29 0.09 0.21 0.22 0.16 0.33
    Yb 1.94 0.60 1.36 1.40 1.16 1.93
    Lu 0.24 0.09 0.16 0.19 0.14 0.26
    δEu 0.93 1.04 0.97 1.08 0.93 0.88
    Sr/Y 20.29 73.29 34.17 55.46 34.11 27.72
    (La/Yb)N 3.44 23.86 3.11 4.65 13.48 6.49
    ∑REE+Y 76.04 91.39 59.87 71.46 109.67 118.56
    L/H 4.74 16.49 4.41 5.45 11.87 7.30
    测试单位: 河北省区域地质调查院实验室. 单位: 10-6.
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 3  哈日阿玛闪长质糜棱岩PM10TW1样品LA-ICP-MS错石U-Pb测年结果

    Table 3.  LA-ICP-MS zircon U-Pb data of Hariama dioritic mylonite sample PM10Tw1

    测点 含量/10-6 同位素比值 年龄/Ma
    Pb U 232Th/238U 206Pb/238U 207Pb/235U 207Pb/206Pb 206Pb/238U 207Pb/235U 207Pb/206Pb
    1 10.9 140.9 1.1289 0.0041 0.0601 0.0007 0.5998 0.0161 0.0724 0.0018 376 4 477 13 998 52
    2 45.8 502.5 0.5956 0.0061 0.0823 0.0011 0.7188 0.0130 0.0633 0.0008 510 7 550 10 719 27
    3 11.5 156.8 0.4623 0.0032 0.0694 0.0010 0.5330 0.0140 0.0557 0.0014 433 6 434 11 440 56
    4 43.5 525.8 0.5102 0.0084 0.0780 0.0009 0.6838 0.0104 0.0636 0.0008 484 6 529 8 729 27
    5 6.3 81.0 0.7370 0.0152 0.0691 0.0009 0.5309 0.0314 0.0557 0.0031 431 5 432 26 441 124
    6 7.9 121.1 0.4781 0.0029 0.0591 0.0007 0.5966 0.0167 0.0732 0.0021 370 4 475 13 1019 57
    7 15.5 191.9 0.8700 0.0173 0.0715 0.0009 0.5563 0.0117 0.0565 0.0011 445 6 449 9 471 42
    8 42.0 820.0 0.7329 0.0041 0.0473 0.0006 0.3691 0.0057 0.0566 0.0007 298 4 319 5 477 29
    9 37.1 519.0 0.5392 0.0024 0.0686 0.0008 0.5326 0.0082 0.0563 0.0008 428 5 434 7 466 30
    10 14.1 215.0 0.4646 0.0025 0.0649 0.0008 0.4974 0.0118 0.0556 0.0013 405 5 410 10 436 50
    11 47.6 546.0 0.9004 0.0380 0.0803 0.0009 0.6787 0.0102 0.0613 0.0008 498 6 526 8 651 27
    12 6.6 108.8 0.7143 0.0006 0.0555 0.0007 0.5838 0.0172 0.0763 0.0022 348 4 467 14 1103 59
    13 9.9 144.7 1.0556 0.0033 0.0596 0.0007 0.5901 0.0169 0.0719 0.0018 373 5 471 13 982 50
    14 29.6 378.4 1.1382 0.0075 0.0693 0.0008 0.5316 0.0097 0.0556 0.0008 432 5 433 8 438 34
    15 24.3 362.2 0.7382 0.0014 0.0518 0.0006 1.1762 0.0245 0.1647 0.0031 326 4 790 16 2505 32
    16 37.3 602.7 0.6108 0.0011 0.0607 0.0007 0.4721 0.0083 0.0564 0.0008 380 4 393 7 470 32
    17 4.3 72.6 0.5458 0.0021 0.0566 0.0006 0.5391 0.0245 0.0690 0.0030 355 4 438 20 899 91
    18 18.6 261.8 0.6568 0.0022 0.0694 0.0009 0.5362 0.0106 0.0560 0.0009 433 5 436 9 453 37
    19 52.1 742.1 1.0640 0.0028 0.0646 0.0008 0.4924 0.0079 0.0553 0.0007 403 5 407 6 425 29
    20 22.1 330.4 0.5824 0.0051 0.0648 0.0007 0.4938 0.0089 0.0552 0.0009 405 5 407 7 422 36
    21 11.9 202.7 0.6046 0.0013 0.0551 0.0006 0.5553 0.0127 0.0730 0.0014 346 4 448 10 1015 40
    22 9.0 137.1 0.6247 0.0044 0.0582 0.0006 0.7276 0.0152 0.0907 0.0018 365 4 555 12 1440 37
    23 13.6 210.5 0.6269 0.0064 0.0596 0.0007 0.7028 0.0124 0.0855 0.0014 373 4 540 10 1328 32
    测试单位: 中国地质调查局天津地质调查中心.
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 4  哈日阿玛英云闪长岩JDTW12样品LA-ICP-MS错石U-Pb测年结果

    Table 4.  LA-ICP-MS zircon U-Pb data of Harlama dioritic mylonte sample JDTw12

    测点 含量/10-6 同位素比值 年龄/Ma
    Pb U 232Th/238U 206Pb/238U 207Pb/235U 207Pb/206Pb 206Pb/238U 207Pb/235U 207Pb/206Pb
    1 17.6 225.4 0.4326 0.0013 0.0755 0.0008 0.5902 0.0114 0.0567 0.0010 469 5 471 9 481 38
    2 48.4 612.7 0.5077 0.0031 0.0751 0.0007 0.5893 0.0081 0.0569 0.0007 467 4 470 6 487 27
    3 11.9 151.2 0.6354 0.0009 0.0726 0.0007 0.5619 0.0114 0.0561 0.0011 452 5 453 9 456 43
    4 11.4 150.1 0.5806 0.0038 0.0706 0.0007 0.5856 0.0120 0.0601 0.0011 440 4 468 10 608 41
    5 11.6 152.6 0.5293 0.0013 0.0723 0.0007 0.5602 0.0125 0.0562 0.0012 450 4 452 10 459 47
    6 8.4 114.3 0.5706 0.0014 0.0683 0.0007 0.5532 0.0142 0.0587 0.0015 426 4 447 12 556 55
    7 14.8 191.8 0.4917 0.0014 0.0724 0.0007 0.5640 0.0104 0.0565 0.0010 451 5 454 8 472 38
    8 12.3 159.2 0.5320 0.0038 0.0722 0.0008 0.5608 0.0129 0.0563 0.0012 449 5 452 10 466 47
    9 67.3 1193.2 0.2348 0.0004 0.0562 0.0006 0.4734 0.0065 0.0611 0.0007 353 4 394 5 642 25
    10 11.1 140.9 0.5139 0.0033 0.0733 0.0007 0.5428 0.0139 0.0537 0.0014 456 4 440 11 360 59
    11 19.6 255.0 0.3821 0.0005 0.0747 0.0007 0.5838 0.0112 0.0567 0.0009 464 5 467 9 480 36
    12 11.1 140.4 0.6237 0.0011 0.0708 0.0007 0.5559 0.0135 0.0569 0.0014 441 4 449 11 488 52
    13 22.4 263.7 0.5332 0.0021 0.0790 0.0009 0.6235 0.0103 0.0573 0.0008 490 6 492 8 502 31
    14 30.3 379.1 0.4159 0.0009 0.0763 0.0008 0.6050 0.0089 0.0575 0.0008 474 5 480 7 511 29
    15 16.6 215.5 0.5305 0.0022 0.0725 0.0007 0.5602 0.0103 0.0560 0.0010 451 4 452 8 453 38
    16 9.7 122.7 0.5531 0.0023 0.0735 0.0007 0.5701 0.0142 0.0563 0.0014 457 5 458 11 463 54
    17 22.9 258.8 0.4300 0.0013 0.0847 0.0009 0.6842 0.0113 0.0586 0.0008 524 5 529 9 551 31
    18 12.3 155.1 0.5538 0.0041 0.0735 0.0008 0.5678 0.0115 0.0561 0.0011 457 5 457 9 455 43
    19 24.3 296.9 0.4097 0.0021 0.0785 0.0008 0.6183 0.0100 0.0571 0.0008 487 5 489 8 495 32
    20 10.5 133.4 0.4644 0.0029 0.0747 0.0008 0.5845 0.0166 0.0568 0.0014 464 5 467 13 483 54
    21 12.6 158.8 0.5891 0.0014 0.0726 0.0007 0.5665 0.0123 0.0566 0.0011 452 5 456 10 475 45
    测试单位: 中国地质调查局天津地质调查中心.
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1]

    左国朝, 何国琦. 北山板块构造及成矿规律[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 1990: 1-209.

    Zuo G C, He G Q. Plate tectonics and metallogenic regularities in Beishan region[M]. Beijing: Peking University Press, 1990: 1-209.

    [2]

    左国朝, 刘义科, 刘春燕. 甘新蒙北山地区构造格局及演化[J]. 甘肃地质学报, 2003, 12(1): 1-15. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GSDZ200301000.htm

    Zuo G C, Liu Y K, Liu C Y. Framework and evolution of the tectonic structure in Beishan area across Gansu Province, Xinjiang autonomous region and Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region[J]. Acta Geologica Gansu, 2003, 12(1): 1-15. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GSDZ200301000.htm

    [3]

    左国朝, 李茂松. 甘蒙北山地区早古生代岩石圈形成与演化[M]. 兰州: 甘肃科学技术出版社, 1996: 1-120.

    Zuo G C, Li M S. Formation and evolution of the early Paleozoic lithosphere in the Beishan area, Gansu-Inner Mongolia, China[M]. Lanzhou: Gansu Science and Technology Press, 1996: 1-120.

    [4]

    李锦轶, 张进, 杨天南, 等. 北亚造山区南部及其毗邻地区地壳构造分区与构造演化[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2009, 39(4): 584-605. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CCDZ200904002.htm

    Li J Y, Zhang J, Yang T N, et al. Crustal tectonic division and evolution of the southern part of the North Asian Orogenic Region and its adjacent areas[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2009, 39(4): 584-605. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CCDZ200904002.htm

    [5]

    徐学义, 何世平, 王洪亮, 等. 中国西北部地质概论——秦岭、祁连、天山地区[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2008: 1-347.

    Xu X Y, He S P, Wang H L, et al. An introduction to geology in Qinling, Qilian and Tianshan, Northwest China[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2008: 1-347. (in Chinese)

    [6]

    杨合群, 李英, 赵国斌, 等. 北山蛇绿岩特征及构造属性[J]. 西北地质, 2010, 43(1): 26-36. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6248.2010.01.002

    Yang H Q, Li Y, Zhao G B, et al. Character and structural attribute of the Beishan ophiolite[J]. Northwestern Geology, 2010, 43(1): 26-36. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6248.2010.01.002

    [7]

    何世平, 周会武, 任秉琛, 等. 甘肃内蒙古北山地区古生代地壳演化[J]. 西北地质, 2005, 38(3): 6-15. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6248.2005.03.002

    He S P, Zhou H W, Ren B C, et al. Crustal evolution of Palaeozoic in Beishan area, Gansu and Inner Mongolia, China[J]. Northwestern Geology, 2005, 38(3): 6-15. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6248.2005.03.002

    [8]

    廖云峰, 胡新茁, 程海峰, 等. 内蒙古月牙山蛇绿岩的岩石学、地球化学特征及其地质意义[J]. 地质通报, 2016, 35(8): 1243-1254. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2552.2016.08.005

    Liao Y F, Hu X Z, Cheng H F, et al. Petrological and petrochemical characteristics and geological significance of Yueyashan ophiolite[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2016, 35(8): 1243-1254. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2552.2016.08.005

    [9]

    王国强. 北山古生代蛇绿岩、火山岩研究与构造演化[D]. 西安: 长安大学, 2015.

    Wang G Q. The research of the Paleozoic ophiolites and volcanic rocks and the tectonic evolution in the Beishan area (Northwest China)[D]. Xi'an: Chang'an University, 2015.

    [10]

    胡新茁, 赵国春, 胡新悦, 等. 内蒙古北山地区月牙山蛇绿质构造混杂岩带地质特征、形成时代及大地构造意义[J]. 地质通报, 2015, 34(2/3): 425-436. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZQYD2015Z1019.htm

    Hu X Z, Zhao G C, Hu X Y, et al. Geological characteristics, formation epoch and geotectonic significance of the Yueyashan ophiolitic tectonic mélange in Beishan area, Inner Mongolia[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2015, 34(2/3): 425-436. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZQYD2015Z1019.htm

    [11]

    胡醒民, 廖云峰, 程海峰, 等. 内蒙古月牙山一带基性火山岩的地质特征、形成时代及归属[J]. 地质通报, 2016, 35(8): 1234-1242. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2552.2016.08.004

    Hu X M, Liao Y F, Cheng H F, et al. A discussion on the geological characteristics, formation age and attribution of basic volcanic rocks in Yueyashan area, Inner Mongolia[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2016, 35(8): 1234-1242. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2552.2016.08.004

    [12]

    杨鑫朋, 田粉英, 王硕, 等. 内蒙古横峦山组类高镁安山岩年代学及地球化学特征[J]. 中国地质调查, 2018, 5(5): 58-65. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZDC201805008.htm

    Yang X P, Tian F Y, Wang S, et al. Geochronological and geochemical characteristics of analogy high-magnesium andesite in Henluanshan Formation of Inner Mongolia[J]. Geological Survey of China, 2018, 5(5): 58-65. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZDC201805008.htm

    [13]

    赵志雄, 贾元琴, 王金荣, 等. 内蒙古小黑山地区二长花岗岩和石英闪长岩的锆石U-Pb年代学、元素地球化学及其地质意义[J]. 地球科学, 2018, 34(S2): 49-59. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQKX2018S2005.htm

    Zhao Z X, Jia Y Q, Wang J R, et al. LA-ICP-MS zircon U-Pb age and geochemistry of Monzonite granite-quartz diorite pluton in Xiaoheishan area of Beishan Orogenic Belt and its geological significance, Inner Mongolia[J]. Earth Science, 2018, 34(S2): 49-59. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQKX2018S2005.htm

    [14]

    修迪, 陈超, 专少鹏, 等. 北山石板井地区英云闪长岩-石英闪长岩体锆石U-Pb年龄、成因及对古洋盆俯冲作用时限的制约[J]. 地质通报, 2018, 37(6): 975-986. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZQYD201806002.htm

    Xiu D, Chen C, Zhuan S P, et al. Zircon U-Pb age and petrogenesis of tonalite-quartz diorite in the Shibanjing area, central Beishan orogenic belt, and its constraint on subduction of the ancient oceanic basin[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2018, 37(6): 975-986. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZQYD201806002.htm

    [15]

    专少鹏, 陈超, 申宗义, 等. 北山地区早古生代洋盆俯冲记录-来自石板井高镁闪长岩的年代学、地球化学证据[J]. 岩石矿物学杂志, 2018, 37(4): 533-546. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6524.2018.04.002

    Zhuan S P, Chen C, Shen Z Y, et al. Early Paleozoic subduction of the ocean in Beishan region: zircon U-Pb geochronological and geochemical evidence from the high-Mg diorite in the Shibanjing area[J]. Acta Petrologica et Mineralogica, 2018, 37(4): 533-546. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6524.2018.04.002

    [16]

    董洪凯, 孟庆涛, 刘广, 等. 内蒙古北山地区标山一带早志留世花岗岩地球化学特征及构造意义[J]. 西北地质, 2018, 51(1): 159-174. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6248.2018.01.016

    Dong H K, Meng Q T, Liu G, et al. Geochemical characteristics of early Silurian granite from Biaoshan area in Beishan, Inner Mongolia and their tectonic implications[J]. Northwestern Geology, 2018, 51(1): 159-174. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6248.2018.01.016

    [17]

    王怀涛. 中亚造山带南段北山构造-岩浆作用及其地质意义的研究[D]. 兰州: 兰州大学, 2019.

    Wang H T. Tectono-magmatism and its geological significance in the Beishan area of the southern part of the Central Asian Orogenic Belt[D]. Lanzhou: Lanzhou University, 2019.

    [18]

    王鑫玉, 袁超, 龙晓平, 等. 北山造山带尖山和石板井花岗岩年代学、地球化学研究及其地质意义[J]. 地球化学, 2018, 47(1): 63-78. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQHX201801005.htm

    Wang X Y, Yuan C, Long X P, et al. Geochronological, geochemical, and geological significance of Jianshan and Shibanjing granites in the Gongpoquan Arc, Beishan Orogenic Belt[J]. Geochimica, 2018, 47(1): 63-78. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQHX201801005.htm

    [19]

    王鑫玉. 北山公婆泉岛弧岩石组合、岩浆时空演变及其构造意义[D]. 广州: 中国科学院大学(中国科学院广州地球化学研究所), 2017.

    Wang X Y. The rock assemblages, spatial and temporal variations in the Gongpoquan arc, Beishan and their implications for tectonic setting[D]. Guangzhou: University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences), 2017.

    [20]

    李小菲. 北山马鬃山地区古生代花岗岩形成年龄、地球化学特征及其地质意义[D]. 西安: 西北大学, 2013.

    Li X F. Formation age, geochemical characteristics and geological significance of Paleozoic granites in Mazongshan, Beishan[D]. Xi'an: Northwest University, 2013. (in Chinese)

    [21]

    张太荣. 甘肃北山寒武纪地层的划分意见[J]. 新疆地质, 1983, 1(2): 42-47. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XJDI198302005.htm

    Zhang T R. On division of the Cambrian Stratuml Beishan of Gansu Province, China[J]. Xinjiang Geology, 1983, 1(2): 42-47. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XJDI198302005.htm

    [22]

    余吉远, 计波, 过磊, 等. 甘肃北山地区古硐井群地质特征与时代厘定[J]. 地质通报, 2018, 37(4): 704-715. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZQYD201804017.htm

    Yu J Y, Ji B, Guo L, et al. Geological characteristics and age determination of the Palaeoproterozoic Gudongjing Group complex in the Beishan Mountain, Gansu Province[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2018, 37(4): 704-715. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZQYD201804017.htm

    [23]

    张金龙, 潘志龙, 陈超, 等. 内蒙古北山地区三道明水一带早白垩世赤金堡组沉积特征及时代厘定[J]. 地质调查与研究, 2017, 40(1): 29-34, 80. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-4135.2017.01.004

    Zhang J L, Pan Z L, Chen C, et al. Sedimentary characteristics and age of the Early Cretaceous Chijinbao formation in the Sandaomingshui of Beishan area, Inner Mongolia[J]. Geological Survey and Research, 2017, 40(1): 29-34, 80. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-4135.2017.01.004

    [24]

    潘志龙, 张欢, 陈超, 等. 内蒙古北山敖包呼图仁斑状正长花岗岩锆石U-Pb年龄、Lu-Hf同位素组成及其地质意义[J]. 地质科学, 2017, 52(1): 301-316.

    Pan Z L, Zhang H, Chen C, et al. Zircon U-Pb geochronology and Lu-Hf isotope compositions of porphyritic syenite granite from Aobaohuturen in Beishan, Inner Mongolia and its tectonic implication[J]. Chinese Journal of Geology, 2017, 52(1): 301-316.

    [25]

    高剑峰, 陆建军, 赖鸣远, 等. 岩石样品中微量元素的高分辨率等离子质谱分析[J]. 南京大学学报(自然科学), 2003, 39(6): 844-850. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NJDZ200306013.htm

    Gao J F, Lu J J, Lai M Y, et al. Analysis of trace elements in rock samples using HR-ICPMS[J]. Journal of Nanjing University (Natural Science), 2003, 39(6): 844-850. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NJDZ200306013.htm

    [26]

    袁洪林, 吴福元, 高山, 等. 东北地区新生代侵入体的锆石激光探针U-Pb年龄测定与稀土元素成分分析[J]. 科学通报, 2003, 48(14): 1511-1520. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0023-074X.2003.14.008

    Yuan H L, Wu F Y, Gao S, et al. Determination of U-Pb age and rare earth element concentrations of zircons from Cenozoic intrusions in northeastern China by laser ablation ICP-MS[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2003, 48(14): 1511-1520. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0023-074X.2003.14.008

    [27]

    Le Maitre R W. Igneous rocks: A classification and glossary of terms[M]. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002: 33-39.

    [28]

    Rollinson H R. Using geochemical data: Evaluation, presentation, interpretation[M]. New York: Longman Scientific & Technical, 1993: 1-352.

    [29]

    Kemp A I S, Hawkesworth C J. Granitic perspectives on the generation and secular evolution of the continental crust[J]. Treatise on Geochemistry, 2003, 3: 349-410. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B0080437516030279

    [30]

    Turner S, Arnaud N, Liu J, et al. 1996. Post-collision, shoshonitic volcanism on the Tibetan Plateau: Implications for convective thinning of the lithosphere and the source of ocean island basalts[J]. Journal of Petrology, 1996, 37(1): 45-71. doi: 10.1093/petrology/37.1.45

    [31]

    Boynton W V. Geochemistry of the rare earth elements: meteorite studies[M]//Henderson P. Rare Earth Element Geochemistry. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1984: 63-114.

    [32]

    McDonough W F, Sun S S, Ringwood A E, et al. Potassium, rubidium, and cesium in the Earth and Moon and the evolution of the mantle of the Earth[J]. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 1992, 56(3): 1001-1012. doi: 10.1016/0016-7037(92)90043-I

    [33]

    Rapp R P, Shimizu N, Norman M D, et al. Reaction between slab-derived melts and peridotite in the mantle wedge: Experimental constraints at 3.8 GPa[J]. Chemical Geology, 1999, 160(4): 335-356. doi: 10.1016/S0009-2541(99)00106-0

    [34]

    Smithies R H. The Archaean tonalite-trondhjemite-granodiorite (TTG) series is not an analogue of Cenozoic adakite[J]. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 2000, 182(1): 115-125. doi: 10.1016/S0012-821X(00)00236-3

    [35]

    Green T H. Significance of Nb/Ta as an indicator of geochemical processes in the crust-mantle system[J]. Chemical Geology, 1995, 120(3/4): 347-359. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/000925419400145X

    [36]

    Hofmann A W. Chemical differentiation of the Earth: The relationship between mantle, continental crust, and oceanic crust[J]. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 1998, 90(3): 297-314. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0012821X8890132X

    [37]

    Barbarin B. A review of the relationships between granitoid types, their origins and their geodynamic environments[J]. Lithos, 1999, 46(3): 605-626. doi: 10.1016/S0024-4937(98)00085-1

    [38]

    Wyllie P J, Ryabchikov I D. Volatile components, magmas, and critical fluids in upwelling mantle[J]. Journal of Petrology, 2000, 41(7): 1195-1206. doi: 10.1093/petrology/41.7.1195

    [39]

    Condie K C. Geochemistry and tectonic setting of early Proterozoic supracrustal rocks in the southwestern United States[J]. The Journal of Geology, 1986, 94(6): 845-864. doi: 10.1086/629091

    [40]

    Wood D A. The application of a Th-Hf-Ta diagram to problems of tectonomagmatic classification and to establishing the nature of crustal contamination of basaltic lavas of the British Tertiary Volcanic Province[J]. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 1980, 50(1): 11-30. doi: 10.1016/0012-821X(80)90116-8

    [41]

    Pearce J A, Harris N B W, Tindle A G. Trace element discrimination diagrams for the tectonic interpretation of granitic rocks[J]. Journal of Petrology, 1984, 25(4): 956-983. doi: 10.1093/petrology/25.4.956

    [42]

    Pearce J. Sources and settings of granitic rocks[J]. Episodes, 1996, 19(4): 120-125. doi: 10.18814/epiiugs/1996/v19i4/005

    [43]

    孙立新, 张家辉, 任邦方, 等. 北山造山带白云山蛇绿混杂岩的地球化学特征、时代及地质意义[J]. 岩石矿物学杂志, 2017, 36(2): 131-147. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSKW201702001.htm

    Sun L X, Zhang J H, Ren B F, et al. Geochemical characteristics and U-Pb age of Baiyunshan ophiolite mélange in the Beishan orogenic belt and their geological implications[J]. Acta Petrologica et Mineralogica, 2017, 36(2): 131-147. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSKW201702001.htm

    [44]

    侯青叶, 王忠, 刘金宝, 等. 北山月牙山蛇绿岩地球化学特征及SHRIMP定年[J]. 现代地质, 2012, 26(5): 1008-1018. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDDZ201205023.htm

    Hou Q Y, Wang Z, Liu J B, et al. Geochemistry characteristics and SHRIMP dating of Yueyashan Ophiolite in Beishan Orogen[J]. Geoscience, 2012, 26(5): 1008-1018. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDDZ201205023.htm

    [45]

    郑荣国, 吴泰然, 张文, 等. 北山地区月牙山-洗肠井蛇绿岩的地球化学特征及形成环境[J]. 地质学报, 2012, 86(6): 961-971. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZXE201206011.htm

    Zheng R G, Wu T R, Zhang W, et al. Geochemical characteristics and tectonic setting and of the Yueyashan-Xichangjing Ophiolite in the Beishan area[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2012, 86(6): 961-971. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZXE201206011.htm

    [46]

    董洪凯, 孟庆涛, 张正平, 等. 内蒙古标山一带石英闪长岩地质特征及构造意义[J]. 新疆地质, 2018, 36(4): 518-525. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XJDI201804020.htm

    Dong H K, Meng Q T, Zhang Z P, et al. A discussion on the geological characteristics and tectonic significance of Quartz-tonalite in Biaoshan area, Inner Mongolia[J]. Xinjiang Geology, 2018, 36(4): 518-525. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XJDI201804020.htm

    [47]

    杨岳清, 吕博, 孟贵祥, 等. 内蒙古东七一山花岗岩地球化学、锆石SHRIMP U-Pb年龄及岩体形成环境探讨[J]. 地球学报, 2013, 34(2): 163-175. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQXB201302005.htm

    Yang Y Q, Lv B, Meng X G, et al. Geochemistry, SHRIMP zircon U-Pb dating and formation environment of Dongqiyishan granite, Inner Mongolia[J]. Acta Geoscientica Sinica, 2013, 34(2): 163-175. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQXB201302005.htm

    [48]

    王怀涛, 任文秀, 赵淇馨, 等. 北山地区照壁山南A型花岗岩地球化学特征及构造意[J]. 西北地质, 2016, 49(1): 39-49. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XBDI201601006.htm

    Wang H T, Ren W X, Zhao Q X, et al. Geochemical characteristics and tectonic significance of A-type granite in the South Margin of Zhaobishan, Beishan area[J]. Northwestern Geology, 2016, 49(1): 39-49. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XBDI201601006.htm

    [49]

    李舢, 王涛, 童英, 等. 北山辉铜山泥盆纪钾长花岗岩锆石U-Pb年龄、成因及构造意义[J]. 岩石学报, 2011, 27(10): 3055-3070. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB201110022.htm

    Li S, Wang T, Tong Y, et al. Zircon U-Pb age, origin and its tectonic significances of Huitongshan Devonian K-feldspar granites from Beishan orogeny, NW China[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2011, 27(10): 3055-3070. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB201110022.htm

    [50]

    李舢, 王涛, 童英, 等. 北山柳园地区双峰山早泥盆世A型花岗岩的确定及其构造演化意义[J]. 岩石矿物学杂志, 2009, 28(5): 407-422. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSKW200905000.htm

    Li S, Wang T, Tong Y, et al. Identification of the Early Devonian Shuangfengshan A-type granites in Liuyuan area of Beishan and its implications to tectonic evolution[J]. Acta Petrologica et Mineralogica, 2009, 28(5): 407-422. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSKW200905000.htm

    [51]

    王国强, 李向民, 徐学义, 等. 甘蒙北山志留纪公婆泉群火山岩的地球化学及其对岩石成因和构造环境的制约[J]. 地质学报, 2016, 90(10): 2603-2619. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZXE201610006.htm

    Wang G Q, Li X M, Xu X Y, et al. Geochemistry of Gongpoquan Group in the Beishan area, Gansu Province: Constraints on petrogenesis and tectonic setting[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2016, 90(10): 2603-2619. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZXE201610006.htm

    [52]

    戴霜, 方小敏, 张翔, 等. 塔里木-中朝板块北缘的志留纪岛弧公婆泉群火山岩地质地球化学及构造意义[J]. 兰州大学学报(自然科学版), 2003, 39(4): 80-87. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LDZK200304021.htm

    Dai S, Fang X M, Zhang X, et al. Island arc north of the Tarim-SK plate: the geology and geochemistry of Gongpoquan Group[J]. Journal of Lanzhou University (Natural Sciences), 2003, 39(4): 80-87. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LDZK200304021.htm

    [53]

    郭小宝. 甘肃北山公婆泉斑岩型铜矿地质地球化学特征及成因分析[D]. 北京: 中国地质大学(北京), 2015.

    Guo X B. Characteristics of geology and geochemistry of Gongpoquan porphyry copper deposit, Beishan, Gansu Province, and its mineralization[D]. Beijing: China University of Geosciences (Beijing), 2015.

    [54]

    王伏泉. 公婆泉铜矿二矿区火山岩的全岩Rb-Sr等时线年龄及其构造-成矿意义[J]. 大地构造与成矿学, 1998, 22(S1): 23-27. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DGYK1998S1004.htm

    Wang F Q. The Rb-Sr isochron ages of whole rock and its tectono-metallogenetic meaning of the volcanic rocks in the Second Mining area of the Gongpoquan copper deposit[J]. Geotectonica et Metallogenia, 1998, 22(S1): 23-27. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DGYK1998S1004.htm

    [55]

    刘威, 魏启荣, 车越新. 内蒙古石板井公婆泉组火山岩地球化学特征及构造意义[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2015, 15(17): 18-22. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KXJS201517005.htm

    Liu W, Wei Q R, Che Y X. Geochemistry characteristics and tectonic significance of the volcanic rocks of Gongpoquan formation on Shibanjing, Inner-Mongolia[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2015, 15(17): 18-22. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KXJS201517005.htm

    [56]

    左国朝, 金松桥, 冯铁全. 甘肃省公婆泉群发现牙形石[J]. 中国区域地质, 1994(2): 185. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZQYD402.016.htm

    Zuo G C, Jin S Q, Feng T Q. Conodonts were found in Gongpoquan group, Gansu Province[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 1994(2): 185. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZQYD402.016.htm

  • 加载中

(13)

(4)

计量
  • 文章访问数:  1344
  • PDF下载数:  136
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
收稿日期:  2020-08-13
修回日期:  2020-11-18
刊出日期:  2021-04-28

目录