松辽盆地西部斜坡区上二叠统林西组生烃潜力评价--来自吉白地2井的证据

孙雷, 陈树旺, 张健, 苏飞, 卞雄飞, 张海华. 松辽盆地西部斜坡区上二叠统林西组生烃潜力评价--来自吉白地2井的证据[J]. 地质与资源, 2021, 30(3): 333-340, 332. doi: 10.13686/j.cnki.dzyzy.2021.03.015
引用本文: 孙雷, 陈树旺, 张健, 苏飞, 卞雄飞, 张海华. 松辽盆地西部斜坡区上二叠统林西组生烃潜力评价--来自吉白地2井的证据[J]. 地质与资源, 2021, 30(3): 333-340, 332. doi: 10.13686/j.cnki.dzyzy.2021.03.015
SUN Lei, CHEN Shu-wang, ZHANG Jian, SU Fei, BIAN Xiong-fei, ZHANG Hai-hua. EVALUATION ON THE HYDROCARBON GENERATION POTENTIAL OF UPPER PERMIAN LINXI FORMATION IN WESTERN SLOPE OF SONGLIAO BASIN: Evidence from JBD-2 Well[J]. Geology and Resources, 2021, 30(3): 333-340, 332. doi: 10.13686/j.cnki.dzyzy.2021.03.015
Citation: SUN Lei, CHEN Shu-wang, ZHANG Jian, SU Fei, BIAN Xiong-fei, ZHANG Hai-hua. EVALUATION ON THE HYDROCARBON GENERATION POTENTIAL OF UPPER PERMIAN LINXI FORMATION IN WESTERN SLOPE OF SONGLIAO BASIN: Evidence from JBD-2 Well[J]. Geology and Resources, 2021, 30(3): 333-340, 332. doi: 10.13686/j.cnki.dzyzy.2021.03.015

松辽盆地西部斜坡区上二叠统林西组生烃潜力评价--来自吉白地2井的证据

  • 基金项目:
    国家重点研发计划项目"松辽盆地深层早白垩世新层系古环境与古气候及油气资源潜力评价"(2019YFC06054);中国地质调查局项目"松辽盆地北部及外围石炭-二叠系油气地质调查"(DD20190097),"松辽外围西部盆地油气基础地质调查"(DD20160163);"中国矿产地质志"(DD20190379)
详细信息
    作者简介: 孙雷(1988-), 男, 硕士, 工程师, 从事油气基础地质调查研究, 通信地址辽宁省沈阳市皇姑区黄河北大街280号, E-mail//281270393@qq.com
    通讯作者: 陈树旺(1964-), 男, 博士, 研究员, 从事油气基础地质调查研究, 通信地址辽宁省沈阳市皇姑区黄河北大街280号, E-mail//sycswgeology@163.com
  • 中图分类号: P618.13;P534.46

EVALUATION ON THE HYDROCARBON GENERATION POTENTIAL OF UPPER PERMIAN LINXI FORMATION IN WESTERN SLOPE OF SONGLIAO BASIN: Evidence from JBD-2 Well

More Information
  • 对松辽盆地西部斜坡区中部吉白地2井上二叠统林西组的烃源岩发育特征及有机地球化学特征进行了系统研究.结果表明,该区上二叠统林西组暗色泥岩、板岩发育,单层最大厚度为29 m,累计厚度达138.42 m.有机碳含量为0.01%~2.10%,平均为0.62%,整体为中等烃源岩范畴,有机质丰度较高.应用干酪根碳同位素、干酪根元素法综合分析,判断其有机质类型以Ⅱ型干酪根为主,部分为Ⅲ型干酪根.镜质组反射率与伊利石结晶度分析表明烃源岩热演化达到高成熟-过成熟阶段,整体处于成岩作用阶段.综合评价认为该区上二叠统林西组具备一定的生烃潜力,且以生气为主,具有一定的页岩气资源前景.

  • 加载中
  • 图 1  松辽盆地西部斜坡区上古生界物探预测图

    Figure 1. 

    图 2  吉白地2井中林西组暗色泥岩

    Figure 2. 

    图 3  吉白地2井林西组烃源岩TOC分布图

    Figure 3. 

    图 4  松辽盆地西部斜坡区吉白地2井林西组烃源岩综合评价柱状图

    Figure 4. 

    图 5  吉白地2井林西组烃源岩干酪根δ13C值与有机质类型关系图

    Figure 5. 

    图 6  吉白地2井林西组烃源岩H/C与O/C相关图

    Figure 6. 

    图 7  吉白地2井林西组烃源岩Ro分布直方图

    Figure 7. 

    图 8  吉白地2井林西组烃源岩Tmax分布图

    Figure 8. 

    表 1  松辽盆地西部斜坡区吉白地2井林西组烃源岩地球化学测试分析数据表

    Table 1.  Geochemical analysis data of Linxi Formation source rocks in JBD-2 well

    深度/m 岩性 总有机碳TOC/% 氯仿沥青“A”/% 生烃潜量S1+S2/10-3 HI/10-3 最高峰温Tmax/℃ H/C O/C 干酪根碳同位素δ13C/‰ Ro /%
    1879.65 黑色炭质泥岩 2.1 0.021894 0.32 19 434 / / -23.714 2.73
    1881.85 黑色炭质泥岩 2.05 0.019483 0.14 7 447 0.13 0.01 -23.662 /
    1896.88 黑色炭质泥岩 1.69 0.012338 0.04 2 442 0.13 0.02 -22.881 1.39
    1897.95 黑色炭质泥岩 0.897 0.008147 0.12 6 300 0.43 0.08 -23.325 /
    1917.7 灰黑色泥岩 0.0165 0.005303 0.07 13 436 / / -23.439 /
    1919.91 灰黑色泥岩 0.0148 0.004545 0.16 31 326 / / -26.237 /
    1921 灰黑色泥岩 0.041 0.005576 0.06 8 546 / / -28.632 3.14
    1922 灰黑色泥岩 0.0104 0.004717 0.03 5 525 / / -26.038 /
    1923 灰黑色泥岩 0.746 0.054696 0.15 12 433 0.44 0.12 -26.239 /
    1924.04 灰黑色泥岩 1.1 0.007393 0.03 2 370 0.88 0.04 -26.006 3.63
    1925.29 灰黑色泥岩 0.492 0.004762 0.12 10 351 0.58 0.09 -26.843 /
    1926 灰黑色泥岩 0.802 0.003232 0.03 1 390 0.99 0.08 -26.465 3.02
    1927 灰黑色泥岩 0.842 0.00547 0.06 3 440 0.79 0.14 -24.859 /
    1928.2 灰黑色泥岩 0.861 0.002925 0.03 2 350 0.49 0.09 -24.631 3.35
    1992.7 灰黑色板岩 0.0106 0.004215 0.09 7 408 / / -25.221 /
    1993.7 灰黑色板岩 0.0251 0.003203 0.06 10 543 / / -25.257 2.87
    1994.8 灰黑色板岩 0.0199 0.004915 0.06 8 450 1.02 0.12 -26.094 3.29
    1995.5 灰黑色板岩 0.0118 0.007427 0.01 3 409 / / -27.914 2.27
    1996.6 灰黑色板岩 0.0228 0.009011 0.02 2 373 1.27 0.21 -26.631 4.13
    分析测试单位:长江大学油气资源与勘探技术教育部重点实验室.
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 2  吉白地2井林西组烃源岩TOC>1.0%厚度统计表

    Table 2.  Thickness data of Linxi Formation source rocks with TOC>1.0% in JBD-2 well

    层数 岩性 顶深/m 底深/m 厚度/m TOC/%
    1 黑色碳质泥岩 1879 1898 19 $ \frac{{1.69 \sim 2.10 * }}{{1.95}} $
    2 灰黑色泥岩 1913 1929.26 16.26 1.10
    *横线上为测试值范围, 横线下为平均值; n=3.
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 3  吉白地2井林西组烃源岩伊利石结晶度数据表

    Table 3.  Illite crystallinity data of Linxi Formation source rocks in JBD-2 well

    深度/m 岩性 伊利石结晶度KIΔ2θ
    1 923 黑色泥岩 0.55
    1 925 黑色泥岩 0.84
    1 926 黑色泥岩 0.26
    1 928 黑色泥岩 0.50
    1 995 黑色泥岩 0.53
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1]

    任收麦, 乔德武, 张兴洲, 等.松辽盆地及外围上古生界油气资源战略选区研究进展[J].地质通报, 2011, 30(2/3):197-204. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZQYD2011Z1004.htm

    Ren S M, Qiao D W, Zhang X Z, et al. The present situation of oil & gas resources exploration and strategic selection of potential area in the Upper Paleozoic of Songliao Basin and surrounding area, NE China[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2011, 30(2/3):197-204. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZQYD2011Z1004.htm

    [2]

    赵志魁, 江涛, 贺君玲.松辽盆地石炭系-二叠系油气勘探前景[J].地质通报, 2011, 30(2/3):221-227. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZQYD2011Z1007.htm

    Zhao Z K, Jiang T, He J L. The oil and gas exploration prospect of Carboniferous-Permian in Songliao Basin, Northeastern China[J]. Geologcal Bulletin of China, 2011, 30(2/3):221-227. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZQYD2011Z1007.htm

    [3]

    陈树旺, 张健, 郑月娟, 等.松辽盆地西部斜坡区上古生界油气地质调查进展与发现[J].中国地质调查, 2019, 6(1):1-9. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZDC201901001.htm

    Chen S W, Zhang J, Zheng Y J, et al. Progresses and discoveries of geological survey on oil and gas resources related to the Upper Paleozoic in the western slope of Songliao Basin[J]. Geological Survey of China, 2019, 6(1):1-9. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZDC201901001.htm

    [4]

    张健, 郑月娟, 张德军, 等.松辽盆地西缘高力板断陷高D1井地层划分对比[J].东北石油大学学报, 2019, 43(1):22-29. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-4107.2019.01.003

    Zhang J, Zheng Y J, Zhang D J, et al. Stratigraphic division and correlation of the borehole GD1 in the Gaoliban fault depression, western margin of Songliao Basin[J]. Journal of Northeast Petroleum University, 2019, 43(1):22-29. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-4107.2019.01.003

    [5]

    Sun L, Wang C L, Bian X F. A new palynological assemblage from the Nenjiang Formation of Dayangshu Basin, and its geological implication[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica (English Edition), 2020, 94(1):198-199. doi: 10.1111/1755-6724.14416

    [6]

    王成龙.松南东部断陷带与盆缘断陷层系综合地层对比研究[D].长春: 吉林大学, 2018.

    Wang C L. Comprehensive stratigraphic correlation of the rift sequences in Eastern Fault Depression Belt of the Southern Songliao Basin and the margin area of the basin[D]. Changchun: Jilin University, 2018.

    [7]

    Wang C L, Zhang M S, Sun K, et al. Latest zircon U-Pb geochronology of the Huoshiling Formation volcanic rocks in the southeastern margin of the Songliao Basin[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica (English Edition), 2017, 91(5):1924-1925. doi: 10.1111/1755-6724.13425

    [8]

    张健, 孙雷, 苏飞, 等.松辽盆地西缘高力板断陷油气勘探层系及资源前景[J].东北石油大学学报, 2019, 43(1):30-39. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-4107.2019.01.004

    Zhang J, Sun L, Su F, et al. Layer series of oil and gas exploration and resource prospect in Gaoliban fault depression in the west edge of Songliao Basin[J]. Journal of Northeast Petroleum University, 2019, 43(1):30-39. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-4107.2019.01.004

    [9]

    张健, 孙雷, 何大祥, 等.松辽盆地滨北西部上二叠统林西组烃源岩生物标志化合物的特征及意义[J].地质与资源, 2019, 28(4):350-357. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1947.2019.04.007 http://manu25.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_dzyzy/CN/abstract/abstract8359.shtml

    Zhang J, Sun L, He D X, et al. Biomarker compounds in the source rocks of Upper Permian Linxi Formation in western Binbei area, Songlioa Basin:Characteristics and implications[J]. Geology and Resources, 2019, 28(4):350-357. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1947.2019.04.007 http://manu25.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_dzyzy/CN/abstract/abstract8359.shtml

    [10]

    张永生, 王延斌, 卢振权, 等.松辽盆地及外围地区石炭系-二叠系烃源岩的特征[J].地质通报, 2011, 30(2):214-220. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2552.2011.02.005

    Zhang Y S, Wang Y B, Lu Z Q, et al. Characteristics of source rocks from Carboniferous-Permian in Songliao Basin and its peripheral area, Northeastern China[J]. Geologcal Bulletin of China, 2011, 30(2); 214-220. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2552.2011.02.005

    [11]

    卢双舫, 张敏.油气地球化学[M].北京:石油工业出版社, 2008:171-226.

    Lu S F, Zhang M. Petroleum geochemistry[M]. Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press, 2008:171-226. (in Chinese)

    [12]

    中国石油天然气总公司. SY/T 5735-1995陆相烃源岩地球化学评价方法[S].北京: 石油工业出版社, 1996.

    China National Petroleum Company. SY/T 5735-1995 Geochemical evaluation method of terrestrial hydrocarbon source rocks[S]. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 1996.

    [13]

    魏仙样, 陈高潮, 魏建设, 等.内蒙古西部阿拉善右旗芒罕超克地区上石炭统-下二叠统阿木山组烃源岩的特征[J].地质通报, 2011, 30(6):879-887. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2552.2011.06.008

    Wei X Y, Chen G C, Wei J S, et al. Characteristics of hydrocarbon source rocks in Amushan Formation in Manghanchaoke region of Alxa Right Banner, Western Inner Mongolia[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2011, 30(6):879-887. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2552.2011.06.008

    [14]

    卢进才, 魏仙样, 魏建设, 等.内蒙古西部额济纳旗及邻区石炭系-二叠系烃源岩干酪根C同位素的特征和影响因素[J].地质通报, 2010, 29(2/3):384-391. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZQYD2010Z1026.htm

    Lu J C, Wei X Y, Wei J S, et al. Kerogen carbon isotopic features and influencing factors of Carboniferous-Permian hydrocarbon source rocks in Ejina Banner and its vicinities, Western Inner Mongolia, China[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2010, 29(2/3):384-391. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZQYD2010Z1026.htm

    [15]

    公繁浩, 陈树旺, 张健, 等.内蒙古陶海营子地区上二叠统林西组泥岩热演化程度研究[J].地质与资源, 2012, 21(1):129-133. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1947.2012.01.019 http://manu25.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_dzyzy/CN/abstract/abstract9023.shtml

    Gong F H, Chen S W, Zhang J, et al. Study on the thermal evolution of the mudstone from Linxi Formation in Taohaiyingzi, Inner Mongolia[J]. Geology and Resources, 2012, 21(1):129-133. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1947.2012.01.019 http://manu25.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_dzyzy/CN/abstract/abstract9023.shtml

    [16]

    蒂索B P, 威尔特D H.石油形成和分布——油气勘探新途径[M].郝石生, 译.北京: 石油工业出版社, 1982: 87-102.

    Tissot B P, Welte D H. Petroleum formation and occurrence: A new approach to oil and gas exploration[M]. Hao S S, trans. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 1982: 87-102. (in Chinese)

    [17]

    朱光.用伊利石结晶度确定碎屑沉积岩甚低级变质等级[J].石油勘探与开发, 1995, 22(1):33-35. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK501.009.htm

    Zhu G. Grading the extreme-low metamorphic clastic sedimentary rocks by the crystallinity of the illite[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 1995, 22(1):33-35. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK501.009.htm

    [18]

    朱莉, 朱敏.合肥盆地中生界地层的热演化程度——伊利石结晶度的指示[J].安徽地质, 2006, 16(3):169-172. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6157.2006.03.003

    Zhu L, Zhu M. Thermal evolution stages for Mesozoic strata in the Hefei Basin:Constraints from illite crystallinity[J]. Geology of Anhui, 2006, 16(3):169-172. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6157.2006.03.003

    [19]

    张勇, 曹雪晴, 任凤楼, 等.合肥盆地烃源岩有机质热演化历史分析[J].沉积学报, 2008, 26(1):168-177. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CJXB200801022.htm

    Zhang Y, Cao X Q, Ren F L, et al. Thermal evolution history analysis of source rocks of Hefei Basin[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2008, 26(1):168-177. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CJXB200801022.htm

    [20]

    蒲泊伶, 包书景, 王毅, 等.页岩气成藏条件分析——以美国页岩气盆地为例[J].石油地质与工程, 2008, 22(3):33-36. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8217.2008.03.009

    Pu B L, Bao S J, Wang Y, et al. Analysis on condition of shale gas accumulation:A studying case from shale gas basin in America[J]. Petroleum Geology and Engineering, 2008, 22(3):33-36. (inChinese doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8217.2008.03.009

    [21]

    Lou R X, Dong Q S, Nie H. Exploration prospects of shale gas resources in the Upper Permian Linxi Formation in the Suolun-Linxi Area, NE China[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2017, 31(2):1100-1107.

    [22]

    李政.东营凹陷页岩气勘探潜力初步评价[D].成都: 成都理工大学, 2011.

    Li Z. Exploration potential analyses of the shale gas in Dongying Depression[D]. Chengdu: Chengdu University of Technology, 2011.

  • 加载中

(8)

(3)

计量
  • 文章访问数:  1269
  • PDF下载数:  93
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
收稿日期:  2020-12-15
修回日期:  2021-04-13
刊出日期:  2021-06-25

目录