组合薄板状导体的地-井瞬变电磁异常理论计算

牛峥, 秦长春, 韩要记, 罗婧. 组合薄板状导体的地-井瞬变电磁异常理论计算[J]. 地质与资源, 2022, 31(5): 653-659. doi: 10.13686/j.cnki.dzyzy.2022.05.009
引用本文: 牛峥, 秦长春, 韩要记, 罗婧. 组合薄板状导体的地-井瞬变电磁异常理论计算[J]. 地质与资源, 2022, 31(5): 653-659. doi: 10.13686/j.cnki.dzyzy.2022.05.009
NIU Zheng, QIN Chang-chun, HAN Yao-ji, LUO Jing. MODELING STUDY ON MULTIPLE THIN-PLATE CONDUCTORS BASED ON SURFACE-HOLE TRANSIENT ELECTROMAGNETIC ANOMALY RESPONSES[J]. Geology and Resources, 2022, 31(5): 653-659. doi: 10.13686/j.cnki.dzyzy.2022.05.009
Citation: NIU Zheng, QIN Chang-chun, HAN Yao-ji, LUO Jing. MODELING STUDY ON MULTIPLE THIN-PLATE CONDUCTORS BASED ON SURFACE-HOLE TRANSIENT ELECTROMAGNETIC ANOMALY RESPONSES[J]. Geology and Resources, 2022, 31(5): 653-659. doi: 10.13686/j.cnki.dzyzy.2022.05.009

组合薄板状导体的地-井瞬变电磁异常理论计算

  • 基金项目:
    陕西地矿集团科研基金"时间域激发极化法(TDIP)谱参数解释试验研究"(No. KY210909)
详细信息
    作者简介: 牛峥(1982—), 男, 硕士, 高级工程师, 从事地球物理勘查与研究工作, 通信地址陕西省西安市莲湖区龙首北路东段16号, E-mail//22596952@qq.com
  • 中图分类号: P631.3

MODELING STUDY ON MULTIPLE THIN-PLATE CONDUCTORS BASED ON SURFACE-HOLE TRANSIENT ELECTROMAGNETIC ANOMALY RESPONSES

  • 地-井瞬变电磁法(SHTEM)是指场源在地面激发, 接收线圈在钻井中观测瞬变响应, 用以勘查深部矿产资源的勘探方法. 从等效涡流环方法原理出发, 计算了等效涡流环与Rx之间的互感系数以及感应电压. 通过建立组合薄板导体的数学模型, 计算模拟地下存在多个薄板状良导体组合情况下的起响应叠加场, 以研究组合导体的地-井瞬变电磁异常响应, 并分析这些异常响应的特征及规律. 认为钻孔在距离多个组合薄板状矿体较近的情况下, 通过地-井瞬变电磁测量能够进行分辨.

  • 加载中
  • 图 1  不同钻孔接收水平单板体异常响应曲线

    Figure 1. 

    图 2  不同钻孔接收倾斜单板体异常响应曲线

    Figure 2. 

    图 3  不同钻孔接收水平多板体纵向组合异常曲线

    Figure 3. 

    图 4  不同钻孔接收倾斜多板体纵向组合异常曲线

    Figure 4. 

    图 5  由不同钻孔观测水平板组合异常响应分辨单个板体

    Figure 5. 

    图 6  由固定钻孔观测水平板组合异常响应分辨单个板体

    Figure 6. 

  • [1]

    蒋邦远. 实用近区磁源瞬变电磁法勘探[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 1998: 199-237.

    Jiang B Y. Practical near-field magnetic source transient electromagnetic exploration[M]. Beijing: Geological Publishing House, 1998: 199- 237. (in Chinese)

    [2]

    牛之琏. 时间域电磁法原理[M]. 长沙: 中南大学出版社, 2007: 249-267.

    Niu Z L. Principle of time domain electromagnetic method[M]. Changsha: Central South University Press, 2007: 249-267. (in Chinese)

    [3]

    Buselli G, Lee S K. Modelling of drill-hole TEM responses from multiple targets covered by a conductive overburden[J]. Exploration Geophysics, 1996, 27(2/3): 141-153.

    [4]

    Singh N P, Mogi T. Electromagnetic response of a large circular loop source on a layered earth: A new computation method[J]. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 2005, 162(1): 181-200. doi: 10.1007/s00024-004-2586-2

    [5]

    Richards D J. CRAE's approach to downhole TEM at Broken Hill[J]. Exploration Geophysics, 1987, 18(3): 279-284. doi: 10.1071/EG987279

    [6]

    Eaton P A, Hohmann G W. The influence of a conductive host on two-dimensional borehole transient electromagnetic responses[J]. Geophysics, 1984, 49(7): 861-869. doi: 10.1190/1.1441732

    [7]

    West R C, Ward S H. The borehole transient electromagnetic response of a three-dimensional fracture zone in a conductive half-space[J]. Geophysics, 1988, 53(11): 1469-1478. doi: 10.1190/1.1442427

    [8]

    Macnae J, Staltari G. Classification of sign changes in Borehole TEM decays[J]. Exploration Geophysics, 1987, 18(3): 331-339. doi: 10.1071/EG987331

    [9]

    Dyck A V, West G F. The role of simple computer models in interpretations of wide-band, drill-hole electromagnetic surveys in mineral exploration[J]. Geophysics, 1984, 49(7): 957-980. doi: 10.1190/1.1441741

    [10]

    Telford W M, Geldart L P, Sheriff R E. Applied geophysics[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990: 353.

    [11]

    Paul C R. Inductance: Loop and partial[M]. Hoboken: John Wiley and Sons Ltd, 2010: 196-206.

    [12]

    Dwight H B. Tables of integrals and other mathematical data[M]. 4th ed. New York: MacMillan, 1964: 45.

    [13]

    Jeffrey A. Handbook of mathematical formulas and integrals[M]. San Diego: Academic Press, 1995: 178.

    [14]

    Vella L. Taking downhole EM underground, at hill 50 decline, mount magnet, Western Australia[J]. Exploration Geophysics, 1997, 28(1/2): 141-146.

    [15]

    Zhang Z, Xiao J. Inversions of surface and borehole data from large- loop transient electromagnetic system over a 1-D earth[J]. Geophysics, 2001, 66(4): 1090-1096. doi: 10.1190/1.1487056

    [16]

    Aziz A A, Strack K, Hanstein T. Surface-to-borehole TEM for reservoir monitoring[C]//SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2011. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 2011: 1882-1886.

    [17]

    李建慧, 刘树才, 焦险峰, 等. 地-井瞬变电磁法三维正演研究[J]. 石油地球物理勘探, 2015, 50(3): 556-564. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYDQ201503029.htm

    Li J H, Liu S C, Jiao X F, et al. Three-dimensional forward modeling for surface-borehole transient electromagnetic method[J]. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2015, 50(3): 556-564. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYDQ201503029.htm

    [18]

    杨海燕, 岳建华, 徐正玉, 等. 覆盖层影响下典型地-井模型瞬变电磁法正演[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(5): 1527-1537. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CCDZ201605025.htm

    Yang H Y, Yue J H, Xu Z Y, et al. Transient electromagnetic method modeling in ground-borehole model with overburden influence[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2016, 46 (5): 1527-1537. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CCDZ201605025.htm

    [19]

    Paggi J, Macklin D. Discovery of the Eureka volcanogenic massive sulphide lens using downhole electromagnetics[J]. Exploration Geophysics, 2016, 47(3): 248-257. doi: 10.1071/EG15096

    [20]

    Kolaj M, Smith R. Robust conductance estimates from spatial and temporal derivatives of borehole electromagnetic data[J]. Geophysics, 2014, 79(3): E115-E123. doi: 10.1190/geo2013-0387.1

  • 加载中

(6)

计量
  • 文章访问数:  551
  • PDF下载数:  111
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
收稿日期:  2021-01-04
修回日期:  2021-03-04
刊出日期:  2022-10-25

目录