THE MAIN CONTROL FACTORS ON EFFECTIVE PALEOGENE PRIMARY OIL AND GAS MIGRATION:A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF EXPLORATION RESULTS FROM XIJIANG A AND XIJIANG B STRUCTURAL TRAPS, ZHUJIANGKOU BASIN
-
摘要:
通过珠江口盆地西江主洼地区古近系油气勘探实例，提出了油气初次运移有效性与初次运移有效区的概念。初次运移是否有效取决于烃源岩排出之油气进入邻近砂体后能否顺利二次分配。初次运移有效性的主控因素取决于2点：一是发育与烃源岩接触面积较大的规模性砂体；二是砂体中粗孔喉相对发育。前者可为初次运移有效性、提高运聚充注效率奠定基础；后者则决定了油气优先充注的运聚方向，其是决定初次运移最终有效的直接条件。据此，对比分析了西江A构造圈闭与西江B构造圈闭的钻探结果，并对西江A构造钻探失利进行了深入解剖，进而深化了该区古近系油气成藏规律的认识，且为进一步勘探寻找类似油气藏提供了参考和借鉴。
Abstract:Based upon the exploration data from the major Xijiang depression, we put forward in this paper the two concepts of effective primary migration and effective primary migration area.The effective primary migration of oil and gas depends upon the capability of remigration or secondary migration of oil and gas after charging into the sand body close to the source rocks.The effectiveness is depending on two main factors:one is the occurrence of large-scale sand body near the hydrocarbon source rock and the other is the availability of coarse pore throats within the sand body.The former will decide if there is enough oil and gas for effective primary migration, the latter determines the priority of filling direction of oil and gas.Based on this working hypothesis, we made a comparison between the Xijiang A and Xijiang B structural traps with the exploration results available and discussed the failure of exploration in the Xijiang A region.The conclusion may help further understanding the Paleogene hydrocarbon accumulation in this region and provide a case for the endeavor to look for similar reservoirs.
-
Key words:
- primary migration /
- hydrocarbon source rocks /
- large-scale sand body /
- coarse pore throat /
- Paleogene
-
-
表 1 不同尺度的孔喉半径对应的油柱高度需求
Table 1. The height of oil column required to different pore radius
孔喉半径/μm 毛细管力油/MPa 对应油柱高度/m 1 0.043 17.6 0.1 0.43 175.5 0.01 4.3 1 755.2 0.001 43 17 552 
下载: 导出CSV
表 2 西江A构造与西江B构造孔喉特征及油柱需求
Table 2. The statistics of required height demanding and pore throat characteristics of XJ A and XJ B structures
井名 深度/m 孔隙度/% 渗透率/(×10-3 μm2) 排驱压力/MPa 平均孔喉半径/μm 最大孔吼半径/μm 最小油柱高度需求/m 平均油柱高度需求/m 测井解释 XJ3 4 193 9.6 / 0.893 0.266 0.823 21.3 66 水层 XJ1 4 584 13.4 247 0.021 12.3 35.5 0.49 1.43 油层 XJ1 4 328 13.1 9.6 0.138 1.4 5.33 3.3 12.5 油层 XJ1 4 318 7.2 3.5 0.138 1.26 5.33 3.3 13.9 油层 XJ1 4 236 10.4 15.1 0.096 2.12 7.2 2.4 8.3 油层 XJ1 4 211.5 15.3 39.4 0.069 2.57 10.68 1.6 6.8 油层
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] 洪荆晶, 邓媛.油气运移研究进展综述[J].中国西部科技, 2011, 10(5):15-17. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-6396.2011.05.006
[2] 李传亮, 张景廉, 杜志敏.油气初次运移理论新探[J].地学前缘, 2007, 14(4):132-141. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1005-2321.2007.04.014
[3] 金之钧, 张发强.油气运移研究现状及主要进展[J].石油与天然气地质, 2005, 26(3):263-268. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-9985.2005.03.001
[4] 黄传卿, 张金功.油气初次运移机制与运移方向的研究[J].地下水, 2014, 36(1):181-183. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1184.2014.01.073
[5] Wilson H H.Time of hydrocarbon expulsion, paradox for geologists and geochemists[J].AAPG Bull, 1975, 61:407-415. http://cn.bing.com/academic/profile?id=94ff08809235be2fc55a5918b30cfd38&encoded=0&v=paper_preview&mkt=zh-cn
[6] Levorsen A I.Geology of petroleum[M].2nd ed.San Fran-cisco:W H Freeman, 1967:724.
[7] 邓运华.裂谷盆地油气运移"中转站"模式的实践效果[J].石油学报, 2012, 33(1):18-24. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=syxb201201002
[8] 曹爱武.西江主洼生油潜力分析[J].中国海上油气(地质), 1999, 13(3):198-199. doi: 10.7623/syxb201201002
[9] 杜家元, 施和生, 朱明.西江主洼相对低地温条件下油气成藏特征和勘探潜力分析[J].中国海上油气, 2008, 20(5):287-292. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-1506.2008.05.001
[10] 曾驿, 汪瑞良, 张振波.西江主洼中深层地震采集攻关[J].石油天然气学报:江汉石油学院学报, 2010, 32(2):236-239.
[11] 朱文奇, 梁建设, 郭刚.珠江口盆地西江主洼油气运聚主控因素及运聚模式[J].中国海上油气, 2014, 26(6):14-20. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=zghsyq-gc201406003
[12] 丁亮, 郭刚, 郝建荣.珠一坳陷西江主洼古近系文昌组烃源岩特征及生烃潜力[J].中国海上油气, 2015, 27(5):21-26. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=zghsyq-gc201505003
[13] 李明诚.石油与天然气运移研究综述[J].石油勘探与开发, 2000, 27(4):3-9. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0747.2000.04.002
[14] 金之钧, 张发强.油气运移研究现状及主要进展[J].石油与天然气地质, 2005, 26(3):263-268. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-9985.2005.03.001
[15] 安作相, 马纪, 庞奇伟.油气运移研究进展[J].新疆石油地质, 2008, 29(6):775-777. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=xjsydz200806032
[16] 康德江.碎屑岩中油气初次运移输导体系分类及特征[J].石油实验地质, 2009, 33(5):455-460. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-6112.2009.05.004
[17] 王新洲, 周迪贤, 王学军.流体间歇压裂运移—石油初次运移的重要方式之一[J].石油勘探与开发, 1994, 21(1):20-26. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=QK199400717675
[18] 罗晓容.油气初次运移的动力学背景与条件[J].石油学报, 2001, 22(6):24-28. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=syxb200106005
[19] 李传亮.油气初次运移机理分析[J].新疆石油地质, 2005, 26(3):331-334. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3873.2005.03.032
[20] 姜振学, 庞雄奇, 曾溅辉.油气优势运移通道的类型及其物理模拟实验研究[J].地学前缘, 2005, 12(4):507-514. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1005-2321.2005.04.020
[21] 庞雄奇, 周新源, 董月霞.含油气盆地致密砂岩类油气藏成因机制与资源潜力[J].中国石油大学学报:自然科学版, 2013, 37(5):28-37. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=sydxxb201305005
[22] 黄传卿, 张金功, 席辉.油气初次运移机制与运移方向的研究[J].地下水, 2014, 36(1):181-183. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1184.2014.01.073
[23] 付广, 邓玮, 王伟.不同形态砂体油气运移路径分布控制因素及预测方法[J].西安石油大学学报:自然科学版, 2016, 31(3):23-29. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=xasyxyxb201603004
[24] 郭迎春, 宋岩, 庞雄奇.连续型致密砂岩气近源累计聚集的特征及成因机制[J].地球科学, 2016, 41(3):434-439. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=dqkx201603010
-
图(10)
表(2)
计量
- 文章访问数: 901
- PDF下载数: 82
- 施引文献: 0