BEACH MAINTENANCE AND NOURISHMENT WITH DREDGED SANDS ON TRóIA PENINSULA, PORTUGAL
-
摘要:
葡萄牙特洛亚半岛海滩近十余年受到强烈侵蚀，海浪冲刷到数千万年稳定的古罗马遗址，在2006—2007年，当局将28.6万m3港口航道疏浚沙抛填至海滩上，进行养滩修复，效果较好，扩宽了干滩，稳定了古罗马遗址，发展了旅游业。这不仅是一个完美高效的养滩工程，而且还是一个极其节约的工程，使用疏浚沙不仅降低了运输费，还为港口节约了购买抛沙海域的费用。我国港口航道甚多，每年至少约有8亿m3疏浚沙，很少用于养滩工程，反而购置河道沙和邻近河口沙。若改用疏浚沙养滩，可极大地降低养护成本，既可节约购沙经费，还可为港口部门节约抛沙海域的购置费用，而且也能为抛沙取沙海域维持正常的航运环境。
Abstract:The beaches on PortugueseTróia Peninsula have been intensively eroded for more than ten years. Waves have gradually washed away some of the ancient Roman constructions which have stand there for tens of thousands years. From 2006 to 2007, the Portuguese authorities carried out a large project. 286, 000 m3of sand were dredged from the port waterway and nourished onto the beach and a beach rehabilitation project was then initiated. As the results, dry beach is widened, the ancient Roman ruins restablized and tourism developed. This is not only a perfect and efficient beach maintenance project, but also a conservation project. The use of dredged sand not only reduced transportation costs, but also saved the budget for purchase water areas for sand throwing.There are a lot of port and waterway in China. At least 800 million m3 of sand are dredged every year. However, they are seldom used for beach maintenance. On the contrary, land sand and adjacent estuary sand are purchased for beach management. If the beach is maintained with dredging sand, the maintenance cost can be greatly reduced.We may save funds not only for purchasing sand, but also for purchasing the water areas to be managed. On the other hand, the normal shipping environment will not be effected.
-
Key words:
- dredging sediment /
- beach conservation /
- sand source /
- Tróia Peninsula
-
-
[1] 柯马尔P D.海滩过程与沉积作用[M].北京:海洋出版社, 1985.
[2] 迪安, 蔡锋, 曹惠美, 等.海滩养护:理论与实践[M].北京:海洋出版社, 2010.
[3] 庄振业, 杨燕雄, 刘会欣.环渤海砂质岸侵蚀和海滩养护[J].海洋地质前沿, 2013, 29(2):1-9. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=hydzdt201302001
[4] 蔡峰.中国海滩养护技术手册[M].北京:海洋出版社, 2015.
[5] 庄振业, 王永红, 包敏, 等.海滩养护过程和工程技术[J].中国海洋大学学报:自然科学版, 2009, 39(5):1019-1024. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=qdhydxxb200905025
[6] Silveira T M, Kraus N C, Psuty N P, et al. Beach Nourishment on Tróia Peninsula, Portugal[J]. Journal of Coastal Research, 2011, 59(1):173-180. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=hydzdt201902005
[7] Silveira T M, Santos C F, Andrade F. Beneficial use of dredged sand for beach nourishment and coastal landform enhancement—the case study of Tróia, Portugal[J]. Journal of Coastal Conservation, 2013, 17(4):825-832. doi: 10.1007/s11852-013-0283-y
[8] Quevauviller P. Estuário do Soda-Costa da Galé. Análise Geomorfológica e estudo de alguns aspectos sedimentológicos[J]. Internal Report for the Direccao Geral de Ordenamento, 1985:85.
[9] Carapuço A M.Morfodinamica do vértice noroeste da península de Tróia[D]. Lisbon: Universidade do Algarve, 2005: 70.
[10] IMAR.Relatório do Programa de Monitorização Ambiental do projecto da Marina e novo Cais dos "ferries" do Troiaresort. Submitted to IMOAREIA-Investimentos Turísticos[D]. SGPS, SA, 2009: 296.
[11] Islam S, Parks J.Economic assessment of dredging operations in Mobile Bay, USA and some additional notes on sustainable management of dredged material[J]. Journal of Coastal Conservation, 2014, 18(3):157-165. doi: 10.1007/s11852-013-0301-0
[12] Fletemeyer J, Hearin J, Haus B, et al.The Impact of Sand Nourishment on Beach Safety[J]. Journal of Coastal Research, 2018, 341(1):1-5.
[13] 胡广元, 庄振业, 高伟.欧洲各国海滩养护概观和启示[J].海洋地质动态, 2008, 24(12):29-33. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-2722.2008.12.007
[14] Finkl C W, Walker H J. Beach nourishment [C]//Chen J, Hotta K, Eisma D, et al. Engineered Coasts. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer, 2002: 1-22.
[15] Marinho B, Coelho C, Larson M, et al.Monitoring the evolution of nearshore nourishments along Barra-Vagueira coastal stretch, Portugal[J]. Ocean & Coastal Management, 2018, 157:23-39. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=83ee1d6d4de92117b3cf8f7d5d15074c
[16] 郑永梓.疏浚土利用中存在的问题及对策分析[J].中国水运, 2018(1):59-60. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=zgsy201801021
[17] 赵德招.长江口12.5 m深水航道运行初期的疏浚效益评价[J].水运工程, 2017(4):111-116. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-4972.2017.04.019
[18] Thomas & Hutton Engineering Co. Dredging and disposal alternatives and techniques[M]. Prepared for South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control, Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management. 2005.
[19] 付桂, 赵德招, 程海峰.国内外疏浚土综合利用现状对比分析[J].水运工程, 2011 (3):90-96. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-4972.2011.03.019
[20] 朱伟, 张春雷, 刘汉龙.疏浚泥的处理再生资源技术的现状[J].环境科学与技术, 2002, 25(4):39-41. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-6504.2002.04.017
[21] 夏雪瑾.长江口泥沙资源可持续利用方案探讨[J].中国水运, 2016, 27(8):46-48. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=zgsy201608017
-
下载:
图(2)
计量
- 文章访问数: 673
- PDF下载数: 50
- 施引文献: 0