THERMO-COMPRESSION CHARACTERISTICS OF HYDROCARBON GENERATION FOR THE SOURCE ROCKS IN THE FUNINGFORMATION OF SOUTH YELLOW SEA BASIN
-
摘要:
通过生烃模拟获取生烃动力学参数是近年来油气资源评价工作中极为重要的一个环节,利用地层热压生排烃模拟装置对南黄海盆地南二凹陷阜四段烃源岩进行了生烃模拟实验,并拟合了生烃动力学参数。实验及研究结果表明,阜四段烃源岩的生烃演化可分为3个阶段:第1阶段产烃量随温度上升快速增大,以产油为主;第2阶段产烃量随温度上升缓慢增加,为油、气同产;第3阶段产烃量随温度上升快速增大,主要是以生气为主。实验拟合出阜四段烃源岩的生油活化能为228 kJ/mol,生气活化能为280 kJ/mol。与常压—完全开放体系试验、金管-高压釜实验装置的实验结果对比,本次实验南黄海盆地阜四段烃源岩在地层热压条件下出现生油窗滞后现象,烃源岩样品在高成熟演化阶段依然具有较高的液态烃产率。阜四段生油活化能值较高,其内在原因是有机质受到烃源岩孔隙中高压水的“保护”作用以及受生烃空间的影响,延缓了烃源岩的热演化进程。综合前人实验结果分析,有限空间热压生烃模拟实验环境更接近于烃源岩在地层条件下的生烃条件,实验结果对南黄海盆地的油气资源潜力评价及油气勘探方向具有指导意义。
Abstract:The kinetics data of hydrocarbon generation is very important to hydrocarbon resource evaluation. The source rock samples taken from the 4th Member of the Funing Formation in the Naner Sag of the South Yellow Sea Basin are used in this paper for thermo-compression simulation and fitting experiment of kinetic parameters for hydrocarbon generation. The results suggest that the generation of hydrocarbon in the 4th Member of the Funing Formation can be subdivided into three stages. In the first stage, hydrocarbon production dominated by oil increased rapidly with the rise of temperature. In the second stage, with the increase in temperature, hydrocarbon production including both oil and gas increased slowly. In the third stage, hydrocarbon production, dominated by gas, increased rapidly with the rise of temperature. The experimental results show that the activation energy for oil generation and gas generation is 228 kJ/mol and 280 kJ/mol, Respectively. Compared with the results from conventional experiment under open system and the gold tube autoclave test for the source rock samples of the Funing Formation, a lag phenomenon is noticed. The source rock samples still have high liquid hydrocarbon production in the highly matured stage. The activation energy value of the 4th Member of Funing Formation derived from this experiment is higher than that in the other two cases of experiment. It is believed that the evolution of organic matter is protected by the high pressure porewater and influenced by the hydrocarbon generation space, which caused the delay of the thermal evolution process of the source rock. Based on the comprehensive analysis of this experiment and previous experimental results, the experiment environment of the thermo-compression simulation for hydrocarbon generation in finite space is concluded, which is closer to the geological conditions for hydrocarbon generation, and results of this experiment are useful to oil and gas resource evaluation and exploration in the South Yellow Sea Basin
-
-
[1] 陈建文,梁杰,张银国,等. 中国海域油气资源潜力分析与黄东海海域油气资源调查进展[J]. 海洋地质与第四纪地质,2019,39(6):1-29.
[2] 陈建文,张银国,欧光习,等. 南黄海古生界油气多期成藏的包体证据[J]. 海洋地质前沿,2018,34(2):69-70.
[3] 陈建文,张银国,欧光习. 南黄海崂山隆起志留系古油藏的深部烃源证据[J]. 海洋地质前沿,2019,35(1):74-76.
[4] 陈建文,施剑,刘俊,等. 南黄海海相中—古生界地震地质条件[J]. 海洋地质前沿,2016,32(10):1-8.
[5] 许红,张海洋,张柏林,等. 南黄海盆地26口钻井特征[J]. 海洋地质前沿,2015,31(4):1-6.
[6] 陈建文,雷宝华,梁杰,等. 南黄海盆地油气资源调查新进展[J]. 海洋地质与第四纪地质,2018,38(3):1-23.
[7] 陈建文,肖国林,刘守全,等. 中国海域油气资源勘查战略研究[J]. 海洋地质与第四纪地质,2003,23(4):77-82.
[8] TISSOT B P, WELTE D H. Petroleum Formation and Occurrence[M]. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1984.
[9] 饶松,胡圣标,汪集旸,等. 有机质生烃动力学参数研究进展:回顾和展望[J]. 地球物理学进展,2010,25(4):1424-1432. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-2903.2010.04.034
[10] 刘立峰,姜振学,钟宁宁,等. 辽河西部凹陷古近系烃源岩生烃动力学特征[J]. 地球科学:中国地质大学学报,2009,34(5):799-805.
[11] 王民,卢双舫,薛海涛,等. 烃源岩非均质性对有机质生烃动力学参数影响及评价[J]. 地球科学:中国地质大学学报,2011,36(3):530-540.
[12] 郑伦举,马中良,王强,等. 烃源岩有限空间热解生油气潜力定量评价研究[J]. 石油实验地质,2011,33(5):452-459. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-6112.2011.05.003
[13] 郭小文,何生,刘可禹,等. 烃源岩生气增压定量评价模型及影响因素[J]. 地球科学:中国地质大学学报,2013,38(6):1263-1270.
[14] 郑伦举,关德范,郭小文,等. 影响海相烃源岩热解生烃过程的地质条件[J]. 地球科学:中国地质大学学报,2015,40(5):909-917.
[15] 蒋启贵,马媛媛,李欣,等. 单冷阱热解色谱仪在烃源岩评价中的应用[J]. 石油实验地质,2011,33(5):546-551,558. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-6112.2011.05.019
[16] 郑伦举,何生,秦建中,等. 近临界特性的地层水及其对烃源岩生排烃过程的影响[J]. 地球科学:中国地质大学学报,2011,36(1):83-92.
[17] 汤庆艳,张铭杰,张同伟,等. 生烃热模拟实验方法述评[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版),2013,35(1):52-62.
[18] 冯志强,陈春峰,姚永坚,等. 南黄海北部前陆盆地的构造演化与油气突破[J]. 地学前缘,2008,15(6):219-231. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1005-2321.2008.06.029
[19] 陈春峰,施剑,徐东浩,等. 南黄海崂山隆起形成演化及对油气成藏的影响[J]. 海洋地质与第四纪地质,2018,38(3):55-65.
[20] 陈春峰. 南黄海盆地中部隆起构造分区与有利区带[J]. 东华理工大学学报(自然科学版),2020,43(2):137-144.
[21] 陈春峰. 新构造运动在南黄海盆地的表现及其对油气成藏的影响[J]. 沉积与特提斯地质,2019,39(3):84-91. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-3850.2019.03.010
[22] 耿新华,耿安松,熊永强,等. 海相碳酸盐岩烃源岩热解动力学研究:全岩和干酪根的对比[J]. 地球化学,2005,34(6):612-618. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0379-1726.2005.06.008
[23] 李双林, 董贺平, 王建强, 等.南黄海盆地崂山隆起中南部海域油气目标地球化学探测: 海底油气渗漏与双环状地球化学异常[J]. 海洋地质与第四纪地质, 2020, 40(2): 135-147
[24] 郑伦举,马中良. 中国石化无锡石油地质研究所实验地质技术之地层孔隙热压生排烃模拟实验技术[J]. 石油实验地质,2010,32(3):202.
[25] 马中良,郑伦举,李志明. 烃源岩有限空间温压共控生排烃模拟实验研究[J]. 沉积学报,2012,30(5):955-963.
[26] 付小东,秦建中,姚根顺,等. 两种温压体系下烃源岩生烃演化特征对比及其深层油气地质意义[J]. 地球化学,2017,46(3):262-275. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0379-1726.2017.03.006
[27] 苏鹏,徐建永,汪航,等. 南黄海盆地南二凹古近系泥岩生烃动力学特征[J]. 高校地质学报,2019,25(6):871-878.
[28] 仝志刚,席小应,王鹏,等. 南黄海盆地南五凹油气资源潜力再评价:基于生烃动力学数值模拟方法[J]. 中国海上油气,2017,29(1):23-28.
[29] PEPPER A S,CORVI J. Simple kinetic models of petroleum formation. Part I:oil and gas generation from kerogen[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology,1995,12(3):291-319. doi: 10.1016/0264-8172(95)98381-E
[30] 余晓露,马中良,郑伦举,等. 不同热模拟方式下烃源岩干酪根演化特征红外光谱分析[J]. 石油实验地质,2017,39(1):134-140. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201701134
-