中国地质环境监测院
中国地质灾害防治工程行业协会
主办

滑坡预测预报中改进的Pearl模型及其应用

贺小黑. 2020. 滑坡预测预报中改进的Pearl模型及其应用. 中国地质灾害与防治学报, 31(6): 91-95. doi: 10.16031/j.cnki.issn.1003-8035.2020.06.11
引用本文: 贺小黑. 2020. 滑坡预测预报中改进的Pearl模型及其应用. 中国地质灾害与防治学报, 31(6): 91-95. doi: 10.16031/j.cnki.issn.1003-8035.2020.06.11
HE Xiaohei. 2020. An improved Pearl model for landslide forecast and its application. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control, 31(6): 91-95. doi: 10.16031/j.cnki.issn.1003-8035.2020.06.11
Citation: HE Xiaohei. 2020. An improved Pearl model for landslide forecast and its application. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control, 31(6): 91-95. doi: 10.16031/j.cnki.issn.1003-8035.2020.06.11

滑坡预测预报中改进的Pearl模型及其应用

  • 基金项目:

    东华理工大学博士启动基金项目(DHBK2017139);东华理工大学2019年实验技术开放项目(DHSYKF-2019-007)

详细信息
    作者简介: 贺小黑(1984-),男,博士,讲师,主要从事边坡稳定性评价和失稳预报方面的研究。E-mail:307986245@qq.com
  • 中图分类号: P642.22

An improved Pearl model for landslide forecast and its application

  • 针对选点法和变换法在求取Pearl模型参数时误差较大的缺陷,且预报判据缺乏足够论证,可能导致预测预报准确度较低问题,将非线性拟合确定参数的方法应用到Pearl模型的滑坡预测预报中,推导了Pearl模型速度和加速度最大值判据预报滑坡发生时间的计算公式。将非线性拟合确定参数的方法和推导的判据计算公式应用于一些滑坡实例的预报中,结果表明:滑坡实际发生时间介于Pearl模型速度最大值判据和加速度最大值判据的预报时间之间,用Pearl模型加速度最大值判据能起到提前预报的作用。
  • 加载中
  • [1]

    孙景恒, 李振明, 苏万益. Pearl模型在边坡失稳时间预报中的应用[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报, 1993, 4(2):38-43.[SUN J H, LI Z M, SU W Y. Application of Pearl model on landslide forecast[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control, 1993, 4(2):38-43.(in Chinese)]

    [2]

    孙景恒, 李振明. Pearl生长模型预报边坡失稳破坏时间[J]. 华北水利水电学院学报, 1993:37-42.[SUN J H, LI Z M. Application of Pearl model on landslide forecast[J]. Journal of North China Institute of Water Conservancy and Hydroelectric Power, 1993:37-42.(in Chinese)]

    [3]

    文伯健,李文娟. China-PEARL和PRZM-GW模型潍坊市场景农药地下水风险评估研究[J]. 农业资源与环境学报, 2014, 31(5):401-410.[WEN B J, LI W J. Pesticide groundwater risk assessment with China-PEARL and PRZM-GW model in Weifang City scenario[J]. Journal of Agricultural Resources and Environment, 2014, 31(5):401-410.(in Chinese)]

    [4]

    熊文兰. 利用PEARL模型评价农药渗透对地下水的污染[D]. 重庆:西南农业大学, 2004.[XIONG W L. The hazard evaluation of pesticide leaching into ground water by PEARL model[D]. Chongqing:Southwest Agriculture College, 2004. (in Chinese)]

    [5]

    郭晓昕. 基于等时距Pearl曲线的某电厂沉降预测[D]. 邯郸:河北工程大学, 2015.[GUO X X. Settlement prediction of a power plant based on equal time distance Pearl curve[D]. Handan:Hebei University of Engineering, 2015. (in Chinese)]

    [6]

    缪海波, 殷坤龙, 徐峰. 基于因子分析的滑坡位移多模型预测综合评判[J]. 武汉理工大学学报, 2010, 32(19):65-70.[MIAO H B, YIN K L, XU F. Comprehensive evaluation on multiple predictions of the landslide displacements based on component analysis[J]. Journal of Wuhan University of Technology, 2010, 32(19):65-70.(in Chinese)]

    [7]

    陈小亮. 基于混沌非线性时间序列的滑坡预测预报研究[D]. 南宁:广西大学, 2008.[CHEN X L. Analysis of landslide prediction by chaotic nonlinear time series[D]. Nanning:Guangxi University, 2008. (in Chinese)]

    [8]

    贺小黑, 王思敬, 肖锐铧. Verhulst滑坡预测预报模型的改进及其应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2013, 34(增刊1):355-364.[HE X H, WANG S J, XIAO R H. Improvement of Verhulst forecast model of landslide and its application[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2013, 34(Sup1):355-364.(in Chinese)]

    [9]

    秦四清. 滑坡前兆突变异常识别方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2000, 21(1):36-39.[QIN S Q. Identification approach to abrupt abnormality of landslide forerunners[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2000, 21(1):36-39.(in Chinese)]

  • 加载中
计量
  • 文章访问数:  1069
  • PDF下载数:  54
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
收稿日期:  2020-08-21
修回日期:  2020-09-27

目录