中国地质环境监测院
中国地质灾害防治工程行业协会
主办

梅大高速公路路基边坡失稳条件与滑坡机理初探

岳中琦. 梅大高速公路路基边坡失稳条件与滑坡机理初探[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报, 2024, 35(4): 1-12. doi: 10.16031/j.cnki.issn.1003-8035.202408001
引用本文: 岳中琦. 梅大高速公路路基边坡失稳条件与滑坡机理初探[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报, 2024, 35(4): 1-12. doi: 10.16031/j.cnki.issn.1003-8035.202408001
YUE Zhongqi. Study on the instability condition and landslide mechanism of subgrade slope in Mei–Da Expressway[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control, 2024, 35(4): 1-12. doi: 10.16031/j.cnki.issn.1003-8035.202408001
Citation: YUE Zhongqi. Study on the instability condition and landslide mechanism of subgrade slope in Mei–Da Expressway[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control, 2024, 35(4): 1-12. doi: 10.16031/j.cnki.issn.1003-8035.202408001

梅大高速公路路基边坡失稳条件与滑坡机理初探

  • 基金项目: 国家自然科学基金项目(41372336)
详细信息
    作者简介: 岳中琦(1962—),男,安徽宣城人,教授,主要从事岩土工程、地质地震灾害防治方面的研究。E-mail:Yueqzq@hku.hk
  • 中图分类号: P642.22

Study on the instability condition and landslide mechanism of subgrade slope in Mei–Da Expressway

  • 文章对广东梅大(梅州—大埔)高速公路路基边坡失稳和滑坡的成因机制进行了初步研究和分析,基于香港路基边坡失稳滑坡调查研究资料、成果和现场勘察获得了失稳路基边坡附近完全风化花岗岩土的颗粒分布和液限塑限含水率,定量计算、分析了该段路基边坡稳定性。通过Google地形图分析了失稳路基边坡附近的几个可能汇水区域和汇水量,对该路基边坡失稳与滑流的成因机制进行了分析。研究认为山坡公路建设需要开挖削坡和填土,可完全改变自然山坡汇水流域;公路可成为瞬态河流,将大量雨水跨流域调流到其他公路边坡或山坡,导致边坡失稳和滑坡,形成公路坍塌丢失。这种路基边坡失稳模式亟待深入研究并加强防范。

  • 加载中
  • 图 1  路基边坡失稳滑坡的3个实例

    Figure 1. 

    图 2  失稳路基边坡附近山坡完全风化花岗岩土体3个取样点的现场照片

    Figure 2. 

    图 3  梅大高速公路路基边坡失稳滑坡前的自然冲沟和可能公路跨流域调水汇水盆地

    Figure 3. 

    图 4  2#完全风化花岗岩土样从砾粒到黏粒的19组颗粒物质

    Figure 4. 

    图 5  失稳路基边坡附近山坡的完全风化花岗岩土的颗粒大小质量分布曲线

    Figure 5. 

    图 6  2#土样5组砾粒的立体显微镜图像

    Figure 6. 

    图 7  2#土样8组砂粒的立体显微镜图像

    Figure 7. 

    图 8  2#土样的粉粒、黏粒的扫描电镜图像

    Figure 8. 

    图 9  3个完全风化花岗岩土样的塑限指数与液限对应关系

    Figure 9. 

    图 10  路基边坡地质力学的简化模型剖面

    Figure 10. 

    图 11  路基边坡稳定性安全系数分布参数分析结果

    Figure 11. 

    图 12  路基边坡失稳滑坡后现场照片和沿C冲沟最小滑移距离和高程

    Figure 12. 

    图 13  路基边坡失稳后滑坡沿C冲沟最大滑移距离和高程

    Figure 13. 

    图 14  边坡失稳后滑坡最小滑坡流动角与滑坡体积的香港统计数据关系

    Figure 14. 

    图 15  梅大高速公路路基边坡失稳滑坡后的B、C、D冲沟和可能公路跨流域调水汇水盆地

    Figure 15. 

    图 16  梅大高速公路路基边坡失稳滑坡段的公路与上方山坡之间存在洪水残留土石体

    Figure 16. 

    图 17  梅州地区高速公路经常使用的路边隔水条

    Figure 17. 

    图 18  B、C、D冲沟汇合的径流汇入鸭塘(土坝)的现场照片

    Figure 18. 

    图 19  香港南朗山道跨流域调水、汇入山坡径流形成河流的现场照片

    Figure 19. 

  • [1]

    殷跃平. 地质灾害风险调查评价方法与应用实践[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报,2022,33(4):I − II. [YIN Yueping. Geological hazard risk investigation and evaluation method and its application practice[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control,2022,33(4):I − II. (in Chinese )] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-8035.2022.4.zgdzzhyfzxb202204001

    YIN Yueping. Geological hazard risk investigation and evaluation method and its application practice[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control, 2022, 33(4): I − II. (in Chinese ) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-8035.2022.4.zgdzzhyfzxb202204001

    [2]

    岳中琦. 香港滑坡灾害防治和社会效益[J]. 工程地质学报,2006,14(增刊1):12 − 17. [YUE Zhongqi. Hong Kong landslip prevention and its social benefits[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology,2006,14(Sup 1):12 − 17. (in Chinese with English abstract)]

    YUE Zhongqi. Hong Kong landslip prevention and its social benefits[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology, 2006, 14(Sup 1): 12 − 17. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [3]

    Geotechnical Engineering Office. Highway slope manual [R]. Hong Kong:Civil Engineering and Development Department,The Government of the Hong Kong Special Administration Region,2000:116.

    [4]

    黎佐贤. 一九九五年八月十三日深湾道山泥倾泻事件报告[R]//第一册:就土力工程处的调查所作的独立检讨. 香港:香港政府,1996:12. [SIR JOHN KNILL. Independent review of the investigation by the geotechnical engineering office[R]//Volume 1 of the report on the Shum Wan Road landslide of 13 August 1995. Hong Kong:Hong Kong Government,1996:12. (in Chinese)]

    SIR JOHN KNILL. Independent review of the investigation by the geotechnical engineering office[R]//Volume 1 of the report on the Shum Wan Road landslide of 13 August 1995. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Government, 1996: 12. (in Chinese)

    [5]

    土力工程处. 一九九五年八月十三日深湾道山泥倾泻事件报告[R]//第二册:山泥倾泻调查结果. 香港:香港政府土木工程署土力工程处,1996:49. [GEO. Findings of the landslide investigation[R]//Volume 2 of the report on the Shum Wan Road landslide of 13 August 1995. Hong Kong:Geotechnical Engineering Office(GEO),Hong Kong Government,1996:49. (in Chinese)]

    GEO. Findings of the landslide investigation[R]//Volume 2 of the report on the Shum Wan Road landslide of 13 August 1995. Hong Kong: Geotechnical Engineering Office(GEO), Hong Kong Government, 1996: 49. (in Chinese)

    [6]

    YUE Zhongqi. Report surface drainage analysis of the 1995 Shum Wan road landslide site[R]. Expert witness report prepared for the Department of Justice,HKSAR Government,1999:4.

    [7]

    YUE Zhongqi. Supplementary report no. 1 surface drainage analysis of the 1995 Shum Wan road landslide site[R]. Expert witness report prepared for the Department of Justice,HKSAR Government,2000:5.

    [8]

    YUE Zhongqi. Supplementary report no. 2 surface drainage analysis of the 1995 Shum Wan road landslide site[R]. Expert witness report prepared for the Department of Justice,HKSAR Government,2000:10.

    [9]

    岳中琦,徐前. 现今斜坡工程安全设计理论的根本缺陷与灾难后果[J]. 岩土工程学报,2014,36(9):1601 − 1606. [YUE Zhongqi,XU Qian. Fundamental drawbacks and disastrous consequences of current geotechnical safety design theories for slopes[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,2014,36(9):1601 − 1606. (in Chinese with English abstract)] doi: 10.11779/CJGE201409005

    YUE Zhongqi, XU Qian. Fundamental drawbacks and disastrous consequences of current geotechnical safety design theories for slopes[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2014, 36(9): 1601 − 1606. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.11779/CJGE201409005

    [10]

    岳中琦. 全球岩土工程领域共同挑战性问题的土力学理论根源[J]. 岩土工程学报,2015,37(增刊2):11 − 15. [YUE Zhongqi. Challenging issues in global geotechnical profession caused by soil mechanics[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,2015,37(Sup2):11 − 15. (in Chinese with English abstract)] doi: 10.11779/CJGE2015S2003

    YUE Zhongqi. Challenging issues in global geotechnical profession caused by soil mechanics[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2015, 37(Sup2): 11 − 15. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.11779/CJGE2015S2003

    [11]

    MA Shengnan,SONG Yi,LIU Jiawei,et al. Extended wet sieving method for determination of complete particle size distribution of general soils[J]. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering,2024,16(1):242 − 257. doi: 10.1016/j.jrmge.2023.03.006

    [12]

    Geotechnical Engineering Office. Geoguide 1:Guide to retain wall design[S]. Hong Kong:Civil Engineering and Development Department,The Government of the Hong Kong Special Administration Region,2017:245.

    [13]

    岳中琦,康兴宇. 土质斜坡存在唯一最小安全系数的数据作图论证及原因分析[J]. 工程地质学报,2022,30(1):83 − 100. [YUE Zhongqi,KANG Xingyu. Existence and reason of a global minimum factor of safety of soil slopes[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology,2022,30(1):83 − 100. (in Chinese with English abstract)]

    YUE Zhongqi, KANG Xingyu. Existence and reason of a global minimum factor of safety of soil slopes[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology, 2022, 30(1): 83 − 100. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [14]

    张明,殷跃平,吴树仁,等. 高速远程滑坡-碎屑流运动机理研究发展现状与展望[J]. 工程地质学报,2010,18(6):805 − 817. [ZHANG Ming,YIN Yueping,WU Shuren,et al. Development status and prospects of studies on kinematics of long runout rock avalanches[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology,2010,18(6):805 − 817. (in Chinese with English abstract)] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9665.2010.06.001

    ZHANG Ming, YIN Yueping, WU Shuren, et al. Development status and prospects of studies on kinematics of long runout rock avalanches[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology, 2010, 18(6): 805 − 817. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9665.2010.06.001

    [15]

    Geotechnical Engineering Office. Guidelines for classification of consequence-to-life category for slope features,GEO Technical Guidance Note No. 15 (TGN 15) [S]. Hong Kong:Geotechnical Engineering Office,Civil Engineering and Development Department,The Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region,2007:14.

    [16]

    土力工程处. 斜坡岩土工程手册[S]. 香港:香港特别行政区政府土木工程署,1998:308. [GEO. Geotechnical manual for slopes[S]. Hong Kong:Geotechnical Engineering Office,Civil Engineering and Development Department,1998:308. (in Chinese)]

    GEO. Geotechnical manual for slopes[S]. Hong Kong: Geotechnical Engineering Office, Civil Engineering and Development Department, 1998: 308. (in Chinese)

    [17]

    任雾,陈蕾,刘昱秀. 梅大高速涉事边坡:脆弱地带与养护之困[N/OL]. 澎湃人物,(2024-05-12)[2024-07-15]. https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1798838205926423083&wfr=spider&for=pc [REN Wu,CHEN Lei,LIU Yuxiu. The slope involved in Mei–Da Expressway:The fragile zone and the difficulty of maintenance[N/OL]. The Paper Person,(2024-05-12)[2024-07-15].(in Chinese)]

    REN Wu, CHEN Lei, LIU Yuxiu. The slope involved in Mei–Da Expressway: The fragile zone and the difficulty of maintenance[N/OL]. The Paper Person, (2024-05-12)[2024-07-15].(in Chinese)

  • 加载中

(19)

计量
  • 文章访问数:  725
  • PDF下载数:  131
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
收稿日期:  2024-08-01
修回日期:  2024-08-06
刊出日期:  2024-08-25

目录