中国地质调查局西安地质调查中心主办
高级检索

吐哈盆地小草湖凹陷东缘侏罗系煤系烃源岩埋藏史、热演化史模拟

,  ,  ,  , 

文章导航 > 西北地质 > 2021 > 54(4): 180-191

上一篇

下一篇

吴琰杰, 王帅, 何磊, 王紫笛, 聂国权. 2021. 吐哈盆地小草湖凹陷东缘侏罗系煤系烃源岩埋藏史、热演化史模拟. 西北地质, 54(4): 180-191. doi: 10.19751/j.cnki.61-1149/p.2021.04.014
引用本文: 吴琰杰, 王帅, 何磊, 王紫笛, 聂国权. 2021. 吐哈盆地小草湖凹陷东缘侏罗系煤系烃源岩埋藏史、热演化史模拟. 西北地质, 54(4): 180-191. doi: 10.19751/j.cnki.61-1149/p.2021.04.014
shu
WU Yanjie, WANG Shuai, HE Lei, WANG Zidi, NIE Guoquan. 2021. Research on the Burial History and the Thermal Evolution History of the Jurassic Coal-Measure Source Rocks in the Eastern Margin of Xiaocaohu Sag. Northwestern Geology, 54(4): 180-191. doi: 10.19751/j.cnki.61-1149/p.2021.04.014
Citation: WU Yanjie, WANG Shuai, HE Lei, WANG Zidi, NIE Guoquan. 2021. Research on the Burial History and the Thermal Evolution History of the Jurassic Coal-Measure Source Rocks in the Eastern Margin of Xiaocaohu Sag. Northwestern Geology, 54(4): 180-191. doi: 10.19751/j.cnki.61-1149/p.2021.04.014
shu

吐哈盆地小草湖凹陷东缘侏罗系煤系烃源岩埋藏史、热演化史模拟

  • 1. 黄河交通学院交通工程学院, 河南 焦作 4540001;

  • 2. 长安大学, 陕西 西安 710061;

  • 3. 中国地质调查局成都地质调查中心, 四川 成都 610081;

  • 4. 中国石油东方地球物理公司, 四川 成都 610081;

  • 5. 中国地质科学院岩溶地质研究所, 广西 桂林 541004

  • 基金项目:

    国家自然科学基金项目“钻井附近地层随钻三维声速成像测井理论与方法研究”（41474092）。

详细信息
    作者简介: 吴琰杰(1987-),男,讲师,主要从事于地质勘探、物探技术。E-mail:57943213@qq.com。

  • 中图分类号: TE122

Research on the Burial History and the Thermal Evolution History of the Jurassic Coal-Measure Source Rocks in the Eastern Margin of Xiaocaohu Sag

  • 1. School of Traffic Engineering, Yellow River Transportation University, Jiaozuo 4540001, Henan, China;

  • 2. Chang'an University, Xi'an 710061, Shaanxi, China;

  • 3. Chengdu Geological Survey Center, China Geological Survey, Chengdu 610081, Sichuan, China;

  • 4. Petrochina Oriental Geophysics Company, Chengdu 610081, Sichuan, China;

  • 5. Institute of Karst Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Guilin 541004, Guangxi, China

    摘要
  • 小草湖凹陷东缘侏罗系是吐哈盆地台北凹陷潜在油气勘探地层，但目前该地层烃源岩埋藏情况及生烃潜力未落实。本次研究利用盆地模拟技术结合实际数据对小草湖凹陷东缘侏罗系煤系烃源岩的埋藏史、热演化史进行了模拟分析。研究结果显示，侏罗系沉积速率最大可达70 m/Ma；从侏罗系开始研究区地层热流值一直处于减小状态，模拟所得各井最大温度在120~160℃；研究区中、下侏罗统烃源岩大约在白垩纪晚期—侏罗纪早期开始进入早期生油阶段，对应的门限深度大约为2 200 m，现今处于低成熟-中等成熟阶段。该结果对小草湖地区油气资源勘探开发具有一定的借鉴意义。
    In this study, the burial history and thermal evolution history of coal-derived hydrocarbon source rocks in the eastern margin of Xiaocaohu sag were simulated and analyzed by using basin simulation technology and actual data. The results show that Jurassic is the main deposition period of the strata in the study area, and the maximum deposition rate of the strata can be 70 m/Ma. The heat flow value of the strata has been decreasing since the Jurassic, and the maximum temperature of each well obtained from the simulation is between 120℃ and 160℃. The hydrocarbon source rocks of the Middle and Lower Jurassic in the study area entered the early oil production stage in almost the late Cretaceous-early Jurassic, corresponding to a threshold depth of about 2200 m, and are now in the low-middle maturity stage. The results have some implications for the exploration and development of oil and gas resources in the Xiaocaohu area.
    • HTML全文
  • 加载中
    • 参考文献(49)

  • 白忠凯, 杨有星, 邱海峻, 等.塔里木盆地西南坳陷齐姆根凸起侏罗系钻获油气显示[J]. 中国地质, 2018, 45(1):193-194.

    BAI Zhongkai, YANG Youxing, QIU Haijun, et al. The jurassic drilled oil and gas display in the Zimugen uplift in the southwest depression of the Tarim basin[J]. Geology in Chinese, 2018, 45(1):193-194.

    曹代勇, 邵龙义, 张鹏飞.吐哈盆地早、中侏罗世聚煤期古构造[J]. 古地理学报, 1999, 1(2):46-52.

    CAO Daiyong, SHAO Longyi, ZHANG Pengfei. Palaeotectonics in the early and middle jurassic coal-forming periods of the Turpan-hami basin[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography, 1999, 1(2):46-52.

    陈蟒蛟.吐哈盆地演化及数值模拟[D]. 北京:中国石油勘探开发科学研究院, 2004.

    CHEN Mangjiao.Turpan-Hami basin evolution and numerical simulation[D]. Beijing:China Petroleum Exploration and Development Research Institute, 2004.

    陈治军, 孙玉峰, 牟兰异, 等.吐哈盆地北部山前带致密砂岩气藏控藏要素[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2011, 32(2):130-132.

    CHEN Zhijun, SUN Yufeng, MO Lanyi, et al. Key control factors of tight sandstone gas reservoir of piedmont in northern Tuha basin[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2011, 32(2):130-132.

    郭建宇, 张大林, 邓宏文, 等.低勘探程度区域油气资源评价方法[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2006, 13(6):43-45.

    GUO Jianyu, ZHANG Dalin, DENG Hongwen, et al. Resource assessment methodology of oil and gas in the areas of low-degree prospecting[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2006, 13(6):43-45.

    郭秋麟, 米石云, 胡素云, 等.盆地模拟技术在油气资源评价中的作用[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2006, 11(3):50-55.

    GUO Qiulin, MI Shiyun, HU Suyun, et al. Application of basin modeling technology in petroleum resource evaluation[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2006, 11(3):50-55.

    郭秀英, 张艺钟.低勘探程度区域油气区块选择评价指标体系研究[J]. 天然气勘探与开发, 2013, 36(3):27-30.

    GUO Xiuying, ZHANG Yizhong.Study on evaluation index system of oil and gas area selection in low exploration area[J]. Natural Gas Exploration and Development, 2013, 36(3):27-30.

    卢兵力, 李晓东, 耿德祥, 等.松南十屋断陷盆地模拟[J]. 天然气工业, 2000, 20(S1):37-39.

    LU Bingli, LI Xiaodong, GENG Dexiang, et al. Simulation of Songnan Shiwu rift basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2000, 20(S1):37-39.

    柳益群, 周立发.关于地层剥蚀厚度求取方法的讨论:以吐-哈盆地为例[J]. 西北大学学报:自然科学版, 1997, 27(4):337-339.

    LIU Yiqun, ZHOU Lifa.Discussion on the method of obtain-ing the thickness of stratum denudation:Taking the Turpan-Hami basin as an example[J]. Journal of Northwest University:Natural Science Edition, 1997, 27(4):337-339.

    李巧梅, 贺永红, 周玉中.吐哈盆地混源型油气藏的形成、地化特征及混源比例研究[J]. 吐哈油气, 1999, 4(2):1-5.

    LI Qiaomei, HE Yonghong, ZHOU Yuzhong.Formation, geochemical characteristics and mixed source proportion of mixed source reservoirs in Turpan-Hami basin[J]. Journal of Tuha Oil and Gas, 1999, 4(2):1-5.

    李新宁, 李志军, 王劲松, 等.盆地模拟技术在吐哈盆地的应用及分析[J]. 石油天然气学报:江汉石油学院学报, 2005, 27(6):838-842.

    LI Xinning, LI Zhijun, WANG Jinsong, et al. Application and analysis of basin simulation technology in Tuha basin[J]. Journal of Oil and Gas Technology Journal:Jianghan Petroleum Institute, 2005, 27(6):838-842.

    李谋杰, 郭海敏, 蔡炳坤, 等.测井资料-致性处理在井震联合反演中的应用[J]. 石油天然气学报, 2014, 36(5):69-72.

    LI Mojie, GUO Haimin, CAI Bingkun, et al. Application of logging data-induced processing in well joint Surveying[J]. Journal of Oil and Gas Technology, 2014, 36(5):69-72.

    李广庆.基于低勘探程度区域油气资源评价办法[J]. 科技致富向导, 2015, 5:275-275.

    LI Guangqing.Regional oil and gas resources assessment methods based on low exploration level[J]. Get Rich Technology Wizard, 2015, 5:275-275.

    潘磊, 曹强, 刘一茗, 等.伦坡拉盆地始新统牛堡组烃源岩成熟史[J]. 石油实验地质, 2016, 38(3):382-388.

    PAN Lei, CAO Qiang, LIU Yiming, et al. Maturity history of source rocks in the Eocene Niubao formation, Lunpola basin[J]. Petroleum Geology &Experiment, 2016, 38(3):382-388.

    单玄龙, 杨亮, 王璞珺.新疆塔里木盆地东部奥陶系剥蚀厚度计算和平面成图[J]. 新疆地质, 2006, 24(4):389-391.

    SHAN Xuanlong, YANG Liang, WANG Pujun.Denudation thickness calculation and plane mapping of the Ordovician in the eastern Tarim Basin, Xinjiang[J]. Xinjiang Geology, 2006, 24(4):389-391.

    宋党育, 秦勇.镜质组反射率反演的EASY%Ro数值模拟新方法[J]. 煤田地质与勘探, 1998, 26(3):15-17.

    SONG Dangyu, QIN Yong.A New method of easy%Ro numerical simulation for vitrinite reflectance in version[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration, 1998, 26(3):15-17.

    文志刚, 何文祥, 米立军, 等.利用盆地模拟技术评价渤东凹陷下第三系油气勘探潜力[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2004, 15(4):379-382.

    WEN Zhigang, HE Wengxiang, MI Zhijun, et al. Evaluating hydrocarbon exploration potential of lower tertiary in Bodong depression by basin modelling technique[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2004, 15(4):379-382.

    王文建.吐哈盆地油气的相关研究[J]. 中国科技博览, 2013, 11:200-204.

    WANG Wenjian.Correlation Study on Hydrocarbon in Turpan-Hami Basin[J]. China Science and Technology Expo, 2013, 11:200-204.

    苑坤, 陈彬滔, 于兴河, 等.盆地模拟技术与BasinMod软件应用[J]. 沉积与特提斯地质, 2010, 30(2):55-60.

    YUAN Kun, CHEN Bintao, YU Xinghe, et al. Basin simulation technology and BasinMod software application[J]. Sedimentary Geology and Tethyan Geology, 2010, 30(2):55-60.

    张庆春, 李一纯, 米石云.大民屯凹陷二维盆地模拟[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 1994, 21(3):24-32.

    ZHANG Qingchun, LI Yichun, MI Shiyun.2D Basin Simulation in Damintun Depression[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 1994, 21(3):24-32.

    张代生, 季卫华.小草湖洼陷成藏条件分析及有利区带评价[J]. 吐哈油气, 1999, 4(1):11-16.

    ZHANG Daisheng, JI Weihua.Reservoir forming conditions and evaluation of favorable zone in Xiaocaohu depression[J]. Journal of Tuha Oil and Gas, 1999, 4(1):11-16.

    张斌, 王璞珺, 苏玉山, 等.中低勘探程度区块油气条件地质风险评价[J]. 大庆石油地质与开发, 2009, 28(2):24-28.

    ZHANG Bin, WANG Peijun, SU Yushan, et al. Geological risk assessment of oil and gas conditions in low and medium exploring area[J]. Daqing Petroleum Geology and Development, 2009, 28(2):24-28.

    张鲁川, 卢双舫, 肖佃师, 等.基于井震联合反演方法的泥页岩有机碳质量分数预测及应用[J]. 东北石油大学学报, 2015, 39(2):34-41.

    ZHANG Luchuan, LU Shuangfang, XIAO Dianshi, et al. Prediction and application of organic carbon mass fraction in shale based on joint seismic inversion method[J]. Journal of Northeast Petroleum University, 2015, 39(2):34-41.

    张凤奇, 鲁雪松, 钟红利, 等.沉积条件和埋藏过程对深层地层超压的影响[J]. 西北地质, 2019, 52(1):89-97.

    ZHANG Fengqi, LU Xuesong, ZHONG Lihong, el al. Effect of sedimentary conditions and burial process on layers overpressure in deep zones[J]. Northwestern Geology, 2019, 52(1):89-97.

    Premarathne U, Suzuki N, Ratnayake N, et al. Burlal and thermal history modelling of the mannar basin, offshore srilanka[J]. Journal of Petroleum Geology, 2016, 39(2):193-213.

    • 相关文章
  • 施引文献
  • 资源附件(0)
  • 加载中
计量
  • 文章访问数:  822
  • PDF下载数:  45
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
收稿日期:  2020-07-10
修回日期:  2021-05-21

目录

    版权所有：中国地质调查局发展研究中心 copyright @2020
    返回