基于DEM的内蒙古狼山地貌参数提取及其构造抬升的差异性分析

刘晓彤; 张绪教; 叶培盛; 何泽新; 傅连珍; 贾丽云; 何祥丽

基于DEM的内蒙古狼山地貌参数提取及其构造抬升的差异性分析

1.
中国地质大学地球科学与资源学院, 北京 100083

2.
中国地质科学院地质力学研究所, 北京 100081

基金项目:
国土资源部公益性行业科研专项"我国不同季风区古气候演化差异及成因机制研究"(201211077-3);中国地质调查局项目"内蒙古1 :5万呼勒斯太苏木(K48E017024) 等四幅填图试点"(12120114042101);内蒙古国土资源厅2014年地质遗迹保护专题"巴彦淖尔国家地质公园狼山山前构造地貌过程及其环境效应研究"(BSZFCG2015-HW-00403)

详细信息

作者简介: 刘晓彤(1989-), 女, 硕士研究生, 主要研究方向第四纪环境。E-mail:13120366829@163.com

通讯作者: 张绪教(1964-), 男, 博士, 副教授, 主要从事第四纪地质、新构造运动的教学及科研。E-mail:zhangxj@cugb.edu.cn

中图分类号: P542

收稿日期: 2015-09-20

刊出日期: 2016-03-25

EXTRACTION OF TECTONIC GEOMORPHOLOGIC PARAMETRES BASED ON DEM AND ANALYSIS OF DIFFERENCE ON TECTONIC ACTIVITY ABOUT LANGSHAN MOUNTAIN, INNER MONGOLIA

1.
School of Earth Sciences and Resources, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China

2.
Institute of Geomechanics, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Beijing 100081, China

More Information

Corresponding author: ZHANG Xu-jiao, zhangxj@cugb.edu.cn

Received Date: 20 September 2015

Publish Date: 25 March 2016

摘要

摘要:
基于30 m分辨率DEM数据, 利用ArcGIS10.0对内蒙古狼山东南坡河流流域地貌参数进行提取, 精确计算了其中15条规模较大的北西—南东向河流的面积-高程积分值(HI), 并据此对河流发育阶段以及构造运动进行分析。研究结果显示有8条河流的HI值处于0.3~0.6之间, 属于河流发展的壮年阶段; 7条河流的HI值大于0.6, 为幼年期, 未出现老年期河流。狼山西南部河流河谷V1—V14的HI值变化平缓, 波动幅度不大, 构造运动呈现出先增强后减弱的态势; 中北部河流V14—V22的HI值变化较剧烈, 尤其是V14—V19, 呈明显上升趋势, 河流受侵蚀后残存体积增多, 构造运动活跃性下降; V19以北HI值持续下降, 其构造运动的活跃性增加。由此认为狼山从西南到东北总体呈现增强—减弱—增强的差异性运动状态, 该结论与前人所做山前构造地貌研究结果较为一致。
- 新构造运动 /
- DEM /
- 河流地貌面积-高程积分 /
- 内蒙古狼山
Abstract:
This paper extracted the drainage basins of 15 rivers on the southeast slope of Langshan Mountain and narrowly calculated their HI values using ArcGIS10.0 based on 30 meter resolution DEM data, then analysed the tectonic activities and geomophological evolutions in this region. The results showed that the HI values of 8 rivers were between 0.3 and 0.6, indicating that these rivers were in their mature stage; the HI values of 7 rivers were greater than 0.6, stating clearly that these rivers were in their juvenile stage. Moreover, there were no rivers in old age. The HI values of V1~V14 changed gently, with the tectonic movement first increasing and then decreasing. The area-altitude points of V14~V22 changed tempestuously, especially rivers V14~V19, which showed a clear upward trend and the river eroded remnant volume increased in the result the tectonic activity decreased. HI values the rivers north of V19 continued to decline, and its tectonic activity increased. The Langshan Mountain was suggested in enhanced-weakening-enhanced diversity state of motion from the southwest to the northeast with the conclusion of previous work in tectonic geomorphology of the consistent results.
- neotectonics /
- DEM /
- fluvial geomorphology /
- hypsometric integral (HI)

HTML全文

图 1 研究区概况(据文献[23]修改)

Figure 1.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 研究区流域分布

Figure 2.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 水系密度图

Figure 3.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 河谷HI值变化曲线

Figure 4.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 河谷高差与HI对比曲线

Figure 5.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 研究区构造运动变化趋势

Figure 6.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 狼山整体构造运动变化趋势图

Figure 7.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 各流域参数

Table 1. Parameters of every valley

河谷序号	流域面积/km²	河网总长度/km	平均高程/m	河网密度	HI值	高差/m
V2	66.55	40.23	1570	0.605	0.680	649
V3	34.77	20.63	1517	0.593	0.598	676
V4	71.48	38.66	1568	0.541	0.639	698
V5	218.14	119.53	1664	0.548	0.584	920
V7	243.11	131.75	1706	0.542	0.562	1050
V9	63.35	38.76	1688	0.612	0.581	1008
V10	113.05	60.07	1800	0.531	0.650	1053
V13	55.85	30.16	1693	0.540	0.582	1033
V14	149.51	83.72	1852	0.560	0.647	1141
V15	140.34	77.28	1935	0.551	0.674	1217
V18	142.68	71.79	1990	0.503	0.711	1254
V19	376.46	199.58	1893	0.530	0.638	1265
V20	86.13	44.57	1746	0.517	0.585	1110
V21	66.85	37.40	1661	0.559	0.514	1116
V22	123.67	65.53	1692	0.530	0.505	1215

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(30)

[1]	汤国安.我国数字高程模型与数字地形分析研究进展[J].地理学报, 2014, 69, (09):1305~1325 http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DLXB201409007.htm TANG Guo-an.Progress of DEM and digital terrain analysis in China[J].Acta Geographica Sinica, 2014, 69(09):1305~1325. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DLXB201409007.htm
[2]	单菊萍. 基于DEM的雅鲁藏布江河流地貌特征的研究[D]. 中国地质大学(北京), 2007http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JDXK199805011.htm SHAN Ju-ping.Research on the Morphological Features of YarlungZangbo River Based on DEM[D].China University of Geosciences(Beijing), 2007.
[3]	李利波, 徐刚, 胡健民, 等.基于DEM渭河上游流域的活动构造量化分析[J].第四纪研究, 2012, 32(5):866~879 http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DSJJ201205008.htm LI Li-bo, XU Gang, HU Jian-min, et al. Quantitative analysis of relative active tectonics of the upstream region of Weihe River based on DEM [J].Quaternary Sciences, 2012, 32(5):866~879. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DSJJ201205008.htm
[4]	韩海辉. 基于SRTM-DEM的青藏高原地貌特征分析[D]. 兰州大学, 2009http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10730-1015334753.htm HAN Hai-hui. Analysis of geomorphological features of the Tibetan Plateau based on DEM[D].Lanzhou University, 2009.
[5]	A. Demoulin. An automated method to extract fluvial terraces from digital elevation models: The Vesdre valley, a case study in eastern Belgium. Geomorphology, 2007, 91:51~64. doi: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2007.01.020
[6]	M. Font, D. Amorese, J.-L. Lagarde, . DEM and GIS analysis of the stream gradient index to evaluate effects of tectonics: the Normandy intraplate area (NW France) [J].Geomorphology, 2010, 119: 172~180. doi: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2010.03.017
[7]	John T. Hack. Stream-profile analysis and stream-gradient index [J]. U.S. Geological Survey Journal Research, 1: 421~429. http://catalogue.nla.gov.au/Record/3770826
[8]	何祥丽, 张绪教, 何泽新.基于构造地貌参数的新构造运动研究进展与思考[J].现代地质, 2014, 28(1):119~127 http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDDZ201401012.htm HE Xiang-li, ZHANG Xu-jiao, HE Ze-xin. Neotectonics Research Based on Tectonic Geomorphologic Parameters: Progress and Discussion[J].Geoscience, 2014, 28(1):119~127. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDDZ201401012.htm
[9]	宋效东, 刘学军, 汤国安, 等DEM与地形分析的并行计算[J].地理与地理信息科学, 2012, 28, (4):1~7 http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DLGT201204002.htm SONG Xiao-dong, LIU Xue-jun, Tang Guo-an, etal.Parallel Computing of the Digital Elevation Model and Digital Terrain Analysis[J]. Geography and Geo-Information Science, 2012, 28, (4):1~7. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DLGT201204002.htm
[10]	王岩, 刘少峰, 高明星, 等.洮河水系流域地貌特征及其构造指示意义[J].地学前缘, 2010, 17, (4):43~49 http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY201004007.htm WANG Yan, LIU Shao-feng, GAO Ming-xing, et al. Geomorphology of the Taohe River drainage system and its structural implications.Earth Science Frontiers, 2010, 17(4):43~49. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY201004007.htm
[11]	胡小飞, 潘保田, KIRBY Eirc, 等.河道陡峭指数所反映的祁连山北翼抬升速率的东西差异[J].科学通报, 2010, 55(23):2329~2338 http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KXTB201023016.htm HU Xiao-fei, Pan Bao-tian, KIRBY Eirc, et al. Spatial differences in rock uplift rates inferred from channel steepness indices along the northern flank of the Qilian Mountain, northeast Tibetan Plateau [J]. Science China Press, 2010, 55(23):2329~2338. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KXTB201023016.htm
[12]	宋卓沁. 青藏高原东缘典型河流地貌及其活动构造指示[D]. 中国地震局地震预测研究所, 2014http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-DKXB201502020.htm SONG Zhuo-qin.The Geomorphology of the Typical Rivers in the Eastern Tibet and their Active Tectonic Implications[D].Institute of Earthquake Science China, China Earthquake Administration, 2014.
[13]	常直杨, 王建, 白世彪, 等.基于DEM的白龙江流域构造活动定量分析[J].第四纪研究, 2014, 34, (2):292~301 http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DSJJ201402003.htm CHANG Zhi-yang, WANG Jian, BAI Shi-biao, et al.Research on Quantitative Geomorphologic indices of Bailongjiang drainage basin in the eastern Tibet Plateau based on Digital Elevation Models[J].Quaternary Sciences, 2014, 34, (2):292~301. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DSJJ201402003.htm
[14]	信忠保, 许炯心, 马元旭.黄土高原面积-高程分析及其侵蚀地貌学意义[J].山地学报, 2008, 26, (3):356~363 http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SDYA200803024.htm XIN Zhong-bao, XU Jong-xin, MA Yuan-xu. Hypsometric integral analysis and its sediment yield implications in the Plateau, China[J]. Journal of Mountain Science, 2008, 26(3): 356~363. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SDYA200803024.htm
[15]	施炜.黄河中游晋陕峡谷的DEM流域特征分析及其新构造意义[J].第四纪研究, 2008, 28, (2):288~298 http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DSJJ200802013.htm SHI Wei. DEM drainage analysis of the ShanXi-ShaanxiGorge in the middle reaches of the Huanghe River and its neotectonic implications[J]. Quaternary Sciences, 2008, 28(2):288~298. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DSJJ200802013.htm
[16]	高明星, 徐锡伟, 谭锡斌. 地貌参数指示的龙门山最新活动的特征[C] //中国地球物理2012. 北京: 中国地球物理学会, 2012: 269http://industry.wanfangdata.com.cn/dl/Column/Paper?q=%E4%BD%9C%E8%80%85%3A%22Tan%20Xibin%22 GAO Ming-xing, XU Xi-wei, TAN Xi-bin.Geomorphic indices indicated recent tectonic activity of the Longmensha[C] //The Chinese Geophysics 2012. Beijing: Geophysical Society of China, 2012:269.
[17]	郑光佑. 台湾西部麓山带前缘流域面积高度积分之构造意义研究[D]. 台北国立高雄大学, 2002. 33~37http://edu.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/Detail/dsjyj201501006 ZHENG Guang-you.The Implications of Hypsometric Integral for River Basins in the Mountain Front of Western Taiwan[D].National Kaohsiung NormalUniversity, 2002, 33~37.
[18]	Martin D. Hurst, Simon M. Mudd, Mikael Attal, et al.Hillslopes record the growth and decay of landscapes[J].Science, 2013, 341: 868~871. http://www.geos.ed.ac.uk/homes/mattal/CVAttal_Aug16.pdf
[19]	何泽新, 张绪教, 贾丽云, 等.内蒙古狼山山前台地成因及其新构造运动意义[J].现代地质, 2014, 28(1):98~108 http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDDZ201401010.htm HE Ze-xin, ZHANG Xu-jiao, JIA Li-yun, et al.Genesis of Piedmont Terraces and Its Neotectonic Movement SignificanceinLangshan Mountain Area, Inner Mongolia[J].Geoscience, 2014, 28(1):98~108. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDDZ201401010.htm
[20]	江娃利.内蒙狼山—色尔腾山山前活动断裂古地震事件识别及同震垂直位移[J].地壳构造与地壳应力文集, 2003, 15: 45~52 http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SEIS200300005.htm JIANG Wa-li. Paleo-Earthquake Event and Co-Seismic Vertieal Deformation Recognition along the Langshan-Sertenshan Pediment Fault, Inner Mongolia[J].Crustal tectonics and crustal stress, 2003, 15:45~52. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SEIS200300005.htm
[21]	LI YunJia. Late Quaternary climatic and tectonic mechanisms driving river terrace development in an area of mountain uplift: A case study in the Langshanarea, Inner Mongolia, northern China.Geomorphology, 2015, 234:109~121. doi: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2014.12.043
[22]	彭润民, 翟裕生, 韩雪峰, 等.内蒙古狼山造山带构造演化与成矿响应[J].岩石学报, 2007, 23(3):679~688 http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB200703016.htm PENG Run-min, ZHAI Yu-sheng, Han Xue-feng, et al.Mineralization response to structural evolution in the Langshan orogenic belt, Inner Mongolia[J].Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2007, 23(3):679~688. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB200703016.htm
[23]	毕丽思. 基于DEM的活动构造地貌参数研究[D]. 北京: 中国地震局地质研究所, 2011http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Area/CDMDUnitArticle-85402-2011-1.htm BI Li-si, A Study on the Geomorphologic Indexes in Active Tectonics Based on DEM Data[D].Beijing: Institute of Geology China Earthquake Administrations, 2011.
[24]	张敬春, 李川川, 张梅等.格尔木河流域面积-高程积分值的地貌学分析[J].山地学报, 2011, 29(3):257~268 http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SDYA201103001.htm ZHANG Jing-chun, LI Chuan-chuan, ZHANG Mei, et al.Geomorphologic analysis of the Golmud River drainage basin based on Hypsometric-Intrgral Value[J].Journal of Mountain Science, 2011, 29(3):257~268. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SDYA201103001.htm
[25]	Strahler A N.Hypsometric (area-altitude) analysis of erosional topography [J].Bulletin of the Geological Society of America, 1952, 63(1): 1117~1142. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1952GSAB...63.1117S
[26]	Pike R J.Wilson S E. Elevation-relief ratio, hypsometric integral and geomorphic area-altitude analysis [J].Geological Society of America Builetin.1971, 82:1079~1084. doi: 10.1130/0016-7606(1971)82[1079:ERHIAG]2.0.CO;2
[27]	张天琪, 王振, 吕红华.北天山乌鲁木齐河流域面积-高程积分及其地貌意义.第四纪研究, 2015, 35(1):60~70 http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/dsjyj201501006 ZHANG Tian-qi, WANG Zhen, LV Hong-hua, et al.Hypsometric integral analysis of the Urumqi River drainage basin and its implications for topographic evolution[J]. Quaternary Sciences, 2014, 34(2): 281~291. http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/dsjyj201501006
[28]	Lifton N A, Chase C G. Tectonic, climatic and lithologic influences on landscape fractal dimension and hypsometry: Implications for landscape evolution in the San Gabriel Mountains, California[J]. Geomorphology, 1992, 5: 77~114. doi: 10.1016/0169-555X(92)90059-W
[29]	邵建崇, 李勇, 赵国华.基于面积-高程积分对龙门山南段山前河流的构造地貌研究.现代地质, 2015, 29(4):727~737 http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDDZ201504001.htm SHAO Chong-jian, LI Yong, ZHAO Guo-hua. Tectonic geomorphology analysis of piedmont rivers of the southen section LongMen Shan based on Area-Altitude points[J].Geoscience, 2015, 29(4):727~737. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDDZ201504001.htm
[30]	何祥丽, 张绪教, 何泽新, 等.内蒙古狼山地区晚第四纪泥石流发育特征及其构造意义[J].地质通报, 2015, 34(9):1735~1748 http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZQYD201509015.htm HE Xiang-li, ZHANG xu-jiao, HE Ze-xin. Development features of the Late Quaternary debris flow and their tectonic significance in Langshan area, Inner Mongolia[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2015, 34(9):1735~1748. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZQYD201509015.htm