THEORETICAL DEVELOPMENT OF MAXIMUM EFFECTIVE MOMENT CRITERION
-
摘要:
在分析"导致变形带内先存面理或层理发生转动的最大有效力矩与先存面理或层理方向有关"的基础上, 对最大有效力矩准则(Meff=0.5(σ1-σ3) Lsin2αsinα)进行理论上的拓展, 提出了可以判定任意方向先存面理最大有效力矩的准则——泛最大有效力矩准则(MG-eff=0.5(σ1-σ3)Lsin2αsin(α-θ)), 其中当先存面理与最大主压应力(σ1)平行时, 则成为最大有效力矩准则。该准则的理论分析表明:①当先存面理与σ1平行时, 在σ1左右两侧±54.7°方向出现2个有效力矩的最大值, 形成共轭的变形带, 钝角(109.4°)对着σ1方向; ②当先存面理与σ1斜交时, 在σ1的另一侧出现1个有效力矩的最大值, 从而只出现一个方向的变形带, 并随着先存面理偏离σ1方向, 变形带与σ1的夹角逐渐减小(从θ=0°时的54.7°, 减小到θ=90°时的35.3°), 而与先存面理之间的夹角逐渐增大(从θ=0°时的54.7°, 增加到θ=90°时的125.3°); ③当先存面理与σ1垂直时, 在σ1左右两侧± 35.3°方向出现2个有效力矩的最大值, 也形成共轭的变形带, 但锐角(70.6°)对着σ1方向。在主应变平面上变形带与先存面理方向及变形带剪切方向(左旋或右旋)已知的情况下, 可以确定最大主压应力方向。泛最大有效力矩准则克服了最大有效力矩准则与滑移线理论不相容的问题, 可以解释大多膝褶带非共轭发育等多种现象, 预期在韧性变形域中具有广阔的应用前景。
Abstract:Theoretical analysis shows that the Maximum Effective Moment, which cause preexisting cleavage or bedding to rotate, is related to the direction of pre-existing cleavage or bedding, and the Maximum Effective Moment Criterion (Meff=0.5(σ1-σ3) Lsin2αsinα, simplified as MEMC) proposed by Zheng et al is theoretically expanded to General Criterion of Maximum Effective Moment (MG-eff=0.5(σ1-σ3) Lsin2αsin (α-θ), simplified as GCMEM), which can be used to determine the Maximum Effective Moment with any direction of cleavage in this paper.MEMC is a special case of GCMEM when cleavage is parallel to maximum principal compressive stress (σ1).Theoretical analysis of GCMEM shows that:① when cleavage is parallel to σ1, there occur two values of Maximum Effective Moment symmetrically on either side of σ1 in the direction of ± 54.7°, and two conjugate deformation zone are predicted to appear with obtuse angle (109.4°) facing σ1 direction.② When cleavage is oblique to σ1, one Maximum Effective Moment, along which one deformation zone will appear, is predicted to occur on other side of σ1, and the angle between deformation zone and σ1 will decrease (from 54.7 ° when θ=0° reduced to 35.3° when θ=90°), while the angle between pre-existing cleavage and deformation zone will increase (from 54.7° when θ=0° increased to 125.3° when θ=90°) with pre-existing cleavage deviating from the σ1 direction.③ when cleavage is perpendicular to σ1, there also occur two values of Maximum Effective Moment symmetrically on either side of σ1 in the direction of ± 35.3°, but two conjugate deformation zone with acute angle (70.6°) facing σ1 direction.When the directions of pre-existing cleavage and deformation zone on principal strain surface and shear direction (sinistral or dextral) are known, the direction of maximum principal stress can be determined.GCMEM overcomes the incompatibility of MEMC with Slip Line Theory, and can be used to explain most of the kink zone development and other non-conjugate phenomena.It is expected to have wide application prospects in ductile deformation field.
-
Key words:
- Maximum Effective Moment /
- ductile deformation /
- pre-existing cleavage /
- deformation zone /
- conjugate
-
-
表 1 不同方位先存面理出现最大有效力矩的方位及其组合
Table 1. Directions and potential deformation zones of the maximum effective moment of the different cleavages
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] ZHENG Ya-dong, WANG Tao, MA Ming-bo, et al.Maximum effective moment criterion and the origin of low-angle normal fault[J].Journal of Structural Geology, 2004, 26:271~285. doi: 10.1016/S0191-8141(03)00079-8
[2] 郑亚东, 王涛, 王新社.最大有效力矩准则的理论与实践[J].北京大学学报:自然科学版, 2007, 43(2):145~156. http://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?filename=bjdz200702000&dbname=CJFD&dbcode=CJFQ
ZHENG Ya-dong, WNAG Tao, WANG Xin-she.Theory and practice of the Maximum Effective Moment Criterion (MEMC)[J].Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis, 2007, 43(2):145~156. http://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?filename=bjdz200702000&dbname=CJFD&dbcode=CJFQ
[3] 郑亚东, 杜思清. 共轭扭折带夹角的定量分析[C]//马宗晋. 国际交流地质学术论文集---为二十七届国际地质大会撰写(2). 北京: 地质出版社, 1985: 187~190.
ZHENG Ya-dong, DU Si-qing. A quantitative analysis of the angle between conjugate joint drags[C]//MA Zong-jin. Geological symposium for international interchange: Writing for the 27 th International Geological Conference (Ⅱ). Beijing: Geological Publishing House, 1985: 187~190.
[4] ZHENG Ya-dong. A quantitative analysis of the angle between conjugate sets of extensional crenulation cleavage: An explanation of the low-angle normal fault development[C]//Abstract of 29 th IGC. 1992: 131.
[5] Wernicke B.Low-angle normal faults in the Basin and Ridge Province:Nappe tectonics in an extending orogeny[J].Nature, 1981, 291:645~648. doi: 10.1038/291645a0
[6] Lister G S, Davis G A.The origin of metamorphic core complexes and detachment faults formed during Tertiary continental extension in the northern Colorado River region, USA[J].Journal of Structural Geology, 1989, 11(1):65~94.
[7] Wernicke B, Burchfiel B C.Modes of extensional tectonics[J].Journal of Structural Geology, 1982, 4(1):105~115.
[8] Wernicke B, Axen G J.On the role of isostasy in the evolution of normal fault systems[J].Geology, 1988, 16(9):848~851. doi: 10.1130/0091-7613(1988)016<0848:OTROII>2.3.CO;2
[9] Anderson E M.The dynamics of faulting:2 nd edition[M].Edingburgh:Oliver and Boyd, 1951.
[10] Ramsay J G.Shear zone geometry:A review[J].Journal of Structural Geology, 1980, 2(1-2):83~99. doi: 10.1016/0191-8141(80)90038-3
[11] Paterson M S, Weiss L E.Experimental deformation and folding in phyllite[J].GSA Bulletin, 1966, 77(4):343~374. doi: 10.1130/0016-7606(1966)77[343:EDAFIP]2.0.CO;2
[12] 郑亚东, 张进江, 王涛.实践中发展的最大有效力矩准则[J].地质力学学报, 2009, 15(3):209~217. http://journal.geomech.ac.cn/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?flag=1&file_no=20090301&journal_id=dzlxxb
ZHENG Ya-dong, ZHANG Jin-jiang, WANG Tao.The Maximum-Effective-Moment Criterion developing in practice[J].Journal of Geomechanics, 2009, 15(3):209~217. http://journal.geomech.ac.cn/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?flag=1&file_no=20090301&journal_id=dzlxxb
[13] Hill R.The mathematical theory of plasticity[M].Oxford:Oxford University Press, 1950.
[14] Platt J P, Vissers R L M.Extensional structures in anisotropic rocks[J].Journal of Structural Geology, 1980, 2(4):397~410. doi: 10.1016/0191-8141(80)90002-4
[15] Price N J, Cosgrave J W.Analysis of geological structures[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 1990.
[16] Johnson A M.Styles of folding:Mechanics and mechanisms of folding of natural elastic materials[M].New York:Elservier Scientific Publication Company, 1977.
[17] Camerlo R H, Benson E F.Geometric and seismic interpretation of the Perdido fold belt:Northwestern deep-water Gulf of Mexico[J].AAPG Bulletin, 2006, 90(3):363~386. doi: 10.1306/10120505003
[18] 童亨茂, 孟令箭, 蔡东升, 等.裂陷盆地断层的形成和演化---目标砂箱模拟实验与认识[J].地质学报, 2009, 83(6):759~774. http://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?filename=dzxe200906003&dbname=CJFD&dbcode=CJFQ
TONG Heng-mao, MENG Ling-jian, CAI Dong-sheng, et al.Fault formation and evolution in rift basins:Sandbox modeling and cognition[J].Acta Geologica Sinica, 2009, 83(6):759~774. http://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?filename=dzxe200906003&dbname=CJFD&dbcode=CJFQ
[19] Reches Z.Analysis of faulting in three-dimensional strain field[J].Tectonophysics, 1978, 47(1-2):109-129. doi: 10.1016/0040-1951(78)90154-3
[20] Krantz R W.Multiple fault sets and three-dimensional strain:Theory and application[J].Journal of Structural Geology, 1988, 10(3):225~237. doi: 10.1016/0191-8141(88)90056-9
[21] Nieto-Samaniego, ángel F.Stress, strain and fault patterns[J].Journal of Structural Geology, 1999, 21(8-9):1065~1070. doi: 10.1016/S0191-8141(99)00016-4
[22] TONG Heng-mao, CAI Dong-sheng, WU Yong-ping, et al.Activity criterion of pre-existing fabrics in non-homogeneous deformation domain[J].Science China:Earth Science, 2010, 53(1):1~11.
-
图(6)
表(1)
计量
- 文章访问数: 320
- PDF下载数: 2
- 施引文献: 0