中国地质科学院地质力学研究所
中国地质学会
主办

差应变法地应力测量——以汶川地震断裂带科学钻探WFSD-1钻孔为例

彭华, 马秀敏, 姜景捷. 差应变法地应力测量——以汶川地震断裂带科学钻探WFSD-1钻孔为例[J]. 地质力学学报, 2011, 17(3): 249-261.
引用本文: 彭华, 马秀敏, 姜景捷. 差应变法地应力测量——以汶川地震断裂带科学钻探WFSD-1钻孔为例[J]. 地质力学学报, 2011, 17(3): 249-261.
PENG Hua, MA Xiu-min, JIANG Jing-jie. IN-SITU STRESS MEASUREMENT BY DIFFERENTIAL STRAIN ANALYSIS METHOD IN WFSD-1[J]. Journal of Geomechanics, 2011, 17(3): 249-261.
Citation: PENG Hua, MA Xiu-min, JIANG Jing-jie. IN-SITU STRESS MEASUREMENT BY DIFFERENTIAL STRAIN ANALYSIS METHOD IN WFSD-1[J]. Journal of Geomechanics, 2011, 17(3): 249-261.

差应变法地应力测量——以汶川地震断裂带科学钻探WFSD-1钻孔为例

  • 基金项目:
    科技部“汶川地震断裂带科学钻探”项目和地调项目(编号:1212010916064)联合资助
详细信息
    作者简介: 彭华(1964-),男,研究员,主要从事地应力测量及相关测量仪器研制、地壳稳定性调查与评价、地质灾害、岩稳定性和岩石力学与工程施工等方面的研究工作。E-mail:ph68486797@yahoo.com.cn
  • 中图分类号: P315

IN-SITU STRESS MEASUREMENT BY DIFFERENTIAL STRAIN ANALYSIS METHOD IN WFSD-1

  • 岩心差应变分析法是汶川地震断层科学钻探(WFSD)项目地应力测量的主要手段之一, 该技术通过高压容器对取之于钻孔不同深度的实验样品施加围压, 观察先前由于失去地层应力而膨胀产生的裂纹重新闭合, 并通过裂纹闭合过程差应变曲线分析, 确定主应力大小和方向。WFSD-1孔12个岩心样品的DSA测试结果表明:断层上下盘的应力状态有明显差异, 区域地应力不仅随深度增加, 还与地质结构和岩石的物理性质等因素有关。

  • 加载中
  • 图 1  岩心应力释放卸载产生的微裂隙及其分布示意图

    Figure 1. 

    图 2  岩石受压微裂纹闭合过程围压-应变曲线

    Figure 2. 

    图 3  WFSD-1钻孔示意图及采样位置

    Figure 3. 

    图 4  DSA试验岩心试件贴片方式

    Figure 4. 

    图 5  贴12个应变片的DSA试样

    Figure 5. 

    图 6  熔凝石英补偿块

    Figure 6. 

    图 7  试验高压容器

    Figure 7. 

    图 8  数字应变仪记录的用标样作为桥臂的实验过程的围压-应变(ε(p))曲线(原始数据)

    Figure 8. 

    图 9  压力闭合点pc补偿弹性模量后的差应变η(pc)曲线(WFSD-1-B6砂岩试样,深度1190 m)

    Figure 9. 

    图 10  差应变数据η(pc)对p求导后的曲线

    Figure 10. 

    图 11  部分试样围压下裂缝闭合过程主差主应变轴极密图

    Figure 11. 

    图 12  WFSD-1钻孔应力随深度变化曲线

    Figure 12. 

    表 1  差应变法应变椭球主应变轴比率

    Table 1.  Ratio of strain ellipsoid principal strain axes in DSA

    下载: 导出CSV

    表 2  WFSD-1井差应变法地应力测量结果比较

    Table 2.  The compared results of DSA stress measurement in WFSD-1 hole

    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1]

    Tanimoto K, Nakamura J, Fudo R. Application of acoustic emission in in-situ test[C]//Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering. Rotterdam: A A Balkema, 1981: 573~576https://www.researchgate.net/publication/293572007_Application_of_acoustic_emission_in_in-situ_test

    [2]

    Hardy H R Jr, Zhang D, Zdlanko J C. Recent studies of the Kaiser effect in geologic materials[C]//Drnevich V P, Gray R E. Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Acoustic Emission: Microseismic Activity in Geologic Structures and Materials. American Society for Testing and Materials, 1989: 27~55.

    [3]

    Yoshikawa S, Mogi K. Experimental studies on the Kaiser effect of stress history on acoustic emission activity: A possibility for estimation of rock stress[J]. Journal of Acoustic Emission, 1990, 8 (4):113~123.

    [4]

    Michadl J F. Stress determination in rock using the Kaiser Effect[M]. Washington: Bureau of Mines, United States Department of the Interior, 1990.

    [5]

    石林, 张旭东, 金衍, 等.深层地应力测量新方法[J].岩石力学与工程学报, 2004, 23 (14):2355~2358. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6915.2004.14.009

    SHI Lin, ZHANG Xu-dong, JIN Yan, et al. New method for measurement of in-situ stresses at great depth[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2004, 23 (14):2355~2358. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6915.2004.14.009

    [6]

    邓金根, 黄荣撙, 田效山.油田深部地层地应力测定的新方法[J].石油大学学报:自然科学版, 1997, 21 (1):32~35. http://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?filename=sydx701.008&dbname=CJFD&dbcode=CJFQ

    DENG Jin-gen, HUANG Rong-zun, TIAN Xiao-shan. A new method for measuring in-situ stresses in deep formation[J]. Journal of Petroleum University: Natural Science Edition, 1997, 21 (1):32~35. http://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?filename=sydx701.008&dbname=CJFD&dbcode=CJFQ

    [7]

    张广清, 金衍, 陈勉.围压下利用凯泽效应测量地应力[J].岩石力学与工程学报, 2002, 21 (3):360~363. http://www.cqvip.com/Main/Detail.aspx?id=5970144

    ZHANG Guang-qing, JIN Yan, CHEN Mian. Measurement of in-situ stresses by Kaiser Effect under confining pressures [J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2002, 21 (3):360~363. http://www.cqvip.com/Main/Detail.aspx?id=5970144

    [8]

    刘建中, 张金珠, 张雪.油田应力测量[M].北京:地震出版社, 1993.

    LIU Jian-zhong, ZHANG Jin-zhu, ZHANG Xue. In-situ stress measurement in oilfield[M]. Beijing: Seismological Publishing House, 1993.

    [9]

    White J E. The hula log: A proposed acoustic tool[C]//Proceedings of the 8th Annual Logging Symposium. Houston: Society of Professional Well Log Analysts, 1967: 125.http://www.onepetro.org/conference-paper/SPWLA-1967-I

    [10]

    Sinha B K, Kostek S. Stress-induced azimuthal anisotropy in borehole flexural waves[J]. Geophysics, 1996, 61 (6):1899~1907. doi: 10.1190/1.1444105

    [11]

    Sinha BK, Plona T J. Wave propagation in rocks with elasto-plastic deformations[J]. Geophysics, 2001, 66 (3):772~785. doi: 10.1190/1.1444967

  • 加载中

(12)

(2)

计量
  • 文章访问数:  321
  • PDF下载数:  3
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
收稿日期:  2011-05-30
刊出日期:  2011-09-25

目录