中国自然资源航空物探遥感中心主办
地质出版社出版

面向地球化学异常识别的深度学习算法对比研究

李沐思, 陈丽蓉, 谢飞, 谷兰丁, 吴晓栋, 马芬, 尹兆峰. 2023. 面向地球化学异常识别的深度学习算法对比研究. 物探与化探, 47(1): 179-189. doi: 10.11720/wtyht.2023.2667
引用本文: 李沐思, 陈丽蓉, 谢飞, 谷兰丁, 吴晓栋, 马芬, 尹兆峰. 2023. 面向地球化学异常识别的深度学习算法对比研究. 物探与化探, 47(1): 179-189. doi: 10.11720/wtyht.2023.2667
LI Mu-Si, CHEN Li-Rong, XIE Fei, GU Lan-Ding, WU Xiao-Dong, MA Fen, YIN Zhao-Feng. 2023. Comparison of deep learning algorithms for geochemical anomaly identification. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 47(1): 179-189. doi: 10.11720/wtyht.2023.2667
Citation: LI Mu-Si, CHEN Li-Rong, XIE Fei, GU Lan-Ding, WU Xiao-Dong, MA Fen, YIN Zhao-Feng. 2023. Comparison of deep learning algorithms for geochemical anomaly identification. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 47(1): 179-189. doi: 10.11720/wtyht.2023.2667

面向地球化学异常识别的深度学习算法对比研究

  • 基金项目:

    中国地质调查局地质调查项目“地质云系统集成与共享服务”(DD20190392)

详细信息
    作者简介: 李沐思(1998-),女,硕士研究生,主要从事地质大数据挖掘与分析研究工作。Email:342159595@qq.com
  • 中图分类号: TP39;P595

Comparison of deep learning algorithms for geochemical anomaly identification

  • 针对选用不同网络结构的深度学习算法进行地球化学异常识别,重构符合成矿分布的地球化学背景时选择依据较少的问题,本文基于闽西南铜锌银成矿区1∶20万水系沉积物数据,采用3种无监督深度学习模型AE、MCAE、FCAE,分别提取了样本中多元素的组合结构特征、空间分布特征以及混合特征,并基于其重构地球化学背景,模拟成矿分布。结果显示,FCAE模型圈定的异常区域与已知铜矿点最贴合,其次是MCAE模型和AE模型,其AUC值分别为0.80、0.78、0.61,且FCAE模型和AE模型对卷积窗口尺寸变化不敏感;说明面向地球化学异常识别构建深度学习算法时,基于提取空间分布特征或混合特征的算法综合表现较好,且基于提取组合结构特征或混合特征的算法对由观测空间尺度变化或不一致引起的噪声有较强抗干扰能力。本文为因地制宜地构建基于深度学习算法的地球化学异常识别模型提供了有效依据。
  • 加载中
  • [1]

    郭科. 复杂地质地貌区多尺度地球化学异常识别的非线性研究[D]. 成都: 成都理工大学, 2005:12.

    [2]

    Guo K. The study of non-linear of complex geology land form identification of the multi-dimensioned geochemistry anomaly[D]. Chengdu: Chengdu University of Technology, 2005:12.

    [3]

    Tobler W. On the first law of geography: A reply[J]. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 2004, 94(2): 304-310.

    [4]

    Zuo R G, Xiong Y H, Wang J, et al. Deep learning and its application in geochemical mapping[J]. Earth-Science Reviews, 2019, 192: 1-14.

    [5]

    Zuo R G. Machine learning of mineralization-related geochemical anomalies: A review of potential methods[J]. Natural Resources Research, 2017, 26(4): 457-464.

    [6]

    刘艳鹏, 朱立新, 周永章. 卷积神经网络及其在矿床找矿预测中的应用——以安徽省兆吉口铅锌矿床为例[J]. 岩石学报, 2018, 34(11): 3217-3224.

    [7]

    Liu Y P, Zhu L X, Zhou Y Z. Application of convolutional neural network in prospecting prediction of ore deposits: Taking the Zhaojikou Pb-Zn ore deposit in Anhui Province as a case[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2018, 34(11): 3217-3224.

    [8]

    蔡惠慧, 朱伟, 李孜轩, 等. 基于深度学习的钨钼找矿靶区预测方法研究[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2019, 21(6):928-936.

    [9]

    Cai H H, Zhu W, Li Z X, et al. Prediction method of tungsten-molybdenum prospecting target area based on deep learning[J]. Journal of Geo-information Science, 2019, 21(6):928-936.

    [10]

    陈丽蓉. 顾及空间约束的多元地球化学异常识别自编码神经网络方法研究[D]. 武汉: 中国地质大学(武汉), 2019:79.

    [11]

    Chen L R. Multivariate geochemical anomaly recognition using spatial constrained autoencoders[D]. Wuhan: China University of Geosciences(Wuhan), 2019:79.

    [12]

    Chen L R, Guan Q F, Xiong Y H, et al. A spatially constrained multi-autoencoder approach for multivariate geochemical anomaly recognition[J]. Computers & geosciences, 2019, 125:43-54.

    [13]

    Chen L R, Guan Q F, Feng B, et al. A multi-convolutional autoencoder approach to multivariate geochemical anomaly recognition[J]. Minerals, 2019, 9(5):270.

    [14]

    Guan Q F, Ren S L, Chen L R, et al. A spatial-compositional feature fusion convolutional autoencoder for multivariate geochemical anomaly recognition[J]. Computers and Geosciences, 2021(1):104890.

    [15]

    高原. 闽西南铜多金属矿找矿信息挖掘与成矿预测[D]. 武汉: 中国地质大学(武汉), 2019:30.

    [16]

    Gao Y. Mineral prospecting information mining and mapping mineral prospectivity for copper polymetallic mineralization in southwest Fujian Province[D]. Wuhan: China University of Geosciences(Wuhan), 2019:30.

    [17]

    张翠光, 陈润生, 黄昌旗, 等. 武夷山成矿带成矿地质背景及成矿规律研究[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 2014: 60.

    [18]

    Zhang C G, Chen R S, Huang C Q, et al. Study on the geological background of mineralization and mineralization pattern of Wuyishan mineralization zone[M]. Beijing: Geological Publishing House, 2014: 60.

    [19]

    刘崇民, 胡树起, 马生明, 等. 成矿元素相态对地球化学异常识别的作用[J]. 物探与化探, 2013, 37(6):1049-1055.

    [20]

    Liu C M, Hu S Q, Ma S M, et al. The role of the phase state of metallogenic elements in the recognition of geochemical anomalies[J]. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2013, 37(6):1049-1055.

    [21]

    郑泽宇, 赵庆英, 李湜先, 等. 地球化学异常识别的两种机器学习算法之比较[J]. 世界地质, 2018, 37(4): 1288-1294.

    [22]

    Zheng Z Y, Zhao Q Y, Li S X, et al. Comparison of two machine learning algorithms for geochemical anomaly detection[J]. Global Geology, 2018, 37(4): 1288-1294.

    [23]

    Rumelhart D E, Hinton G E, Williams R J. Learning representations by back propagating errors[J]. Nature, 1986, 323(6088): 533-536.

    [24]

    邓俊锋, 张晓龙. 基于自动编码器组合的深度学习优化方法[J]. 计算机应用, 2016, 36(3): 697-702.

    [25]

    Deng J F, Zhang X L. Deep learning algorithm optimization based on combination of auto-encoders[J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2016, 36(3): 697-702.

    [26]

    费艳, 缪骞云, 刘学军. 一种基于卷积自动编码器的推荐系统攻击检测方法[J]. 小型微型计算机系统, 2021, 42(5): 1088-1092.

    [27]

    Fei Y, Miao Q Y, Liu X J. Recommendation system attack detection method based on convolutional autoencoder[J]. Journal of Chinese Computer Systems, 2021, 42(5): 1088-1092.

    [28]

    宋晓霞. 基于栈式自动编码器的高分辨率遥感影像分类[J]. 测绘与空间地理信息, 2021, 44(5):128-131.

    [29]

    Song X X. High resolution remote sensing image classification based on stacked autoencoder[J]. Geomatics & Spatial Information Technology, 2021, 44(5):128-131.

    [30]

    张扬. 基于卷积自编码器的异常事件检测研究[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2018:10.

    [31]

    Zhang Y. Anomaly detection based on convolutional autoencoder[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2018:10.

    [32]

    Chen K, Seuret M, Liwicki M, et al. Page segmentation of historical document images with convolutional autoencoders[C]// 2015 13th International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition (ICDAR), IEEE, 2015: 1011-1015.

    [33]

    宋辉, 高洋, 陈伟, 等. 基于卷积降噪自编码器的地震数据去噪[J]. 石油地球物理勘探, 2020, 55(6): 1210-1219.

    [34]

    Song H, Gao Y, Chen W, et al. Seismic noise suppression based on convolutional denoising autoencoders[J]. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2020, 55(6): 1210-1219.

    [35]

    江金生, 任浩然, 李瀚野. 基于卷积自编码器的地震数据处理[J]. 浙江大学学报:工学版, 2020, 54(5): 978-984.

    [36]

    Jiang J S, Ren H R, Li H Y. Seismic data processing based on convolutional autoencoder[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University:Engineering Science, 2020, 54(5): 978-984.

    [37]

    An J, Cho S. Variational autoencoder based anomaly detection using reconstruction probability[J]. Special Lecture on IE, 2015, 2(1): 1-18.

    [38]

    Xiong Y H, Zuo R G. Recognition of geochemical anomalies using a deep autoencoder network[J]. Computers and Geosciences, 2016, 86: 75-82.

    [39]

    Valentine A P, Trampert J. Data space reduction, quality assessment and searching of seismograms: Autoencoder networks for waveform data[J]. Geophysical Journal International, 2012, 189(2): 1183-1202.

    [40]

    Fawcett T. An introduction to ROC analysis[J]. Pattern recognition letters, 2006, 27(8): 861-874.

    [41]

    Benesty J, Chen J, Huang Y, et al. Pearson correlation coefficient [G]// Noise reduction in speech processing. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2009: 1-4.

    [42]

    Chen Y L, Lu L J, Li X B. Application of continuous restricted Boltzmann machine to identify multivariate geochemical anomaly[J]. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 2014, 140: 56-63.

    [43]

    Zhou J, Cui G Q, Hu S D, et al. Graph neural networks: A review of methods and applications[J]. AI Open, 2020, 1∶ 57-81.

    [44]

    陈志军, 成秋明, 陈建国. 利用样本排序方法比较化探异常识别模型的效果[J]. 地球科学:中国地质大学学报, 2009, 34(2):353-364.

    [45]

    Chen Z J, Cheng Q M, Chen J G. Comparison of different models for anomaly recognition of geochemical data by using sample ranking method[J]. Earth Science:Journal of China University of Geosciences, 2009, 34(2):353-364.

  • 加载中
计量
  • 文章访问数:  1439
  • PDF下载数:  76
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
收稿日期:  2021-12-10
修回日期:  2023-02-20
刊出日期:  2023-02-24

目录