中国地质调查局 中国地质科学院主办
科学出版社出版

库车坳陷东部阿合组地层水化学特征及其油气响应

张海祖, 徐同, 谢亚妮, 张慧芳, 凡闪, 陈常超, 朱传庆. 2024. 库车坳陷东部阿合组地层水化学特征及其油气响应[J]. 中国地质, 51(6): 2017-2027. doi: 10.12029/gc20210830002
引用本文: 张海祖, 徐同, 谢亚妮, 张慧芳, 凡闪, 陈常超, 朱传庆. 2024. 库车坳陷东部阿合组地层水化学特征及其油气响应[J]. 中国地质, 51(6): 2017-2027. doi: 10.12029/gc20210830002
ZHANG Haizu, XU Tong, XIE Yani, ZHANG Huifang, FAN Shan, CHEN Changchao, ZHU Chuanqing. 2024. Hydrochemical characteristics and hydrocarbon response of stratum water of Ahe Formation in Eastern Kuqa Depression[J]. Geology in China, 51(6): 2017-2027. doi: 10.12029/gc20210830002
Citation: ZHANG Haizu, XU Tong, XIE Yani, ZHANG Huifang, FAN Shan, CHEN Changchao, ZHU Chuanqing. 2024. Hydrochemical characteristics and hydrocarbon response of stratum water of Ahe Formation in Eastern Kuqa Depression[J]. Geology in China, 51(6): 2017-2027. doi: 10.12029/gc20210830002

库车坳陷东部阿合组地层水化学特征及其油气响应

  • 基金项目: 塔里木油田公司委托科研项目(041020050021)、国家科技重大专项(2017ZX05008−004)及中国石油天然气集团有限公司攻关性应用性科技专项(2023ZZ14)联合资助。
详细信息
    作者简介: 张海祖,男,1976年生,博士,高级工程师,石油地质专业;E-mail:zhanghz-tlm@petrochina.com.cn
    通讯作者: 徐同,男,1997年生,博士生,地质资源与地质工程专业;E-mail:1113822424@qq.com
  • 中图分类号: P618.13

Hydrochemical characteristics and hydrocarbon response of stratum water of Ahe Formation in Eastern Kuqa Depression

  • Fund Project: Funded by the commissioned scientific research project of Tarim Oilfield Company (No. 041020050021) and the National Science and Technology Major Project (No. 2017ZX05008-004), and Special Project for Tackling Key and Applied Technologies of China National Petroleum Corporation (No. 2023ZZ14).
More Information
    Author Bio: ZHANG Haizu, male, born in 1976, Ph.D., senior engineer, majors in petroleum geology; E-mail: zhanghz-tlm@petrochina.com.cn .
    Corresponding author: XU Tong, male, born in 1997, Ph.D. candidate, majors in geological resources and geological engineering; E-mail: 1113822424@qq.com.
  • 研究目的

    地层水作为油气运移的载体,对油气成藏具有重要意义。塔里木盆地库车坳陷东部侏罗系阿合组油气藏的油水分布关系复杂,地层水特征及其与油气藏的关系缺少系统研究。

    研究方法

    为了明确地层水化学特征及其与油气藏之间的关系,在对地层水样品筛选的基础上,对库车东部阿合组的地层水测试数据进行分析,研究地层水的水型、矿化度、离子比例系数的分布特征及其油气意义。

    研究结果

    阿合组的地层水主要为NaHCO3型,其次为CaCl2型和MgCl2型,矿化度相对较低。地层水的矿化度、离子比例系数具有受构造控制的特点:在构造的开启区、地层的尖灭区,地层水主要为低矿化度的NaHCO3型,钠氯系数、脱硫酸系数较高且变质系数为负值,而封闭性的地层中地层水具有相反的化学特征。

    结论

    地层水化学特征与油水层的平面分布特征有较好的耦合关系,以迪北油气藏为例,依奇克里克断裂以北虽经历过油气的充注,但已经生成的油气沿着断裂逸散,低矿化度、高钠氯系数、高脱硫酸系数、低变质系数及高高岭石含量表明地层受到了沿断裂进入大气降水的影响;而断裂以南相反的地层水化学特征及高岭石含量反映地层封闭性较好,受大气降水影响小,对应了气藏的分布。地层水的化学特征与油气藏的分布关系为后续致密油气藏的勘探开发和评价提供一定依据。

  • 加载中
  • 图 1  研究区位置图

    Figure 1. 

    图 2  地层水矿化度频率直方图及水型分类图

    Figure 2. 

    图 3  库车坳陷东部阿合组地层水Piper三线图

    Figure 3. 

    图 4  库车坳陷东部阿合组地层水矿化度分布图

    Figure 4. 

    图 5  库车坳陷东部阿合组钠氯系数分布图

    Figure 5. 

    图 6  库车坳陷东部阿合组脱硫酸系数分布图

    Figure 6. 

    图 7  库车坳陷东部阿合组变质系数分布图

    Figure 7. 

    图 8  库车东部阿合组油水平面分布图

    Figure 8. 

    图 9  迪北斜坡带油气藏剖面(据李谨等,2019修改)(剖面位置在图1中用A−A'表示)

    Figure 9. 

    表 1  库车坳陷东部阿合组高岭石含量统计

    Table 1.  Statistics of kaolinite content in Ahe Formation of eastern Kuqa Depression

    井号 井段/m 层位 高岭石含量/% 水分析
    最大 最小 平均 Cl/(mg/L) 矿化度/(mg/L) 水型
    YN24334~4583J2kz-J1y8.00.01.620456.037068.0CaCl2
    4612~4946J1y-J1a15.00.07.218063.033502.0MgCl2
    3216~4378J2kz-J1y60.021.034.623902.042270.0NaHCO3
    YS42715~3432J2kz-J1y70.027.046.37237.015279.0NaHCO3
    3434~3995J1y58.013.032.38967.820190.5NaHCO3
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1]

    Birkle P, García B M, Padrón C M M. 2009. Origin and evolution of formation water at the Jujo−tecominoacán oil reservoir, Gulf of Mexico. Part 1: Chemical evolution and water−rock interaction[J]. Applied Geochemistry, 24(4): 543−55412. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2008.12.009

    [2]

    Cai C F, Li K K, Li H T, Zhang B S. 2008. Evidence for Cross Formational hot brine flow from integrated 87Sr/ 86Sr, Ree and fluid inclusions of the Ordovician veins in Central Tarim, China[J]. Applied Geochemistry, 23(8): 2226−2235. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2008.03.009

    [3]

    Chen J, Liu D, Hou X L, Fan Y K, Jia W L, Peng P A, Zhang B S, Xiao Zhongyao. 2018. Origin and evolution of oilfield waters in the Tazhong oilfield, Tarim Basin, China, and their relationship to multiple hydrocarbon charging events[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 98: 554−568. doi: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2018.09.018

    [4]

    Chen J, Liu D, Peng P, Yu C, Zhang B. 2013. The sources and formation processes of brines from the Lunnan Ordovician paleokarst reservoir, Tarim Basin, Northwest China[J]. Geofluids, 13(3): 381−394. doi: 10.1111/gfl.12033

    [5]

    Chen Zhonghong, Zha Ming. 2013. Basin Fluid and Hydrocarbon Accumulation[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 1−361 (in Chinese with English abstract).

    [6]

    Davisson M L, Presser, T S, Criss, R E. 1994. Geochemistry of tectonically expelled fluids from the Northern Coast Ranges, Rumsey Hills, California, USA[J]. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 58: 1687−1699. doi: 10.1016/0016-7037(94)90530-4

    [7]

    Dou Weitan, Liu Xinshe, Wang Tao. 2010. The origin of formation water and the regularity of gas and water distribution for the Sulige gas field, Ordos Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 31(5): 767−773 (in Chinese with English abstract).

    [8]

    Guan Yunmei, Wang Lansheng, Zhang Jian, Zhang Qi, Shi Yuhua. 2011. Characteristics of mixed liquid of formation water with residual acid and drilling fluid[J]. Natural Gas Exploration and Development, 34(2): 62−64 (in Chinese with English abstract).

    [9]

    Hanor J S. 1994. Physical and chemical controls on the composition of waters in sedimentary basins[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 11(1): 31−45. doi: 10.1016/0264-8172(94)90007-8

    [10]

    He Dengfa, Zhou Xinyuan, Yang Haijun, Lei Ganglin, Ma Yujie. 2009. Geological structure and its controls on giant oil and gas fields in Kuqa Depression, Tarim Basin: A clue from new shot seismic data[J]. Geotectonica et Metallogenia, 33(1): 19−32 (in Chinese with English abstract).

    [11]

    Jiang Zhenxue, Li Feng, Yang Haijun, Li Zhuo, Liu Luofu, Chen Lei, Du Zhongming. 2015. Development characteristics of fractures in Jurassic tight reservoir in Dibei area of Kuqa depression and its reservoir−controlling mode[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 36(S2): 102−111 (in Chinese with English abstract).

    [12]

    Li Guoxin, Yi Shiwei, Lin Shiguo, Gao Yang, Li Mingpeng, Li Dejiang, Wang Changyong. 2018. Reservoir characteristics and major factors influencing the reservoir quality of Lower Jurassic in eastern Kuqa Depression, Tarim Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 29(10): 1506−1517 (in Chinese with English abstract).

    [13]

    Li H X, Cai C F. 2017. Origin and evolution of formation water from the Ordovician carbonate reservoir in the Tazhong Area, Tarim Basin, NW China[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science & Engineering, 148: 103−114.

    [14]

    Li Jin, Wang Chao, Li Jian, Ma Wei, Zhang Haizu, Lu Yuhong, Li Dejiang, Liu Mancang. 2019. Source and exploration direction of tight oil and gas in the Dibei section of northern Kuqa depression[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 24(4): 485−497 (in Chinese with English abstract).

    [15]

    Li Pengchun, Liu Chunxiao, Zhang Yuan, Long Liping, Zhang Lihong. 2007. Geochemical behaviors of the Ordovician formation water in the Tazhong area and its origin and evolution[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 28(6): 802−808 (in Chinese with English abstract).

    [16]

    Li W, Yang J L, Jiang J W, Liu J M, Liu Z C. 2009. Origin of Upper Triassic formation water in middle Sichuan Basin and its natural gas significance[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 36(4): 428−435. doi: 10.1016/S1876-3804(09)60138-5

    [17]

    Liang Digang, Zhang Shuichang, Zhao Mengjun, Wang Feiyu. 2002. Hydrocarbon accumulation period in Kuqa depression[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 47(S1): 56−63 (in Chinese).

    [18]

    Liu Jianliang, Jiang Zhenxue, Li Feng, Wang Ying. 2015. Identification of paleo−oil−water contact of Jurassic Ahe Formation in Dibei Area, Kuqa Depression, Tarim Basin[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 36(2): 153−158 (in Chinese with English abstract).

    [19]

    Lu Bin, Li Jian, Ran Qigui, Hao Aisheng. 2015. Geochemical characteristics and genetic type of natural gases in Eastern Kuqa Depression, Tarim Basin[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 15(6): 52−58 (in Chinese).

    [20]

    Meng Wangcai, Li Yun, Fu Guomin, Li Jing. 2018. Relationship between chemical characteristics of formation water and natural gas accumulation within Shan 2 Member of Shanxi Formation in North Yulin Gas Field[J]. Northwestern Geology, 51(2): 203−208 (in Chinese with English abstract).

    [21]

    Piper A M. 1944. A graphic procedure in the geochemical interpretation of water analyses[J]. Eos Transactions American Geophysical Union, 25: 914−923. doi: 10.1029/TR025i006p00914

    [22]

    Wang Huachao, Han Denglin, Ou Yang Chuanxiang, Zhou Jiayi, Wang Qianqian, Ma Li. 2019. Characteristics and main controlling factors of tight sandstone reservoir of Ahe Formation in northern Kuqa Depression[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 31(2): 115−123 (in Chinese with English abstract).

    [23]

    Wang Ke, Zhang Ronghu, Yu Chaofeng, Yang Zhao, Tang Yangang, Wei Hongxing. 2020. Characteristics and controlling factors of Jurassic Ahe reservoir of the northern tectonic belt, Kuqa Depression, Tarim Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 31(5): 623−635 (in Chinese with English abstract).

    [24]

    Wang Weifeng, Wang Qian, Shan Xinjian. 2018. Development characteristics and formation mechanism of transverse faults along the Kuqa thrust belt[J]. Geology in China, 45(3): 493−510 (in Chinese with English abstract).

    [25]

    Wang Xiaomei, Zhao Jingzhou, Liu Xinshe, Fan Liyong. 2012. Occurrence state and production mechanism of formation water in tight sandstone reservoirs of Sulige area, Ordos Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 33(5): 802−810 (in Chinese with English abstract).

    [26]

    Yong Ziquan, Li Junliang, Zhou Zhongli, Zhai Zhonghua, Gong Changming, Zhao Yihua, Song Huanrong, Wang Wei. 2006. The formation−water chemical characters and petroleum significance of the fourth segment reservoirs of Xiangxi group in center of Sichuan basin[J]. Computing Techniques for Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 28(1): 41−45 (in Chinese with English abstract).

    [27]

    Zeng Jianhui, Ma Yong, Lin Lamei. 2021. Petroleum Hydrogeology [M]. Qingdao: China University of Petroleum Press, 1−190 (in Chinese with English abstract).

    [28]

    Zhang Baoshou, Yang Haijun, Yang Wenjing, Gu Qiaoyuan, Li Xinsheng. 2009. Formation water identification and characteristics of lower paleozoic carbonate reservoir [C]// Proceedings of the Fifth International Symposium on Hydrocarbon Accumulation Mechanism and Oil and Gas Resources Evaluation. Beijing: China Petroleum Institute (in Chinese).

    [29]

    Zhang Ronghu, Yang Haijun, Wei Hongxing, Yu Chaofeng, Yang Zhao, Wu Jin. 2019. The sandstone characteristics and hydrocarbon exploration signification of Lower Jurassic in middle east section of northern tectonic belt in Kuqa Depression, Tarim Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 30(9): 1243−1252 (in Chinese with English abstract).

    [30]

    Zhang S W, Zhang L Y, Bao Y S. 2012. Formation Fluid characteristics and hydrocarbon accumulation in the Dongying Sag, Shengli Oilfield[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 39(4): 423−435. doi: 10.1016/S1876-3804(12)60059-7

    [31]

    Zhang Yongwang, Zeng Jianhui, Qu Zhengyang, Chen Junbing. 2015. Development characteristics and genetic mechanism of authigenic kaolinite in sandstone reservoirs of the Dongying Sag, Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Oil and Gas Geology, 36(1): 73−79 (in Chinese with English abstract).

    [32]

    陈中红, 查明. 2013. 盆地流体与油气成藏[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1−361.

    [33]

    窦伟坦, 刘新社, 王涛. 2010. 鄂尔多斯盆地苏里格气田地层水成因及气水分布规律[J]. 石油学报, 31(5): 767−773. doi: 10.7623/syxb201005011

    [34]

    关云梅, 王兰生, 张鉴, 张琦, 施雨华. 2011. 地层水与残酸、钻井液混合液特征分析[J]. 天然气勘探与开发, 34(2): 62−64. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-3177.2011.02.017

    [35]

    何登发, 周新源, 杨海军, 雷刚林, 马玉杰. 2009. 库车坳陷的地质结构及其对大油气田的控制作用[J]. 大地构造与成矿学, 33(1): 19−32. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1552.2009.01.003

    [36]

    姜振学, 李峰, 杨海军, 李卓, 刘洛夫, 陈磊, 杜忠明. 2015. 库车坳陷迪北地区侏罗系致密储层裂缝发育特征及控藏模式[J]. 石油学报, 36(S2): 102−111. doi: 10.7623/syxb2015S2009

    [37]

    李国欣, 易士威, 林世国, 高阳, 李明鹏, 李德江, 王昌勇. 2018. 塔里木盆地库车坳陷东部地区下侏罗统储层特征及其主控因素[J]. 天然气地球科学, 29(10): 1506−1517. doi: 10.11764/j.issn.1672-1926.2018.09.015

    [38]

    李谨, 王超, 李剑, 马卫, 张海祖, 卢玉红, 李德江, 刘满仓. 2019. 库车坳陷北部迪北段致密油气来源与勘探方向[J]. 中国石油勘探, 24(4): 485−497. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7703.2019.04.009

    [39]

    李鹏春, 刘春晓, 张渊, 龙利平, 张利红. 2007. 塔中奥陶系地层水化学特征及其成因与演化[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 28(6): 802−808. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-9985.2007.06.015

    [40]

    梁狄刚, 张水昌, 赵孟军, 王飞宇. 2002. 库车拗陷的油气成藏期[J]. 科学通报, 47(S1): 56−63. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0023-074X.2002.z1.009

    [41]

    刘建良, 姜振学, 李峰, 王赢. 2015. 库车坳陷迪北地区侏罗系阿合组古油水界面识别[J]. 新疆石油地质, 36(2): 153−158. doi: 10.7657/XJPG20150205

    [42]

    卢斌, 李剑, 冉启贵, 郝爱胜. 2015. 塔里木盆地库车坳陷东部天然气地球化学特征及成因类型[J]. 科学技术与工程, 15(6): 52−58. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1815.2015.06.011

    [43]

    孟旺才, 李云, 付国民, 李晶. 2018. 榆林北部气田山2段地层水化学特征与天然气聚集关系[J]. 西北地质, 51(2): 203−208. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6248.2018.02.027

    [44]

    王华超, 韩登林, 欧阳传湘, 周嘉义, 王倩倩, 马力. 2019. 库车坳陷北部阿合组致密砂岩储层特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 31(2): 115−123. doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20190213

    [45]

    王珂, 张荣虎, 余朝丰, 杨钊, 唐雁刚, 魏红兴. 2020. 塔里木盆地库车坳陷北部构造带侏罗系阿合组储层特征及控制因素[J]. 天然气地球科学, 31(5): 623−635. doi: 10.11764/j.issn.1672-1926.2020.04.005

    [46]

    王伟锋, 王乾, 单新建. 2018. 库车前陆冲断带横断层发育特征及其形成机制[J]. 中国地质, 45(3): 493−510. doi: 10.12029/gc20180306

    [47]

    王晓梅, 赵靖舟, 刘新社, 范立勇. 2012. 苏里格气田西区致密砂岩储层地层水分布特征[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 33(5): 802−810. doi: 10.11743/ogg20120519

    [48]

    雍自权, 李俊良, 周仲礼, 翟中华, 龚昌明, 赵异华, 宋焕荣, 王威. 2006. 川中地区上三叠统香溪群四段地层水化学特征及其油气意义[J]. 物探化探计算技术, 28(1): 41−45.

    [49]

    曾溅辉, 马勇, 林腊梅. 2021. 油田水文地质学[M]. 青岛: 中国石油大学出版社, 1−190.

    [50]

    张宝收, 杨海军, 杨文静, 顾乔元, 李新生. 2009. 塔中下古生界碳酸盐岩地层水的识别与特征[C]//第五届油气成藏机理与油气资源评价国际学术研讨会论文集. 北京: 中国石油学会.

    [51]

    张荣虎, 杨海军, 魏红兴, 余朝丰, 杨钊, 伍劲. 2019. 塔里木盆地库车坳陷北部构造带中东段中下侏罗统砂体特征及油气勘探意义[J]. 天然气地球科学, 30(9): 1243−1252. doi: 10.11764/j.issn.1672-1926.2019.05.005

    [52]

    张永旺, 曾溅辉, 曲正阳, 陈俊兵. 2015. 东营凹陷砂岩储层自生高岭石发育特征与成因机制[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 36(1): 73−79. doi: 10.11743/ogg20150109

  • 加载中

(9)

(1)

计量
  • 文章访问数:  201
  • PDF下载数:  13
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
收稿日期:  2021-08-30
修回日期:  2021-10-22
刊出日期:  2024-11-25

目录