Thinking for the transformation of ecological protection and restoration in the coupled view
-
摘要:
自然资源、社会经济和生态系统相互作用、相互影响，构成了动态演变的耦合系统。本文明晰了自然资源−社会经济−生态系统耦合视角下生态保护修复的认知内涵，梳理了人地关系、社会−生态系统发展框架等耦合方法理论，分析了当前国土空间生态保护修复工作中存在的不足，主要体现在要素关联的系统性不足、空间尺度统筹的联动性不足、与社会可持续发展目标的协同性不足等。针对这些不足，提出了耦合视角下生态保护修复转型的路径和策略，包括强化系统目标进行模式与格局优化、跨层级联动统筹、高质量协同匹配等，以期为新时期生态保护修复与生态文明建设提供科学依据。
-
关键词:
- 生态文明建设 /
- 生态保护修复 /
- 自然资源−社会经济−生态系统耦合 /
- 转型策略
Abstract:Interactions among natural resources, socio−economic and ecological systems makes the resources, socio−economic and ecology as a coupled system. The coupled resources−socio−economic–ecological (REE) system were introduced for the cognitive connotation for ecological protection and restoration from the perspective of the coupled REE system. Based on the frontier research of coupled social−ecological system and the above cognitive connotation, we summarized three shortcomings of ecological restoration which were mainly reflected in the insufficient systemic nature of elemental association, insufficient spatial−scale integrated linkage and insufficient synergy with social sustainable development objectives. Therefore, we proposed the strategies for the transformation from coupling perspective in three aspects, including: ① strengthening systematic goals for pattern and pattern optimization, ② strengthening spatial linkage coordination among different scales, ③ enhancing matching with sustainable developing in high−quality synergy.
-
-
[1] Bai Z K, Zhou W, Wang J M, et al. 2019. Overall protection, systematic restoration and comprehensive management of land space[J]. China Land Science, 33: 1–11 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[2] Chen Y P, Zhang Y. 2019. Sustainable model of rural vitalization in hilly and Gully region on Loess Plateau[J]. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 34(6): 708−716(in Chinese with English abstract) .
[3] Du Y L, Wang Y L, Li R J, et al. 2024. Constructing a county−level landscape ecological restoration pattern of agricultural and forestry interlacing based on the "Source−Sink" theory: A case study of Oroqen Banner[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 43(2/3): 463−473 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[4] Feng X, Fu B, Piao S, et al. 2016. Revegetation in China’s Loess Plateau is approaching sustainable water resource limits[J]. Nat. Clim. Change, 6: 1019−1022. doi: 10.1038/nclimate3092
[5] Fischer J, Riechers M, Loos J, et al. 2021. Making the UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration a Social−Ecological Endeavour[J]. Trends Ecol. Evol., 36: 20−28. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2020.08.018
[6] Foley J A, Defries R, Asner G P, et al. 2005. Global Consequences of Land Use[J]. Science, 309: 570−574. doi: 10.1126/science.1111772
[7] Fu B, Wang S, Liu Y, et al. 2017. Hydrogeomorphic Ecosystem Responses to Natural and Anthropogenic Changes in the Loess Plateau of China[J]. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci., 45: 223−243. doi: 10.1146/annurev-earth-063016-020552
[8] Fu B. 2021. Several Key Points in Territorial Ecological Restoration[J]. Bulletin of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, 36(1): 64−69.
[9] Gari S R, Newton A, Icely J D. 2015. A review of the application and evolution of the DPSIR framework with an emphasis on coastal social−ecological systems[J]. Ocean Coast Manag, 103: 63–77.
[10] Gari S R, Ortiz Guerrero C E, Auribe B, et al. 2018. A DPSIR−analysis of water uses and related water quality issues in the Colombian Alto and Medio Dagua Community Council[J]. Water Sci., 32: 318−337. doi: 10.1016/j.wsj.2018.06.001
[11] Ge L S, Xia R. 2020. Research on comprehensive investigation work system of natural resources[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 35(9): 2254−2269. doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20200917
[12] Gu T W, Peng J, Jiang H, et al. 2023. Watershed−based territorial ecological restoration: Theoretical cognition and key planning issues[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 38(10): 2464−2474. doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20231003
[13] Guo C H, Zhang M S, Wang Y, et al. 2023. Ecological restoration of China's territorial space in Yulin section of the Yellow River Basin through nature−based solutions[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 42(10): 1745−1756(in Chinese with English abstract).
[14] Hale R L, Armstrong A, Baker M A, et al. 2015. iSAW: Integrating Structure, Actors, and Water to study socio−hydro−ecological systems[J]. Earths Future, 3: 110−132. doi: 10.1002/2014EF000295
[15] Harris JA, Hobbs RJ, Higgs E, et al. 2006. Ecological Restoration and Global Climate Change[J]. Restor. Ecol., 14: 170−176. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2006.00136.x
[16] Kates RW, Clark WC, Corell R, et al. 2001. Sustainability science[J]. Science, 292: 641−642. doi: 10.1126/science.1059386
[17] Liang W, Bai D, Wang F, et al. 2015. Quantifying the impacts of climate change and ecological restoration on streamflow changes based on a Budyko hydrological model in China’s Loess Plateau: Streamflow response to climate change/ecological restoration[J]. Water Resour. Res., 51: 6500−6519. doi: 10.1002/2014WR016589
[18] Liu J, Dietz T, Carpenter S R, et al. 2007. Complexity of Coupled Human and Natural Systems [J]. Science, 317: 1513–1516.
[19] Liu Y X, Fu B J, Wang S, et al. 2021. Review and prospect of the water−food−ecosystem nexus in dryland's Coupled Human−Earth System[J]. Geographical Research, 40(2): 541−555.
[20] Luyssaert S, Jammet M, Stoy P C, et al. 2014. Land management and land−cover change have impacts of similar magnitude on surface temperature[J]. Nat. Clim. Change, 4: 389−393. doi: 10.1038/nclimate2196
[21] Mcginnis M D, Ostrom E. 2014. Social−ecological system framework: initial changes and continuing challenges[J]. Ecol. and Soc., 19(2): 30.
[22] Ostrom E. 2009. A General Framework for Analyzing Sustainability of Social−Ecological Systems[J]. Science, 325: 419−422. doi: 10.1126/science.1172133
[23] Peng J, Lyu D N, Dong J Q. 2020a. Processes coupling and spatial integration: Characterizing ecological restoration of territorial space in view of landscape ecology[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 35(1): 3−13 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[24] Peng J, Li B, Dong J Q. 2020b. Basic Logic of Territorial Ecological Restoration[J]. China Land Science, 34(5): 18−26 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[25] Peng J, Tang H, Su C, et al. 2023. Regarding reference state to identify priority areas for ecological restoration in a karst region[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 348: 119214. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119214
[26] Peng J, Liu X, Gu T, Fu B. 2024. Developing integrated geography to support the “Community” visions [J/OL]. Science Bulletin, https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.scib.2024.01.003.
[27] Qiu S, Peng J, Zheng H, et al. 2022. How can massive ecological restoration programs interplay with social−ecological systems? A review of research in the South China karst region[J]. Sci. Total Environ., 807: 150723. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150723
[28] Schiff J S. 2017. The evolution of Rhine river governance: historical lessons for modern transboundary water management[J]. Water Hist, 9: 279−294.
[29] Wang J, Zhong L N. 2017. Current status and prospects for practical research of landscape ecology in land consolidation[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 37(12): 3982–3990(in Chinese with English abstract) .
[30] Wang J, Zhong L N. 2019. Application of ecosystem service theory for ecological protection and restoration of mountain−river−forest− field−lake−grassland[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 39(23): 8702−8708 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[31] Wang J, Ying L X, Zhong L N. 2020. Thinking for the transformation of land consolidation and ecological restoration in the new era[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 35: 26–36 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[32] Wang J, Peng J, Fu B J. 2023. Integrated Ecological Protection and Restoration in the Guangdong−Hong Kong−Macao Greater Bay Area: Thoughts and Suggestions (in Chinese with English abstract) [J]. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 38(2): 288−293.
[33] Wang S, Fu B, Bodin Ö, et al. 2019. Alignment of social and ecological structures increased the ability of river management[J]. Sci. Bull., 64: 1318–1324.
[34] Wu X, Wang S, Fu B, et al. 2019. Pathways from payments for ecosystem services program to socioeconomic outcomes[J]. Ecosyst Serv., 39: 101005. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.101005
[35] Yang Y, Bao W, Liu Y. 2020. Coupling coordination analysis of rural production−living−ecological space in the Beijing−Tianjin−Hebei region[J]. Ecol. Indic., 117: 106512. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106512
[36] Ye Y M, Lin Y B, Liu S C, et al. 2019. Social−ecological system (SES) analysis framework for application in ecological restoration engineering of mountains−rivers−forests−farmlands−lakes−grasslands: Utilizing the source area of Qiantang River in Zhejiang Province as an example[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 39(23): 8846−8856(in Chinese with English abstract).
[37] Ying L X, Wang J, Zhou Y. 2019. Ecological−environmental problems and solutions in the Minjiang River basin, Fujian Province, China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 39(23): 8857−8866(in Chinese with English abstract).
[38] Yu G R, Yang M. 2022. Ecological economics foundation research on ecological values, ecological asset management, and value realization: Scientific concepts, basic theories, and realization paths[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 33(5): 1153−1165 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[39] Zhou Y, Chen Y, Ying L X. 2021. A technical framework for ecosystem conservation and restoration [J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 28: 14–24.
[40] Zhao W W, Hou Y Z, Liu Y X. 2021. Human−natural coupling system for sustainable development: Framework and progress[J]. Science and Technology Review, 38(13): 25−31(in Chinese with English abstract).
[41] Zhao X, He G Z. 2021. Review on the DPSIR research based on CiteSpace[J]. Acta Ecologia Sinica, 41(16): 6692−6705(in Chinese with English abstract).
[42] 白中科, 周伟, 王金满, 等. 2019. 试论国土空间整体保护、系统修复与综合治理[J]. 中国土地科学, 33: 1−11. doi: 10.11994/zgtdkx.20190218.090442
[43] 陈怡平, 张义. 2019. 黄土高原丘陵沟壑区乡村可持续振兴模式[J]. 中国科学院院刊, 34: 708−716.
[44] 杜银龙, 王永亮, 李瑞嘉, 等. 2024: 基于“源-汇”理论构建农林交错的县域景观生态修复格局——以鄂伦春旗为例[J]. 地质通报, 43(2/3): 463−473.
[45] 傅伯杰. 2021. 国土空间生态修复亟待把握的几个要点[J]. 中国科学院院刊, 36: 64−69.
[46] 葛良胜, 夏锐. 2020. 自然资源综合调查业务体系框架[J]. 自然资源学报, 35: 2254−2269.
[47] 郭迟辉, 张茂省, 王尧, 等. 2023. 基于自然解决方案的黄河中游国土空间生态修复——以陕西榆林国土空间生态修复为例 [J]. 地质通报, 42(10): 1745-1756.
[48] 顾恬玮, 彭建, 姜虹, 等 2023. 流域国土空间生态修复: 理论认知与规划要点[J]. 自然资源学报, 38(10): 2464-2474.
[49] 刘焱序, 傅伯杰, 王帅, 等. 2021. 旱区人地耦合系统水-粮食-生态关联研究述评[J]. 地理研究, 40: 541−555. doi: 10.11821/dlyj020191013
[50] 彭建, 吕丹娜, 董建权, 等. 2020a. 过程耦合与空间集成: 国土空间生态修复的景观生态学认知[J]. 自然资源学报, 35: 3−13.
[51] 彭建, 李冰, 董建权, 等. 2020b. 论国土空间生态修复基本逻辑[J]. 中国土地科学, 34(5): 18−26.
[52] 王军, 钟莉娜. 2017. 景观生态学在土地整治中的应用研究进展[J]. 生态学报, 37: 3982−3990.
[53] 王军, 钟莉娜. 2019. 生态系统服务理论与山水林田湖草生态保护修复的应用[J]. 生态学报, 39: 8702−8708.
[54] 王军, 应凌霄, 钟莉娜. 2020. 新时代国土整治与生态修复转型思考[J]. 自然资源学报, 35: 26−36.
[55] 王军, 彭建, 傅伯杰. 2023. 关于粤港澳大湾区一体化生态保护修复的思考与建议[J]. 中国科学院院刊, 38(2): 288−293.
[56] 叶艳妹, 林耀奔, 刘书畅, 等. 2019. 山水林田湖草生态修复工程的社会-生态系统(SES)分析框架及应用——以浙江省钱塘江源头区域为例[J]. 生态学报, 39: 8846−8856.
[57] 于贵瑞, 杨萌. 2022. 自然生态价值、生态资产管理及价值实现的生态经济学基础研究——科学概念、基础理论及实现途径[J]. 应用生态学报, 33: 1153−1165.
[58] 周妍, 陈妍, 应凌霄, 等. 2021. 山水林田湖草生态保护修复技术框架研究[J]. 地学前缘, 28: 14−24.
[59] 赵文武, 侯焱臻, 刘焱序. 2020. 人地系统耦合与可持续发展: 框架与进展[J]. 科技导报, 38(13): 25−31.
[60] 赵翔, 贺桂珍. 2021. 基于CiteSpace的驱动力-压力-状态-影响-响应分析框架研究进展[J]. 生态学报, 41(16): 6692−6705.
-
下载:
图(3)
计量
- 文章访问数: 892
- PDF下载数: 288
- 施引文献: 0