THE LOWER CRETACEOUS SOURCE ROCKS FROM EASTERN BASIN GROUP IN THE PERIPHERY OF SONGLIAO BASIN: Sedimentary Characteristics and Hydrocarbon Generation Potential
-
摘要:
松辽外围东部盆地群位于中国东北地区的东部,研究区内共有39个中小规模沉积盆地,总面积约52×104 km2.在总结东部盆地群烃源岩沉积特征的基础上,通过对三江、勃利、通化及红庙子等盆地下白垩统烃源岩有机地球化学综合分析,查明了研究区下白垩统主力烃源岩有机质丰度、有机质成熟度以及有机质类型等指标特征、分布规律,并分析了影响这些指标在区域上规律变化的地质因素,以提升研究区的油气基础地质认识,为东北地区油气资源调查与勘探部署提供科学依据.
Abstract:The eastern basin group in the periphery of Songliao Basin, located in the east of Northeast China, includes 39 small- and medium-scale sedimentary basins, covering an area about 52×104 km2. Based on the sedimentary characteristics of source rocks in the eastern basin group, through comprehensive analysis of organic geochemistry of the Lower Cretaceous source rocks in Sanjiang, Boli, Tonghua and Hongmiaozi basins, the paper identifies the characteristics and distribution rule of organic matter abundance, maturity and types in the Lower Cretaceous source rocks of the study area, and analyzes the geological factors that affect regular changes of the above indexes regionally, to improve the basic geological understanding of oil-gas resources in the area and provide scientific basis for the oil-gas survey and exploration in Northeast China.
-
-
图 1 松辽外围东部盆地群分布图(据文献[9])
Figure 1.
图 2 松辽外围东部盆地群主要盆地地层对比图(据文献[12])
Figure 2.
表 1 松辽外围东部盆地群南、北地层区主要特征
Table 1. Characteristics of south and north stratigraphic subareas in the eastern periphery of Songliao Basin
地层分区名称 构造位置 地层发育状况 一般厚度/m 主要沉积盆地 黑龙江东部地层分区 新华夏系第二隆起带 海相、海陆交互相地层及早白垩世早中期及古近纪和新近纪地层较发育 E+N:800~1500
K:1500~3000
J:1000
T:1500~3000三江盆地、勃利盆地、虎林盆地、鸡西盆地、鹤岗盆地、宁安盆地、佳木斯盆地 吉林东部地层分区 新华夏系第二隆起带 白垩系、古近系和新近系较发育 E+N:1400~4800
K:500~2200
J:500
T: 1000~2000依兰-伊通地堑、延吉盆地、敦化盆地、蛟河盆地、柳河盆地、通化盆地、红庙子盆地、果松盆地、马鞍山盆地 表 2 松辽外围东部盆地群下白垩统烃源岩有机质丰度统计表
Table 2. Organic matter abundance of Lower Cretaceous source rocks in the eastern periphery of Songliao Basin
盆地 地层 烃源岩 TOC/% (S1+S2)/10-3 氯仿沥青“A”/% 总烃HC/10-6 综合评价 三江盆地 穆棱组 煤系泥岩 $\frac{0.25 \sim 3.80}{1.22(106)}$ $\frac{ 0.09 \sim 2.27 }{ 0.89(70) }$ $\frac{ 0.003 \sim 0.044 }{ 0.018(32) }$ $\frac{ 36 \sim 268 }{ 121(15) }$ 差-中 暗色泥岩 $\frac{6.73 \sim 13.58}{ 9.07(3) }$ $\frac{11.36 \sim 93.81}{ 36.08(4) }$ $\frac{0.108 \sim 0.317}{ 0.213(2) }$ $\frac{509 \sim 2163}{ 1336(2) }$ 城子河组 煤系泥岩 $\frac{0.14 \sim 4.30}{ 1.47(77) }$ $\frac{0.02 \sim 5.80}{ 1.04(60) }$ $\frac{0.003 \sim 0.105}{ 0.033(33) }$ $\frac{47 \sim 488}{ 207(18) }$ 暗色泥岩 9.55 11.88 鸡西盆地 穆棱组 煤系泥岩 $\frac{0.12 \sim 5.02}{ 1.36(112) }$ $\frac{0.06 \sim 17.04}{ 1.04(96) }$ $\frac{0.003 \sim 0.116}{ 0.022(56) }$ $\frac{79 \sim 606}{ 543(2) }$ 差-中 碳质泥岩 $\frac{8.15 \sim 36.80}{ 21.06(6) }$ $\frac{1.62 \sim 96.19}{ 43.25(6) }$ $\frac{0.015 \sim 0.340}{ 0.105(4) }$ $\frac{164 \sim 1274}{ 719(2) }$ 城子河组 煤系泥岩 $\frac{0.30 \sim 5.96}{ 1.84(75) }$ $\frac{0.07 \sim 13.54}{ 1.73(64) }$ $\frac{0.003 \sim 0.156}{ 0.034(62) }$ $\frac{133 \sim 917}{ 385(11) }$ 碳质泥岩 $\frac{6.50 \sim 39.57}{ 22.76(21) }$ $\frac{0.54 \sim 105.78}{ 35.09(21) }$ $\frac{0.013 \sim 0.709}{ 0.218(12) }$ $\frac{327 \sim 3001}{ 939(10) }$ 双阳盆地 长安组 煤系泥岩 $\frac{1.54 \sim 4.10}{ 2.68(6) }$ $\frac{0.19 \sim 9.34}{ 3.33(6) }$ 0.039 341 中-好 金家屯组 煤系泥岩 $\frac{3.06 \sim 3.41}{ 3.24(2) }$ $\frac{0.30 \sim 5.53}{ 2.92(2) }$ 0.328 1375 通化盆地 亨通山组 暗色泥岩 $\frac{0.25 \sim 2.79}{ 1.08(36) }$ $\frac{0.08 \sim 10.33}{ 2.57(36) }$ $\frac{0.107 \sim 0.159}{ 0.133(2) }$ $\frac{762 \sim 976}{ 869 (2) }$ 中等-好 下桦皮甸子组 暗色泥岩 $\frac{1.02 \sim 3.08}{ 1.85(8) }$ $\frac{1.19 \sim 9.65}{ 4.42(8) }$ $\frac{0.052 \sim 0.087}{ 0.064(3) }$ $\frac{195 \sim 576}{ 334(3) }$ 虎林盆地 云山组 煤系泥岩 $\frac{0.39 \sim 5.90}{ 1.97(40) }$ $\frac{0.08 \sim 20.80}{ 3.29(34) }$ 碳质泥岩 $\frac{6.89 \sim 36.33}{ 14.50(5) }$ $\frac{27.43 \sim 73.05}{ 44.85(5)}$ 勃利盆地 穆棱组 暗色泥岩 $\frac{0.40 \sim 0.53}{ 0.48(3) }$ $\frac{0.06 \sim 0.28}{ 0.1767(3) }$ $\frac{0.007 \sim 0.259}{ 0.091(3) }$ 1135 下云山组 暗色泥岩 $\frac{0.15 \sim 3.52}{ 0.78(14) }$ $\frac{0.04 \sim 2.41}{ 0.31(14) }$ $\frac{0.002 \sim 0.038}{ 0.010(14) }$ 珠山组 暗色泥岩 $\frac{0.11 \sim 4.37}{ 1.12(30) }$ $\frac{0.04 \sim 16.93}{ 1.45(28) }$ $\frac{0.002 \sim 0.422}{ 0.039(17) }$ $\frac{204 \sim 1046}{ 625(2) }$ 宁安盆地 穆棱组 煤系泥岩 $\frac{0.22 \sim 5.93}{ 1.63(19) }$ $\frac{0.24 \sim 41.06}{ 5.34(22) }$ 碳质泥岩 $\frac{6.30 \sim 33.75}{ 14.87(7) }$ $\frac{0.58 \sim 112.36}{ 41.47(6) }$ 延吉盆地 铜佛寺组 暗色泥岩 $\frac{0.31 \sim 4.57}{ 1.94(42) }$ $\frac{0.08 \sim 33.77}{ 3.69(51) }$ $\frac{0.008 \sim 0.225}{ 0.057(25) }$ $\frac{306 \sim 583}{ 444(2) }$ 大砬子组 暗色泥岩 $\frac{0.16 \sim 4.81}{ 1.57(56) }$ $\frac{0.04 \sim 34.01}{ 4.39(68) }$ $\frac{0.005 \sim 0.220}{ 0.053(38) }$ $\frac{70 \sim 960}{ 357(5) }$ 安民组 煤系泥岩、碳质泥岩 $\frac{1.48 \sim 8.38}{ 4.62(6) }$ $\frac{0.04 \sim 4.75}{ 2.38(6) }$ $\frac{0.010 \sim 0.080}{ 0.030(5) }$ 久大组 煤系泥岩 $\frac{2.55 \sim 5.54}{ 3.54(11) }$ $\frac{0.34 \sim 46.80}{ 16.13(11) }$ $\frac{0.010 \sim 0.690}{ 0.390(4) }$ 表 3 松辽外围东部盆地群下白垩统烃源岩有机质显微组分统计表
Table 3. Characteristics of organic maceral in Lower Cretaceous source rocks in the eastern periphery of Songliao Basin
盆地 地层 烃源岩 腐泥组/% 壳质组/% 镜质组/% 惰性组/% 类型指数 干酪根类型 三江盆地 穆棱组 煤系泥岩 $\frac{42.0 \sim 84.7 }{ 67.7(24) }$ $\frac{0.3 \sim 2.0 }{ 0.8(8) }$ $\frac{12.3 \sim 48.0 }{ 29.8(24) }$ $\frac{0.3 \sim 17.0 }{ 4.5(13) }$ $\frac{-2.8 \sim 73.2 }{ 43.2(24) }$ Ⅱ1-Ⅲ 城子河组 煤系泥岩 $\frac{28.3 \sim 74.0 }{ 62.6(22) }$ $\frac{0.3 \sim 0.7 }{ 0.5(2) }$ $\frac{24.0 \sim 64.3 }{ 36.3(23) }$ $\frac{0.3 \sim 7.3 }{ 2.4(9) }$ $\frac{-27.3 \sim 54.5 }{ 34.4(22) }$ 鸡西盆地 穆棱组 煤系泥岩 $\frac{24.0 \sim 46.7 }{ 39.5(24) }$ $\frac{0.7 \sim 6.7 }{ 6.4(21) }$ $\frac{30.0 \sim 66.0 }{ 40.9(24) }$ $\frac{6.7 \sim 16.7 }{ 14.8(23) }$ $\frac{-35.5 \sim 10.8 }{ -2.7(24) }$ Ⅱ2-Ⅲ 双阳盆地 长安组 煤系泥岩 35.2 64.8 -31.0 Ⅲ 金家屯组 煤系泥岩 9.3 90.7 -63.4 炭质泥岩 6.3 93.7 -67.1 柳河盆地 亨通山组 暗色泥岩 $\frac{35.0 \sim 78.0 }{ 51.8(5) }$ $\frac{20.0 \sim 60.0 }{ 43.8(5) }$ $\frac{1.0 \sim 8.0 }{ 4.4(5) }$ $\frac{-32.5 \sim 22.0 }{ -11.4(5) }$ Ⅱ2-Ⅲ 通化盆地 亨通山组 暗色泥岩 $\frac{78.7 \sim 80.7 }{ 79.7(2) }$ $\frac{19.3 \sim 21.3 }{ 20.3(2) }$ $\frac{23.4 \sim 25.92 }{ 4.65(2) }$ Ⅱ1-Ⅲ 下桦皮甸子组 暗色泥岩 $\frac{68.0 \sim 81.0 }{ 74.7(3) }$ $\frac{15.0 \sim 24.0 }{ 19.3(3) }$ $\frac{4.0 \sim 8.0 }{6.0(3) }$ $\frac{8.0 \sim 25.01 }{ 6.7(3) }$ 鹰嘴砬子组 暗色泥岩 $\frac{16.0 \sim 25.0 }{ 19.7(3) }$ $\frac{68.0 \sim 76.0 }{ 51.7(7) }$ $\frac{14.0 \sim 65.0 }{ 34.5(6) }$ $\frac{1.0 \sim 9.0 }{ 4.3(4) }$ $\frac{-43.0 \sim 41.5 }{ 3.7(7) }$ 红庙子盆地 亨通山组 暗色泥岩 $\frac{60.0 \sim 75.0 }{ 66.2(5) }$ $\frac{18.0 \sim 30.0 }{ 24.2(5) }$ $\frac{7.0 \sim 11.0 }{ 9.6(5) }$ $\frac{-3.0 \sim 17.0 }{ 5.2(5) }$ Ⅱ2-Ⅲ 油页岩 $\frac{60.0 \sim 70.0 }{ 65.0(2) }$ $\frac{22.0 \sim 30.0 }{ 26.0(2) }$ $\frac{8.0 \sim 10.0 }{ 9.0(2) }$ $\frac{-3.0 \sim 11.0 }{ 4.0(2) }$ 下桦皮甸子组 暗色泥岩 $\frac{83.0 \sim 85.0 }{ 84.0(2) }$ $\frac{10.0 \sim 12.0 }{ 11.0(2) }$ 5.0 $\frac{28.0 \sim 30.0 }{ 39.0(2) }$ 鹰嘴砬子组 暗色泥岩 22.0 $\frac{55.0 \sim 73.0 }{ 66.0(3) }$ $\frac{20.0 \sim 23.0 }{ 21.7(3) }$ $\frac{7.0 \sim 8.0 }{ 7.5(2) }$ $\frac{11.0 \sim 32.3 }{ 19.4(3) }$ -
[1] 张君峰, 许浩, 赵俊龙, 等. 中国东北地区油气地质特征与勘探潜力展望[J]. 中国地质, 2018, 45(2): 260-273. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DIZI201802005.htm
Zhang J F, Xu H, Zhao J L, et al. Geological characteristics and exploration potential of oil and gas in the northeast area of China[J]. Geology in China, 2018, 45(2): 260-273. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DIZI201802005.htm
[2] 任收麦, 乔德武, 张兴洲, 等. 松辽盆地及外围上古生界油气资源战略选区研究进展[J]. 地质通报, 2011, 30(2/3): 197-204. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZQYD2011Z1004.htm
Ren S M, Qiao D W, Zhang X Z, et al. The present situation of oil & gas resources exploration and strategic selection of potential area in the Upper Paleozoic of Songliao Basin and surrounding area, NE China[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2011, 30(2/3): 197-204. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZQYD2011Z1004.htm
[3] 张抗. 东北地区油气领域接替形势展望[J]. 地质通报, 2013, 32(8): 1141-1146. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2552.2013.08.001
Zhang K. The prospect of the development of oil and gas exploration in Northeast China (in lieu of preface)[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2013, 32(8): 1141-1146 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2552.2013.08.001
[4] 陈树旺, 丁秋红, 郑月娟, 等. 松辽盆地外围新区、新层系-油气基础地质调查进展与认识[J]. 地质通报, 2013, 32(8): 1147-1158. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2552.2013.08.002
Chen S W, Ding Q H, Zheng Y J, et al. New areas and series of strata on the periphery of Songliao Basin: the progress and recognition based on foundational geological survey for oil and gas resources[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2013, 32(8): 1147-1158 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2552.2013.08.002
[5] 乔德武, 张兴洲, 杨建国, 等. 东北中-新生代盆地油气资源战略调查与选区[M]. 北京: 地质出版社. 2013.
Qiao D W, Zhang X Z, Yang J G, et al. Investigation and evaluation of strategic oil and gas resources in Meso-Cenozoic basin in Northeast China[M]. Beijing: Geological Publishing House, 2013.
[6] 张文浩, 王丹丹, 李世臻, 等. 重磁电勘探在黑龙江三江盆地石炭系-二叠系油气地质调查中的应用[J]. 中国地质, 2019, 46(1): 191-201. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DIZI201901013.htm
Zhang W H, Wang D D, Li S Z, et al. The application of gravity-magnetic-electric prospecting engineering for Carboniferous-Permian petroleum geological survey in Sanjiang Basin, Heilongjiang Province[J]. Geology in China, 2019, 46(1): 191-201. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DIZI201901013.htm
[7] 张文浩, 周新桂, 李世臻, 等. 三江盆地前进坳陷油气地质调查新进展[J]. 地质通报, 2018, 37(6): 1157-1165. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZQYD201806019.htm
Zhang W H, Zhou X G, Li S Z, et al. The progress in oil and gas survey in Qianjin Depression of Sanjiang Basin[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2018, 37(6): 1157-1165. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZQYD201806019.htm
[8] 张文浩, 苗苗青, 姜鲲鹏, 等. 中国油气资源勘探开发特点、趋势及生态管理[J]. 地质与资源, 2019, 28(5): 454-459. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1947.2019.05.007 http://manu25.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_dzyzy/CN/abstract/abstract8420.shtml
Zhang W H, Miao M Q, Jiang K P, et al. Characteristics, trends and ecological management of oil-gas resources exploration and development in China[J]. Geology and Resources, 2019, 28(5): 454-459. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1947.2019.05.007 http://manu25.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_dzyzy/CN/abstract/abstract8420.shtml
[9] 张文浩, 张交东, 王丹丹, 等. 中国东北地区东部盆地群油气资源前景展望[J]. 地质通报, 2020, 39(23): 307-318. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZQYD2020Z1013.htm
Zhang W H, Zhang J D, Wang D D, et al. The present situation and potential of oil and gas resources exploration in eastern Northeast China[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2020, 39(23): 307-318. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZQYD2020Z1013.htm
[10] 王丹丹, 周新桂, 李世臻, 等. 通化盆地下白垩统烃源岩石油地质特征及生烃潜力研究[J]. 地质学报, 2017, 91(9): 2119-2130. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0001-5717.2017.09.014
Wang D D, Zhou X G, Li S Z, et al., Petroleum geologic features and generation potential of the Lower Cretaceous hydrocarbon source rocks in the Tonghua Basin[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2017, 91(9): 2119-2130. . doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0001-5717.2017.09.014
[11] 王丹丹, 张文浩, 李世臻, 等. 辽宁省红庙子盆地烃源岩特征与生烃潜力研究——来自红地1井的证据[J]. 石油实验地质, 2018, 40(4): 526-531. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYSD201804011.htm
Wang D D, Zhang W H, Li S Z, et al. Features and hydrocarbon potential of source rocks in the Hongdi 1 well, Hongmiaozi Basin Liaoning Province[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2018, 40(4): 526-531. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYSD201804011.htm
[12] 周新桂, 孟元林, 李世臻, 等. 东北地区东部盆地群中新生代油气地质[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 2018.
Zhou X G, Meng Y L, Li S Z, et al. Meso-Cenozoic petroleum geology of the eastern basin group in Northeast China[M]. Beijing: Geological Publishing House, 2018.
[13] 吉林省地质矿产局. 中华人民共和国地质矿产部地质专报·吉林省区域地质志[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 1988.
Jilin Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources. Regional geology of Jilin Province[M]. Beijing: Geological Publishing House, 1988.
[14] 黑龙江省地质矿产局. 中华人民共和国地质矿产部地质专报·黑龙江省区域地质志[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 1993.
Heilongjiang Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources. Regional geology of Heilongjiang Province[M]. Beijing: Geological Publishing House, 1993.
[15] 李东津. 吉林省岩石地层[M]. 武汉: 中国地质大学出版社, 1997.
Li D J. Lithostratigraphy of Jilin Province[M]. Wuhan: China University of Geosciences Press, 1997.
[16] 曲关生. 黑龙江省岩石地层[M]. 武汉: 中国地质大学出版社, 1997.
Qu G S. Lithostratigraphy of Heilongjiang Province[M]. Wuhan: China University of Geosciences Press, 1997.
[17] 张梅生, 李晓波, 王旖旎, 等. 吉林中南部中生代地层划分及对比[R]. 中国石油吉林油田公司勘探部, 2012.
Zhang M S, Li X B, Wang Y N, et al. Division and correlation of Mesozoic stratigraphy in central and southern part of Jilin province[R]. Exploration Department of Jilin Oilfield Company, PetroChina, 2012. (in Chinese)
[18] 大庆油田石油地质志编写组. 中国石油地质志·大庆油田[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 1993.
Daqing Oilfield Petroleum Geology Compilation Group. Petroleum geology of China: Daqing Oilfield[M]. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 1993. (in Chinese)
[19] 吉林油田石油地质编写组. 中国石油地质志·吉林油田[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 1993.
Jilin Oilfield Petroleum Geology Compilation Group. Petroleum geology of China: Jilin Oilfield[M]. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 1993. (in Chinese)
[20] 辽河油田石油地质志编写组. 中国石油地质志·辽河油田[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 1993.
Liaohe Oilfield Petroleum Geology Compilation Group. Petroleum geology of China: Liaohe Oilfield[M]. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 1993. (in Chinese)
[21] 周荔青, 刘池阳. 中国东北油气区晚侏罗世-早白垩世断陷油气成藏特征[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2004, 9(2): 20-25. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7703.2004.02.003
Zhou L Q, Liu C Y. Oil and Gas Migration and accumulation characteristics of Late Jurassic-Early Cretaceous rifts in Northeast China oil and gas Area[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2004, 9(2): 20-25. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7703.2004.02.003
[22] 孟元林, 申婉琪, 周新桂, 等. 东部盆地群下白垩统烃源岩特征与页岩气勘探潜力[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2016, 37(6): 893-902. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201606013.htm
Meng Y L, Shen W Q, Zhou X G, et al., Characteristics of the Lower Cretaceous source rocks and shale gas exploration potential of eastern basin group, NE China[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2016, 37(6): 893-902. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201606013.htm
[23] 韩春花. 勃利盆地中生界地质特征及油气资源潜力分析[D]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2005.
Han C H. Analysis of Mesozoic geological characteristics and hydrocarbon resource potential of Boli Basin[D]. Changchun: Jilin University, 2005.
[24] 吴河勇, 李子顺, 王世辉, 等. 大庆外围盆地优选区油气资源战略评价及突破研究[R]. 中国石油大庆油田有限责任公司, 2008.
Wu H Y, Li Z S, Wang S H, et al. Strategic evaluation and breakthrough of oil and gas resources in Daqing peripheral basins[R]. Daqing Oilfield Co., Ltd., PetroChina, 2008. (in Chinese)
[25] 刘维亮, 夏斌, 蔡周荣, 等. 鸡西盆地下白垩统天然气地质条件[J]. 天然气工业, 2010, 30(2): 40-44. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG201002007.htm
Liu W L, Xia B, Cai Z R, et al. Natural gas geologic conditions in the Early Cretaceous Jixi Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2010, 30(2): 40-44. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG201002007.htm
[26] 张渝金. 虎林盆地七虎林河坳陷油气地质条件分析[D]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2010.
Zhang Y J. Analysis of petroleum geological conditions in the Qihulin River Depression of Hulin Basin[D]. Changchun: Jilin University, 2010.
[27] 韩欣澎, 郝国丽, 刘超, 等. 通化盆地石油地质特征及油气资源潜力[J]. 世界地质, 2013, 32(2): 337-343. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-5589.2013.02.018
Han X P, Hao G L, Liu C, et al. Petroleum geologic features and petroleum resources potential in Tonghua Basin[J]. Global Geology, 2013, 32(2): 337-343. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-5589.2013.02.018
[28] 林长城, 郝国丽, 陈桂标, 等. 敦-密断裂带吉林段断陷盆地石油地质条件及勘探方向[J]. 世界地质, 2013, 32(2): 317-324. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-5589.2013.02.015
Lin C C, Hao G L, Chen J B, et al. Petroleum geology and exploration orientation in faulted basins along the Duahua-Mishan fault in Jilin Province[J]. Global Geology, 2013, 32(2): 317-324. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-5589.2013.02.015
[29] 张吉光, 金成志, 金银姬. 延吉残留断陷盆地油气地质特点及勘探潜力[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2014.
Zhang J G, Jin C Z, Jin Y J, et al. Petroleum geological characteristics and exploration potential of Yanji residual faulted basin[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2014.
[30] 黄飞, 辛茂安. 中华人民共和国石油天然气行业标准并陆相烃源岩地球化学评价方法(SY/T5735-1995)[S]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 1996.
Huang F, Xin M A. Geochemical method for continental source rock evaluation(SY/T5735-1995)[S]. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 1996.
[31] 程克明, 王铁冠, 钟宁宁, 等. 烃源岩地球化学[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1995.
Cheng K M, Wang T G, Zhong N N, et al. Geochemistry of Hydrocarbon Source Rocks. Beijing: Science Press, 1995.
[32] 王钧, 黄尚瑶, 黄歌山, 等. 中国地温分布的基本特征[M]. 北京: 地震出版社, 1990.
Wang J, Huang S Y, Huang G S, et al. Basic characteristics of the earth's temperature distribution in China[M]. Beijing: Seismological Press, 1990.
-