ORGANIC PETROLOGY OF SOURCE ROCKS FROM THE UPPER PERMIAN LINXI FORMATION IN LINXI AREA, INNER MONGOLIA
-
摘要:
内蒙古东部林西地区是二连盆地外围石炭-二叠系油气勘探的重要潜力区之一. 为了研究上二叠统林西组烃源岩有机岩石学特征, 对野外露头剖面的林西组烃源岩开展了总有机碳、有机显微组分、镜质体反射率及岩石热解等测试分析. 结果表明: 林西组烃源岩总有机碳分布在0.63%~1.30%, 平均为0.87%, 所有样品含量均大于0.6%;有机显微组分分布在0.27%~3.66%, 平均值为2.08%, 其中95.24%的样品达到1.0%以上, 表明有机质丰度达到了"较好"至"好"级别; 镜质体反射率分布在1.26%~2.58%, 平均值为1.88%, 其中90.47%的样品含量大于1.3%, 镜质体反射率较高, 表明有机质成熟度达到"高成熟"至"过成熟"阶段; 岩石热解氢指数分布在8×10-3~89×10-3, 平均为27.52×10-3, 表明有机质类型归属于Ⅲ型. 综合评价表明林西地区上二叠统林西组烃源岩属于"较好-好"烃源岩, 生烃潜力较大, 具有较好的油气资源前景.
Abstract:Linxi area in eastern Inner Mongolia is one of the important potential areas for Carboniferous-Permian oil-gas exploration in the periphery of Erlian Basin. The total organic carbon (TOC), organic macerals, vitrinite reflectance and rock pyrolysis of the source rocks from Upper Permian Linxi Formation in field section are tested and analyzed to study the organic petrological characteristics of the source rocks. The results show that the TOC content of source rocks is 0.63%-1.30%, averagely 0.87%. The content of organic macerals ranges from 0.27% to 3.66%, averagely 2.08%, with 95.24% of the samples above 1.0%, indicating that the organic matter abundance is at relatively good-good level. The vitrinite reflectance(Ro) is 1.26%-2.58%, averagely 1.88%, with that of 90.47% of the samples more than 1.3%, showing the organic matter is in high mature-overmature stage. The hydrogen index of rock pyrolysis is 8×10-3-89×10-3, averagely 27.52×10-3, reflecting that the organic matter belongs to III-type. It is concluded from the comprehensive evaluation that the source rocks of Upper Permian Linxi Formation are relatively good-good, with great hydrocarbon potential and good prospect of oil-gas resources.
-
-
图 1 林西地区地质简图(据文献[4]修改)
Figure 1.
表 1 林西组烃源岩样品总有机碳含量分析结果
Table 1. TOC content of source rock samples from Linxi Formation
样品编号 层位 岩性 TOC/% 16-LGB-2-1 林二段 泥岩 0.85 16-LGB-2-2 林二段 泥岩 0.96 16-LGB-2-3 林二段 泥岩 0.71 16-LGB-2-4 林二段 泥岩 0.67 16-LGB-2-5 林三段 泥岩 0.63 16-LGB-2-5-1 林三段 泥岩 0.63 16-LGB-4-2 林四段 泥岩 0.85 16-LGB-4-3 林四段 泥岩 1.30 16-LGB-4-4 林四段 泥岩 0.89 16-LGB-4-5 林四段 泥岩 1.14 16-LGB-4-6 林四段 泥岩 1.00 16-LGB-4-7 林四段 泥岩 0.98 16-LGB-4-8 林四段 泥岩 1.24 16-LGB-5-1-1 林五段 泥岩 0.85 16-LGB-5-1-2 林五段 泥岩 1.21 16-LGB-5-2 林五段 泥岩 0.70 16-LGB-5-5 林五段 泥岩 0.76 16-LGB-5-28 林五段 泥岩 0.66 16-LGB-5-28-1 林五段 泥岩 0.69 16-LGB-5-30 林五段 泥岩 0.78 16-LGB-5-31 林五段 泥岩 0.84 注:样品由长江大学地球化学实验室测试. 表 2 林西组烃源岩样品(泥岩)有机显微组分含量
Table 2. Content of organic macerals in source rock samples (mudstone) from Linxi Formation
样品编号 镜质组 惰质组 总有机显微组分 矿物 16-LGB-2-1 1.42 2.02 3.44 96.56 16-LGB-2-2 1.93 1.73 3.66 96.34 16-LGB-2-3 0.00 0.27 0.27 99.73 16-LGB-2-4 0.96 0.24 1.20 98.80 16-LGB-2-5 1.40 1.69 3.09 96.91 16-LGB-2-5-1 0.71 1.43 2.14 97.86 16-LGB-4-2 0.93 1.17 2.10 97.90 16-LGB-4-3 0.72 1.44 2.15 97.85 16-LGB-4-4 0.76 1.08 1.84 98.16 16-LGB-4-5 0.62 1.81 2.43 97.57 16-LGB-4-6 0.99 1.28 2.27 97.73 16-LGB-4-7 0.66 0.99 1.65 98.35 16-LGB-4-8 0.25 1.23 1.48 98.52 16-LGB-5-1-1 0.87 1.20 2.07 97.93 16-LGB-5-1-2 1.59 1.17 2.76 97.24 16-LGB-5-2 1.25 0.57 1.82 98.18 16-LGB-5-5 0.39 1.27 1.66 98.34 16-LGB-5-28 1.26 0.63 1.89 98.11 16-LGB-5-28-1 0.50 1.51 2.01 97.99 16-LGB-5-30 0.00 1.61 1.61 98.39 16-LGB-5-31 1.08 1.04 2.12 97.88 注:样品由长江大学地球化学实验室测试. 含量单位:%. 表 3 林西组烃源岩样品镜质体反射率分析结果
Table 3. Vitrinite reflectance analysis results of source rock samples from Linxi Formation
样品编号 最小 最大 平均 16-LGB-2-1 0.75 2.47 1.46 16-LGB-2-2 0.86 1.75 1.35 16-LGB-2-3 0.37 1.77 1.36 16-LGB-2-4 1.81 2.5 2.16 16-LGB-2-5 1.86 2.58 2.06 16-LGB-2-5-1 1.4 1.56 1.43 16-LGB-4-2 1.83 2.58 2.3 16-LGB-4-3 0.89 2.76 2.58 16-LGB-4-4 1.22 1.83 1.61 16-LGB-4-5 0.78 1.7 1.3 16-LGB-4-6 2.01 2.95 2.6 16-LGB-4-7 1.03 3.74 1.77 16-LGB-4-8 5.31 5.31 5.31 16-LGB-5-1-1 0.69 3.73 1.55 16-LGB-5-1-2 0.78 3.74 1.81 16-LGB-5-2 1.17 1.69 1.38 16-LGB-5-5 0.44 1.82 1.43 16-LGB-5-28 0.98 1.52 1.26 16-LGB-5-28-1 1.06 2.82 1.8 16-LGB-5-30 0.68 2.59 1.36 16-LGB-5-31 1.12 2.61 1.65 注:样品由长江大学地球化学实验室测试. Ro单位:%. -
[1] 施立志, 张英利, 张永生, 等. 蒙西地1井发现下二叠统寿山沟组巨厚页岩气生烃层[J]. 中国地质, 2020, 47(5): 1594-1595. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DIZI202005026.htm
Shi L Z, Zhang Y L, Zhang Y S, et al. The discovery of a thick shale gas hydrocarbon-generating layer in the Lower Permian Shoushangou Formation, Mengxidi No. 1 well, Erlian Basin, Inner Mongolia[J]. Geology in China, 2020, 47(5): 1594-1595. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DIZI202005026.htm
[2] 卢进才, 牛亚卓, 姜亭. 中国北方石炭系-二叠系油气地质调查与勘探进展[J]. 地质通报, 2018, 37(1): 7-15. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZQYD201801002.htm
Lu J C, Niu Y Z, Jiang T. Progress in geological survey and petroleum exploration of Carboniferous-Permian strata in northern China[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2018, 37(1): 7-15. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZQYD201801002.htm
[3] 张海华, 张健, 陈树旺, 等. 松辽盆地北部三叠纪重要火山-岩浆事件——对晚古生代地层时限的约束[J]. 地质与资源, 2021, 30(3): 249-256, 283. http://manu25.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_dzyzy/CN/abstract/abstract10293.shtml
Zhang H H, Zhang J, Chen S W, et al. Significant Triassic volcanic- magmatic event in the northern Songliao Basin: Constraints on the Late Paleozoic stratigraphic timing[J]. Geology and Resources, 2021, 30(3): 249-256, 283. http://manu25.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_dzyzy/CN/abstract/abstract10293.shtml
[4] 王丹丹, 李世臻, 周新桂, 等. 内蒙古东部上二叠统林西组砂岩锆石SHRIMP U-Pb年代学及其构造意义[J]. 地质论评, 2016, 62(4): 1021-1040. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZLP201604019.htm
Wang D D, Li S Z, Zhou X G, et al. SHRIMP U-Pb dating of detrital zircon from the Upper Permian Linxi Formation in eastern Inner Mongolia, and its geological significance[J]. Geological Review, 2016, 62(4): 1021-1040. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZLP201604019.htm
[5] 张健, 朱占平, 孙雷, 等. 松辽盆地外围西部上二叠统林西组岩相古地理特征[J]. 东北石油大学学报, 2019, 43(2): 1-11. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-4107.2019.02.001
Zhang J, Zhu Z P, Sun L, et al. Lithofacies palaeogeography characteristics of Upper Permian Linxi Formation in the western periphery of Songliao Basin[J]. Journal of Northeast Petroleum University, 2019, 43(2): 1-11. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-4107.2019.02.001
[6] 郑月娟, 张健, 张海华, 等. 大兴安岭中段晚二叠世林西组介形虫化石及环境意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2020, 50(6): 1776-1786. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CCDZ202006013.htm
Zheng Y J, Zhang J, Zhang H H, et al. New discovery of ostracods of Upper Permian Linxi Formation in central Da Hinggan Mountains and its significance[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2020, 50(6): 1776-1786. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CCDZ202006013.htm
[7] 翟大兴, 张永生, 田树刚, 等. 内蒙古林西地区上二叠统林西组沉积环境与演变[J]. 古地理学报, 2015, 17(3): 359-370. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GDLX201503008.htm
Zhai D X, Zhang Y S, Tian S G, et al. Sedimentary environment and evolution of the Upper Permian Linxi Formation in Linxi area, Inner Mongolia[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2015, 17(3): 359-370. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GDLX201503008.htm
[8] 梁天意, 刘敬党, 张艳飞, 等. 中国大兴安岭中段二叠系林西组发现海相核形石[J]. 中国地质, 2019, 46(1): 213-214. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DIZI201901020.htm
Liang T Y, Liu J D, Zhang Y F, et al. Marine facies oncolite found in Permian Linxi Formation in middle Da Higgnan Mountains in Northeast China[J]. Geology in China, 2019, 46(1): 213-214. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DIZI201901020.htm
[9] 张健, 张海华, 陈树旺, 等. 松辽盆地北部上二叠统林西组地球化学特征及地质意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2020, 50(2): 518-530. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CCDZ202002017.htm
Zhang J, Zhang H H, Chen S W, et al. Geochemical characteristics and geological significance of Upper Permian Linxi Formation in Northern Songliao Basin[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2020, 50(2): 518-530. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CCDZ202002017.htm
[10] 王亚东, 王之晟, 马国祥, 等. 内蒙古扎鲁特旗丰胜村东上二叠统林西组烃源岩沉积学特征[J]. 内蒙古科技与经济, 2018(7): 56-57, 63. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NMKJ201807029.htm
Wang Y D, Wang Z S, Ma G X, et al. Sedimentary characteristics of the source rocks of the Upper Permian Linxi Formation in the east of Fengsheng Village, Jarud Banner, Inner Mongolia[J]. Inner Mongolia Science Technology & Economy, 2018(7): 56-57, 63. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NMKJ201807029.htm
[11] 韩春元, 金凤鸣, 王静, 等. 内蒙古二连盆地上古生界油气勘探前景[J]. 地质通报, 2011, 30(S1): 243-249. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZQYD2011Z1010.htm
Han C Y, Jin F M, Wang J, et al. Exploration prospect of hydrocarbon of Neopaleozoic in Erlian Basin, Inner Mongolia, China[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2011, 30(S1): 243-249. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZQYD2011Z1010.htm
[12] 苏飞, 李臻, 张健, 等. 内蒙古突泉盆地突D2井上二叠统林西组烃源岩新发现[J]. 地质与资源, 2017, 26(3): 268-274. http://manu25.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_dzyzy/CN/abstract/abstract8539.shtml
Su F, Li Z, Zhang J, et al. Discovery of the source rock from Upper Permain Linxi Formation in Tuquan Basin, Inner Mongolia[J]. Geology and Resources, 2017, 26(3): 268-274. http://manu25.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_dzyzy/CN/abstract/abstract8539.shtml
[13] 吴桐, 周铁锁. 大兴安岭南部地区林西组油气勘探前景探讨[J]. 地质与资源, 2018, 27(5): 438-444. http://manu25.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_dzyzy/CN/abstract/abstract8490.shtml
Wu T, Zhou T S. Discussion on the oil-gas exploration prospects of Linxi Formation in southern Daxinganling region[J]. Geology and Resources, 2018, 27(5): 438-444. http://manu25.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_dzyzy/CN/abstract/abstract8490.shtml
[14] 周豪博, 任国杰, 杨燕青, 等. 山西霍西地区煤系泥岩储层特征及生烃潜力评价[J]. 煤炭科学技术, 2020, 48(5): 164-172. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-MTKJ202005023.htm
Zhou H B, Ren G J, Yang Y Q, et al. Reservoir characteristics and hydrocarbon generation potential evaluation of coal measures mudstone in Huoxi area of Shanxi Province[J]. Coal Science and Technology, 2020, 48(5): 164-172. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-MTKJ202005023.htm
[15] 赵青芳, 王建强, 陈建文, 等. 下扬子区海相古生界高成熟烃源岩评价指标的优选[J]. 地质通报, 2021, 40(2/3): 330-340. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZQYD2021Z1015.htm
Zhao Q F, Wang J Q, Chen J W, et al. Optimization of evaluation index of Paleozoic high mature marine source rock in the Lower Yangze region[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2021, 40(2/3): 330-340. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZQYD2021Z1015.htm
[16] 张文浩, 王丹丹, 姚忠岭, 等. 松辽外围东部盆地群下白垩统烃源岩沉积特征与生烃潜力分析[J]. 地质与资源, 2021, 30(3): 284-295. http://manu25.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_dzyzy/CN/abstract/abstract10297.shtml
Zhang W H, Wang D D, Yao Z L, et al. The Lower Cretaceous source rocks from eastern basin group in the periphery of Songliao Basin: Sedimentary characteristics and hydrocarbon generation potential[J]. Geology and Resources, 2021, 30(3): 284-295. http://manu25.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_dzyzy/CN/abstract/abstract10297.shtml
[17] 丁文龙, 李超, 苏爱国, 等. 西藏羌塘盆地中生界海相烃源岩综合地球化学剖面研究及有利生烃区预测[J]. 岩石学报, 2011, 27(3): 878-896. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB201103025.htm
Ding W L, Li C, Su A G, et al. Study on the comprehensive geochemical cross section of Mesozoic marine source rocks and prediction of favorable hydrocarbon generation area in Qiangtan Basin, Tibeta[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2011, 27(3): 878-896. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB201103025.htm
[18] 刘栩, 程青松. 准噶尔盆地侏罗系煤系烃源岩有机显微组成及意义[J]. 河北工程大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 37(3): 82-90. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HJXU202003013.htm
Liu X, Cheng Q S. Organic macerals of source rocks of Jurassic coal measures in Junggar Basin and their significance[J]. Journal of Hebei University of Engineering (Natural Science Edition), 2020, 37(3): 82-90. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HJXU202003013.htm
[19] 唐友军, 张凯, 苏飞, 等. 过成熟烃源岩评价指标探讨——以扎鲁特地区鲁D2井上二叠统林西组烃源岩为例[J]. 石油天然气学报, 2013, 35(12): 35-40. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JHSX201312006.htm
Tang Y J, Zhang K, Su F, et al. Evaluating index for over-matured source rocks: By taking the source rock in Upper Permian Linxi Formation of well Lu D2 for example[J]. Journal of Oil and Gas Technology, 2013, 35(12): 35-40. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JHSX201312006.htm
[20] 禚志博, 朱占平, 丁歌, 等. 内蒙古林西地区晚二叠世林西组碎屑岩成岩作用及其对储层物性的影响[J]. 世界地质, 2016, 35(4): 1058-1065. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SJDZ201604017.htm
Zhuo Z B, Zhu Z P, Ding G, et al. Clastic diagenesis in Late Permian Linxi Formation in Linxi area, Inner Mongolia and its influence on physical properties[J]. Global Geology, 2016, 35(4): 1058-1065. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SJDZ201604017.htm
[21] 刘经纬, 尹文庆, 孙晓然, 等. 镜质体反射率Ro与热解峰温Tmax的关系——以南堡凹陷中深层烃源岩为例[J]. 中国石油和化工标准与质量, 2018, 38(10): 92-93. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HGBJ201810044.htm
Liu J W, Yin W Q, Sun X R, et al. Relationship between vitrinite reflectivity and pyrolysis peak temperature: The example of deep hydrocarbon source rocks in the Nanbu depression[J]. China Petroleum and Chemical Standard and Quality, 2018, 38(10): 92-93. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HGBJ201810044.htm
[22] 孙雷, 陈树旺, 张健, 等. 松辽盆地西部斜坡区上二叠统林西组生烃潜力评价——来自吉白地2井的证据[J]. 地质与资源, 2021, 30(3): 333-340, 332. http://manu25.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_dzyzy/CN/abstract/abstract10302.shtml
Sun L, Chen S W, Zhang J, et al. Evaluation on the hydrocarbon generation potential of Upper Permian Linxi Formation in western slope of Songliao Basin: Evidence from JBD-2 well[J]. Geology and Resources, 2021, 30(3): 333-340, 332. http://manu25.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_dzyzy/CN/abstract/abstract10302.shtml
[23] 刘博奥. 准中地区侏罗系烃源岩地球化学特征[J]. 科学技术创新, 2020(3): 39-40. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HLKX202003021.htm
Liu B A. Geochemical characteristics of Jurassic hydrocarbon source rocks in central Junggar Basin[J]. Scientific and Technological Innovation, 2020(3): 39-40. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HLKX202003021.htm
[24] 袁二军, 崔彬, 冯小伟, 等. 南祁连盆地东北部木里地区三叠系尕勒得寺组烃源岩评价[J]. 中国矿业, 2013, 22(S1): 163-167. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGKA2013S1045.htm
Yuan E J, Cui B, Feng X W, et al. Triassic Galede Temple Group hydrocarbon source rock evaluation in Muli area northeast of the Southern Qilian Basin[J]. China Mining Magazine, 2013, 22(S1): 163-167. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGKA2013S1045.htm
[25] 龚德瑜, 王绪龙, 周川闽, 等. 准噶尔盆地西北缘中三叠统克拉玛依组烃源岩生烃潜力[J]. 中国矿业大学学报, 2020, 49(2): 328-340. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGKD202002014.htm
Gong D Y, Wang X L, Zhou C M, et al. Hydrocarbon generation potential of Middle Triassic Karamay Formation in the northwestern Junggar Basin[J]. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology, 2020, 49(2): 328-340. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGKD202002014.htm
-