渤海湾盆地沧东凹陷孔二段一亚段有利岩相及页岩油甜点区优选

宋斯宇, 陈世悦, 鄢继华, 蒲秀刚. 渤海湾盆地沧东凹陷孔二段一亚段有利岩相及页岩油甜点区优选[J]. 地质与资源, 2023, 32(2): 225-232. doi: 10.13686/j.cnki.dzyzy.2023.02.013
引用本文: 宋斯宇, 陈世悦, 鄢继华, 蒲秀刚. 渤海湾盆地沧东凹陷孔二段一亚段有利岩相及页岩油甜点区优选[J]. 地质与资源, 2023, 32(2): 225-232. doi: 10.13686/j.cnki.dzyzy.2023.02.013
SONG Si-yu, CHEN Shi-yue, YAN Ji-hua, PU Xiu-gang. FAVORABLE LITHOFACIES AND SWEET SPOT OPTIMIZATION OF THE Ek21 SHALE OIL IN CANGDONG SAG, BOHAI BAY BASIN[J]. Geology and Resources, 2023, 32(2): 225-232. doi: 10.13686/j.cnki.dzyzy.2023.02.013
Citation: SONG Si-yu, CHEN Shi-yue, YAN Ji-hua, PU Xiu-gang. FAVORABLE LITHOFACIES AND SWEET SPOT OPTIMIZATION OF THE Ek21 SHALE OIL IN CANGDONG SAG, BOHAI BAY BASIN[J]. Geology and Resources, 2023, 32(2): 225-232. doi: 10.13686/j.cnki.dzyzy.2023.02.013

渤海湾盆地沧东凹陷孔二段一亚段有利岩相及页岩油甜点区优选

  • 基金项目:
    国家自然科学基金项目"湖相盆地细粒混合沉积岩形成机理及油气地质意义研究"(编号41572087)
详细信息
    作者简介: 宋斯宇(1997-), 男, 硕士, 主要从事非常规油气地质学研究, 通信地址 山东省青岛市黄岛区长江西路66号, E-mail//2456849377@qq.com
    通讯作者: 陈世悦(1963-), 男, 博士生导师, 主要从事沉积学、非常规油气地质学研究, 通信地址 山东省青岛市黄岛区长江西路66号, E-mail//chenshiyue@vip.sina.com
  • 中图分类号: P618.13

FAVORABLE LITHOFACIES AND SWEET SPOT OPTIMIZATION OF THE Ek21 SHALE OIL IN CANGDONG SAG, BOHAI BAY BASIN

More Information
  • 为了优选出目标层位页岩有利岩相与预测页岩油分布甜点区, 采用主成分分析法(PCA), 对页岩油资源量(滞留烃)、物性(孔隙度、渗透率)、工程性质(脆性指数、岩石力学参数)3个主地质成分进行分析. 结果表明, 纹层状长英质页岩相与纹层状混合质页岩相滞留烃含量高、孔渗性好且脆性指数偏大; 王官屯、七里店以南、沈家铺东南地区为页岩油分布甜点区, 具有较好油气显示.

  • 加载中
  • 图 1  渤海湾盆地沧东凹陷孔二段页岩沉积有利区(据文献[19])

    Figure 1. 

    图 2  官108-8井孔二段一亚段S1/TOC与预测TOC对比图

    Figure 2. 

    图 3  沧东凹陷孔二段一亚段页岩孔隙度、渗透率分布直方图

    Figure 3. 

    图 4  沧东凹陷孔二段一亚段脆性指数分布直方图

    Figure 4. 

    图 5  抗压强度随围压变化图

    Figure 5. 

    图 6  孔二段一亚段官108-8井、官东14井页岩油甜点段综合评价

    Figure 6. 

    图 7  沧东凹陷孔二段一亚段页岩油甜点区

    Figure 7. 

    表 1  页岩样品三轴力学实验结果

    Table 1.  Triaxial mechanical test results of shale samples

    样品编号 密度/(g/cm3 围压/MPa 抗压强/MPa 泊松比 杨氏模量/GPa
    工1-1 2.53 5
    工1-2 2.54 15 92.49 0.252 19.53
    工1-3 2.54 25 180.52 0.268 31.55
    工1-4 2.53 35 220.05 0.222 30.07
    工2-1 2.37 5 132.75 0.2 23.98
    工2-2 2.39 15 230.11 0.24 22.48
    工2-3 2.44 25 262.21 0.214 27.42
    工2-4 2.47 35 288.63 0.218 29.21
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1]

    王成善. 《松辽盆地及外围油气资源地质调查专辑》序[J]. 地质与资源, 2021, 30(3): 219. http://manu25.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_dzyzy/CN/abstract/abstract10288.shtml

    Wang C S. Special issue on geological survey for oil and gas resources in Songliao Basin and its periphery areas: Preface[J]. Geology and Resources, 2021, 30(3): 219-219. http://manu25.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_dzyzy/CN/abstract/abstract10288.shtml

    [2]

    陈树旺, 许光, 杨建国, 等. 松辽盆地及外围油气资源基础地质调查——"十三五"阶段进展与未来工作展望[J]. 地质与资源, 2021, 30(3): 221-231, 248. http://manu25.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_dzyzy/CN/abstract/abstract10290.shtml

    Chen S W, Xu G, Yang J G, et al. Foundational geological survey for oil and gas resources in Songliao Basin and its periphery areas: Progress and prospect[J]. Geology and Resources, 2021, 30(3): 221-231, 248. http://manu25.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_dzyzy/CN/abstract/abstract10290.shtml

    [3]

    柳波, 刘俊杰, 付晓飞, 等. 松辽盆地陆相页岩油地质研究方法与勘探评价进展[J]. 地质与资源, 2021, 30(3): 239-248. http://manu25.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_dzyzy/CN/abstract/abstract10292.shtml

    Liu B, Liu J J, Fu X F, et al. Progress in geological research methods and exploration evaluation of continental shale oil in Songliao Basin[J]. Geology and Resources, 2021, 30(3): 239-248. http://manu25.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_dzyzy/CN/abstract/abstract10292.shtml

    [4]

    杨建国, 李士超, 姚玉来, 等. 松辽盆地北部陆相页岩油调查取得重大突破[J]. 地质与资源, 2020, 29(3): 300. http://manu25.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_dzyzy/CN/abstract/abstract10208.shtml

    Yang J G, Li S C, Yao Y L, et al. Significant breakthrough in the continental shale oil survey in northern Songliao Basin[J]. Geology and Resources, 2020, 29(3): 300. http://manu25.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_dzyzy/CN/abstract/abstract10208.shtml

    [5]

    朱如凯, 邹才能, 吴松涛, 等. 中国陆相致密油形成机理与富集规律[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40(6): 1168-1184. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201906002.htm

    Zhu R K, Zou C N, Wu S T, et al. Mechanism for generation and accumulation of continental tight oil in China[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2019, 40(6): 1168-1184. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201906002.htm

    [6]

    夏彤彤. 准噶尔盆地中部侏罗系八道湾组储层特征研究[D]. 青岛: 中国石油大学(华东), 2018.

    Xia T T. Reservoir characteristics of the Badaowan Formation in central Junggar Basin[D]. Qingdao: China University of Petroleum (East China), 2018.

    [7]

    董玉菲. 基于组合权重GRA法的村庄生活污水集中处理技术优选研究[D]. 长沙: 湖南大学, 2019.

    Dong Y F. Optimization of centralized treatment technology for village domestic sewage based on combined weight GRA method[D]. Changsha: Hunan University, 2019.

    [8]

    董振国, 陈宏亮, 乔朝泽. 湖南保靖区块龙马溪组页岩气成藏地质因素分析[J]. 录井工程, 2019, 30(4): 131-140. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9803.2019.04.024

    Dong Z G, Chen H L, Qiao C Z. Analysis of geofactor of shale gas accumulation in Longmaxi Formation in Baojing block, Hunan Province[J]. Mud Logging Engineering, 2019, 30(4): 131-140. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9803.2019.04.024

    [9]

    雷丹凤, 王莉, 张晓伟, 等. 影响页岩气井产量的关键因素研究[C] //2016年全国天然气学术年会论文集. 银川: 中国石油学会天然气专业委员会, 2016: 1025-1032.

    Lei D F, Wang L, Zhang X W, et al. Research on the key factors affecting the production of shale gas wells[C]//Proceedings of the 2016 National Natural Gas Academic Conference. Yinchuan: Institute of Petroleum and Gas Professional Committee of China, 2016: 1025- 1032. (in Chinese)

    [10]

    姜生玲, 朱亮亮, 洪克岩, 等. 主成分分析法在页岩气有利区优选中的应用[J]. 地质学刊, 2017, 41(2): 251-256. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-3636.2017.02.013

    Jiang S L, Zhu L L, Hong K Y, et al. Application of principal component analysis in shale gas favorable areas optimization[J]. Journal of Geology, 2017, 41(2): 251-256. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-3636.2017.02.013

    [11]

    张鹏飞, 卢双舫, 李俊乾, 等. 湖相页岩油有利甜点区优选方法及应用——以渤海湾盆地东营凹陷沙河街组为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40(6): 1339-1350. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201906018.htm

    Zhang P F, Lu S F, Li J Q, et al. Identification method of sweet spot zone in lacustrine shale oil reservoir and its application: A case study of the Shahejie Formation in Dongying sag, Bohai Bay basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2019, 40(6): 1339-1350. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201906018.htm

    [12]

    郑付刚. 主成分回归分析在确定大坝效应量分量中的应用[J]. 水力发电, 2010, 36(12): 84-87.

    Zheng F G. Application of principal component regression analysis in determining the component proportion of dam effect variable[J]. Water Power, 2010, 36(12): 84-87.

    [13]

    夏遵义, 马海洋, 房堃. 渤海湾盆地沾化凹陷陆相页岩储层岩石力学特征及可压裂性研究[J]. 石油实验地质, 2019, 41(1): 134-141.

    Xia Z Y, Ma H Y, Fang K. Rock mechanical properties and fracability of continental shale in Zhanhua sag, Bohai Bay basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2019, 41(1): 134-141.

    [14]

    师政. 南堡凹陷及周边凸起古岩溶作用特征及发育模式研究[D]. 青岛: 中国石油大学(华东), 2016.

    Shi Z. The research on palaeokarst characteristics and development model in Nanpu sag and surrounding uplift[D]. Qingdao: China University of Petroleum (East China), 2016.

    [15]

    周立宏, 蒲秀刚, 肖敦清, 等. 渤海湾盆地沧东凹陷孔二段页岩油形成条件及富集主控因素[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(9): 1323-1332.

    Zhou L H, Pu X G, Xiao D Q, et al. Geological conditions for shale oil formation and the main controlling factors for the enrichment of the 2nd member of Kongdian Formation in the Cangdong sag, Bohai Bay basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2018, 29(9): 1323-1332.

    [16]

    李洪香, 马红. 黄骅坳陷云质岩类致密油形成条件与勘探方向[J]. 特种油气藏, 2015, 22(5): 18-22. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TZCZ201505003.htm

    Li H X, Ma H. Forming conditions and exploration direction of dolomitic tight oil in Huanghua depression[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2015, 22(5): 18-22. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TZCZ201505003.htm

    [17]

    李凤霞, 高勇, 汪津, 等. 沧东凹陷孔二段常非一体化成藏研究与实践[J]. 录井工程, 2019, 30(2): 95-99, 136-137.

    Li F X, Gao Y, Wang J, et al. Research and practice on integrated hydrocarbon accumulation of conventional and unconventional oil and gas reservoirs in Member 2 of Kongdian Formation in Cangdong sag[J]. Mud Logging Engineering, 2019, 30(2): 95-99, 136-137.

    [18]

    蒲秀刚, 金凤鸣, 韩文中, 等. 陆相页岩油甜点地质特征与勘探关键技术——以沧东凹陷孔店组二段为例[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40 (8): 997-1012. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB201908011.htm

    Pu X G, Jin F M, Han W Z, et al. Sweet spots geological characteristics and key exploration technologies of continental shale oil: A case study of Member 2 of Kongdian Formation in Cangdong sag[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2019, 40(8): 997-1012. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB201908011.htm

    [19]

    韩文中, 赵贤正, 金凤鸣, 等. 渤海湾盆地沧东凹陷孔二段湖相页岩油甜点评价与勘探实践[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2021, 48(4): 777-786. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK202104012.htm

    Han W Z, Zhao X Z, Jin F M, et al. Sweet spots evaluation and exploration of lacustrine shale oil of the second member of Paleogene Kongdian Formation in Cangdong sag, Bohai Bay basin[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2021, 48(4): 777-786. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK202104012.htm

    [20]

    赵贤正, 周立宏, 蒲秀刚, 等. 湖相页岩滞留烃形成条件与富集模式——以渤海湾盆地黄骅坳陷古近系为例[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2020, 47(5): 856-869. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK202005004.htm

    Zhao X Z, Zhou L H, Pu X G, et al. Formation conditions and enrichment model of retained petroleum in lacustrine shale: A case study of the Paleogene in Huanghua depression, Bohai Bay basin, China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2020, 47(5): 856-869. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK202005004.htm

    [21]

    朱日房, 张林晔, 李政, 等. 陆相断陷盆地页岩油资源潜力评价——以东营凹陷沙三段下亚段为例[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2019, 26(1): 129-136. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YQCS201901014.htm

    Zhu R F, Zhang L Y, Li Z, et al. Evaluation of shale oil resource potential in continental rift basin: A case study of Lower Es3 Member in Dongying sag[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2019, 26(1): 129-136. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YQCS201901014.htm

    [22]

    Jarvie D M, Jarvie B M, Weldon D, et al. Components and processes impacting production success from unconventional shale resource systems[J/OL]. Search and Discovery Article #40908, 2012.

    [23]

    姜南. 鄂尔多斯盆地合水地区长7油层组含油富集区优选[D]. 西安: 西北大学, 2017.

    Jiang N. Oil enrichment area optimization of Chang 7 reservoir in Heshui area, Ordos basin[D]. Xi'an: Northwest University, 2017.

    [24]

    郭同翠, 姜明军, 纪迎章, 等. 叠前地质统计学反演在页岩甜点和薄夹层预测中的应用——以西加拿大盆地W区块为例[J]. 石油地球物理勘探, 2020, 55(1): 167-175. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYDQ202001020.htm

    Guo T C, Jiang M J, Ji Y Z, et al. The application of prestack geostatistical inversion in the prediction of shale sweet spots and thin interbeds: A case study of Block W in Western Canada Basin[J]. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2020, 55(1): 167-175. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYDQ202001020.htm

    [25]

    鄢继华, 蒲秀刚, 周立宏, 等. 基于X射线衍射数据的细粒沉积岩岩石定名方法与应用[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2015, 20(1): 48-54.

    Yan J H, Pu X G, Zhou L H, et al. Naming method of fine-grained sedimentary rocks on basis of X-ray diffraction data[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2015, 20(1): 48-54.

    [26]

    李珊珊. 辽河油田致密油气勘探现状分析[J]. 内蒙古石油化工, 2015, 41(10): 61-64.

    Li S S. Analysis on the current situation of tight oil and gas exploration in Liaohe oilfield[J]. Inner Mongolia Petrochemical Industry, 2015, 41(10): 61-64. (in Chinese)

    [27]

    张敏. 致密油藏体积压裂水平井缝网设计及效果评价[D]. 青岛: 中国石油大学(华东), 2017.

    Zhang M. Design optimization and performance estimation of volume fracturing horizontal well in tight oil reservoir[D]. Qingdao: China University of Petroleum (East China), 2017.

  • 加载中

(7)

(1)

计量
  • 文章访问数:  1501
  • PDF下载数:  136
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
收稿日期:  2021-10-14
修回日期:  2022-01-04
刊出日期:  2023-04-25

目录