华北板块北缘东段库伦杂岩的发现及其构造意义

李东涛, 刘锦, 陈井胜, 赵辰, 李玉超, 彭游博, 蒯兵, 杨仲杰, 刘文彬. 华北板块北缘东段库伦杂岩的发现及其构造意义[J]. 地质与资源, 2024, 33(1): 1-11. doi: 10.13686/j.cnki.dzyzy.2024.01.001
引用本文: 李东涛, 刘锦, 陈井胜, 赵辰, 李玉超, 彭游博, 蒯兵, 杨仲杰, 刘文彬. 华北板块北缘东段库伦杂岩的发现及其构造意义[J]. 地质与资源, 2024, 33(1): 1-11. doi: 10.13686/j.cnki.dzyzy.2024.01.001
LI Dong-tao, LIU Jin, CHEN Jing-sheng, ZHAO Chen, LI Yu-chao, PENG You-bo, KUAI Bing, YANG Zhong-jie, LIU Wen-bin. DISCOVERY OF KULUN COMPLEX IN THE EAST PART OF THE NORTHERN MARGIN OF NORTH CHINA PLATE: Tectonic Implication[J]. Geology and Resources, 2024, 33(1): 1-11. doi: 10.13686/j.cnki.dzyzy.2024.01.001
Citation: LI Dong-tao, LIU Jin, CHEN Jing-sheng, ZHAO Chen, LI Yu-chao, PENG You-bo, KUAI Bing, YANG Zhong-jie, LIU Wen-bin. DISCOVERY OF KULUN COMPLEX IN THE EAST PART OF THE NORTHERN MARGIN OF NORTH CHINA PLATE: Tectonic Implication[J]. Geology and Resources, 2024, 33(1): 1-11. doi: 10.13686/j.cnki.dzyzy.2024.01.001

华北板块北缘东段库伦杂岩的发现及其构造意义

  • 基金项目:
    中国地质调查局项目"东北地区区域基础地质调查"(DD20221632);"辽东-吉中地区区域地质调查"(DD20190042);"松辽盆地西缘扎赉特-巴林左旗区域地质调查"(DD20190039)
详细信息
    作者简介: 李东涛(1966-)男, 正高级工程师, 从事区域地质矿产调查工作, 通信地址辽宁省沈阳市皇姑区黄河北大街280号, E-mail//1352339345@qq.com
    通讯作者: 陈井胜(1983-), 男, 正高级工程师, 从事区域地质调查工作, 通信地址辽宁省沈阳市皇姑区黄河北大街280号, E-mail/5202268@qq.com
  • 中图分类号: P597;P544

DISCOVERY OF KULUN COMPLEX IN THE EAST PART OF THE NORTHERN MARGIN OF NORTH CHINA PLATE: Tectonic Implication

More Information
  • 在华北板块北缘东段辽宁与内蒙古交界的库伦旗地区新发现了以晚古生代变质火山岩为主体的库伦杂岩. 通过剖面测制, 确定库伦杂岩岩石组合包括凝灰岩、安山岩及变沉积岩. 凝灰岩锆石LA-ICP-MS U-Pb同位素测试结果为391.0±3.7 Ma, 确定库伦杂岩形成时代为中泥盆世. 地球化学特征显示库伦杂岩形成于晚期岛弧环境. 通过对新发现的中泥盆世库伦杂岩及相关古生代的沉积事件、岩浆事件及变形的研究, 结合本区古生代杂岩、岩浆岩及火山沉积地层研究成果, 建立了华北板块北缘东段古生代增生型造山带的构造演化过程, 其经历了志留纪活动大陆边缘阶段、泥盆纪弧-陆碰撞阶段、石炭纪-中二叠世活动大陆边缘阶段和晚二叠世碰撞造山阶段. 志留系方家屯岩组、西别河岩组形成于弧后盆地环境, 反映了奥陶纪-志留纪研究区处于活动大陆边缘环境; 泥盆纪库伦杂岩火山-沉积为弧-陆碰撞结果, 伴随伸展背景下的岩浆活动. 石炭纪-中二叠世研究区在碰撞后伸展背景下重新拉张, 接受了白家店岩组、酒局子岩组沉积并导致了佟家屯岩组火山岛弧的形成. 晚二叠世古亚洲洋闭合, 发生陆-陆碰撞, 后造山作用延续到三叠纪.

  • 加载中
  • 图 1  研究区大地构造位置[2]及地质略图

    Figure 1. 

    图 2  通辽市库伦旗采石场泥盆纪库伦杂岩实测剖面图

    Figure 2. 

    图 3  库伦杂岩变凝灰岩锆石U-Pb年龄谐和图及加权平均年龄图

    Figure 3. 

    图 4  库伦杂岩log(N2O/K2O)-SiO2图解(据文献[10])

    Figure 4. 

    图 5  库伦杂岩形成构造环境判别图解(据文献[11])

    Figure 5. 

    图 6  黑云母安山岩构造环境Rb-(Y+Nb)判别图(据文献[12])

    Figure 6. 

    图 7  黑云母安山岩构造环境La/Yb-Th判别图(据文献[13])

    Figure 7. 

    表 1  内蒙古自治区库伦旗-辽宁省彰武法库地区古生界构造岩石地层单位一览表

    Table 1.  Paleozoic stratigraphy of Kulun Qi of Inner Mongolia and Faku of Liaoning areas

    符号 厚度/m 岩性特征 同位素年龄/Ma 生物组合
    二叠系 中统 叶茂台岩组 P2ym > 512 绢云绿泥片岩、绢云泥质板岩、变质粉砂岩 268±3
    下统 佟家屯岩组 P1t 1052.08 深灰色含斜长石榴绿泥绿帘绢云石英质糜棱岩、绿灰色绢云绿泥石英绿帘质糜棱岩、灰色绢云绿泥绿帘石英斜长质糜棱岩、深灰色石英绿泥绿帘斜长质糜棱岩及安山质糜棱岩 292±2
    石炭系 上统 酒局子组 C2j > 1776.14 黑色板岩、片岩、含砾石英岩屑杂砂岩、薄层灰岩 Calamltes sp., Neuropteris cf. Pseudovata Gothan et Sze, Pecopteris cf. wongii, P. cf. arborescens, Lepidodendron tachingshancnsis, L. szeianum, Tingiac arbonica
    下统 白家店组 C1b > 3947.6 碳质钙质页岩、大理岩、变质砂岩、灰色结晶灰岩、片岩及生物碎屑灰岩 Dibunophyllm bipatitum (Mcoy), D. cf. hochanpingense Yu, Lithostrotion cf. irregulare Phillips, Giantoproduclus manchuriensis (Minato), G. edelburgensis (Phillips)等
    泥盆系 中统 库伦杂岩 D2kl > 233 灰色铁质炭质泥岩、浅紫红色钙质泥岩、灰色绿帘石化泥岩、灰色绿帘石化硅质泥岩 391.0±3.7 本次获得
    志留系 上统 西别河岩组 S3x 1044.7 灰白色大理岩夹斜长角闪岩、二长浅粒岩及石英二云片岩 > 380 Amplexus xiashibeiense GUO, Diplochone sp., Tabularia sp., Thamnopra (Paralhamnopora) yu Tchi, Clathrodictyon cystosiforme khalfiua
    中统 方家屯岩组 S2f > 464 灰绿色透辉透闪片岩、灰绿色黑云斜长变粒岩、灰绿色绿帘绿泥片岩、灰黄色石英闪长质糜棱岩 433.4±4.2
    下载: 导出CSV
    库伦杂岩(D2kl): > 233.2 m
    43.灰黑色绿帘变质泥岩 9.3 m
    42.灰黑色硅化凝灰岩 5.1 m
    41.深灰色绿帘变质泥岩夹碳质绢云泥质板岩 11.1 m
    40.灰紫色绿帘斜黝帘蚀变岩 1.6 m
    39.深灰色绿帘变质泥岩 0.8 m
    38.青灰色碳质绢云泥质板岩 3.7 m
    37.灰黑色变质安山质岩屑凝灰岩 2.8 m
    36.灰黑色碳质绢云泥质板岩 0.9 m
    35.青灰色变质英安质晶屑岩屑凝灰岩 8.4 m
    34.灰黑色绿帘变质泥岩 5.6 m
    33.黄绿色蚀变火山角砾岩 1.9 m
    32.灰黑色碳质绢云泥质板岩 1.9 m
    31.黄绿色绿帘变质泥岩 1.9 m
    30.灰黑色碳质绢云泥质板岩 8.4 m
    29.黄绿色绿帘变质泥岩 23.2 m
    28.墨绿色变质英安质晶屑岩屑凝灰熔岩 4.7 m
    27.灰白色绿帘变质泥岩 1.9 m
    26.灰黑色变质英安质晶屑岩屑凝灰岩 32.1 m
    25.暗灰褐色绿帘斜黝帘蚀变岩 2 m
    24.青灰色钙质泥岩 1 m
    23.灰黑色绿帘变质泥岩 7 m
    22.灰黑色碳质绢云泥质板岩与绿帘变质泥岩互层 7 m
    21.灰白色变质晶屑岩屑凝灰岩 7.7 m
    20.灰黑色含碳质千枚状板岩 10.5 m
    19.浅灰色变质英安质熔结凝灰岩 2.9 m
    18.深灰色变质英安质岩屑晶屑凝灰岩 2.8 m
    17.浅灰色绿帘变质泥岩 10.9 m
    16.灰黑色黑云母安山岩 2.7 m
    15.灰黑色绢云泥质板岩 3.8 m
    14.灰黑色绿帘变质含粉砂质泥岩 1.9 m
    13.灰色硅化凝灰岩 2.9 m
    12.灰黑色绢云泥质板岩 1 m
    11.浅黄色硅化凝灰岩 12.5 m
    10.深灰色绢云碳质板岩 2.9 m
    9.灰绿色绢云母化凝灰岩 1.9 m
    8.灰黑色碳质绢云泥质板岩 1.9 m
    7.深灰色碳质绿帘硅质岩 4.7 m
    6.灰黑色碳质绢云泥质板岩 7.3 m
    5.灰黑色绿帘变质碳质泥岩 4.6 m
    4.灰黑色含粉砂质碳质泥岩 3.7 m
    3.黄褐色流纹质晶屑岩屑凝灰岩 3 m
    2.灰黑色钙质泥岩 3.9 m
    1.灰白色绿帘变质泥岩 > 15.7 m
    未见底
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 2  库伦杂岩中变凝灰岩样品中锆石LA-ICP-MS U-Pb分析结果

    Table 2.  LA-ICP-MS zircon U-Pb dating results of metamorphic tuff samples in Kulun complex

    样品号 Pb/10-6 Th/10-6 U/10-6 Th/U 207Pb/235U 206Pb/238U 年龄/Ma
    207Pb/235U 206Pb/238U
    TW14KL001-01 11 107 141 0.75 0.47179 0.01969 0.06275 0.00101 392 14 392 6
    TW14KL001-02 9 85 111 0.77 0.46781 0.01686 0.06207 0.00094 390 12 388 6
    TW14KL001-03 6 62 78 0.80 0.47115 0.01821 0.06219 0.00096 392 13 389 6
    TW14KL001-04 213 213 416 0.51 7.46078 0.10153 0.39951 0.00521 2168 12 2167 24
    TW14KL001-05 165 212 418 0.51 4.66875 0.06295 0.31406 0.00407 1762 11 1761 20
    TW14KL001-06 15 78 206 0.38 0.47502 0.01333 0.06289 0.00089 395 9 393 5
    TW14KL001-07 97 36 269 0.13 4.75444 0.09245 0.31493 0.00443 1777 16 1765 22
    TW14KL001-08 10 107 122 0.88 0.47301 0.01693 0.06279 0.00096 393 12 393 6
    TW14KL001-09 10 75 127 0.59 0.47918 0.02292 0.06302 0.00108 398 16 394 7
    TW14KL001-10 150 125 248 0.50 10.26069 0.15839 0.46346 0.00632 2459 14 2455 28
    TW14KL001-11 17 136 213 0.64 0.47387 0.02021 0.06282 0.00103 394 14 393 6
    TW14KL001-12 133 266 314 0.85 4.61796 0.07607 0.31483 0.00425 1753 14 1764 21
    TW14KL001-13 13 84 167 0.50 0.46454 0.01526 0.06211 0.00092 387 11 388 6
    TW14KL001-14 362 71 1022 0.07 4.64609 0.06368 0.31332 0.00409 1758 11 1757 20
    TW14KL001-15 256 81 465 0.17 9.74907 0.12458 0.45323 0.00589 2411 12 2410 26
    TW14KL001-16 167 76 459 0.17 4.56494 0.06818 0.31337 0.00416 1743 12 1757 20
    TW14KL001-17 84 60 221 0.27 4.72719 0.08725 0.31511 0.00440 1772 15 1766 22
    TW14KL001-18 145 92 390 0.24 4.58139 0.06815 0.31419 0.00417 1746 12 1761 20
    TW14KL001-19 217 70 632 0.11 4.29496 0.06834 0.29972 0.00403 1692 13 1690 20
    TW14KL001-20 237 56 698 0.08 4.24197 0.05882 0.29830 0.00390 1682 11 1683 19
    TW14KL001-21 9 114 100 1.14 0.43074 0.02394 0.06209 0.00113 364 17 388 7
    TW14KL001-22 15 153 185 0.83 0.45129 0.01527 0.06257 0.00094 378 11 391 6
    TW14KL001-23 135 95 375 0.25 4.31179 0.07040 0.30002 0.00406 1696 13 1691 20
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 3  库伦杂岩碎屑岩岩石化学成分

    Table 3.  Petrochemical compositions of clastic rocks in Kulun complex

    序号 岩性 SiO2 Al2O3 Fe2O3 FeO K2O Na2O CaO MgO TiO2 P2O5 MnO Los 总和
    1 绿帘变质泥岩 55.00 15.50 5.26 4.67 3.16 1.94 10.57 1.41 0.77 0.25 0.18 1.35 100.06
    2 钙质泥岩 60.84 16.60 5.32 2.88 3.06 3.16 2.34 1.89 0.80 0.23 0.09 2.88 100.07
    3 碳质绢云泥质板岩 63.79 16.85 5.15 2.25 3.4 1.1 1.26 1.83 0.71 0.092 0.095 3.29 99.82
    4 绿帘变质泥岩 62.03 14.00 4.45 3.54 1.81 3.07 7.43 1.07 0.71 0.16 0.16 1.63 100.04
    含量单位:%.
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1]

    谢鸣谦. 拼贴板块构造及其驱动机理——中国东北及邻区的大地构造演化[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2000: 1-256.

    Xie M Q. Collage plate tectonics and its driving mechanism: Tectonic evolution of Northeast China and its adjacent areas[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2000: 1-256. (in Chinese)

    [2]

    唐克东, 鞠楠, 张大权, 等. 关于古亚洲洋构造演化研究的几点思考[J]. 地质与资源, 2022, 31(3): 246-258, 330. http://manu25.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_dzyzy/CN/abstract/abstract10389.shtml

    Tang K D, Ju N, Zhang D Q, et al. Implication of the tectonic evolution of Paleo-Asian Ocean[J]. Geology and Resources, 2022, 31 (3): 246-258, 330. http://manu25.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_dzyzy/CN/abstract/abstract10389.shtml

    [3]

    时溢, 石绍山, 舒广龙. 辽宁北部早古生代弧-陆碰撞作用的发现及其构造意义[J]. 地质与资源, 2020, 29(4): 397-400. http://manu25.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_dzyzy/CN/abstract/abstract10222.shtml

    Shi Y, Shi S S, Shu G L. Discovery of the Early Paleozoic arc-continent collision in northern Liaoning Province: Tectonic implication[J]. Geology and Resources, 2020, 29(4): 397-400. http://manu25.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_dzyzy/CN/abstract/abstract10222.shtml

    [4]

    周建波, 张兴洲, 马志红, 等. 中国东北地区的构造格局与盆地演化[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2009, 30(5): 530-538. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-9985.2009.05.002

    Zhou J B, Zhang X Z, Ma Z H, et al. Tectonic framework and basin evolution in Northeast China[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2009, 30(5): 530-538. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-9985.2009.05.002

    [5]

    刘永江, 张兴洲, 金巍, 等. 东北地区晚古生代区域构造演化[J]. 中国地质, 2010, 37(4): 943-951. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3657.2010.04.010

    Liu Y J, Zhang X Z, Jin W, et al. Late Paleozoic tectonic evolution in Northeast China[J]. Geology in China, 2010, 37(4): 943-951. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3657.2010.04.010

    [6]

    王成文, 金巍, 张兴洲, 等. 东北及邻区晚古生代大地构造属性新认识[J]. 地层学杂志, 2008, 32(2): 119-136. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4959.2008.02.001

    Wang C W, Jin W, Zhang X Z, et al. New understanding of the Late Paleozoic tectonics in northeastern China and adjacent areas[J]. Journal of Stratigraphy, 2008, 32(2): 119-136. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4959.2008.02.001

    [7]

    李双林, 欧阳自远. 兴蒙造山带及邻区的构造格局与构造演化[J]. 海洋地质与第四纪地质, 1998, 18(3): 45-54. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HYDZ803.006.htm

    Li S L, Ouyang Z Y. Tectonic framework and evolution of Xing' anling-Mongolian Orogenic Belt (XMOB) and its adjacent region[J]. Marine Geology & Quaternary Geology, 1998, 18(3): 45-54. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HYDZ803.006.htm

    [8]

    李继亮. 增生型造山带的基本特征[J]. 地质通报, 2004, 23(9/10): 947-951. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZQYD2004Z2017.htm

    Li J L. Basic characteristics of accretion-type orogens[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2004, 23(9/10): 947-951. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZQYD2004Z2017.htm

    [9]

    徐备, 陈斌. 内蒙古北部华北板块与西伯利亚板块之间中古生代造山带的结构及演化[J]. 中国科学(D辑), 1997, 27(3): 227-232. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JDXK199703005.htm

    Xu B, Chen B. The structure and evolution of the Mesozoic orogenic belt between the North China Plate and the Siberian Plate in northern Inner Mongolia[J]. Science in China (Series D), 1997, 27(3): 227-232. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JDXK199703005.htm

    [10]

    Roser B P, Korsch R J. Determination of tectonic setting of sandstone-mudstone suites using silica content and potassium oxide/ sodium oxide ratio[J]. The Journal of Geology, 1986, 94(5): 635-650. doi: 10.1086/629071

    [11]

    Bhatia M R. Plate tectonics and geochemical composition of sandstones[J]. The Journal of Geology, 1983, 91(6): 611-627. doi: 10.1086/628815

    [12]

    Pearce J A, Harris N B W, Tindle A G. Trace element discrimination diagrams for the tectonic interpretation of granitic rocks[J]. Journal of Petrology, 1984, 25: 956-983. doi: 10.1093/petrology/25.4.956

    [13]

    Condie K C. Geochemistry and tectonic setting of Early Proterozoic supracrustal rocks in the southwestern United States[J]. The Journal of Geology, 1986, 94(6): 845-864. doi: 10.1086/629091

    [14]

    杨泽黎, 刘洋, 滕飞, 等. 白乃庙岛弧东段早古生代火山岩年代学、地球化学特征及地质意义[J]. 高校地质学报, 2019, 25(2): 206-220. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GXDX201902004.htm

    Yang Z L, Liu Y, Teng F, et al. Geochronology and geochemistry of the Early Paleozoic volcanic rocks in eastern segment of the Bainaimiao arc, and their geological significances[J]. Geological Journal of China Universities, 2019, 25(2): 206-220. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GXDX201902004.htm

    [15]

    胡晓佳, 杨泽黎, 王树庆, 等. 内蒙古包尔汉图岛弧早古生代火山岩年代学、地球化学特征——岩石成因及对兴蒙造山带构造演化的约束[J]. 地质学报, 2022, 96(3): 897-917. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0001-5717.2022.03.011

    Hu X J, Yang L Z, Wang S Q, et al. Geochronology and geochemistry of the Early Paleozoic volcanic rocks from the Baoerhantu arc in Inner Mongolia: Petrogenesis and constraints on the tectonic evolution of the Xing-Meng orogenic belt[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2022, 96 (3): 897-917. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0001-5717.2022.03.011

    [16]

    Shi Y, Shi S S, Liu Z H, et al. Petrogenesis of the late Early Palaeozoic adakitic granitoids in the southern margin of the Songliao Basin, NE China: Implications for the subduction of the Palaeo-Asian Ocean[J]. Geological Journal, 2019, 54(6): 3821-3839. doi: 10.1002/gj.3377

    [17]

    李锦轶, 张进, 杨天南, 等. 北亚造山区南部及其毗邻地区地壳构造分区与构造演化[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2009, 39(4): 584-605. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CCDZ200904002.htm

    Li J Y, Zhang J, Yang T N, et al. Crustal tectonic division and evolution of the southern part of the North Asian Orogenic region and its adjacent areas[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2009, 39(4): 584-605. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CCDZ200904002.htm

    [18]

    张拴宏, 赵越, 刘建民, 等. 华北地块北缘晚古生代—早中生代岩浆活动期次、特征及构造背景[J]. 岩石矿物学杂志, 2010, 29(6): 824-842. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6524.2010.06.017

    Zhang S H, Zhao Y, Liu J M, et al. Geochronology, geochemistry and tectonic setting of the Late Paleozoic: Early Mesozoic magmatism in the northern margin of the North China block: A preliminary review[J]. Acta Petrologica et Mineralogica, 2010, 29(6): 824-842. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6524.2010.06.017

    [19]

    罗镇宽, 苗来成, 关康, 等. 河北张家口水泉沟岩体SHRIMP年代学研究及其意义[J]. 地球化学, 2001, 30(2): 116-122. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0379-1726.2001.02.002

    Luo Z K, Miao L C, Guang K, et al. SHRIMP chronological study of Shuiquangou intrusive body in Zhangjiakou area, Hebei Province and its geochemical significance[J]. Geochimica, 2001, 30(2): 116-122. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0379-1726.2001.02.002

    [20]

    刘建峰, 李锦轶, 迟效国, 等. 华北克拉通北缘与弧-陆碰撞相关的早泥盆世长英质火山岩——锆石U-Pb定年及地球化学证据[J]. 地质通报, 2013, 32(2/3): 267-278. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZQYD2013Z1005.htm

    Liu J F, Li J Y, Chi X G, et al. Early Devonian felsic volcanic rocks related to the arc-continent collision on the northern margin of North China craton: Evidences of zircon U-Pb dating and geochemical characteristics[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2013, 32(2/3): 267-278. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZQYD2013Z1005.htm

    [21]

    Liu J M, Zhao Y, Sun Y L, et al. Recognition of the latest Permian to Early Triassic Cu-Mo mineralization on the northern margin of the North China block and its geological significance[J]. Gondwana Research, 2010, 17(1): 125-134. doi: 10.1016/j.gr.2009.07.007

    [22]

    Shi Y R, Liu D Y, Miao L C, et al. Devonian A-type granitic magmatism on the northern margin of the North China Craton: SHRIMP U-Pb zircon dating and Hf-isotopes of the Hongshan granite at Chifeng, Inner Mongolia, China[J]. Gondwana Research, 2010, 17 (4): 632-641. doi: 10.1016/j.gr.2009.11.011

    [23]

    Zhang S H, Zhao Y, Song B, et al. Petrogenesis of the Middle Devonian Gushan diorite pluton on the northern margin of the North China block and its tectonic implications[J]. Geological Magazine, 2007, 144(3): 553-568. doi: 10.1017/S0016756807003275

    [24]

    王惠初, 赵凤清, 李惠民, 等. 冀北闪长质岩石的锆石SHRIMP U-Pb年龄: 晚古生代岩浆弧的地质记录[J]. 岩石学报, 2007, 23(3): 597-604. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB200703009.htm

    Wang H C, Zhao F Q, Li H M, et al. Zircon SHRIMP U-Pb age of the dioritic rocks from northern Hebei: The geological records of Late Paleozoic magmatic arc[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2007, 23(3): 597-604. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB200703009.htm

    [25]

    张拴宏, 赵越, 宋彪, 等. 冀北隆化早前寒武纪高级变质区内的晚古生代片麻状花岗闪长岩-锆石SHRIMP U-Pb年龄及其构造意义[J]. 岩石学报, 2004, 20(3): 621-626. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB200703004.htm

    Zhang S H, Zhao Y, Song B, et al. The Late Paleozoic gneissic granodiorite pluton in Early Pre-Cambrian high-grade metamorphic terrains near Longhua County in northern Hebei Province, North China: Result from zircon SHRIMP U-Pb dating and its tectonic implications[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2004, 20(3): 621-626. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB200703004.htm

    [26]

    Zhang S H, Zhao Y, Song B, et al. Contrasting Late Carboniferous and Late Permian-Middle Triassic intrusive suites from the northern margin of the North China craton: Geochronology, petrogenesis, and tectonic implications[J]. GSABulletin, 2009, 121(1/2): 181-200.

    [27]

    Zhang S H, Zhao Y, Liu X C, et al. Late Paleozoic to Early Mesozoic mafic-ultramafic complexes from the northern North China Block: Constraints on the composition and evolution of the lithospheric mantle[J]. Lithos, 2009, 110(1/4): 229-246.

    [28]

    Ducea M. The California arc: Thick granitic batholiths, eclogitic residues, lithospheric-scale thrusting, and magmatic flare-ups[J]. GSA Today, 2001, 11(11): 4-10. doi: 10.1130/1052-5173(2001)011<0004:TCATGB>2.0.CO;2

    [29]

    Lackey J S, Valley J W, Saleeby J B. Supracrustal input to magmas in the deep crust of Sierra Nevada batholith: Evidence from high-δ18O zircon[J]. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 2005, 235(1/2): 315-330.

    [30]

    倪志耀, 翟明国, 王仁民, 等. 华北古陆块北缘中段发现晚古生代退变榴辉岩[J]. 科学通报, 2004, 49(6): 585-591. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KXTB200406016.htm

    Ni Z Y, Zhai M G, Wang R M, et al. Discovery of Late Paleozoic retrograded eclogites from the middle part of the northern margin of North China Craton[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2004, 49(6): 600-606. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KXTB200406016.htm

    [31]

    罗镇宽, 苗来成, 关康, 等. 冀东都山花岗岩基及相关花岗斑岩脉SHRIMP锆石U-Pb法定年及其意义[J]. 地球化学, 2003, 32(2): 173-180. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQHX200302010.htm

    Luo Z K, Miao L C, Guan K, et al. SHRIMP U-Pb zircon dating of the Dushan granitic batholiths and related granite-porphyry dyke, eastern Hebei Province, China, and their geological significance[J]. Geochimica, 2003, 32(2): 173-180. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQHX200302010.htm

    [32]

    罗镇宽, 李俊建, 关康, 等. 辽宁凌源柏杖子金矿区花岗岩SHRIMP锆石U-Pb年龄[J]. 地质调查与研究, 2004, 27(2): 82-85, 128. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QHWJ200402003.htm

    Luo Z K, Li J J, Guan K, et al. SHRIMP zircon U-Pb age of the granite at Baizhangzi gold field in Lingyuan, Liaoning Province[J]. Geological Survey and Research, 2004, 27(2): 82-85, 128. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QHWJ200402003.htm

    [33]

    马芳, 穆治国, 刘玉琳. 河北滦平球状闪长岩年代学及其地质意义[J]. 地质论评, 2004, 50(4): 360-364. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0371-5736.2004.04.004

    Ma F, Mu Z G, Liu Y L. Geochronology and geologic significance of the orbicular dioritic rocks in Luanping, Hebei Province[J]. Geological Review, 2004, 50(4): 360-364. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0371-5736.2004.04.004

    [34]

    张拴宏, 赵越, 刘健, 等. 华北地块北缘晚古生代-中生代花岗岩体侵位深度及其构造意义[J]. 岩石学报, 2007, 23(3): 625-638. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB200703012.htm

    Zhang S H, Zhao Y, Liu J, et al. Emplacement depths of the Late Paleozoic-Mesozoic granitoid intrusions from the northern North China block and their tectonic implications[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2007, 23(3): 625-638. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB200703012.htm

    [35]

    田伟, 陈斌, 刘超群, 等. 冀北小张家口超基性岩体的锆石U-Pb年龄和Hf同位素组成[J]. 岩石学报, 2007, 23(3): 583-590. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB200703007.htm

    Tian W, Chen B, Liu C Q, et al. Zircon U-Pb age and Hf isotopic composition of the Xiaozhangjiakou ultramafic pluton in northern Hebei[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2007, 23(3): 583-590. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB200703007.htm

    [36]

    Zhang S H, Zhao Y, Song B, et al. Carboniferous granitic plutons from the northern margin of the North China block: Implications for a Late Palaeozoic active continental margin[J]. Journal of the Geological Society, 2007, 164(2): 451-463.

  • 加载中

(7)

(4)

计量
  • 文章访问数:  902
  • PDF下载数:  165
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
收稿日期:  2022-07-17
修回日期:  2023-03-06
刊出日期:  2024-02-25

目录