生态文明背景下云南省绿色矿山评价方法

伍伟. 生态文明背景下云南省绿色矿山评价方法[J]. 地质与资源, 2024, 33(2): 254-266. doi: 10.13686/j.cnki.dzyzy.2024.02.015
引用本文: 伍伟. 生态文明背景下云南省绿色矿山评价方法[J]. 地质与资源, 2024, 33(2): 254-266. doi: 10.13686/j.cnki.dzyzy.2024.02.015
WU Wei. EVALUATION METHOD FOR GREEN MINES IN YUNNAN PROVINCE UNDER THE BACKGROUND OF ECOLOGICAL CIVILIZATION[J]. Geology and Resources, 2024, 33(2): 254-266. doi: 10.13686/j.cnki.dzyzy.2024.02.015
Citation: WU Wei. EVALUATION METHOD FOR GREEN MINES IN YUNNAN PROVINCE UNDER THE BACKGROUND OF ECOLOGICAL CIVILIZATION[J]. Geology and Resources, 2024, 33(2): 254-266. doi: 10.13686/j.cnki.dzyzy.2024.02.015

生态文明背景下云南省绿色矿山评价方法

  • 基金项目:
    云南省教育厅科学研究基金项目“生态文明背景下云南省资源型企业生态矿山发展模式研究——以铅锌矿企业为例”(2022J1308)
详细信息
    作者简介: 伍伟(1981-), 男, 博士, 副教授, 主要从事绿色矿山建设研究、综合信息成矿预测工作, 通信地址云南省昆明市玉华区学府路388号, E-mail//tourist1105@163.com
  • 中图分类号: X822.5

EVALUATION METHOD FOR GREEN MINES IN YUNNAN PROVINCE UNDER THE BACKGROUND OF ECOLOGICAL CIVILIZATION

  • 在国家绿色矿山指标体系基础上, 依托层次分析法, 选用矿区环境、资源开发方式、资源综合利用、节能减排、科技创新与智能矿山、企业管理与形象6个一级评价指标共计100项绿色矿山评价指标, 构建层次判断矩阵, 计算出不同指标在绿色矿山建设过程中的重要程度. 采用经改良后的二态(-1, 1)赋值方法, 更加准确地对绿色矿山建设进行综合评分, 并在此基础上, 采用等级模糊评价方法确定绿色矿山等级, 为确定云南省示范性绿色矿山提供数据支撑.

  • 加载中
  • 图 1  云南省绿色矿山区域分布图

    Figure 1. 

    图 2  云南省不同矿种绿色矿山分布范围

    Figure 2. 

    图 3  绿色矿山评价指标分布及分值图

    Figure 3. 

    图 4  生产矿山块模型属性赋值图

    Figure 4. 

    图 5  各评价总指标二态赋值结果图

    Figure 5. 

    图 6  绿色矿山评价模型层次关系图

    Figure 6. 

    表 1  不同判断结构矩阵阶数所对应的RI值

    Table 1.  RI values corresponding to different judgment matrix exponents

    矩阵阶数(n) 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
    RI 0 0 0 0.52 0.89 1.12 1.26 1.36 1.41 1.46 1.49 1.52 1.54 1.58 1.58 1.59
    矩阵阶数(n) 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
    RI 1.5943 1.6064 1.6133 1.6207 1.6292 1.6358 1.6403 1.6462 16497 1.6556 1.6587 1.6631 1.6670 1.6693 1.6724
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 2  基准层(B)成对比较矩阵

    Table 2.  Paired comparison matrix of reference layer (B)

    矿山绿色建设总评 矿区环境 资源开采方式 资源综合利用 节能减排 科技创新与智能矿山 企业管理与形象
    矿区环境 1 1/3 1 1 5 7
    资源开采方式 3 1 3 3 7 9
    资源综合利用 1 1/3 1 1 5 7
    节能减排 1 1/3 1 1 5 7
    科技创新与智能矿山 1/5 1/7 1/5 1/5 1 5
    企业管理与形象 1/7 1/9 1/7 1/7 1/5 1
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 3  矿区环境项目所涉子项目间的成对比较矩阵

    Table 3.  Paired comparison matrix of subitems involved in environmental item in mining area

    X1 F1 F2 F3 F4 F5 F6 F7 F8 F9 F10 F11 F12 F13 F14 F15 F16 F17
    F1 1 1/2 1/2 1/2 1/2 3 3 1/3 1/2 1 1/3 1/3 1/3 1 3 3 1
    F2 2 1 1 1 1 3 3 1/2 1 2 1/2 1/2 1/2 2 4 4 2
    F3 2 1 1 1 1 3 3 1/2 1 2 1/2 1/2 1/2 2 4 4 2
    F4 2 1 1 1 1 3 3 1/2 1 2 1/2 1/2 1/2 2 4 4 2
    F5 2 1 1 1 1 3 3 1/2 1 2 1/2 1/2 1/2 2 4 4 2
    F6 1/3 1/3 1/3 1/3 1/3 1 1 1/5 1/3 1/2 1/5 1/5 1/5 1/2 2 2 1/2
    F7 1/3 1/3 1/3 1/3 1/3 1 1 1/5 1/3 1/2 1/5 1/5 1/5 1/2 2 2 1/2
    F8 3 2 2 2 2 5 5 1 2 3 1 1 1 3 7 7 3
    F9 2 1 1 1 1 3 3 1/2 1 2 1/2 1/2 1/2 2 4 4 2
    F10 1 1/2 1/2 1/2 1/2 3 3 1/3 1/2 1 1/3 1/3 1/3 1 3 3 1
    F11 3 2 2 2 2 5 5 1 2 3 1 1 1 3 7 7 3
    F12 3 2 2 2 2 5 5 1 2 3 1 1 1 3 7 7 3
    F13 3 2 2 2 2 5 5 1 2 3 1 1 1 3 7 7 3
    F14 1 1/2 1/2 1/2 1/2 3 3 1/3 1/2 1 1/3 1/3 1/3 1 3 3 1
    F15 1/3 1/4 1/4 1/4 1/4 1/2 1/2 1/7 1/4 1/3 1/7 1/7 1/7 1/3 1 1 1/3
    F16 1/3 1/4 1/4 1/4 1/4 1/2 1/2 1/7 1/4 1/3 1/7 1/7 1/7 1/3 1 1 1/3
    F17 1 1/2 1/2 1/2 1/2 3 3 1/3 1/2 1 1/3 1/3 1/3 1 3 3 1
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 4  资源开采方式项目所涉子项目的成对比较矩阵

    Table 4.  Paired comparison matrix of subitems involved in resource mining mode item

    X2 F18 F19 F20 F21 F22 F23 F24 F25 F26 F27 F28 F29 F30 F31 F32
    F18 1 2 1/2 2 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
    F19 1/2 1 1/3 1 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
    F20 2 3 1 3 5 5 5 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
    F21 1/2 1 1/5 1 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
    F22 1/3 1/2 1/5 1/2 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
    F23 1/3 1/2 1/5 1/2 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
    F24 1/3 1/2 1/5 1/2 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
    F25 1/4 1/3 1/7 1/3 1/2 1/2 1/2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
    F26 1/4 1/3 1/7 1/3 1/2 1/2 1/2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
    F27 1/4 1/3 1/7 1/3 1/2 1/2 1/2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
    F28 1/4 1/3 1/7 1/3 1/2 1/2 1/2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
    F29 1/4 1/3 1/7 1/3 1/2 1/2 1/2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
    F30 1/4 1/3 1/7 1/3 1/2 1/2 1/2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
    F31 1/4 1/3 1/7 1/3 1/2 1/2 1/2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
    F32 1/4 1/3 1/7 1/3 1/2 1/2 1/2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 5  资源综合利用项目所涉一类子项目成对比较矩阵

    Table 5.  Paired comparison matrix of Type Ⅰ subitems involved in resources comprehensive utilization item

    X3-1 F33 F34 F35 F36 F37 F38 F39 F40 F41 F42
    F33 1 1/3 2 2 1/5 1 2 1/2 1/2 1
    F34 3 1 4 4 1/2 3 4 4 4 4
    F35 1/2 1/4 1 1 1/7 1/2 1 1/3 1/3 1/2
    F36 1/2 1/4 1 1 1/7 1/2 1 1/3 1/3 1/2
    F37 5 2 7 7 1 5 7 3 3 5
    F38 1 1/3 2 2 1/5 1 2 1/2 1/2 1
    F39 1/2 1/4 1 1 1/7 1/2 1 1/3 1/3 1/2
    F40 2 1/2 3 3 1/3 2 3 1 1 2
    F41 2 1/2 3 3 1/3 2 3 1 1 2
    F42 1 1/3 2 2 1/5 1 2 1/2 1/2 1
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 6  资源综合利用项目所涉二类子项目成对比较矩阵

    Table 6.  Paired comparison matrix of Type Ⅱ subitems involved in resources comprehensive utilization item

    X3-2 F43 F44 F45 F46
    F43 1 1 2 3
    F44 1 1 2 3
    F45 1/2 1/2 1 2
    F46 1/3 1/3 1/2 1
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 7  节能减排项目所涉子项目的成对比较矩阵

    Table 7.  Paired comparison matrix of subitems involved in energy saving and emission reduction item

    X4 F47 F48 F49 F50 F51 F52 F53 F54 F55 F56 F57 F58 F59 F60 F61 F62 F63
    F47 1 1/2 1/3 1 1 1/3 1/3 1/2 1/2 1/2 1/3 1/2 1/3 1/7 1 1/3 1/2
    F48 2 1 1/2 2 2 1/2 1/2 1 1 1 1/2 1 1/2 1/5 2 1/2 1
    F49 3 2 1 3 3 1 1 2 2 2 1 2 1 1/5 2 1 2
    F50 1 1/2 1/3 1 1 1/3 1/3 1/2 1/2 1/2 1/3 1/2 1/3 1/7 1 1/3 1/2
    F51 1 1/2 1/3 1 1 1/3 1/3 1/2 1/2 1/2 1/3 1/2 1/3 1/7 1 1/3 1/2
    F52 3 2 1 3 3 1 1 2 2 2 1 2 1 1/5 2 1 2
    F53 3 2 1 3 3 1 1 2 2 2 1 2 1 1/5 2 1 2
    F54 2 1 1/2 2 2 1/2 1/2 1 1 1 1/2 1 1/2 1/5 2 1/2 1
    F55 2 1 1/2 2 2 1/2 1/2 1 1 1 1/2 1 1/2 1/5 2 1/2 1
    F56 2 1 1/2 2 2 1/2 1/2 1 1 1 1/2 1 1/2 1/5 2 1/2 1
    F57 3 2 1 3 3 1 1 2 2 2 1 2 1 1/5 2 1 2
    F58 2 1 1/2 2 2 1/2 1/2 1 1 1 1/2 1 1/2 1/5 2 1/2 1
    F59 3 2 1 3 3 1 1 2 2 2 1 2 1 1/5 2 1 2
    F60 7 5 5 7 7 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 1 7 5 5
    F61 1 1/2 1/3 1 1 1/3 1/3 1/2 1/2 1/2 1/3 1/2 1/3 1/7 1 1/3 1/2
    F62 3 2 1 3 3 1 1 2 2 2 1 2 1 1/5 2 1 2
    F63 2 1 1/2 2 2 1/2 1/2 1 1 1 1/2 1 1/2 1/5 2 1/2 1
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 8  科创与智能矿山项目所涉子项目的成对比较矩阵

    Table 8.  Paired comparison matrix of subitems involved in sci-tech innovation and intelligent mine item

    X5 F64 F65 F66 F67 F68 F69 F70 F71 F72 F73 F74 F75 F76 F77 F78
    F64 1 1 1/2 1/7 1/2 1 1/2 1/7 1/2 1/3 1/3 1/3 1/2 1/2 1/2
    F65 1 1 1/2 1/7 1/2 1 1/2 1/7 1/2 1/3 1/3 1/3 1/2 1/2 1/2
    F66 2 2 1 1/5 1 2 1 1/5 1 1/2 1/2 1/2 1 1 1
    F67 7 7 5 1 5 7 5 1 5 3 3 3 5 5 5
    F68 2 2 1 1/5 1 2 1 1/5 1 1/2 1/2 1/2 1 1 1
    F69 1 1 1/2 1/7 1/2 1 1/2 1/7 1/2 1/3 1/3 1/3 1/2 1/2 1/2
    F70 2 2 1 1/5 1 2 1 1/5 1 1/2 1/2 1/2 1 1 1
    F71 7 7 5 1 5 7 5 1 5 3 3 3 5 5 5
    F72 2 2 1 1/5 1 2 1 1/5 1 1/2 1/2 1/2 1 1 1
    F73 3 3 2 1/3 2 3 2 1/3 2 1 1 1 2 2 2
    F74 3 3 2 1/3 2 3 2 1/3 2 1 1 1 2 2 2
    F75 3 3 2 1/3 2 3 2 1/3 2 1 1 1 2 2 2
    F76 2 2 1 1/5 1 2 1 1/5 1 1/2 1/2 1/2 1 1 1
    F77 2 2 1 1/5 1 2 1 1/5 1 1/2 1/2 1/2 1 1 1
    F78 2 2 1 1/5 1 2 1 1/5 1 1/2 1/2 1/2 1 1 1
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 9  企业管理与企业形象项目所涉子项目的成对比较矩阵

    Table 9.  Paired comparison matrix of subitems involved in enterprise management and image item

    X6 F79 F80 F81 F82 F83 F84 F85 F86 F87 F88 F89 F90 F91 F92 F93 F94 F95 F96 F97 F98 F99 F100
    F79 1 1 1 1 1/2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1/5 2 2 2 1 2 1 1 2 2 2
    F80 1 1 1 1 1/2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1/5 2 2 2 1 2 1 1 2 2 2
    F81 1 1 1 1 1/2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1/5 2 2 2 1 2 1 1 2 2 2
    F82 1 1 1 1 1/2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1/5 2 2 2 1 2 1 1 2 2 2
    F83 2 2 2 2 1 3 3 3 3 3 3 1/3 3 3 3 2 3 2 2 3 3 3
    F84 1/2 1/2 1/2 1/2 1/3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1/7 1 1 1 1/2 1 1/2 1/2 1 1 1
    F85 1/2 1/2 1/2 1/2 1/3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1/7 1 1 1 1/2 1 1/2 1/2 1 1 1
    F86 1/2 1/2 1/2 1/2 1/3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1/7 1 1 1 1/2 1 1/2 1/2 1 1 1
    F87 1/2 1/2 1/2 1/2 1/3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1/7 1 1 1 1/2 1 1/2 1/2 1 1 1
    F88 1/2 1/2 1/2 1/2 1/3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1/7 1 1 1 1/2 1 1/2 1/2 1 1 1
    F89 1/2 1/2 1/2 1/2 1/3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1/7 1 1 1 1/2 1 1/2 1/2 1 1 1
    F90 5 5 5 5 3 7 7 7 7 7 7 1 7 7 7 5 7 5 5 7 7 7
    F91 1/2 1/2 1/2 1/2 1/3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1/7 1 1 1 1/2 1 1/2 1/2 1 1 1
    F92 1/2 1/2 1/2 1/2 1/3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1/7 1 1 1 1/2 1 1/2 1/2 1 1 1
    F93 1/2 1/2 1/2 1/2 1/3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1/7 1 1 1 1/2 1 1/2 1/2 1 1 1
    F94 1 1 1 1 1/2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1/5 2 2 2 1 2 1 1 2 2 2
    F95 1/2 1/2 1/2 1/2 1/3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1/7 1 1 1 1/2 1 1/2 1/2 1 1 1
    F96 1 1 1 1 1/2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1/5 2 2 2 1 2 1 1 2 2 2
    F97 1 1 1 1 1/2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1/5 2 2 2 1 2 1 1 2 2 2
    F98 1/2 1/2 1/2 1/2 1/3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1/7 1 1 1 1/2 1 1/2 1/2 1 1 1
    F99 1/2 1/2 1/2 1/2 1/3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1/7 1 1 1 1/2 1 1/2 1/2 1 1 1
    F100 1/2 1/2 1/2 1/2 1/3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1/7 1 1 1 1/2 1 1/2 1/2 1 1 1
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1]

    聂选华. 云南边疆民族地区生态文明建设可持续发展研究[J]. 昆明理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2017, 17(2): 33-39. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KMLS201702005.htm

    Nie X H. The research on sustainable development of eco-civilization construction in Yunnan frontier ethnic minority regions[J]. Journal of Kunming University of Science and Technology (Social Sciences Edition), 2017, 17(2): 33-39. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KMLS201702005.htm

    [2]

    王富林, 杨仕教, 杨波, 等. 生态文明视阈下的绿色生态矿业发展路径[J]. 河南理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2016, 17(2): 169-173. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JZXS201602006.htm

    Wang F L, Yang S J, Yang B, et al. Development path of green ecological mining from the perspective of ecological civilization[J]. Journal of Henan Polytechnic University (Social Sciences), 2016, 17(2): 169-173. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JZXS201602006.htm

    [3]

    栗欣. 绿色矿山文化建设模式的分析[J]. 中国矿业, 2019, 28(7): 86-88, 93. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGKA201907016.htm

    Li X. Analysis of the construction mode of green mining culture[J]. China Mining Magazine, 2019, 28(7): 86-88, 93. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGKA201907016.htm

    [4]

    云南省自然资源厅, 云南省发展和改革委员会, 云南省工业和信息化厅, 等. 云南省矿产资源总体规划(2021-2025年)(公开发布稿)[EB/OL]. http://dnr.yn.gov.cn/html/2022/tongzhigonggao_1030/33927.html, 2022-10-30.

    Yunnan Provincial Department of Natural Resources, Yunnan Provincial Development and Reform Commission, Yunnan Provincial Department of Industry and Information Technology, et al. Yunnan Province mineral resources master plan (2021-2025)[EB/OL]. http://dnr.yn.gov.cn/html/2022/tongzhigonggao_1030/33927.html, 2022-10-30. (in Chinese)

    [5]

    云南省人民政府办公厅. 云南省"十四五"区域协调发展规划[EB/OL]. https://www.yn.gov.cn/zwgk/zcwj/zxwj/202204/t20220421_241076.html, 2022-04-14.

    General Office of the People's Government of Yunnan Province. The regional coordinated development plan of Yunnan Province during the 14th Five-Year Plan[EB/OL]. https://www.yn.gov.cn/zwgk/zcwj/zxwj/202204/t20220421_241076.html, 2022-04-14. (in Chinese).

    [6]

    郭冬艳, 杨繁, 路永严. 关于云南绿色矿山建设的思考与建议[J]. 铜业工程, 2021(2): 15-18, 22. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-3842.2021.02.005

    Guo D Y, Yang F, Lu Y Y. Thoughts and suggestions on the construction of green mines in Yunnan[J]. Copper Engineering, 2021(2): 15-18, 22. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-3842.2021.02.005

    [7]

    董煜, 柳晓娟, 侯华丽. 绿色矿山评价指标解析[J]. 中国矿业, 2020, 29(12): 68-74. doi: 10.12075/j.issn.1004-4051.2020.12.032

    Dong Y, Liu X J, Hou H L. Analysis of green mine evaluation index[J]. China Mining Magazine, 2020, 29(12): 68-74. doi: 10.12075/j.issn.1004-4051.2020.12.032

    [8]

    杨伟龙, 白宇明, 李永利, 等. 内蒙古包头某铁矿尾矿库生态修复的植物优选研究[J]. 中国地质, 2022, 49(3): 683-694. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DIZI202203001.htm

    Yang W L, Bai Y M, Li Y L, et al. Plant optimal screening for contaminated soil remediation in an iron mining tailing of Baotou, Inner Mongolia[J]. Geology in China, 2022, 49(3): 683-694. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DIZI202203001.htm

    [9]

    刘亦晴, 梁雁茹, 刘娜娜, 等. 基于高质量发展视角的绿色矿山建设评价指标体系研究[J]. 黄金科学技术, 2020, 28(2): 176-187. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HJKJ202002003.htm

    Liu Y Q, Liang Y R, Liu N N, et al. Study on evaluation index system of green mine construction based on high quality development perspective[J]. Gold Science and Technology, 2020, 28(2): 176-187. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HJKJ202002003.htm

    [10]

    刘艳, 张星梓, 李森, 等. 云南省生态文明建设指标分析研究[J]. 环境科学导刊, 2022, 41(2): 34-38. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YNHK202202007.htm

    Liu Y, Zhang X Z, Li S, et al. Analysis on indicators of ecological civilization construction in Yunnan Province[J]. Environmental Science Survey, 2022, 41(2): 34-38. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YNHK202202007.htm

    [11]

    段顺荣, 李延福, 李春阳. 基于GIS和层次分析法的青海甘德县地质灾害危险性评价[J]. 矿产勘查, 2021, 12(2): 453-460. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7801.2021.02.034

    Duan S R, Li Y F, Li C Y. Geological hazard risk assessment based on GIS and analytical hierarchy process in Gande County, Qinghai Province[J]. Mineral Exploration, 2021, 12(2): 453-460. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7801.2021.02.034

    [12]

    秦先燕, 彭苗枝, 焦团理, 等. 基于GIS的环巢湖地区地质环境承载能力评价[J]. 地质与资源, 2020, 29(2): 180-186. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1947.2020.02.010

    Qin X Y, Peng M Z, Jiao T L, et al. Assessment of GIS-basedgeological environment carrying capacity in circu-Chaohu Lake area, Anhui, China[J]. Geology and Resources, 2020, 29(2): 180-186. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1947.2020.02.010

    [13]

    张炳江. 层次分析法及其应用案例[M]. 北京: 电子工业出版社, 2014: 9-55, 156-157.

    Zhang B J. Analytic hierarchy process and its application cases[M]. Beijing: Publishing House of Electronics Industry, 2014: 9-55, 156-157. (in Chinese)

    [14]

    杨艺苑, 杨存建. 基于GIS的东川区生态环境敏感性分析[J]. 测绘通报, 2022, 3(3): 7-12. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CHTB202203002.htm

    Yang Y Y, Yang C J. Sensitivity analysis of ecological environment in Dongchuan district based on GIS[J]. Bulletin of Surveying and Mapping, 2022, 3(3): 7-12. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CHTB202203002.htm

    [15]

    王红梅. 基于层次分析法的煤矿矿山生态环境评价定量模型研究[J]. 中国矿业, 2020, 29(7): 70-75. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGKA202007013.htm

    Wang H M. The study on eco-environmental evaluation model of coal mine based on analytic hierarchy process method[J]. China Mining Magazine, 2020, 29(7): 70-75. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGKA202007013.htm

    [16]

    洪志国, 李焱, 范植华, 等. 层次分析法中高阶平均随机一致性指标(RI)的计算[J]. 计算机工程与应用, 2002, 38(12): 45-47, 150. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1002-8331.2002.12.017

    Hong Z G, Li Y, Fan Z H, et al. Calculation on high-ranked RI of analytic hierarchy process[J]. Computer Engineering and Applications, 2002, 38(12): 45-47, 150. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1002-8331.2002.12.017

    [17]

    王国卫, 李明波, 蒋明光, 等. 基于加权信息量模型的湖南省麻阳县地质灾害危险性评价与区划[J]. 地质与资源, 2020, 29(5): 266-272. http://manu25.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_dzyzy/CN/abstract/abstract10202.shtml

    Wang G W, Li M B, Jiang M G, et al. Risk assessment and zoning of the geological hazards in Mayang County of Hunan Province based on weighted information model[J]. Geology and Resources, 2020, 29(5): 266-272. http://manu25.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_dzyzy/CN/abstract/abstract10202.shtml

    [18]

    江思义, 吴福, 黄希明, 等. 基于专家-层次分析法的岩溶地面塌陷易发性评价--以广西平桂区为例[J]. 矿产勘查, 2021, 12(11): 2294-2302. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7801.2021.11.014

    Jiang S Y, Wu F, Huang X M, et al. Evaluation of vulnerability of karst collapse based on expert-analytic hierarchy process: A case study of Pinggui Distric, Guangxi[J]. Mineral Exploration, 2021, 12(11): 2294-2302. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7801.2021.11.014

    [19]

    王宇, 葛育廷, 朱晓华. 莱州湾南岸滨海典型盐化工企业绿色矿山建设评价指标体系研究[J]. 中国矿业, 2021, 30(S2): 104-109. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGKA2021S2025.htm

    Wang Y, Ge Y T, Zhu X H. Study on green mine construction evaluation index system of typical salt chemical enterprises in the south coast of Laizhou Bay[J]. China Mining Magazine, 2021, 30(S2): 104-109. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGKA2021S2025.htm

    [20]

    吴冷, 张作红. 绿色矿山评价指标体系研究与构建[J]. 山西大同大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 36(3): 72-77, 92. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-0874.2020.03.020

    Wu L, Zhang Z H. Research and construction of evaluation index system for green mines[J]. Journal of Shanxi Datong University (Natural Science Edition), 2020, 36(3): 72-77, 92. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-0874.2020.03.020

    [21]

    周秀全, 黄海波, 郑宁, 等. 基于层次分析法的水库蓄水后滑坡易发性评价[J]. 地质与资源, 2022, 31(6): 804-810. http://manu25.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_dzyzy/CN/abstract/abstract10453.shtml

    Zhou X Q, Huang H B, Zheng N, et al. Susceptibility assessment of landslide after reservoir impoundment based on analytic hierarchy process[J]. Geology and Resources, 2022, 31(6): 804-810. http://manu25.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_dzyzy/CN/abstract/abstract10453.shtml

    [22]

    闫志刚, 刘玉朋, 王雪丽. 绿色矿山建设评价指标与方法研究[J]. 中国煤炭, 2012, 38(2): 116-120. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGME201202033.htm

    Yan Z G, Liu Y P, Wang X L. Evaluation criterion and method of green mine[J]. China Coal, 2012, 38(2): 116-120. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGME201202033.htm

    [23]

    钟琛, 胡乃联, 段绍甫, 等. 有色金属绿色矿山评价体系研究[J]. 矿业研究与开发, 2019, 39(7): 146-151. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KYYK201907030.htm

    Zhong C, Hu N L, Duan S F, et al. Research on evaluation system of green mines in non-ferrous metal industry[J]. Mining Research and Development, 2019, 39(7): 146-151 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KYYK201907030.htm

  • 加载中

(6)

(9)

计量
  • 文章访问数:  548
  • PDF下载数:  84
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
收稿日期:  2023-01-30
修回日期:  2023-03-23
刊出日期:  2024-04-25

目录