三江盆地南部猴石沟组砂岩地球化学特征及地质意义

李研. 三江盆地南部猴石沟组砂岩地球化学特征及地质意义[J]. 地质与资源, 2024, 33(3): 315-322. doi: 10.13686/j.cnki.dzyzy.2024.03.006
引用本文: 李研. 三江盆地南部猴石沟组砂岩地球化学特征及地质意义[J]. 地质与资源, 2024, 33(3): 315-322. doi: 10.13686/j.cnki.dzyzy.2024.03.006
LI Yan. GEOCHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE SANDSTONE FROM HOUSHIGOU FORMATION IN SOUTHERN SANJIANG BASIN: Geological Implication[J]. Geology and Resources, 2024, 33(3): 315-322. doi: 10.13686/j.cnki.dzyzy.2024.03.006
Citation: LI Yan. GEOCHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE SANDSTONE FROM HOUSHIGOU FORMATION IN SOUTHERN SANJIANG BASIN: Geological Implication[J]. Geology and Resources, 2024, 33(3): 315-322. doi: 10.13686/j.cnki.dzyzy.2024.03.006

三江盆地南部猴石沟组砂岩地球化学特征及地质意义

  • 基金项目:
    中国核工业地质局项目“吉林省辽源-黑龙江省富锦地区砂岩型铀矿资源调查评价”(202225)
详细信息
    作者简介: 李研(1990—),男,博士,主要从事铀矿地质勘查研究工作,通信地址 辽宁省沈阳市沈北新区孝信街12号,E-mail//1483792423@qq.Com
  • 中图分类号: P619.14

GEOCHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE SANDSTONE FROM HOUSHIGOU FORMATION IN SOUTHERN SANJIANG BASIN: Geological Implication

  • 三江盆地白垩系猴石沟组是主要的铀矿含矿层,发育大面积灰色、浅黄色含砾中-细砂岩. 本文以松木河凹陷猴石沟组砂岩为研究对象,通过详细的岩石学、地球化学等特征探讨了猴石沟组的物源区成分、源区风化强度及构造背景. 结果表明,猴石沟组砂岩以长石和岩屑砂岩为主,主量元素SiO2含量在58.91%~71.51%之间,全碱含量4.59%~10.05%,铝含量12.87%~16.12%. 稀土元素总量100.72×10-6~171.34×10-6,平均为134.532×10-6,Eu负异常相对明显(δEu=0.27~0.84),说明岩石来源于上地壳. 元素地球化学特征表明,猴石沟组砂岩CIA=13.13~45.25,ICV=0.74~1.02,PIA=53.08~67.90,整体说明猴石沟组沉积时期为干旱-半干旱环境,源区经历了弱风化作用. Sr/Ba大多数小于1,相当B含量大多数亦小于200×10-6,SiO2/Al2O3平均为4.35,表明猴石沟组沉积时期为低盐度环境. 砂岩具有活动大陆边缘地球化学属性,结合区域演化史,认为其物源区应为佳木斯隆起地区发育的长英质岩石.

  • 加载中
  • 图 1  松木河凹陷地质图

    Figure 1. 

    图 2  松木河凹陷猴石沟组砂岩岩石学特征

    Figure 2. 

    图 3  松木河凹陷猴石沟组砂岩命名图解

    Figure 3. 

    图 4  松木河凹陷猴石沟组砂岩Harker图解

    Figure 4. 

    图 5  松木河凹陷猴石沟组砂岩稀土元素配分模式图和微量元素蛛网图

    Figure 5. 

    图 6  松木河凹陷猴石沟组砂岩Th/Sc-Zr/Sc图解(据文献[9])

    Figure 6. 

    图 7  松木河凹陷猴石沟组砂岩CIA-ICV图解和ICV-CIA图解(据文献[12])

    Figure 7. 

    图 8  松木河凹陷猴石沟组砂岩主量-微量元素源岩属性判别图解(据文献[13-16])

    Figure 8. 

    图 9  松木河凹陷猴石沟组砂岩构造判别图解

    Figure 9. 

  • [1]

    高福红, 王枫, 曹花花, 等. 三江盆地绥滨断陷基底花岗岩的锆石U-Pb年代学及其构造意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2010, 40(4): 955-960. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CCDZ201004029.htm

    Gao F H, Wang F, Cao H H, et al. Zircon U-Pb age of the basement granite from Suibin depression in Sanjiang Basin and its tectonic implications[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2010, 40(4): 955-960. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CCDZ201004029.htm

    [2]

    于介江, 张彦龙, 葛文春, 等. 三江盆地北缘晚白垩世花岗质岩石的年代学、地球化学及其构造意义[J]. 岩石学报, 2013, 29(2): 369-385. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB201302004.htm

    Yu J J, Zhang Y L, Ge W C, et al. Geochronology and geochemistry of the Late Cretaceous granitoids in the northern margin of the Sanjiang Basin, NE China and its tectonic implications[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2013, 29(2): 369-385. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB201302004.htm

    [3]

    冀华丽, 何中波, 卫三元, 等. 汤原断陷宝泉岭组微量元素地球化学特征及其对沉积环境的指示意义[J]. 世界核地质科学, 2022, 39(1): 27-38. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-0636.2022.01.003

    Ji H L, He Z B, Wei S Y, et al. Geochemical characteristics of trace elements and its sedimentary implication in Baoquanling Formation, Tangyuan fault depression[J]. World Nuclear Geoscience, 2022, 39(1): 27-38. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-0636.2022.01.003

    [4]

    何中波, 冀华丽, 胡宝群, 等. 汤原断陷古近系宝泉岭组沉积特征及其对铀成矿作用的制约[J]. 矿产勘查, 2023, 14(3): 432-447. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSJS202303009.htm

    He Z B, Ji H L, Hu B Q, et al. Sedimentary characteristics of Paleogene Baoquanling Formation in Tangyuan fault depression and its constraints on uranium mineralization[J]. Mineral Exploration, 2023, 14(3): 432-447. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSJS202303009.htm

    [5]

    何玉平, 刘招君, 董清水, 等. 依舒地堑汤原断陷古近系湖底扇沉积与层序特征[J]. 世界地质, 2006, 25(1): 23-28. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-5589.2006.01.005

    He Y P, Liu Z J, Dong Q S, et al. Sedimentary and sequence characteristics of Paleogene sublacustrine fan of Tangyuan fault depression in Yishu graben[J]. Global Geology, 2006, 25(1): 23-28. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-5589.2006.01.005

    [6]

    何中波, 冀华丽, 卫三元, 等. 黑龙江省三江盆地砂岩型铀矿找矿方向探讨[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2021, 51(2): 367-379. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CCDZ202102006.htm

    He Z B, Ji H L, Wei S Y, et al. Discussion on prospecting direction of sandstone-type uranium deposits in Sanjiang Basin, Heilongjiang Province[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2021, 51(2): 367-379. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CCDZ202102006.htm

    [7]

    杨君, 王善博, 刘飞. 鄂尔多斯盆地西缘环县地区直罗组沉积相及其与铀矿化的关系[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2019, 19(17): 64-70. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1815.2019.17.008

    Yang J, Wang S B, Liu F. Sedimentary facies of the Zhiluo Formation and its relationship with uranium mineralization in the Huanxian area, west of Ordos Basin[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2019, 19(17): 64-70. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1815.2019.17.008

    [8]

    Sun S S, McDonough W F. Chemical and isotopic systematics of oceanic basalts: Implications for mantle composition and processes[J]. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 1989, 42: 313-345. doi: 10.1144/GSL.SP.1989.042.01.19

    [9]

    McLennan S M, Hemming S, McDaniel D K, et al. Geochemical approaches to sedimentation, provenance, and tectonics[C]//Johnson M J, Basu A. Processes Controlling the Composition of Clastic Sediments Boulder, Colorado: Geological Society of America, 1993, 284: 21-40.

    [10]

    陶瑞, 海连富, 王磊, 等. 宁夏灵武侏罗系直罗组碎屑岩地球化学特征及源区构造背景分析[J]. 中国地质, 2023, 50(6): 1817-1836. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DIZI202306016.htm

    Tao R, Hai L F, Wang L, et al. Geochemical characteristics of clastic rocks from the Jurassic Zhiluo Formation in Lingwu, Ningxia and analysis of tectonic background of the source area[J]. Geology in China, 2023, 50(6): 1817-1836. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DIZI202306016.htm

    [11]

    付振柯, 王晓龙, 饶松, 等. 川西坳陷须三段致密砂岩优质储层特征及控制因素[J]. 中国地质, 2022, 49(1): 298-310. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DIZI202201019.htm

    Fu Z K, Wang X L, Rao S, et al. The characteristics and main controlling factors of high quality tight sandstone reservoir in the 3th member of Xujiahe Formation in West Sichuan Depression[J]. Geology in China, 2022, 49(1): 298-310. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DIZI202201019.htm

    [12]

    Cox R, Lowe D R, Cullers R L. The influence of sediment recycling and basement composition on evolution of mudrock chemistry in the southwestern United States[J]. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 1995, 59(14): 2919-2940. doi: 10.1016/0016-7037(95)00185-9

    [13]

    Schieber J. A combined petrographical-geochemical provenance study of the Newland Formation, Mid-Proterozoic of Montana[J]. Geological Magazine, 1992, 129(2): 223-237. doi: 10.1017/S0016756800008293

    [14]

    Hayashi K I, Fujisawa H, Holland H D, et al. Geochemistry of~1.9 Ga sedimentary rocks from northeastern Labrador, Canada[J]. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 1997, 61(19): 4115-4137. doi: 10.1016/S0016-7037(97)00214-7

    [15]

    Floyd P A, Leveridge B E. Tectonic environment of the Devonian Gramscatho Basin, South Cornwall: Framework mode and geochemical evidence from turbiditic sandstones[J]. Journal of the Geological Society, 1987, 144(4): 531-542. doi: 10.1144/gsjgs.144.4.0531

    [16]

    Bhatia M R, Crook K A W. Trace element characteristics of graywackes and tectonic setting discrimination of sedimentary basins[J]. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, 1986, 92(2): 181-193. doi: 10.1007/BF00375292

    [17]

    刘桂香, 赵广江, 李永胜. 佳木斯地块西缘太平沟地区蛇绿岩的发现及其构造意义[J]. 地质与资源, 2012, 21(1): 51-58. http://manu25.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_dzyzy/CN/abstract/abstract9012.shtml

    Liu G X, Zhao G J, Li Y S. Discover of the ophiolite in Taipinggou area on the western margin of Jiamusi massif: Tectonic implication[J]. Geology and Resources, 2012, 21(1): 51-58. http://manu25.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_dzyzy/CN/abstract/abstract9012.shtml

    [18]

    张兴洲, 马志红. 黑龙江东部中-新生代盆地演化[J]. 地质与资源, 2010, 19(3): 191-196. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1947.2010.03.001

    Zhang X Z, Ma Z H. Evolution of Mesozoic-Cenozoic basins in the eastern Heilongjiang Province, Northeast China[J]. Geology and Resources, 2010, 19(3): 191-196. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1947.2010.03.001

    [19]

    赵立国, 王磊, 李娟娟, 等. 佳木斯地块中部兴东岩群大盘道岩组U-Pb年代学证据[J]. 地质与资源, 2015, 24(6): 532-538. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1947.2015.06.004

    Zhao L G, Wang L, Li J J, et al. Geochronological evidence of U-Pb for the Dapandao rock Formation of Xingdong Group in Jiamusi Block[J]. Geology and Resources, 2015, 24(6): 532-538. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1947.2015.06.004

    [20]

    赵亮亮, 徐福忠, 张岩, 等. 牡丹江地区黑龙江杂岩锆石U-Pb年代学特征及地质意义[J]. 地质与资源, 2021, 30(4): 405-413. http://manu25.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_dzyzy/CN/abstract/abstract10310.shtml

    Zhao L L, Xu F Z, Zhang Y, et al. Zircon U-Pb chronology of the Heilongjiang complex in Mudanjiang area: Geological implication[J]. Geology and Resources, 2021, 30(4): 405-413. http://manu25.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_dzyzy/CN/abstract/abstract10310.shtml

    [21]

    赵立国, 王建民, 王磊, 等. 黑龙江省东部依兰地区金沟花岗岩的锆石U-Pb定年及其地质意义[J]. 地质与资源, 2016, 25(5): 436-442. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1947.2016.05.003

    Zhao L G, Wang J M, Wang L, et al. Zircon U-Pb dating and geological implication of the Jingou granite in Yilan area, eastern Heilongjiang Province[J]. Geology and Resources, 2016, 25(5): 436-442. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1947.2016.05.003

    [22]

    王五力, 李永飞, 郭胜哲. 中国东北地块群及其构造演化[J]. 地质与资源, 2014, 23(1): 4-24. http://manu25.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_dzyzy/CN/abstract/abstract8797.shtml

    Wang W L, Li Y F, Guo S Z. The Northeast China block group and its tectonic evolution[J]. Geology and Resources, 2014, 23(1): 4-24. http://manu25.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_dzyzy/CN/abstract/abstract8797.shtml

  • 加载中

(9)

计量
  • 文章访问数:  115
  • PDF下载数:  15
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
收稿日期:  2023-03-31
修回日期:  2023-07-17
刊出日期:  2024-06-25

目录