Tectonic-sedimentary features of the Shahejie Formation in Chengbei Sag and its implications for oil and gas exploration
-
摘要:
通过三维地震、岩芯、测井、录井资料,以“源-沟-汇”思想为指导,分析了埕北凹陷沙河街组构造断裂体系演化及其沉积响应特征,梳理了不同构造演化阶段沉积体系发育类型与时空展布。研究表明,沙河街组沉积期埕北断层、埕子口断层具有典型幕式构造演化特征。沙三段沉积期表现为强烈断陷幕,埕北断层活动强烈,陡坡带沿大型古沟谷发育扇三角洲沉积体系;西斜坡沿断槽型沟谷发育三角洲沉积体系;沙二—沙一段沉积期为走滑改造断陷幕,埕北断层活动明显减弱,埕子口断层活动相对较强,陡坡带和西斜坡沿物源通道均继承性发育三角洲沉积体系。勘探实践验证了砂体发育区为构造-沉积响应的结果,为研究区油气勘探指明方向。
Abstract:Based on three-dimensional seismic, core, logging, and logging data, guided by the "source-valley-sink" concept, the evolution of the structural fault system in the Shahejie Formation and its sedimentary response characteristics in the Chengbei Sag were analyzed. The development types and spatiotemporal distribution of sedimentary systems in different stages of structural evolution were clarified. Results show that the sedimentation of the Shahejie Formation was controlled by the Chengbei Fault and Chengzikou Fault, reflecting typical episodic structural evolution characteristics. The sedimentation period of the third member of the Shahejie Formation is characterized by strong faulting and subsidence, during which the activity of the Chengbei Fault was strong. A fan delta sedimentary system was developed in steep slope zone along a large ancient valley, while a delta sedimentary system was developed in the western slope along a fault-trough-typed valley. The sedimentary period from the first to second members developed a strike-slip-fault depression, during which the activity of the Chengbei Fault was significantly weakened, and that of the Chengzikou Fault remained relatively strong. The steep slope zone and the western slope both inherited the development of the delta sedimentary system along material supply route. The exploration practice has verified that the sand-body development area was resulted from the structural sedimentary response, indicating the direction for oil and gas exploration in the study area.
-
Key words:
- Chengbei Sag /
- Shahejie Formation /
- structural evolution /
- sedimentary system /
- oil and gas exploration
-
-
[1] 郭伟,徐国强,柳保军,等. 珠江口盆地白云凹陷文昌组构造‒沉积响应关系[J]. 地球科学,2022,47 (7):2433-2453.
[2] 朱筱敏,陈贺贺,葛家旺,等. 陆相断陷湖盆层序构型与砂体发育分布特征[J]. 石油与天然气地质,2022,43(4):746-762. doi: 10.11743/ogg20220402
[3] 刘强虎,朱筱敏,李顺利,等. 沙垒田凸起前古近系基岩分布及源汇过程[J]. 地球科学,2016,41(11):1935-1949
[4] 冯有良,胡素云,李建忠,等. 准噶尔盆地西北缘同沉积构造坡折对层序建造和岩性油气藏富集带的控制[J]. 岩性油气藏,2018,30(4):14-25.
[5] 刘一鸣,吴智平,刘丽芳,等. 埕北凹陷及邻区新生代断裂体系与构造格局[J]. 大地构造与成矿学,2019,43(6):1133-1143.
[6] 沈朴,刘丽芳,吴克强,等. 渤海海域埕岛油田新近系油气差异聚集主控因素[J]. 科学技术与工程,2016,16(2):138-142. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1815.2016.02.027
[7] 李伟,吴智平,张明华,等. 埕岛地区中生代和新生代断层发育特征及其对沉积的控制作用[J]. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版),2006,30(1):1-6. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-5870.2006.01.001
[8] 张晓庆,宋明水,侯中帅,等. 裂陷盆地构造-沉积耦合关系及其控藏作用:以渤海湾盆地埕北凹陷古近系为例[J]. 中国矿业大学学报,2019,48(6):1317-1329.
[9] 张强,刘丽芳,张晓庆,等. 埕北凹陷古近系构造对沉积的控制作用[J]. 东北石油大学学报,2017,41(4):88-98. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-4107.2017.04.010
[10] 付兆辉,张在振,李德纯,等. 渤海湾盆地埕北凹陷古近系沉积体系分析与油气成藏[J]. 沉积学报,2009,27(1):26-31.
[11] 付兆辉,秦伟军,李敏. 渤海湾盆地埕北凹陷古近系沉积特征与油气圈闭[J]. 海洋地质前沿,2015,31(1):9-15.
[12] 郭涛,李慧勇,石文龙,等. 渤海海域埕北低凸起及周围地区构造沉积特征与有利勘探目标[J]. 油气地质与采收率,2015,22(2):28-32. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-9603.2015.02.005
[13] 王六柱,董冬冬,石晓光,等. 渤海湾盆地埕北凹陷东营组构造沉积特征及油气成藏条件[J]. 海洋地质与第四纪地质,2013,33(5):131-136.
[14] 朱红涛,朱筱敏,刘强虎,等. 层序地层学与源-汇系统理论内在关联性与差异性[J]. 石油与天然气地质,2022,43(4):763-776. doi: 10.11743/ogg20220403
[15] 杨棵,董艳蕾,朱筱敏,等. 渤海湾盆地渤中凹陷埕岛东坡古近系东营组二段下部源-汇系统[J]. 石油与天然气地质,2018,39(6):1280-1292. doi: 10.11743/ogg20180617
[16] 操应长,徐琦松,王健. 沉积盆地“源-汇”系统研究进展[J]. 地学前缘,2018,25(4):116-131
[17] 徐长贵,杜晓峰,徐伟,等. 沉积盆地“源-汇”系统研究新进展[J]. 石油与天然气地质,2017,38(1):1-11. doi: 10.11743/ogg20170101
[18] 林畅松,夏庆龙,施和生,等. 地貌演化、源-汇过程与盆地分析[J]. 地学前缘,2015,22(1):9-20.
[19] 杨丽莎,陈彬滔,马轮,等. 陆相湖盆坳陷期源—汇系统的要素特征及耦合关系:以南苏丹 Melut 盆地北部坳陷新近系Jimidi 组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏,2021,33(3):27-38. doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20210303
[20] 黄军立,张伟,刘力辉,等. 珠江口盆地番禺 4 洼古近系文昌组三元地震构形解释技术[J]. 岩性油气藏,2023,35(2):103-112. doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20230210
[21] 陈骥,姜在兴,刘超,等. “源-汇”体系主导下的障壁滨岸沉积体系发育模式:以青海湖倒淌河流域为例[J]. 岩性油气藏,2018,30(3):71-79.
[22] 杜晓峰,王清斌,庞小军,等. 渤中凹陷石南陡坡带东三段源汇体系定量表征[J]. 岩性油气藏,2018,30(5):1-10.
-