黄河三角洲不同生境土壤碳氮磷及其生态化学计量比特征

王凯选, 刘枝刚, 赵广明, 王伟华, 苏大鹏, 路峰, 康志强, 张尧, 尼鑫, 赵俐红. 黄河三角洲不同生境土壤碳氮磷及其生态化学计量比特征[J]. 海洋地质前沿, 2025, 41(5): 90-99. doi: 10.16028/j.1009-2722.2025.058
引用本文: 王凯选, 刘枝刚, 赵广明, 王伟华, 苏大鹏, 路峰, 康志强, 张尧, 尼鑫, 赵俐红. 黄河三角洲不同生境土壤碳氮磷及其生态化学计量比特征[J]. 海洋地质前沿, 2025, 41(5): 90-99. doi: 10.16028/j.1009-2722.2025.058
WANG Kaixuan, LIU Zhigang, ZHAO Guangming, WANG Weihua, SU Dapeng, LU Feng, KANG Zhiqiang, ZHANG Yao, NI Xin, ZHAO Lihong. Characteristics of soil carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus in soils and their ecological stoichiometric ratios in different habitats of Yellow River Delta[J]. Marine Geology Frontiers, 2025, 41(5): 90-99. doi: 10.16028/j.1009-2722.2025.058
Citation: WANG Kaixuan, LIU Zhigang, ZHAO Guangming, WANG Weihua, SU Dapeng, LU Feng, KANG Zhiqiang, ZHANG Yao, NI Xin, ZHAO Lihong. Characteristics of soil carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus in soils and their ecological stoichiometric ratios in different habitats of Yellow River Delta[J]. Marine Geology Frontiers, 2025, 41(5): 90-99. doi: 10.16028/j.1009-2722.2025.058

黄河三角洲不同生境土壤碳氮磷及其生态化学计量比特征

  • 基金项目: 广西省重点研发计划(桂科AB25069497);山东省自然科学基金(ZR2024MD062);国家自然科学基金(42076070);中国地质调查局项目“重要河口及湿地滩区生态地质调查”(DD20221775),“黄渤海海岸带重点生态保护修复区综合地质调查”(DD20211401)
详细信息
    作者简介: 王凯选(2000—),男,在读硕士,主要从事滨海湿地生态地质方面的研究工作. E-mail:1031315298@qq.com
    通讯作者: 刘枝刚(1971—),男,硕士,副高级工程师,主要从事滨海湿地地质方面的研究工作. E-mail:253731116@qq.com
  • 中图分类号: P736.4

Characteristics of soil carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus in soils and their ecological stoichiometric ratios in different habitats of Yellow River Delta

More Information
  • 为揭示黄河三角洲湿地不同生境下碳(C)、氮(N)、磷(P)含量及其生态化学计量学特征,以黄河原流经区域——刁口故道区域湿地裸滩、养殖区、芦苇湿地、柽柳湿地、碱蓬湿地及耕地共6种生境为研究对象,测定表层土壤基本理化性质、碳氮磷含量及其生态化学计量特征。结果显示:①土壤C和N的质量分数基本表现为耕地>芦苇湿地>柽柳湿地>养殖区>裸滩,耕地的土壤C和N平均质量分数最高,分别为6.1和1.1 g/kg。而6种生境中土壤P的质量分数差距不大,峰值为1.03 g/kg。②不同生境土壤C、N、P之间回归拟合程度中,相较于N和P以及C和P,C与N的拟合程度较高;③土壤生态化学计量较其他典型湿地明显减少,且N/P显著低于全国平均水平。④土壤环境因子对C、N和P及其计量比存在一定的影响,其中土壤C与密度呈显著负相关,土壤P与含水率呈显著负相关,土壤C/P和N/P均与密度呈负相关。研究结果表明,刁口故道区域自黄河改道以来,大面积养殖池和耕地等人工湿地的开发对湿地生态化学计量等生态特征产生了一定影响,养分含量有一定程度降低,对了解湿地不同生境的土壤C、N、P及其生态化学计量比差异与调控因素具有重要意义,为湿地生态系统的保护和恢复提供科学依据。

  • 加载中
  • 图 1  研究区取样站位位置

    Figure 1. 

    图 2  不同生境土壤的C、N、P质量分数及化学计量比

    Figure 2. 

    图 3  不同生境土壤间C、N、P线性回归分析

    Figure 3. 

    图 4  不同生境土壤的C、N、P储量

    Figure 4. 

    图 5  土壤C、N、P储量与生态化学计量比相关关系

    Figure 5. 

    图 6  不同生境环境因子与土壤C、N、P含量及其化学计量比之间的PCA分析

    Figure 6. 

    图 7  不同生境土壤C、N、P质量分数及其化学计量比与环境因子相关关系

    Figure 7. 

    表 1  不同生境土壤物理特征

    Table 1.  Soil physical characteristics of different habitats

    黄河三角洲湿地不同生境 土壤密度/(g/cm3 电导率/(mS/cm) 含水量/%
    裸滩 2.57±0.15a 7.72±4.57a 24.34±1.28a
    养殖区 2.41±0.16a 7.05±3.99a 27.14±3.16a
    芦苇湿地 2.06±0.27b 1.48±0.93b 26.56±8.07a
    柽柳湿地 2.12±0.31b 1.68±1.12b 19.25±8.99ab
    碱蓬湿地 1.99±0.06b 4.00±3.46ab 11.67±4.50b
    耕地 1.87±0.12b 0.95±1.31b 12.42±4.78b
    注:表中数据为平均值±标准误差,同列不同的小写字母表示各生境间土壤物理性质差异显著,(p<0.05),下同。
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 2  不同地区土壤养分平均含量及生态化学计量比特征

    Table 2.  Soil nutrient content and ecological stoichiometry in different regions

    地区 C/(g/kg) N/(g/kg) P/(g/kg) C/N C/P N/P
    本研究 3.68 0.55 0.76 8.29 12.18 1.53
    黄河三角洲湿地[11] 16.60 0.64 0.67 43.9 64.5 2.0
    闽江河口[32] 17.02 1.02 0.74 26.0 67.7 3.2
    平潭海岸带[33] 44.08 4.04 0.288 10.9 153.0 14.03
    辽河口[18] 25.11 1.98 0.06 12.68 418.5 32.34
    全国[29] 10 0.65 0.56 11.9 61 5.2
    全球[34] / / / 14.3 186 13.1
    注:“/”为无数据。
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1]

    国家林业局. 中国湿地行动保护计划[M]. 北京:中国林业出版社,2000.

    National Forestry Administration. China National Wetlands Conservation Action Plan[M]. Beijing:China Forestry Publishing House,2000.

    [2]

    NUTTIGA H,GEORGE C,WU J P. Changes of Wiang Nong Lom and Nong Luang Wetlands in Chiang Saen Valley (Chiang Rai Province,Thailand) during the period 1988-2017[J]. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing,2019,12(11):4224-4238. doi: 10.1109/JSTARS.2019.2937949

    [3]

    KUMAR T,MANDAL A,DUTTA D,et al. Discrimination and classification of mangrove forests using EO-1 Hyperion data:a case study of Indian Sundarbans[J]. Geocarto International,2019,34(4):415-442. doi: 10.1080/10106049.2017.1408699

    [4]

    FEDDEMA J J,OLESON W K,BONAN B G,et al. The importance of land-cover change in simulating future climates[J]. Science,2005,310(5754):1674-1678. doi: 10.1126/science.1118160

    [5]

    GALLANT L A. The challenges of remote monitoring of wetlands[J]. Remote Sensing,2015,7(8):10938-10950. doi: 10.3390/rs70810938

    [6]

    岳保静,张军强,辛一. 滨海湿地碳的生物地球化学循环过程[J]. 海洋地质前沿,2011,27(2):72-78.

    YUE B J,ZHANG J Q,XIN Y. Carbon biogeochemical cycle in the wetland ecosystem[J]. Marine Geology Frontiers,2011,27(2):72-78.

    [7]

    BARBIER E B,HACKER S D,KENNEDY C,et al. The value of estuarine and coastal ecosystem services[J]. Ecological Monographs,2011,81(2):169-193. doi: 10.1890/10-1510.1

    [8]

    姚长新,袁红明,孟祥君,等. 黄河三角洲滨海湿地损失和退化的自然因素[J]. 海洋地质与第四纪地质,2011,31(1):43-50.

    YAO C X,YUAN H M,MENG X J,et al. Natural factors for deterioration of coastal wetland in the Yellow River Delta[J]. Marine Geology& Quaternary Geology,2011,31(1):43-50.

    [9]

    陈冲,贾重建,卢瑛,等. 珠江三角洲平原土壤磷剖面分布及形态特征研究[J]. 土壤通报,2015,46(5):1025-1033.

    CHEN C,JIA C J,LU Y,et al. Studies on P distribution and fractions in soil profile of cultivated land in Pearl River Delta Plain[J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science,2015,46(5):1025-1033.

    [10]

    刘婕,勾晓华,刘建国,等. 甘南黄河流域4种典型林分土壤C、N、P 化学计量特征[J]. 生态学报,2023,43(13):5627-5637.

    LIU J,GOU X H,LIU J G,et al. The stoichiometric characteristics of soil C,N and P in four typical forest stands in the Yellow River Basin in Gannan[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica,2023,43(13):5627-5637.

    [11]

    MENG L,QU F Z,BI X L,et al. Elemental stoichiometry(C,N,P) of soil in the Yellow River Delta nature reserve:understanding N and P status of soil in the coastal estuary[J]. Science of the Total Environment,2021,751:141737. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141737

    [12]

    邓小军,朱柳霏,宋贤冲,等. 猫儿山自然保护区不同林分类型土壤生态化学计量特征[J]. 土壤通报,2022,53(2):366-373.

    DENG X J,ZHU L F,SONG X C,et al. Soil ecological stoichiometry characteristics of different stand types in Maoershan Nature Reserve[J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science,2022,53(2):366-373.

    [13]

    REICH P B,OLEKSYN J. Global patterns of plant leaf N and P in relation to temperature and latitude[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,2004,101(30):11001-11006.

    [14]

    VITOUSEK P M,HOWARTH R W. Nitrogen limitation on land and in the sea:how can it occur?[J]. Biogeochemistry,1991,13(2):87-115.

    [15]

    姚卫举,牟晓杰,万斯昂,等. 不同土地利用方式土壤碳、氮、磷、硫含量及其生态化学计量特征[J]. 江苏农业科学,2023,51(17):231-239.

    YAO W J,MOU X J,WAN S A,et al. Soil carbon,nitrogen,phosphorus,sulfur content and their ecological stoichiometry characteristics under different land use patterns[J]. Jangsu Agricultural Sciences,2023,51(17):231-239.

    [16]

    丁俊男,于少鹏,史传奇,等. 寒区湿地不同土地利用方式对土壤理化性质和团聚体稳定性的影响[J]. 生态学杂志,2021,40(11):3543-3551.

    DING J N,YU S P,SHI C Q,et al. Effects of land use types on soil physicochemical properties and aggregates stability in cold region wetland[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology,2021,40(11):3543-3551.

    [17]

    盛昱凤. 滨海湿地互花米草入侵对土壤碳氮磷化学计量时空特征的影响[D]. 南京:南京林业大学,2023.

    SHENG Y F. Influence of Spartina alterniflora invasion on the spatiotemporal characteristics of soil carbon,nitrogen,phosphorus and stoichiometry in a coastal wetland[D]. Nanjing:Nanjing Forestry University. 2023.

    [18]

    刘玥,杨继松,于洋,等. 辽河口不同类型湿地土壤碳氮磷生态化学计量学特征[J]. 生态学杂志,2020,39(9):3011-3020.

    LIU Y,YANG J S,YU Y,et al. Stoichiometric characteristics of carbon,nitrogen and phosphorus of soil in the Liaohe Estuary wetlands[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology,2020,39(9):3011-3020.

    [19]

    蔡馨燕,王毅,陈英凯. 黄河三角洲湿地生态退化修复的应用研究进展[J]. 山东科学,2023,36(6):112-120.

    CAI X Y,WANG Y,CHEN Y K. Progress of applied research on the ecological degradation and restoration of wetlands in the Yellow River Delta:a review[J]. Shandong Science,2023,36(6):112-120.

    [20]

    马乐,陈健斌,俞永庆,等. 近30年黄河陆上三角洲蚀退-淤进对气候变化和人类活动的响应[J]. 海洋地质前沿,2024,40(9):49-62.

    MA Y,CHEN J B,YU Y Q,et al. Response of Yellow River subaerial delta erosion and accretion to climate change and human activities in the past 30 years[J]. Marine Geology Frontiers,2024,40(9):49-62.

    [21]

    卞福花,吴秋堂,吴梦迪,等. 不同水盐生境下芦苇湿地植被及土壤碳氮磷生态化学计量特征[J]. 应用生态学报,2022,33(2):385-396.

    BIAN F H,WU Q T,WU M D,et al. C:N:P stoichiometry in plants and soils of Phragmites australis wetland under different water-salt habitats[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,2022,33(2):385-396.

    [22]

    张友,徐刚,高丽,等. 黄河三角洲新生湿地土壤碳氮磷分布及其生态化学计量学意义[J]. 地球与环境,2016,44(6):647-653.

    ZHANG Y,XU G,GAO L,et al. Distribution characteristics of soil C,N and P in newly-formed wetlands of the Yellow River Delta,China and their stoichiometry implications[J]. Earth and Environment,2016,44(6):647-653.

    [23]

    屈凡柱,孟灵,付战勇,等. 不同生境条件下滨海芦苇湿地C、N、P化学计量特征[J]. 生态学报,2018,38(5):1731-1738.

    QU F Z,MENG L,FU Z Y,et al. The stoichiometry characterization of carbon,nitrogen and phosphorus in different reed-dominated coastal wetland habitats[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica,2018,38(5):1731-1738.

    [24]

    鲁如坤. 土壤化学农业分析方法[M]. 北京:中国农业科技出版社,2000:269.

    LU R K. Soil Chemistry Agricultural Analysis Methods[M]. BeiJing:China Agricultural Science and Technology Press,2000:269.

    [25]

    LEI D,ZHOU P,SHANG G. Afforestation drives soil car-bon and nitrogen changes in China[J]. Land Degradation & Development,2017,28:151-165.

    [26]

    欧延升,汪霞,李佳,等. 不同恢复年限人工草地土壤碳氮磷含量及其生态化学计量特征[J]. 应用与环境生物学报,2019,25(1):38-45.

    OU Y S,WANG X,LI J,et al. Content and ecological stoichiometry characteristics of soil carbon,nitrogen,and phosphorus in artificial grassland under different restoration years[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied and Environmental Biology, 2019,25(1):38-45.

    [27]

    LIU P P,WANG Q G,BAI J H,et al. De-composition and return of C and N of plant litters of Phragmites australis and Suaeda salsa in typical wetlands of the Yellow River Delta,China[J]. Procedia Environmental Sciences,2010,2:1717-1726. doi: 10.1016/j.proenv.2010.10.183

    [28]

    甘树,卢少勇,秦普丰,等. 太湖西岸湖滨带沉积物氮磷有机质分布及评价[J]. 环境科学,2012,33(9):3064-3069.

    GAN S,LU S Y,QIN P F,et al. Spatial distribution and evaluation of nitrogen,phosphorus and organic matter in surface sediments from western lakeside belt of Lake Taihu[J]. Environmental Science,2012,33(9):3064-3069.

    [29]

    TIAN H Q,CHEN G S,ZHANG C,et al. Pattern and variation of C:N:P ratios in China’s soils:a synthesis of observational data[J]. Biogeochemistry,2010,98:139-151. doi: 10.1007/s10533-009-9382-0

    [30]

    白晓霞,范勇勇,王厚杰. 黄河刁口废弃流路冲淤演化及其影响因素[J]. 海洋地质前沿,2023,39(10):34-42.

    BAI X X,FAN Y Y,WANG H J. Erosion and deposition evolution of the abandoned Diaokou course of the Yellow River and influential factors[J]. Marine Geology Frontiers,2023,39(10):34-42.

    [31]

    王锦,叶思源,JAYE E C,等. 滨海湿地水和物质的运移[J]. 海洋地质前沿,2011,27(2):45-50.

    WANG J,YE S Y,JAYE E C,et al. Transport of water andsediment in coastal wetlands[J]. Marine Geology Frontiers,2011,27(2):45-50.

    [32]

    王维奇,王纯,曾从盛,等. 闽江河口不同河段芦苇湿地土壤碳氮磷生态化学计量学特征[J]. 生态学报,2012,32(13):4087-4093. doi: 10.5846/stxb201106160817

    WANG W Q,WANG C,ZENG C S,et al. Soil carbon,nitrogen and phosphorus ecological stoichiometry of Phragmites australis wetlands in different reaches in Minjiang River Estuary[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica,2012,32(13):4087-4093. doi: 10.5846/stxb201106160817

    [33]

    钟春柳,黄义雄,张巧,等. 平潭4种主要防护林碳氮磷化学计量特征与碳氮储量研究[J]. 西南林业大学学报,2016,36(2):96-102.

    ZHONG C L,HUANG Y X,ZHANG Q,et al. The Stoichiometric characteristics and carbon,nitrogen stores of four main coastal shelterbelt forests in Pingtan[J]. Journal of Southwest Forestry University,2016,36(2):96-102.

    [34]

    CLEVELAND C C,LIPTZIN D. C:N:P stoichiometry in soil:is there a “Redfield ratio” for the microbial biomass?[J]. Biogeochemistry,2007,85(3):235-252. doi: 10.1007/s10533-007-9132-0

    [35]

    于君宝,陈小兵,毛培利,等. 新生滨海湿地土壤微量营养元素空间分异特征[J]. 湿地科学,2010,8(3):213-219.

    YU J B,CHEN X B,MAO P L,et al. The spatial differentiation of soil trace nutrient elements in new-born coastal wetland[J]. Wetland Science,2010,8(3):213-219.

    [36]

    陈印平,夏江宝,赵西梅,等. 黄河三角洲典型人工林土壤碳氮磷化学计量特征[J]. 土壤通报,2017,48(2):392-398.

    CHEN Y P,XIA J B,ZHAO X M,et al. Effect of different plantation types on soil ecological stoichiometry in Yellow River Delta[J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science,2017,48(2):392-398.

    [37]

    尹君来,曹翠玉,史瑞和. 徐淮地区石灰性土壤固磷的研究[J]. 土壤学报,1989,26(2):131-138.

    YIN J L,CAO C Y,SHI R H. Sdudy on the phosphprus fixation of calcareous soils in Xu-Huai districts[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica,1989,26(2):131-138.

    [38]

    何高迅,王越,彭淑娴,等. 滇中退化山地不同植被恢复下土壤碳氮磷储量与生态化学计量特征[J]. 生态学报,2020,40(13):4425-4435.

    HE G X,WANG Y,PENG S X,et al. Soil carbon,nitrogen and phosphorus stocks and ecological stoichiometry characteristics of different vegetation restorations in degraded mountainous area of central Yunnan,China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica,2020,40(13):4425-4435.

    [39]

    ZHANG P,WEI T,LI Y L,et al. Effects of straw incorporation on the stratification of the soil organic C,total N and C:N ratio in a semiarid region of China[J]. Soil and Tillage Research,2015,153:28-35. doi: 10.1016/j.still.2015.04.008

    [40]

    谢杨阳,刘旭阳,金强,等. 福州东湖湿地不同生境土壤碳氮磷及其生态化学计量比特征[J]. 中国水土保持科学(中英文),2023,21(4):79-90.

    XIE Y Y,LIU X Y,JIN Q,et al. Characteristics of soil carbon,nitrogen,phosphorus and their ecological stoichiometric ratios in different habitats of East Lake Wetland,Fuzhou[J]. Science of Soil and Water Conservation,2023,21(4):79-90.

  • 加载中

(7)

(2)

计量
  • 文章访问数:  53
  • PDF下载数:  6
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
收稿日期:  2025-03-11
刊出日期:  2025-05-28

目录