典型岩溶槽谷区地下水循环特征

李莲, 唐越尔, 杨琰, 叶许春, 孔志岗. 典型岩溶槽谷区地下水循环特征——以重庆酉阳龙潭槽谷为例[J]. 水文地质工程地质, 2025, 52(2): 53-62. doi: 10.16030/j.cnki.issn.1000-3665.202403044
引用本文: 李莲, 唐越尔, 杨琰, 叶许春, 孔志岗. 典型岩溶槽谷区地下水循环特征——以重庆酉阳龙潭槽谷为例[J]. 水文地质工程地质, 2025, 52(2): 53-62. doi: 10.16030/j.cnki.issn.1000-3665.202403044
LI Lian, TANG Yueer, YANG Yan, YE Xuchun, KONG Zhigang. Characteristics of groundwater circulation in typical karst trough areas:A case study of Longtan trough valley in Youyang, Chongqing[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology, 2025, 52(2): 53-62. doi: 10.16030/j.cnki.issn.1000-3665.202403044
Citation: LI Lian, TANG Yueer, YANG Yan, YE Xuchun, KONG Zhigang. Characteristics of groundwater circulation in typical karst trough areas:A case study of Longtan trough valley in Youyang, Chongqing[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology, 2025, 52(2): 53-62. doi: 10.16030/j.cnki.issn.1000-3665.202403044

典型岩溶槽谷区地下水循环特征

  • 基金项目: 国家自然科学基金项目(42277048;42071028);国家重点研发计划项目(2016YFC050230205)
详细信息
    作者简介: 李莲(1999—),女,硕士研究生,主要从事岩溶地下水循环的研究。E-mail:2240497469@qq.com
    通讯作者: 孔志岗(1980—),男,博士,副教授,主要从事环境地质、构造地质学方面研究。E-mail:zhigangkong@kust.edu.cn
  • 中图分类号: P641.6

Characteristics of groundwater circulation in typical karst trough areas:A case study of Longtan trough valley in Youyang, Chongqing

More Information
  • 西南岩溶槽谷区地下水资源丰富,但有关槽谷区不同部位和类型岩溶地下水的循环特征及其差异的认识还不深入。以重庆酉阳龙潭槽谷为例,采用流量衰减法以及水均衡原理等方法,系统分析了槽谷顺、逆层坡不同性质岩溶泉水的流量衰减过程、水源组成、补给特征及调蓄作用。结果表明:研究区地下水单次流量衰减过程可分为2个阶段,第一阶段的衰减系数比下一阶段的衰减系数高至少1个量级,不同含水介质特征明显,岩溶水的水源组分主要为含水层内部存储的裂隙水;顺坡地下河补给面积为66.15 km2,逆坡表层岩溶泉补给面积仅为0.90 km2,两泉次降雨补给系数在季节变化上呈现出冬春季大、夏季小的特点;顺、逆层岩溶泉水系统在5—9月以地下水储存作用为主,在其他月份,主要表现为地下水的释放;顺坡常流泉全年流量波动幅度相对较小,泉域调蓄能力较强,逆坡季节泉在夏季伏旱期会出现断流现象。本研究揭示了槽谷区顺、逆层坡不同性质岩溶水系统补给、调蓄以及排泄等水循环过程的特征差异,为区域地下水资源开发利用提供科学依据。

  • 加载中
  • 图 1  龙潭槽谷水文地质概况图(修改自参考文献[14])

    Figure 1. 

    图 2  2021年(a)龙洞塘和(b)老泉的降水流量过程图

    Figure 2. 

    图 3  龙洞塘和老泉流量衰减过程曲线

    Figure 3. 

    图 4  单次降雨补给系数与降雨量和降水时间的关系图

    Figure 4. 

    图 5  龙洞塘、老泉月调蓄量变化图

    Figure 5. 

    表 1  龙洞塘和老泉的水源构成

    Table 1.  Composition of water sources in Longdongtang and Laoquan

    研究点 洪峰日期 水源组分(第一衰减期) 水源组分(第二衰减期)
    管道流/L 占比/% 裂隙流/L 占比/% 裂隙流/L 占比/%
    龙洞塘 7月8日 24489.75 24.86 45489.04 46.18 28532.17 28.96
    7月29日 7064.49 11.58 12507.05 20.49 41460.41 67.93
    10月23日 12556.83 9.02 24873.65 17.86 101850.80 73.13
    11月22日 23353.60 10.04 50033.51 21.51 159253.94 68.45
    老泉 5月16日 563.89 69.27 166.76 20.49 83.37 10.24
    6月3日 249.77 49.56 209.04 41.48 45.16 8.96
    8月25日 123.26 17.15 85.45 11.88 509.98 70.95
    11月21日 1308.59 42.51 441.54 14.35 1327.87 43.14
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 2  龙洞塘和老泉降雨量与单次降雨补给系数

    Table 2.  Changes in rainfall and secondary rainfall recharge coefficients at Longdongtang and Laoquan

    龙洞塘 老泉
    时间 单次降雨量/mm 补给系数 时间 单次降雨量/mm 补给系数
    2月16日 2.4 0.632 2月16日 2.4 0.394
    3月22日 3.0 0.703 3月2日 1.4 0.746
    6月2日 37.6 0.022 3月16日 8.0 0.172
    6月28日 102.0 0.024 5月16日 57.0 0.017
    8月25日 34.2 0.045 6月3日 8.4 0.120
    9月19日 20.0 0.127 6月27日 73.4 0.006
    11月7日 6.8 0.335 8月9日 114.2 0.021
    11月21日 18.4 0.151 8月24日 40.8 0.004
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 3  龙洞塘、老泉2021年气象水文要素

    Table 3.  Meteorological and Hydrological Elements for Long Dong Tang and Laoquan in 2021

    气象水文要素 龙洞塘 老泉
    补给面积/km2 66.15 0.90
    平均气温/°C 17.11 17.11
    年降水量/mm 1417 1417
    年地下水径流量/mm 365 224
    年蒸散发量/mm 869 869
    年调蓄量/mm 79 38
    年地下水径流系数 0.26 0.16
    年调蓄系数 0.22 0.17
      注:年地下水径流量、年蒸散发量与年调蓄量均以流域面平均水流深度表示,故为/mm。
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1]

    余梦,李阳兵,罗光杰. 中国西南岩溶山地石漠化演变趋势[J]. 生态学报,2022,42(10):4267 − 4283. [YU Meng,LI Yangbing,LUO Guangjie. Evolution trend of rocky desertification in Karst mountainous areas of Southwest China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica,2022,42(10):4267 − 4283. (in Chinese)]

    YU Meng, LI Yangbing, LUO Guangjie. Evolution trend of rocky desertification in Karst mountainous areas of Southwest China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2022, 42(10): 4267 − 4283. (in Chinese)

    [2]

    王世杰,张信宝,白晓永. 南方喀斯特石漠化分区的名称商榷与环境特点[J]. 山地学报,2013,31(1):18 − 24. [WANG Shijie,ZHANG Xinbao,BAI Xiaoyong. Discussion on nomenclature of the Karst desertification regions and illustration for their environment characteristics in Southwest China[J]. Journal of Mountain Science,2013,31(1):18 − 24. (in Chinese with English abstract)] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-2786.2013.01.003

    WANG Shijie, ZHANG Xinbao, BAI Xiaoyong. Discussion on nomenclature of the Karst desertification regions and illustration for their environment characteristics in Southwest China[J]. Journal of Mountain Science, 2013, 31(1): 18 − 24. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-2786.2013.01.003

    [3]

    GAN Fengling,HE Binghui,QIN Ziyang,et al. Role of rock dip angle in runoff and soil erosion processes on dip/anti-dip slopes in a Karst trough valley[J]. Journal of Hydrology,2020,588:125093. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125093

    [4]

    王世杰. 喀斯特石漠化概念演绎及其科学内涵的探讨[J]. 中国岩溶,2002,21(2):101 − 105. [WANG Shijie. Concept deduction and its connotation of Karst rocky desertification[J]. Carsologica Sinica,2002,21(2):101 − 105. (in Chinese with English abstract)] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2002.02.006

    WANG Shijie. Concept deduction and its connotation of Karst rocky desertification[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2002, 21(2): 101 − 105. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2002.02.006

    [5]

    常勇,吴吉春,姜光辉,等. 峰丛洼地岩溶泉流量和水化学变化过程中地面径流的作用[J]. 水利学报,2012,43(9):1050 − 1057. [CHANG Yong,WU Jichun,JIANG Guanghui,et al. The impact of overland flow on the variation of discharge and hydrochemistry of Karst spring in peak cluster[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering,2012,43(9):1050 − 1057. (in Chinese with English abstract)]

    CHANG Yong, WU Jichun, JIANG Guanghui, et al. The impact of overland flow on the variation of discharge and hydrochemistry of Karst spring in peak cluster[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2012, 43(9): 1050 − 1057. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [6]

    刘丽红. 岩溶槽谷流域地表降水径流过程模拟研究——以重庆青木关岩溶槽谷为例[D]. 重庆:西南大学,2011. [LIU Lihong. Simulation of surface precipitation runoff process in Karst valley watershed:A case study of qingmuguan Karst valley in Chongqing[D]. Chongqing:Southwest University,2011. (in Chinese with English abstract)]

    LIU Lihong. Simulation of surface precipitation runoff process in Karst valley watershed: A case study of qingmuguan Karst valley in Chongqing[D]. Chongqing: Southwest University, 2011. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [7]

    党学亚,张茂省. 晋西南峨嵋台塬的岩溶水系统及岩溶水资源潜力[J]. 水文地质工程地质,2007,34(4):70 − 73. [DANG Xueya,ZHANG Maosheng. Karst water system and water resources potential in the Emei loess platform in southwestern Shanxi[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology,2007,34(4):70 − 73. (in Chinese with English abstract)] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3665.2007.04.017

    DANG Xueya, ZHANG Maosheng. Karst water system and water resources potential in the Emei loess platform in southwestern Shanxi[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology, 2007, 34(4): 70 − 73. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3665.2007.04.017

    [8]

    HARTMANN A,MUDARRA M,ANDREO B,et al. Modeling spatiotemporal impacts of hydroclimatic extremes on groundwater recharge at a Mediterranean Karst aquifer[J]. Water Resources Research,2014,50(8):6507 − 6521. doi: 10.1002/2014WR015685

    [9]

    覃小群,蒋忠诚. 表层岩溶带及其水循环的研究进展与发展方向[J]. 中国岩溶,2005,24(3):250 − 254. [QIN Xiaoqun,JIANG Zhongcheng. A review on recent advances and perspective in epikarst water study[J]. Carsologica Sinica,2005,24(3):250 − 254. (in Chinese with English abstract)] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2005.03.015

    QIN Xiaoqun, JIANG Zhongcheng. A review on recent advances and perspective in epikarst water study[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2005, 24(3): 250 − 254. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2005.03.015

    [10]

    罗明明. 南方岩溶水循环的物理机制及数学模型研究——以香溪河岩溶流域为例[D]. 武汉:中国地质大学,2017. [LUO Mingming. Study on physical mechanism and mathematical model of Karst water circulation in South China:A case study of Xiangxi River Karst Basin[D]. Wuhan:China University of Geosciences,2017. (in Chinese with English abstract)]

    LUO Mingming. Study on physical mechanism and mathematical model of Karst water circulation in South China: A case study of Xiangxi River Karst Basin[D]. Wuhan: China University of Geosciences, 2017. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [11]

    尹德超,罗明明,周宏,等. 鄂西岩溶槽谷区地下河系统水资源构成及其结构特征[J]. 水文地质工程地质,2015,42(3):13 − 18. [YIN Dechao,LUO Mingming,ZHOU Hong,et al. Water resources composition and structure characteristics of the underground river system in the Karst ridge-trough in the western Hubei Province[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology,2015,42(3):13 − 18. (in Chinese with English abstract)]

    YIN Dechao, LUO Mingming, ZHOU Hong, et al. Water resources composition and structure characteristics of the underground river system in the Karst ridge-trough in the western Hubei Province[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology, 2015, 42(3): 13 − 18. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [12]

    常勇. 裂隙—管道二元结构的岩溶泉水文过程分析与模拟[D]. 南京:南京大学,2015. [CHANG Yong. Analysis and simulation of Karst spring water process of fracture-pipeline binary structure[D]. Nanjing:Nanjing University,2015. (in Chinese with English abstract)]

    CHANG Yong. Analysis and simulation of Karst spring water process of fracture-pipeline binary structure[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing University, 2015. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [13]

    CHARLIER J B,BERTRAND C,MUDRY J. Conceptual hydrogeological model of flow and transport of dissolved organic carbon in a small Jura Karst system[J]. Journal of Hydrology,2012,460:52 − 64.

    [14]

    罗振宇. 武陵山龙潭岩溶槽谷坡面至小流域尺度的流量过程及碳通量研究[D]. 重庆:西南大学,2023. [LUO Zhenyu. Flow processes and carbon fluxes from the slope to the sub-watershed scale in Longtan karst trough valley,Wuling Mountains[D]. Chongqing:Southwest University,2023. (in Chinese with English abstract)]

    LUO Zhenyu. Flow processes and carbon fluxes from the slope to the sub-watershed scale in Longtan karst trough valley, Wuling Mountains[D]. Chongqing: Southwest University, 2023. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [15]

    中华人民共和国水利部. 土石坝安全监测技术规范:SL 551—2012[S]. 北京:中国水利水电出版社,2012. [Ministry of Water Resources of the People’s Republic of China. Technical specification for earth-rockfill dam safety monitoring:SL 551—2012[S]. Beijing:China Water & Power Press,2012. (in Chinese)]

    Ministry of Water Resources of the People’s Republic of China. Technical specification for earth-rockfill dam safety monitoring: SL 551—2012[S]. Beijing: China Water & Power Press, 2012. (in Chinese)

    [16]

    他金城,谭立新,张宗孝. 黄池沟配水枢纽分水池侧槽退水道水力特性试验研究[J]. 水资源与水工程学报,2021,32(2):141 − 145. [TA Jincheng,TAN Lixin,ZHANG Zongxiao. Experiments on the hydraulic characteristics of the side channel spillway of the water allocation pool in Huangchigou Water Distribution Hub[J]. Journal of Water Resources and Water Engineering,2021,32(2):141 − 145. (in Chinese with English abstract)] doi: 10.11705/j.issn.1672-643X.2021.02.20

    TA Jincheng, TAN Lixin, ZHANG Zongxiao. Experiments on the hydraulic characteristics of the side channel spillway of the water allocation pool in Huangchigou Water Distribution Hub[J]. Journal of Water Resources and Water Engineering, 2021, 32(2): 141 − 145. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.11705/j.issn.1672-643X.2021.02.20

    [17]

    徐玲君,陈刚,李国栋,等. 薄壁堰泄流能力的数值模型计算及模拟自由水面的评价[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),2010,38(1):225 − 230. [XU Lingjun,CHEN Gang,LI Guodong,et al. Numerical simulation about rectangle sharp-crested weir and evaluation of free-surface[J]. Journal of Northwest A & F University (Natural Science Edition),2010,38(1):225 − 230. (in Chinese with English abstract)]

    XU Lingjun, CHEN Gang, LI Guodong, et al. Numerical simulation about rectangle sharp-crested weir and evaluation of free-surface[J]. Journal of Northwest A & F University (Natural Science Edition), 2010, 38(1): 225 − 230. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [18]

    李一鸣,管光华,陈琛,等. 渠道糙率影响因素分析及预测模型研究[J]. 灌溉排水学报,2017,36(增刊2):155 − 161. [LI Yiming,GUAN Guanghua,CHEN Chen,et al. Analysis of influencing factors of channel roughness and research on prediction model[J]. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage,2017,36(Sup 2):155 − 161. (in Chinese)]

    LI Yiming, GUAN Guanghua, CHEN Chen, et al. Analysis of influencing factors of channel roughness and research on prediction model[J]. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 2017, 36(Sup 2): 155 − 161. (in Chinese)

    [19]

    玛哈沙提·哈孜哈力,努尔夏西·曼斯尔. 天然河道的糙率确定方法分析[J]. 能源与节能,2017(4):94 − 95. [Mahashati Hazihali,Nuerxiaxi Mansier. Analysis of the methods for determing the roughness of natural river course[J]. Energy and Energy Conservation,2017(4):94 − 95. (in Chinese with English abstract)] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0802.2017.04.046

    Mahashati Hazihali, Nuerxiaxi Mansier. Analysis of the methods for determing the roughness of natural river course[J]. Energy and Energy Conservation, 2017(4): 94 − 95. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0802.2017.04.046

    [20]

    罗振宇,杨琰,李计,等. 石漠化治理区表层岩溶泉流量衰减分析及无机碳通量估算——以重庆酉阳龙潭槽谷老泉为例[J]. 中国岩溶,2023,42(2):337 − 350. [LUO Zhenyu,YANG Yan,LI Ji,et al. Flow attenuation analysis and inorganic carbon flux estimation of surface Karst spring in rocky desertification control area:A case study at Laoquan spring in the Longtan trough valley,Youyang County,Chongqing City,China[J]. Carsologica Sinica,2023,42(2):337 − 350. (in Chinese with English abstract)] doi: 10.11932/karst2023y011

    LUO Zhenyu, YANG Yan, LI Ji, et al. Flow attenuation analysis and inorganic carbon flux estimation of surface Karst spring in rocky desertification control area: A case study at Laoquan spring in the Longtan trough valley, Youyang County, Chongqing City, China[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2023, 42(2): 337 − 350. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.11932/karst2023y011

    [21]

    黄宇航,周晓泉,周文桐,等. 曼宁公式在粗糙壁面明渠流的适用性研究[J]. 泥沙研究,2023,48(3):22 − 29. [HUANG Yuhang,ZHOU Xiaoquan,ZHOU Wentong,et al. Study on the applicability of Manning formula to flow in rough wall open channel[J]. Journal of Sediment Research,2023,48(3):22 − 29. (in Chinese with English abstract)]

    HUANG Yuhang, ZHOU Xiaoquan, ZHOU Wentong, et al. Study on the applicability of Manning formula to flow in rough wall open channel[J]. Journal of Sediment Research, 2023, 48(3): 22 − 29. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [22]

    尹德超,罗明明,张亮,等. 基于流量衰减分析的次降水入渗补给系数计算方法[J]. 水文地质工程地质,2016,43(3):11 − 16. [YIN Dechao,LUO Mingming,ZHANG Liang,et al. Methods of calculating recharge coefficient of precipitation event based on spring recession analyses[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology,2016,43(3):11 − 16. (in Chinese with English abstract)]

    YIN Dechao, LUO Mingming, ZHANG Liang, et al. Methods of calculating recharge coefficient of precipitation event based on spring recession analyses[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology, 2016, 43(3): 11 − 16. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [23]

    邹晓岗,杨琰,徐刚,等. 岩溶槽谷石漠化治理区表层泉水化学特征研究:以重庆酉阳泔溪花椒基地老泉为例[J]. 地球与环境,2018,46(6):524 − 533. [ZOU Xiaogang,YANG Yan,XU Gang,et al. Chemical characteristics of surface spring in the rehabilitation area of Karst rock desertification:A case study at Laoquan in the pepper planting base of Ganxi Town,Youyang County,Chongqing City,China[J]. Earth and Environment,2018,46(6):524 − 533. (in Chinese with English abstract)]

    ZOU Xiaogang, YANG Yan, XU Gang, et al. Chemical characteristics of surface spring in the rehabilitation area of Karst rock desertification: A case study at Laoquan in the pepper planting base of Ganxi Town, Youyang County, Chongqing City, China[J]. Earth and Environment, 2018, 46(6): 524 − 533. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [24]

    RUMPH FREDERIKSEN R,MOLINA-NAVARRO E. The importance of subsurface drainage on model performance and water balance in an agricultural catchment using SWAT and SWAT-MODFLOW[J]. Agricultural Water Management,2021,255:107058. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2021.107058

    [25]

    NERANTZAKI S D,HRISTOPULOS D T,NIKOLAIDIS N P. Estimation of the uncertainty of hydrologic predictions in a karstic Mediterranean watershed[J]. Science of the Total Environment,2020,717:137131. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137131

    [26]

    JAKADA H,CHEN Z H. An approach to runoff modelling in small Karst watersheds using the SWAT model[J]. Arabian Journal of Geosciences,2020,13(8):318. doi: 10.1007/s12517-020-05291-0

    [27]

    YAMINI PRIYA R,MANJULA R. A review for comparing SWAT and SWAT coupled models and its applications[J]. Materials Today:Proceedings,2021,45:7190 − 7194.

    [28]

    罗明明,陈植华,周宏,等. 岩溶流域地下水调蓄资源量评价[J]. 水文地质工程地质,2016,43(6):14 − 20. [LUO Mingming,CHEN Zhihua,ZHOU Hong,et al. Assessment of regulating groundwater resources in Karst watersheds[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology,2016,43(6):14 − 20. (in Chinese with English abstract)]

    LUO Mingming, CHEN Zhihua, ZHOU Hong, et al. Assessment of regulating groundwater resources in Karst watersheds[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology, 2016, 43(6): 14 − 20. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [29]

    张亮,陈植华,周宏,等. 典型岩溶泉水文地质条件的调查与分析——以香溪河流域白龙泉为例[J]. 水文地质工程地质,2015,42(2):31 − 37. [ZHANG Liang,CHEN Zhihua,ZHOU Hong,et al. Investigation and analysis of the hydrogeological characteristics of the typical Karst spring in the Xiangxi River Basin:Exemplified by the Bailong spring in Xingshan County of Hubei[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology,2015,42(2):31 − 37. (in Chinese with English abstract)]

    ZHANG Liang, CHEN Zhihua, ZHOU Hong, et al. Investigation and analysis of the hydrogeological characteristics of the typical Karst spring in the Xiangxi River Basin: Exemplified by the Bailong spring in Xingshan County of Hubei[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology, 2015, 42(2): 31 − 37. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [30]

    罗明明,尹德超,张亮,等. 南方岩溶含水系统结构识别方法初探[J]. 中国岩溶,2015,34(6):543 − 550. [LUO Mingming,YIN Dechao,ZHANG Liang,et al. Identifying methods of Karst aquifer system structure in South China[J]. Carsologica Sinica,2015,34(6):543 − 550. (in Chinese with English abstract)] doi: 10.11932/karst20150602

    LUO Mingming, YIN Dechao, ZHANG Liang, et al. Identifying methods of Karst aquifer system structure in South China[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2015, 34(6): 543 − 550. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.11932/karst20150602

    [31]

    刘波,刘玉冰,黎春蕾,等. 重庆市伏秋旱时空演变特征及其影响因素分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境,2022,31(5):1077 − 1085. [LIU Bo,LIU Yubing,LI Chunlei,et al. Characteristics of spatial and temporal evolution of drought in Chongqing and its influencing factors[J]. Yangtze River Basin Resources and Environment,2022,31(5):1077 − 1085. (in Chinese with English abstract)]

    LIU Bo, LIU Yubing, LI Chunlei, et al. Characteristics of spatial and temporal evolution of drought in Chongqing and its influencing factors[J]. Yangtze River Basin Resources and Environment, 2022, 31(5): 1077 − 1085. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [32]

    韩世刚. 重庆市高温伏旱气候特征及其预报方案研究[D]. 兰州:兰州大学,2010. [HAN Shigang. Research on the climatic characteristics of high temperature drought and its forecasting program in Chongqing [D]. Lanzhou:Lanzhou University,2010. (in Chinese with English abstract)]

    HAN Shigang. Research on the climatic characteristics of high temperature drought and its forecasting program in Chongqing [D]. Lanzhou: Lanzhou University, 2010. (in Chinese with English abstract)

  • 加载中

(5)

(3)

计量
  • 文章访问数:  228
  • PDF下载数:  16
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
收稿日期:  2024-03-10
修回日期:  2024-06-27
刊出日期:  2025-03-15

目录