Development law of shallow karst in a rock slope based on equivalent antimagnetic transient electromagnetic method
-
摘要:
边坡赋存溶蚀空间的不确定性和非均质性是影响岩质边坡稳定性的重要因素。首先,从破坏岩体结构完整性、水文地质条件变化、岩体应力分布不均3方面分析了岩溶发育对岩质边坡稳定性的影响机理。然后,以山西某场地岩质边坡为例,在系统分析场地边坡工程地质条件的基础上,采用HPTEM-18型高精度等值反磁通瞬变电磁系统设计并实施了6条物探测线,设置采集频率为12.5 Hz,叠加300次,重复2次。由探测和解译成果可以看出: 边坡上部岩体风化严重、裂隙发育,下部岩体较为完整,边坡基岩上部岩溶现象较为普遍,未见构造集中发育带,未见明显富水区域。钻探验证结果表明物探解译的异常区岩心破碎,裂隙泥质充填,伴有突然掉钻现象,证明物探解译的岩溶发育区准确,可满足工程设计要求。研究成果可为该类型岩溶发育岩质边坡的稳定性评价提供重要的借鉴和参考。
-
关键词:
- 等值反磁通瞬变电磁法 /
- 岩质边坡 /
- 岩溶发育 /
- 边坡稳定性 /
- 数据解译
Abstract:The uncertainty and heterogeneity of karst dissolution occurrence space in slope are important factors affecting the stability of rock slope. First, the impact mechanism of karst development on the stability of rock slopes was analyzed from three aspects, that is damage to the integrity of rock structure, changes in hydrogeological conditions, and uneven distribution of rock stress. Then, a rock slope in a site in Shanxi Province was taken as an example. On the basis of the systematic analysis of the engineering geological conditions of the slope, the HPTEM-18 high-precision equivalent antimagnetic transient electromagnetic system was used to design and implement 6 geophysical detection lines with the acquisition frequency of 12.5 Hz, superimposing time of 300, and repeating time of 2. According to the detection and interpretation results, it could be seen that the upper part of the slope was seriously weathered with developed fractures, while the lower part of the slope was relatively intact. Karst phenomena were common in the upper part of the bedrock, and the structural concentrated development zone and water-rich area were not seen. The drilling verification results show that the rock cores in the abnormal area interpreted by geophysical exploration were broken, and the fissures were filled with mud. The sudden drop of drilling indicated that the karst development area interpreted by geophysical exploration was accurate and could meet the requirements of engineering design. The research results could provide important reference and guidance for the stability evaluation of karst developed rock slope of this type.
-
-
表 1 研究区素填土、粉质黏土、碎石土物理力学参数
Table 1. Physical and mechanical parameters of plain fill, silty clay, and gravelly soil in the study area
地层 地基承载力特征值/kPa 天然重度/
(kN·m-3)压缩模量/
MPa黏聚力/
kPa内摩擦角/(°) 素填土 / 18.0 / / / 粉质黏土 150 19.0 10.0 25.0 21.0 碎石土 300 20.5 30.0 0.0 25.0 注: “/”为无数据。 表 2 研究区强风化灰岩、中风化灰岩物理力学参数
Table 2. Physical and mechanical parameters of highly weathered limestone and moderately weathered limestone in the study area
地层 天然重度/ (kN·m-3) 压缩模量/ MPa 地基承载力特征值/kPa 泊松比 强风化灰岩 23.0 45.0 700 0.30 中风化灰岩 28.0 50.0 2 000 0.16 -
[1] 张倬元, 王士天, 王兰生, 等. 工程地质分析原理[M]. 4版. 北京: 地质出版社, 2016.
Zhang Z Y, Wang S T, Wang L S, et al. Principles of Engineering Geological Analysis[M]. 4th ed. Beijing: Geological Publishing House, 2016.
[2] 刘宏, 宋建波, 王文俊. 岩溶区层状缓倾角岩质边坡变形破坏机制研究[J]. 地质灾害与环境保护, 2007, 18(4): 67-73.
Liu H, Song J B, Wang W J. Study on the deformation and failure mechanism of samdwich glacis slope in karst region[J]. Journal of Geological Hazards and Environment Preservation, 2007, 18(4): 67-73.
[3] 夏开宗, 刘秀敏, 陈从新, 等. 考虑突变理论的顺层岩质边坡失稳研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2015, 36(2): 477-486.
Xia K Z, Liu X M, Chen C X, et al. Analysis of mechanism of bedding rock slope instability with catastrophe theory[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2015, 36(2): 477-486.
[4] 唐尧, 王立娟, 李力生, 等. 地质灾害分布规律及主控要素分析——以甘洛县为例[J]. 中国地质调查, 2024, 11(3): 101-107. doi: 10.19388/j.zgdzdc.2024.03.13
Tang Y, Wang L J, Li L S, et al. Analysis of the distribution law and main control factors of geological hazards: A case study of Ganluo County[J]. Geological Survey of China, 2024, 11(3): 101-107. doi: 10.19388/j.zgdzdc.2024.03.13
[5] 朱涛, 翟亚锋, 翟会君. 浅层顺层滑坡成灾机制分析及其稳定性评价[J]. 中国地质调查, 2023, 10(6): 88-94. doi: 10.19388/j.zgdzdc.2023.06.10
Zhu T, Zhai Y F, Zhai H J. Disaster mechanism analysis and stability evaluation of shallow bedding landslide[J]. Geological Survey of China, 2023, 10(6): 88-94. doi: 10.19388/j.zgdzdc.2023.06.10
[6] 张科, 杨红宣, 范文臣. 基于溶洞随机模型的岩质边坡稳定性评估研究[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2018, 14(5): 1381-1386.
Zhang K, Yang H X, Fan W C. Rock slope stability analysis based on karst cave stochastic model[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2018, 14(5): 1381-1386.
[7] 师海. 沪昆高铁路堑边坡岩溶化岩体力学特性及振动疲劳效应研究[D]. 北京: 北京交通大学, 2017.
Shi H. Study on Mechanical Properties and Vibration Fatigue of Rock Cutting Slope on Shanghai-Kunming High-Speed Railway[D]. Beijing: Beijing Jiaotong University, 2017.
[8] 钟祖良, 王南云, 李滨, 等. 采动作用下上硬下软型缓倾岩质高边坡变形机理试验研究[J]. 中国岩溶, 2020, 39(4): 509-517.
Zhong Z L, Wang N Y, Li B, et al. Experimental study on the deformation mechanism of upper-hard and lower-soft gently dipping rock on high slopes under the mining effect[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2020, 39(4): 509-517.
[9] 刘运思, 牟天光, 肖洪波, 等. 岩溶地区陡峭岩质高边坡动力稳定性分析[J]. 湖南文理学院学报: 自然科学版, 2019, 31(1): 74-78.
Liu Y S, Mou T G, Xiao H B, et al. Dynamic stability analysis of steep rock high slope in karst area[J]. Journal of Hunan University of Arts and Science (Science and Technology), 2019, 31(1): 74-78.
[10] 徐建强, 阎宗岭, 李海平, 等. 黔西岩溶区公路土岩混合边坡致灾模式及调控技术[J]. 公路交通技术, 2019, 35(6): 25-30, 42.
Xu J Q, Yan Z L, Li H P, et al. Disaster mode and control techno\|logy of soil-rock mixed slope in highway in karst area of western Guizhou[J]. Technology of Highway and Transport, 2019, 35(6): 25-30, 42.
[11] 孙茂锐, 丁昕, 李星, 等. 高密度电法和地质雷达在安徽某隧道岩溶探测中的应用[J]. 勘察科学技术, 2023(3): 53-56.
Sun M R, Ding X, Li X, et al. Application of high-density electrical method and ground radar in karst detection of a tunnel in Anhui[J]. Site Investigation Science and Technology, 2023(3): 53-56.
[12] 田方正. 无充填型及充水型岩溶的TGP与地质雷达响应特征分析[J]. 勘察科学技术, 2023(5): 60-64.
Tian F Z. Analysis of TGP and geological radar response characteristics of non-filled and water-filled karst cave[J]. Site Investigation Science and Technology, 2023(5): 60-64.
[13] 祁昌龙. 高速公路岩溶边坡失稳机理及治理措施研究[D]. 重庆: 重庆交通大学, 2022.
Qi C L. Study on Mechanism and Control Measures of Highway Karst Slope Instability[D]. Chongqing: Chongqing Jiaotong University, 2022.
[14] 田凯, 姚品品, 铁永波, 等. 地下水渗流场对库区滑坡稳定性影响的数值模拟——以白马库区羊角滩滑坡为例[J]. 中国地质调查, 2022, 9(4): 74-81. doi: 10.19388/j.zgdzdc.2022.04.09
Tian K, Yao P P, Tie Y B, et al. Numerical simulation study of the influence of groundwater seepage field on the stability of landslide in reservoir: A case study in Yangjiaotan landslide of Baimaku area[J]. Geological Survey of China, 2022, 9(4): 74-81. doi: 10.19388/j.zgdzdc.2022.04.09
[15] 杨瑞芳. 辛安泉域岩溶地下水脆弱性评价研究[D]. 太原: 太原理工大学, 2016.
Yang R F. Study on the Karst Groundwater Vulnerability Evaluation of Xin'an Spring Area[D]. Taiyuan: Taiyuan University of Technology, 2016.
-