Analysis and evaluation of urban geological environment problems:take Liaocheng city, Shandong province as an example
-
摘要: 本文基于聊城市不同精度的基础地质、水工环地质资料以及InSAR解译成果等数据，对聊城市中心城区目前存在的地面沉降、土壤盐渍化、水土污染等环境地质问题进行了分级评价，并分析了环境地质问题的发育特征与分布范围。结果表明：聊城市中心城区2008—2018 年的地面沉降比较均匀，没有明显的沉降漏斗中心，2016 年以来，地面沉降速率逐渐变缓，地面沉降发育程度逐渐从中等发育转变为弱发育；研究区大部分土壤处于未盐渍化状态，土壤盐渍化现象基本消失；研究区郊区地下水污染程度很轻，城区及附近浅层地下水污染较重，主要受三氮和半挥发性有机指标苯并[a]芘等指标影响；研究区良好级水（II、III 类）、较差级水（Ⅳ类）和极差级水（Ⅴ类）分别约占全区总面积的0.6%、53.4%和46%，部分水样硝酸根、Cl-、SO4 2-等单项指标达到Ⅴ类或Ⅳ类；研究区广泛分布易液化砂土，但对建筑未造成危害。本次研究成果可为聊城市规划建设和可持续性发展提供地质依据和技术支撑。Abstract: Based on the data of basic geology, hydro-engineering-environment geological data and InSAR interpretation results of Liaocheng with different precision, this paper graded the existing environmental geological problems, such as land subsidence, soil salinization, water and soil pollution in central city area of Liaocheng, and analyzed the development characteristics and distribution range of environmental geological problems.The results show that: the land subsidence in the central city of Liaocheng from 2008 to 2018 was relatively uniform, with no obvious settlement funnel center.Since 2016, the land subsidence rate gradually slowed down, and the development degree of land subsidence gradually changed from moderate development to weak development; most of the soil in the study area was in a state of unsalinization, and the soil salinization phenomenon basically disappeared;The groundwater pollution in the suburbs of the study area is very light, and the shallow groundwater pollution in the urban and nearby areas is heavy, which is mainly affected by three nitrogen and semi-volatile organic indicators benzo [a]pyrene; Good grade water (class II, class III), poor grade water (class Ⅳ) and extreme poor grade water (class V) accounted for about 0.6%, 53.4% and 46% of the total area, respectively, some water sample nitrate, Cl-, SO4 2-single index to class V or classⅣ; The liquefiable sand soil was widely distributed in the study area, but there was no damage to the buildings.The results can provide the geological basis and technical support for urban planning, construction and sustainable development of Liaocheng city.
-
-
[1] 国家市场监督管理总局, 国家标准化管理委员会.地质灾害危险性评估规范GB/T 40112-2021[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2021.
[2] 中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.盐渍土地区建筑技术规范(GB/T 50942-2014)[S].北京:中国计划出版社,2014.
[3] 中国地质调查局.地下水污染地质调查评价规范DD2008-01[S].2008.
[4] 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局,中国国家标准化管理委员会.地下水质量标准GB/T 14848-2017[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2017.
[5] 聊城市地方史志编纂委员会.聊城市志(1997-2015)[M].北京:方志出版社,2020.
[6] 安梦岭.鲁北平原地下水资源综合评价研究报告[R].山东省地矿局第二水文地质队,1985.
[7] 北京地质学院.聊城幅J-50-32 1/20 万综合水文地质图幅说明书[R].河北地质局水文工程地质大队,1959.
[8] 许庆涛.聊城市地下咸水地质特征与综合开发利用[J].水资源开发与管理,2015(2):35-37.
[9] 李群智,苏付刚,常玉会,等.华北平原典型区浅层地下水现状分析及保护对策-以山东省聊城市为例[J].水利发展研究,2014,14(6):61-63.
[10] 马晓红.聊城市区地下水资源的动态分析与开采研究[J].地下水,2009,31(6):26-28.
[11] 吴传贵,李俊杰,岳青.聊城市地下水资源的开采与补给问题的探讨[J].地下水,2005,27(2):99-101.
[12] 郭秀岩.山东省聊城市环境地质调查评价报告[R].山东省地质科学实验研究院,2007.
[13] 魏伟.山东省聊城城市地质调查报告[R].山东省第一地质矿产勘查院,2015.
[14] Navarro-Hernandez MI, Valdes-Abellan J, Tomas R, et al.ValInSAR: A systematic approach for the validation of Differential SAR Interferometry in land subsidence areas[J].IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 2022, 15:3650-3671.
[15] Fernandez-Torres EA, Cabral-Cano E, Novelo-Casanova DA, et al.Risk assessment of land subsidence and associated faulting in Mexico City using InSAR[J].Natural Hazards, 2022, 114(3):3861-3861.
[16] Becek K , Ibrahim K, Bayik C, et al.Identifying Land Subsidence Using Global Digital Elevation Models[J].IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 2021, 14:8989-8998.
[17] 张永伟,邵明,肖敏.山东省地面沉降监测与防治工作进展[J].山东国土资源,2018,34(8):62-66.
[18] 张静.聊城市东昌府区地下水超采现状及治理措施研究[J].陕西水利,2022,(1):115-117.
[19] 张人权,梁杏,靳孟贵,等.水文地质学基础(第七版)[M].北京:地质出版社,2018.
[20] 陈彭,王威,王国明,等.沧州东部滨海平原土壤盐渍化特征分析[J].华北地质,2022,45(3):36-43.
[21] 王遵亲.中国盐渍土[M].北京:科学出版社,1993.
[22] 王遵亲,黎立羣,刘有昌,等.山东聊城盐渍土的形成条件及其分布规律[J].土壤学报,1963,(4):343-360.
[23] 李扬,吉龙江,窦炳臣,等.聊城市地下水水质特征及评价方法选择研究[J].水资源与水工程学报,2015,26(5):29-34.
[24] 庄付磊,郭中伟,赵红金.聊城市浅层地下水水质评价及建议对策[J].山东水利,2022,(9):54-55.
[25] 李扬,刘术明,于健,等.聊城城郊浅层地下水水质特征及其成因研究[J].环境科学与管理,2020,45(6):57-62.
[26] 蒋万军,孟利山,柳富田,等.张家口地区地下水资源与环境质量现状及开发利用保护建议[J].华北地质,2022,45(3):44-54.
[27] 费宇红,张兆吉,郭春艳,等.区域地下水质量评价及影响因素识别方法研究-以华北平原为例[J].地球学报,2014,35(2):131-138.
[28] 姚新华.谈聊城古城区的砂(粉)土液化及其判别[J].山西建筑,2013,39(2):79-80.
[29] 刘颖,谢君斐.砂土震动液化[M].北京:地震出版社,1984.
[30] 石兆吉,王兰民.土壤动力特性液化势及危害性评价[M].北京:地震出版社,1999.
[31] 中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部,中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局.建筑抗震设计规范(GB 50011-2010)[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2010.
-
计量
- 文章访问数: 25
- PDF下载数: 6
- 施引文献: 0
下载: