SDG15-oriented analysis on the spatiotemporal dynamics of ecosystem services in Qianjiangyuan National Park
-
摘要: 生态系统服务是连接生态与人类福祉的桥梁,快速、准确地评估其变化对实现区域可持续发展具有重要意义。SDG15也为生态系统服务的计算提供了新的思路方向。钱江源为钱塘江发源地、长三角地区当前唯一的国家公园试点区域,目前却对该区域生态系统服务时空分布及变化缺乏深入认识。本研究基于试点区2010—2020年4期土地覆被遥感监测数据,利用InVEST模型,结合单、双变量Moran’s I空间自相关方法,面向SDG15指标,定量评估钱江源国家公园生态系统服务的时空变化特征。结果表明: ①2010—2020年,生态系统服务价值呈不断增加趋势,期间共增加了15.21%。文化服务增长最快,增长了19.70%,调节服务增长了16.27%,供给服务减少了1.72%; ②生态系统服务价值空间分布均呈现出从东北与西南逐渐向中部减小的空间变化趋势; ③土地覆被类型的时空变化导致在无法增加土地利用率的现状下,生态系统服务增长缓慢,湿地和水体等面积与生态质量的减少导致了部分生态系统服务空间聚集度与可提供价值的下降; ④生态系统服务可以成为衡量SDG15的指标。研究结果能为钱江源国家公园建设提供理论依据和技术支撑,实现区域生态环境的可持续发展。
-
关键词:
- 钱江源国家公园 /
- 生态系统服务 /
- Moran’s I指数 /
- InVEST模型 /
- SDG15
Abstract: Ecosystem services are the bridge between ecology and human well-being, hence rapid and accurate assessment of their changes is very important for regional sustainable development. Sustainable Development Goal 15 (SDG15) also provides a new direction for the calculation of ecosystem services. The Qianjiangyuan is the origin of the Qiantang River and the only pilot national park in the Yangtze River Delta region at present. However, it is necessary to further clarify the spatiotemporal distribution and changes of the ecosystem services in Qianjiangyuan. Based on the 2010—2020 remote sensing monitoring data of land cover in the pilot area and oriented to the SDG15 indicators, this study quantitatively assessed the spatiotemporal variation characteristics of ecosystem services in Qianjiangyuan National Park using the InVEST model and the univariate and bivariate Moran’s I spatial autocorrelation methods. The results are shown as follows. ① From 2010 to 2020, the values of ecosystem services gradually increased by 15.21%. Specifically, cultural services grew the fastest by 19.70%, regulating services grew by 16.27%, and supply services decreased by 1.72%. ② The spatial distribution of ecosystem service values showed a gradually decreasing trend from the northeast and the southwest to the center. ③ The spatiotemporal changes in land cover types slowed the growth of ecosystem services under the land development restriction. The reduced areas of wetlands and water bodies and ecological quality led to declined spatial aggregation and value of some ecosystem services. ④ Ecosystem services can be regarded as an indicator of SDG15. The study results are expected to provide a theoretical basis and technical support for the construction of Qianjiangyuan National Park and support the sustainable development of the regional ecological environment.-
Key words:
- Qianjiangyuan National Park /
- ecosystem services /
- Moran’s I index /
- InVEST model /
- SDG15
-
-
[1] 国务院. 国务院办公厅印发《建立国家公园体制总体方案》[EB/OL]. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2017-09/26/content_5227713.htm .
[2] State Council. The General Office of the State Council issued the “Overall Plan for Establishing the National Park System”[EB/OL]. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2017-09/26/content_5227713.htm .
[3] 何思源, 苏杨, 闵庆文. 中国国家公园的边界、分区和土地利用管理——来自自然保护区和风景名胜区的启示[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(4):1318-1329.
[4] He S Y, Su Y, Min Q W. Boundary,zoning,and land use management of the China National Parks:Learning from nature reserves and scenic areas[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39(4):1318-1329.
[5] 虞虎, 陈田, 钟林生, 等. 钱江源国家公园体制试点区功能分区研究[J]. 资源科学, 2017, 39(1):20-29.
[6] Yu H, Chen T, Zhong L S, et al. Functional zoning of the Qianjiangyuan National Park system pilot area[J]. Resources Science, 2017, 39(1):20-29.
[7] 殷楠, 王帅, 刘焱序. 生态系统服务价值评估:研究进展与展望[J]. 生态学杂志, 2021, 40(1):233-244.
[8] Yin N, Wang S, Liu Y X. Ecosystem service value assessment:Research progress and prospect[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2021, 40(1):233-244.
[9] Yang S Q, Zhao W W, Liu Y X, et al. Prioritizing sustainable development goals and linking them to ecosystem services:A global expert’s knowledge evaluation[J]. Geography and Sustainability, 2020, 1(4):321-330.
[10] Peng K F, Jiang W G, Ling Z Y, et al. Evaluating the potential impacts of land use changes on ecosystem service value under multiple scenarios in support of SDG reporting:A case study of the Wuhan urban agglomeration[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021, 307:127321.
[11] Costanza R, d’Arge R, Groot R de, et al. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital[J]. Nature, 1997, 387(6630):253-260.
[12] Li X, Guo J, Qi S. Forestland landscape change induced spatiotemporal dynamics of subtropical urban forest ecosystem services value in forested region of China:A case of Hangzhou City[J]. Environmental Research, 2021, 195:110926.
[13] Grammatikopoulou I, Va?ká?ová D. The value of forest ecosystem services:A meta-analysis at the European scale and application to national ecosystem accounting[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2021, 48: 101262.
[14] 赵亮, 刘吉平, 田学智. 近60年挠力河流域生态系统服务价值时空变化[J]. 生态学报, 2013, 33(10):3169-3176.
[15] Zhao L, Liu J P, Tian X Z. The temporal and spatial variation of the value of ecosystem services of the Naoli River Basin ecosystem during the last 60 years[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2013, 33(10):3169-3176.
[16] Perosa F, Fanger S, Zingraff-Hamed A, et al. A meta-analysis of the value of ecosystem services of floodplains for the Danube River Basin[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2021, 777:146062.
[17] 亢红霞, 那晓东, 臧淑英. 1980—2010年松嫩平原湿地生态服务功能价值评估[J]. 国土资源遥感, 2017, 29(2):193-200.doi:10.6046/gtzyyg.2017.02.28.
[18] Kang H X, Na X D, Zang S Y. Research on the evaluation of wetland ecosystem services of Songnen Plain during 1980—2010[J]. Remote Sensing for Land and Resources, 2017, 29(2):193-200.doi:10.6046/gtzyyg.2017.02.28.
[19] 马依拉·热合曼, 买买提·沙吾提, 尼格拉·塔什甫拉提, 等. 基于遥感与GIS的渭库绿洲生态系统服务价值时空变化研究[J]. 生态学报, 2018, 38(16):5938-5951.
[20] Mayila R H M, Mamat S W T, Nigela T X P L T, et al. The ecosystem service value spatial-temporal changes in the Ugan-Kuqa River Delta Oasis based on RS and GIS[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2018, 38(16):5938-5951.
[21] 张瑜, 赵晓丽, 左丽君, 等. 黄土高原土地利用变化对生态系统服务价值的影响[J]. 国土资源遥感, 2019, 31(3):132-139.doi:10.6046/gtzyyg.2019.03.17.
[22] Zhang Y, Zhao X L, Zuo L J, et al. The impact of land use change on ecosystem services value in Loess Plateau[J]. Remote Sensing for Land and Resources, 2019, 31(3):132-139.doi:10.6046/gtzyyg.2019.03.17.
[23] 胡和兵, 刘红玉, 郝敬锋, 等. 城市化流域生态系统服务价值时空分异特征及其对土地利用程度的响应[J]. 生态学报, 2013, 33(8):2565-2576.
[24] Hu H B, Liu H Y, Hao J F, et al. Spatio-temporal variation in the value of ecosystem services and its response to land use intensity in an urbanized watershed[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2013, 33(8):2565-2576.
[25] Aziz T. Changes in land use and ecosystem services values in Pakistan,1950—2050[J]. Environmental Development, 2021, 37:100576.
[26] 汪清川, 奚砚涛, 刘欣然, 等. 生态服务价值对土地利用变化的时空响应研究——以徐州市为例[J]. 自然资源遥感, 2021, 33(3):219-228.doi:10.6046/zrzyyg.2020305.
[27] Wang Q C, Xi Y T, Liu X R, et al. Spatial-temporal response of ecological service value to land use change:A case study of Xuzhou City[J]. Remote Sensing for Natural Resources, 2021, 33(3):219-228.doi:10.6046/zrzyyg.2020305.
[28] 李晶, 李红艳, 张良. 关中—天水经济区生态系统服务权衡与协同关系[J]. 生态学报, 2016, 36(10):3053-3062.
[29] Li J, Li H Y, Zhang L. Ecosystem service trade-offs in the Guanzhong-Tianshui economic region of China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2016, 36(10):3053-3062.
[30] 胡毅, 乔伟峰, 何天祺. 江淮生态经济区土地利用格局及生态系统服务价值变化[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2020, 29(11):2450-2461.
[31] Hu Y, Qiao W F, He T Q. Land use pattern and ecosystem service value changes in the Jianghuai Ecological Economic Zone[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2020, 29(11):2450-2461.
[32] 郑德凤, 郝帅, 吕乐婷, 等. 三江源国家公园生态系统服务时空变化及权衡-协同关系[J]. 地理研究, 2020, 39(1):64-78.
[33] Zheng D F, Hao S, Lyu L T, et al. Spatiotemporal changes and trade-off-synergy relationship of ecosystem services in the Three Rivers Source National Park[J]. Geographical Research, 2020, 39(1):64-78.
[34] 何思源, 苏杨, 王蕾, 等. 构建促进保护地社区资源使用与保护目标协调的社会情境分析工具——武夷山国家公园试点区实践[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(11):3861-3870.
[35] He S Y, Su Y, Wang L, et al. Developing a social context analysis tool to facilitate communities’ conservation behavior in protected areas:An experiment in the Wuyishan National Park pilot[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39(11):3861-3870.
[36] 肖练练, 钟林生, 虞虎, 等. 功能约束条件下的钱江源国家公园体制试点区游憩利用适宜性评价研究[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(4):1375-1384.
[37] Xiao L L, Zhong L S, Yu H, et al. Assessment of recreational use suitability of Qianjiangyuan National Park pilot under the zoning constraints[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39(4):1375-1384.
[38] Gong P, Liu H, Zhang M, et al. Stable classification with limited sample:Transferring a 30-m resolution sample set collected in 2015 to mapping 10-m resolution global land cover in 2017[J]. Science Bulletin, 2019, 64(6):370-373.
[39] Liu L Y, Zhang X, Chen X D, et al.GLC_FCS30- 2020: Global land cover with fine classification system at 30 m in 2020(v1.2)[DB/OL]. Zenodo, 2020.https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4280923.
[40] 傅伯杰, 张立伟. 土地利用变化与生态系统服务:概念、方法与进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2014, 33(4):441-446.
[41] Fu B J, Zhang L W. Land-use change and ecosystem services:Concepts,methods and progress[J]. Progress in Geography, 2014, 33(4):441-446.
[42] 李屹峰, 罗跃初, 刘纲, 等. 土地利用变化对生态系统服务功能的影响——以密云水库流域为例[J]. 生态学报, 2013, 33(3):726-736.
[43] Li Y F, Luo Y C, Liu G, et al. Effects of land use change on ecosystem services:A case study in Miyun reservoir watershed[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2013, 33(3):726-736.
[44] 李丽, 王心源, 骆磊, 等. 生态系统服务价值评估方法综述[J]. 生态学杂志, 2018, 37(4):1233-1245.
[45] Li L, Wang X Y, Luo L, et al. A review of ecosystem service value evaluation methods[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2018, 37(4):1233-1245.
[46] 高星, 杨刘婉青, 李晨曦, 等. 模拟多情景下白洋淀流域土地利用变化及生态系统服务价值的空间响应[J]. 生态学报, 2021, 41(20):7974-7988.
[47] Gao X, Yang L W Q, Li C X, et al. Land use change and ecosystem service value measurement in Baiyangdian Basin under the simulated multiple scenarios[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2021, 41(20):7974-7988.
[48] Lin W P, Xu D, Guo P P, et al. Exploring variations of ecosystem service value in Hangzhou Bay Wetland,Eastern China[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2019, 37:100944.
[49] 谢高地, 张彩霞, 张雷明, 等. 基于单位面积价值当量因子的生态系统服务价值化方法改进[J]. 自然资源学报, 2015, 30(8):1243-1254.
[50] Xie G D, Zhang C X, Zhang L M, et al. Improvement of the method of valuing ecosystem services based on unit area value equivalent factors[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2015, 30(8):1243-1254.
-
计量
- 文章访问数: 490
- PDF下载数: 40
- 施引文献: 0
下载: