钻井法泥浆用于陕北榆林地区矿山生态修复资源化利用试验研究

李金雨, 王新刚, 亓秋燕, 王宗金, 奚家米, 艾子涵, 李彦君, 王昊宇, 辜超颖. 2025. 钻井法泥浆用于陕北榆林地区矿山生态修复资源化利用试验研究. 西北地质, 58(2): 197-208. doi: 10.12401/j.nwg.2024103
引用本文: 李金雨, 王新刚, 亓秋燕, 王宗金, 奚家米, 艾子涵, 李彦君, 王昊宇, 辜超颖. 2025. 钻井法泥浆用于陕北榆林地区矿山生态修复资源化利用试验研究. 西北地质, 58(2): 197-208. doi: 10.12401/j.nwg.2024103
LI Jinyu, WANG Xingang, QI Qiuyan, WANG Zongjin, XI Jiami, AI Zihan, LI Yanjun, WANG Haoyu, GU Chaoying. 2025. Experimental Study on the Use of Drilling Mud for Ecological Restoration of Mines in Yulin, Northern Shaanxi. Northwestern Geology, 58(2): 197-208. doi: 10.12401/j.nwg.2024103
Citation: LI Jinyu, WANG Xingang, QI Qiuyan, WANG Zongjin, XI Jiami, AI Zihan, LI Yanjun, WANG Haoyu, GU Chaoying. 2025. Experimental Study on the Use of Drilling Mud for Ecological Restoration of Mines in Yulin, Northern Shaanxi. Northwestern Geology, 58(2): 197-208. doi: 10.12401/j.nwg.2024103

钻井法泥浆用于陕北榆林地区矿山生态修复资源化利用试验研究

  • 基金项目: 国家重点研发计划项目(2023YFC3008401),陕西省自然科学基础研究计划重点项目(2024JC-ZDXM-19)联合资助。
详细信息
    作者简介: 李金雨(1999−),男,硕士,主要从事风积沙改良与室内试验。E−mail:992320924@qq.com
    通讯作者: 王新刚(1984−),男,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事地质灾害机理研究。E−mail:xgwang@nwu.edu.cn
  • 中图分类号: P642.5; TD88

Experimental Study on the Use of Drilling Mud for Ecological Restoration of Mines in Yulin, Northern Shaanxi

More Information
  • 近年来钻井法在西部地区得到了广泛的应用,但随之伴随的大量泥浆处置成为了困扰企业和政府的环境难题。钻井泥浆中含有丰富的有机质和矿物质,这些成分能够有效改善土壤的结构和肥力,不合理处置往往会造成巨大的资源浪费和环境污染。为探究废弃钻井泥浆资源化利用的新途径,笔者创新性的将其作为矿山土壤改良剂用于改良陕北干旱地区风积沙,以达到变废为宝的目的。通过开展颗分、渗透性、测定有效磷以及速效K含量等方面的试验,探究了废弃钻井泥浆对陕北矿区风积沙土壤生态修复改良效果及其机理;结合一系列盆栽试验,研究了泥浆掺入对植株株高、叶片发育、根系发育等关键生长特征参数的影响,对比分析了不同处理组之间的植株生长情况。试验结果表明,泥浆的加入有效降低了矿区风积沙渗透性,提高风积沙中黏粒含量、有效磷以及速效K含量,即泥浆的加入使得风积沙土具有了“海绵吸水效应”,并同时起到了“锁住”风积沙水分的良好效果,其肥力也显著提升;盆栽试验结果表明废弃钻井泥浆有效提升了植株的植株株高、叶片发育、根系发育等关键生长特征,证明钻井泥浆可有效改良陕北风积沙区的土壤,提高植株品质;此外综合各项试验结果发现研究区钻井泥浆改良矿山风积沙土壤的最优掺入比为10%。研究成果为钻井泥浆用于陕北矿山生态修复的资源化利用提供了理论依据和试验参考。

  • 加载中
  • 图 1  研究区位置图(据申艳军,2022修改)

    Figure 1. 

    图 2  试验材料

    Figure 2. 

    图 3  试验样品

    Figure 3. 

    图 4  渗透性试验仪器

    Figure 4. 

    图 5  蒸散试验仪器

    Figure 5. 

    图 6  有效磷、速效钾试验过程

    Figure 6. 

    图 7  盆栽试样播种后

    Figure 7. 

    图 8  试验90 d盆栽试样

    Figure 8. 

    图 9  叶绿素试验仪

    Figure 9. 

    图 10  样品渗透系数对比图

    Figure 10. 

    图 11  样品颗分对比图

    Figure 11. 

    图 12  蒸散率折线图

    Figure 12. 

    图 13  样品速效钾、有效磷含量对比图

    Figure 13. 

    图 14  株高测量

    Figure 14. 

    图 15  株高对比图

    Figure 15. 

    图 16  根径测量

    Figure 16. 

    图 17  根长测量

    Figure 17. 

    图 18  根径、根长对比图

    Figure 18. 

    图 19  叶片长、宽对比图

    Figure 19. 

    图 20  叶绿素a、b含量对比图

    Figure 20. 

    图 21  鲜重称量

    Figure 21. 

    图 22  鲜重对比图

    Figure 22. 

    图 23  改良机理

    Figure 23. 

    表 1  风积沙基本参数

    Table 1.  Physical and chemical properties of undisturbed soil

    渗透系数
    (cm/s)
    颗粒度(mm) 元素含量
    (mg/kg)
    0.5~0.25 0.25~0.075 <0.075 有效磷 速效钾
    0.2772 86.9 8.0 1.8 19.15 110.24
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1]

    曹丽花, 赵世伟, 梁向锋, 等. PAM对黄土高原主要土壤类型水稳性团聚体的改良效果及机理研究[J]. 农业工程学报, 2008(1): 45−49.

    CAO Lihua, ZHAO Shiwei, LIANG Xiangfeng, et al. Research on the Improvement Effect and Mechanism of PAM on Water Stable Aggregates of Major Soil Types in the Loess Plateau[J]. Journal of Agricultural Engineering,2008(1):45−49.

    [2]

    贺亚维, 卜涛. 陕北钻井液技术应用现状及发展方向[J]. 延安大学学报(自然科学版), 2007(3): 61−65.

    HE Yawei, BU Tao. The current situation and development direction of drilling fluid technology application in northern Shaanxi[J]. Journal of Yan'an University (Natural Science Edition),2007(3):61−65.

    [3]

    雷琦. 废弃钻井淡水泥浆污染物处理技术浅析[J]. 化工安全与环境, 2022, 35(17): 12−15.

    LEI Qi. Analysis of Pollution Treatment Technology for Abandoned Drilling Freshwater Mud[J]. Chemical Safety and Environment,2022,35(17):12−15.

    [4]

    李凤娟, 张存社, 李小龙, 等. 废弃水基泥浆处理技术研究进展[J]. 精细与专用化学品, 2023, 31(11): 26−28.

    LI Fengjuan, ZHANG Cunshe, LI Xiaolong, et al. Research progress on treatment technology of waste water-based mud[J]. Fine and Specialty Chemicals,2023,31(11):26−28.

    [5]

    刘永宏, 冀浩楠. 打井不下井, 全机械化智能建井[N]. 中国煤炭报, 2022-06-09 (004). DOI: 10.28112/n.cnki.ncmtb.2022.000938.

    LIU Yonghong, JI Haonan. Drilling without going down, fully mechanized and intelligent well construction [N]. China Coal News, 2022-06-09 (004). DOI: 10.28112/n.cnki.ncmtb.2022.000938.

    [6]

    马猛. 不同固体废弃物配施组合对风沙地土壤质量及绿化植株生长的影响[D]. 大连: 大连海事大学, 2023.

    MA Meng. The effects of different combinations of solid waste application on soil quality and green plant growth in sandy areas[D]. Dalian:Dalian Maritime University, 2023.

    [7]

    秦琪焜, 方健梅, 王根柱, 等. 煤矸石与城市污泥混合制备植生基质的试验研究[J]. 煤炭科学技术, 2022, 50(7): 304−314.

    QIN Qikun, FANG Jianmei, WANG Genzhu, etc. Experimental study on the preparation of vegetation substrate by mixing coal gangue with urban sludge[J]. Coal Science and Technology,2022,50(7):304−314.

    [8]

    申艳军, 杨博涵, 王双明, 等. 黄河几字弯区煤炭基地地质灾害与生态环境典型特征[J]. 煤田地质与勘探, 2022, 50(6): 104−117.

    SHEN Yanjun, YANG Bohan, WANG Shuangming, et al. Typical Characteristics of Geological Hazards and Ecological Environment in the Coal Base of the Yellow River Jiziwan District[J]. Coalfield Geology and Exploration,2022,50(6):104−117.

    [9]

    舒畅, 陈天欣, 冯永东, 等. 水基钻井岩屑对土壤的环境风险评价分析[J]. 钻采工艺, 2023, 46(3): 135−140.

    SHU Chang, CHEN Tianxin, FENG Yongdong, et al. Environmental risk assessment analysis of water-based drilling cuttings on soil[J]. Drilling and Production Technology,2023,46(3):135−140.

    [10]

    王丹丹, 董晨曦, 杨添麒. 废弃钻井泥浆无害化处理技术发展方向探讨[J]. 石化技术, 2023, 30(2): 118−120.

    WANG Dandan, DONG Chenxi, YANG Tianqi. Discussion on the Development Direction of Harmless Treatment Technology for Waste Drilling Mud[J]. Petrochemical Technology,2023,30(2):118−120.

    [11]

    王富加, 肖欣欣, 孙静, 等. 生物泥浆技术修复多环芳烃污染土壤研究进展[J]. 化工环保, 2023, 43(4): 427−433.

    WANG Fujia, XIAO Xinxin, SUN Jing, et al. Research progress on bio mud technology for remediation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon contaminated soil[J]. Chemical Environmental Protection,2023,43(4):427−433.

    [12]

    王峻, 李海涛, 吴东阳, 等. 泥水盾构废弃泥浆无害化处理技术及资源化处置分析[J]. 施工技术(中英文), 2023, 52(23): 27−35.

    WANG Jun, LI Haitao, WU Dongyang, et al. Harmless treatment technology and resource utilization analysis of waste slurry from slurry shield tunneling[J]. Construction Technology (Chinese and English),2023,52(23):27−35.

    [13]

    王雪艳, 王宇莹, 龚会蝶, 等. 施磷对灌耕风沙土磷含量及形态的影响[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 50(11): 145−154.

    WANG Xueyan, WANG Yuying, GONG Huidie, et al. The effect of phosphorus application on phosphorus content and forms in irrigated sandy soil[J]. Journal of Northwest A& F University (Natural Science Edition),2022,50(11):145−154.

    [14]

    杨子健, 刘阳生. 水基钻井固体废物处理处置技术研究进展[J]. 环境工程, 2021, 39(10): 143−149.

    YANG Zijian, LIU Yangsheng. Research progress on solid waste treatment and disposal technology for water-based drilling[J]. Environmental Engineering,2021,39(10):143−149.

    [15]

    昝国盛, 王翠萍, 李锋, 等. 第六次全国荒漠化和沙化调查主要结果及分析林业资源管理[J]. 林业资源管理, 2023(2): 1−9.

    ZAN Guosheng, WANG Cuiping, LI Feng, et al. Main Results and Analysis of the Sixth National Desertification and Desertification Survey on Forestry Resource Management[J]. Forestry Resource Management,2023(2):1−9.

    [16]

    翟文晰, 郝明德, 王哲, 等. 黄土区废弃钻井液对苜蓿产量和品质的影响[J]. 钻井液与完井液, 2019, 36(4): 468−472.

    ZHAI Wenxi, HAO Mingde, WANG Zhe, et al. The impact of abandoned drilling fluid on alfalfa yield and quality in loess areas[J]. Drilling and Completion Fluids,2019,36(4):468−472.

    [17]

    张浩, 李雷. 废弃泥浆合理处置技术分析[J]. 陕西地质, 2020, 38(1): 86−90.

    ZHANG Hao, LI Lei. Analysis of Reasonable Disposal Technology for Waste Mud[J]. Shaanxi Geology,2020,38(1):86−90.

    [18]

    张永双, 曲永新. 陕北晋西砂黄土的胶结物与胶结作用研究[J]. 工程地质学报, 2005(1): 18−28.

    ZHANG Yongshuang, QU Yongxin. Research on Cement Materials and Bonding Processes of Sand Loess in Northern Shaanxi and Western Shanxi[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology,2005(1):18−28.

    [19]

    朱启明, 程西科, 刘俊娥, 等. 黄土高原水蚀风蚀交错区风沙土细沟分离能力探究[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022, 36(6): 189−194+205.

    ZHU Qiming, CHENG Xike, LIU Jun'e, et al. Exploration of the Separation Capacity of Rills in Wind Sand Soil in the Ecotone of Water and Wind Erosion on the Loess Plateau[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,2022,36(6):189−194+205.

    [20]

    Bauder T A, Barbarick K A, Shanahan J F, et al. Drilling fluid effects on crop growth and iron and zinc availability[J]. Journal of Environmental Quality,1999,28:744−749.

    [21]

    Bauder T A, Barbarick K A, Ippolito J A, et al. Soil Properties Affecting Wheat Yields following Drilling-Fluid Application[J]. Journal of Environmental Quality,2005,34(5):1687−1696. doi: 10.2134/jeq2004.0384

    [22]

    Chang Y, Wang X, Han Y, et al. The Removal of Crude Oil in Waste Drilling Muds by a Constructed Microbial Consortium[J]. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2014: 1245−1257.

    [23]

    Flemming B, Chang T S, Delafontaine M, et al. Distribution of individual mud fractions in a tidal basin of the East Frisian Wadden Sea (southern North Sea): affinities between sortable silts, aggregated particle suites, and calcium carbonate and organic matter contents[J]. International Journal of Earth Sciences, 2024.

    [24]

    Kisic I, Mesic S, Basic F, et al. The effect of drilling fluids and crude oil on some chemical characteristics of soil and crops[J]. Geoderma,2009,149(3/4):209−216.

    [25]

    Murtaza M, Gbadamosi A, Hussain S M S, et al. Experimental investigation of pyrrolidinium-based ionic liquid as shale swelling inhibitor for water-based drilling fluids[J]. Geoenergy Science and Engineering, 2023, 231.

    [26]

    Tawornpruek S, Aramrak S, Ketrot D, et al. Feasibility assessment of bentonite drilling mud to improve the physical quality of loamy sand soil and water deficit of forest plant seedlings[J]. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association,2021,71(11):1375−1385.

    [27]

    Zvomuya F, Larney F J, Demaere P R, et al. Hydraulic Properties of a Sandy Loam Soil following Spent Drilling Mud Application on Native Prairie[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal,2009,73(4):1108−1112. doi: 10.2136/sssaj2008.0166

    [28]

    Zvomuya F, Larney FJ, Willms WD, et al. Vegetation Response to a one-time spent drilling mud application to semiarid, mixed-grass prairie[J]. Rangeland Ecology and Management,2011,64:375−383. doi: 10.2111/REM-D-10-00028.1

  • 加载中

(23)

(1)

计量
  • 文章访问数:  118
  • PDF下载数:  25
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
收稿日期:  2024-07-15
修回日期:  2024-11-21
录用日期:  2024-11-22
刊出日期:  2025-04-20

目录