GEOLOGICAL CONSTRAINT OF GEOHAZARDS IN EMEISHAN BASALT AREAS: A Case Study of Shuicheng County in Guizhou Province
-
摘要:
玄武岩在贵州省境内出露仅占省域面积的2.08%, 但却孕育着较大的地质灾害风险隐患. 这些区域植被覆盖率较高, 使地质灾害具有隐蔽性和突发性, 常常难以有效进行识别和防范. 本文以水城县为例, 采用ArcGIS软件对玄武岩区发育的各类地质灾害风险隐患点数据和地质、地理信息进行叠加和系统处理分析, 再结合野外现场大比例尺调查检验, 得出水城县玄武岩区地质灾害风险隐患发育的地质约束明显的结论, 即呈土岩二元结构的滑坡、不稳定斜坡、风险斜坡为该区主要地质灾害风险隐患, 较集中展布于北西向褶皱构造翼部和北西向、北东向断褶构造交汇部位, 这些区域通常地势较为平缓, 土地资源丰富, 自然村寨分布较多. 玄武岩体的内生条件和外生条件影响了其风化程度, 风化土的物理力学性质又决定了其对环境的极其敏感性.
Abstract:Basalts in Guizhou Province carry great hidden danger of geohazards, although they account only for 2.08% of the total area. Due to the dense coverage of vegetation, it is often difficult to identify and prevent the hidden and sudden geological disasters effectively in these basalt areas. Taking Shuicheng County as an example, the paper uses ArcGIS for the superposition and systematic analysis of various geohazard hidden point data as well as geological and geographic information in the basalt areas. Combined with the large scale field investigation and verification, it is concluded that the constraint of geohazards in the basalt areas of Shuicheng County is obvious. The main hidden geohazards in the area include soil-rock dual structure landslide, unstable slope and risk slope, which are distributed in the intersection of NW fold structure wing and NW and NE fault-fold structure. The terrain in the area is relatively gentle, rich in land resources and distributed with multiple natural villages. The endogenous and exogenous conditions of basalts affect the weathering degree, and the weathered soil is extremely sensitive to the environment due to its physical and mechanical properties.
-
Key words:
- Emeishan basalt /
- geohazard /
- geological constraint /
- Guizhou Province
-
-
表 1 2002—2022年水城县各类型地质灾害风险隐患点统计表
Table 1. Potential geohazard point statistics of various types in Shuicheng County during 2002-2022
统计年 滑坡 崩塌 不稳定斜坡 地面塌陷 地裂缝 地面沉降 泥石流 风险斜坡 合计 2002 数量/处 143 45 30 7 21 1 42 289 占比/% 49.48 15.57 10.38 2.42 7.27 0.35 14.53 2011 数量/处 235 63 54 8 3 1 364 占比/% 64.56 17.31 14.84 2.20 0.82 0.27 2022 数量/处 194 115 30 4 10 3 383 739 占比/% 26.25 15.56 4.06 0.54 1.35 0.41% 51.83 
下载: 导出CSV
表 2 2002—2022年峨眉山玄武岩区地质灾害风险隐患统计
Table 2. Hidden danger statistics of geohazards in Emeishan basalt area during 2002-2022
统计年 合计/处 滑坡 不稳定斜坡 崩塌 泥石流 地裂缝 风险斜坡 2002 53 35 6 3 6 3 2022 200 49 7 21 1 122
下载: 导出CSV
表 3 不同地质构造区域内的地质灾害
Table 3. Statistics of geohazards by structural areas
构造区域 合计/处 滑坡 不稳定斜坡 崩塌 地面塌陷 泥石流 地裂缝 风险斜坡 沟木底向斜南西翼 57 15 1 2 1 38 发耳构造穹盆区 97 24 4 10 59
下载: 导出CSV
表 4 不同高程内地质灾害分布
Table 4. Statistics of geohazards by elevations
高程/m 合计/处 滑坡 不稳定斜坡 崩塌 泥石流 风险斜坡 800~1000 5 2 3 1000~1400 68 12 4 5 1 46 1400~1900 114 31 3 12 68 ≥1900 13 4 4 5
下载: 导出CSV
表 5 不同地形坡度下地质灾害分布
Table 5. Statistics of geohazards by topographic gradients
地形坡度/（°） 合计/处 滑坡 不稳定斜坡 崩塌 泥石流 风险斜坡 ≤10 35 5 1 2 27 10-20 96 30 4 2 60 20-30 49 10 1 5 1 32 30-40 11 3 1 5 2 ＞40 9 1 7 1
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] 贵州省地质调查院. 中国区域地质志·贵州志[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 2017: 769-787.
Guizhou Institute of Geological Survey. Regional geology of China: Guizhou[M]. Beijing: Geological Publishing House, 2017: 769-787. (in Chinese)
[2] 徐则民, 黄润秋. 峨眉山玄武岩大规模灾难性崩滑事件的地质构造约束[J]. 地质论评, 2010, 56(2): 224-236. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZLP201002010.htm
Xu Z M, Huang R Q. The geological structure constraint for massive and catastrophic landslides in Permian Emeishan basalt[J]. Geological Review, 2010, 56(2): 224-236. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZLP201002010.htm
[3] 韩宝智, 姚智, 倪学文. 黔西北滑坡、崩塌、泥石流遥感研究[J]. 贵州地质, 1996, 13(2): 196-201. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GZDZ602.015.htm
Han B Z, Yao Z, Ni X W. Using remote sensing for the study of landslides, rockfalls and mud-rock flows in northwestern Guizhou[J]. Guizhou Geology, 1996, 13(2): 196-201. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GZDZ602.015.htm
[4] 姚智, 罗孝桓, 况顺达. 贵州西部峨眉山玄武岩的遥感影像特征[J]. 贵州地质, 2004, 21(3): 156-160. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GZDZ200403004.htm
Yao Z, Luo X H, Kuang S D. Essentials of remote sensing images of Emeishan basalts, West Guizhou[J]. Guizhou Geology, 2004, 21(3): 156-160. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GZDZ200403004.htm
[5] 严锐, 董瑞, 龙园, 等. 全球气候变暖背景下水城县近30 a气温与降水变化的新特征[J]. 中低纬山地气象, 2020, 44(3): 5-12.
Yan R, Dong R, Long Y, et al. The new change characteristics of temperature and precipitation of Shuicheng in recent 30 years under the global climate warming[J]. Mid-Low Latitude Mountain Meteorology, 2020, 44(3): 5-12.
[6] 王砚耕, 王尚彦. 峨眉山大火岩省与玄武岩铜矿——以贵州二叠纪玄武岩分布区为例[J]. 贵州地质, 2003, 20(1): 5-10, 4. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GZDZ200301002.htm
Wang Y G, Wang S Y. Emeishan large igneous provinces and basalt copper deposits: An example from Permian basalt areas in Guizhou[J]. Guizhou Geology, 2003, 20(1): 5-10, 4. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GZDZ200301002.htm
[7] 郑启钤. 贵州境内峨眉山玄武岩的基本特征及其与成矿作用的关系[J]. 贵州地质, 1985, 2(1): 1-10.
Zheng Q Q. The basic features of Emei Mountain basalt and the relation of its mineralization in Guizhou[J]. Guizhou Geology, 1985, 2(1): 1-10.
[8] 陈文一, 刘家仁, 王中刚, 等. 贵州峨眉山玄武岩喷发期的岩相古地理研究[J]. 古地理学报, 2003, 5(1): 17-28.
Chen W Y, Liu J R, Wang Z G, et al. Study on lithofacies palaeogeography during the Permian Emeishan basalt explosion in Guizhou province[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2003, 5(1): 17-28.
[9] 田景春, 卢武长, 尹观. 贵州早二叠世玄武岩喷发环境及其古海洋效应研究[J]. 成都地质学院学报, 1993, 20(1): 27-33.
Tian J C, Lu W C, Yin G. The research on the early Permian basalt eruption environment in Guizhou and it's effect to the paleoceanography[J]. Journal of Chengdu College of Geology, 1993, 20(1): 27-33.
[10] 王国卫, 李明波, 蒋明光, 等. 基于加权信息量模型的湖南省麻阳县地质灾害危险性评价与区划[J]. 地质与资源, 2020, 29(3): 266-272. http://manu25.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_dzyzy/CN/abstract/abstract10202.shtml
Wang G W, Li M B, Jiang M G, et al. Risk assessment and zoning of the geological hazards in Mayang County of Hunan Province based on weighted information model[J]. Geology and Resources, 2020, 29 (3): 266-272. http://manu25.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_dzyzy/CN/abstract/abstract10202.shtml
[11] 李信, 阮明, 杨峰, 等. 基于GIS技术和信息量法的地质灾害易发性研究——以海南省昌江县为例[J]. 地质与资源, 2022, 31(1): 98-105. http://manu25.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_dzyzy/CN/abstract/abstract10369.shtml
Li X, Ruan M, Yang F, et al. Evaluation of geological hazard susceptibility based on GIS and information method: A case study of Changjiang County, Hainan Province[J]. Geology and Resources, 2022, 31(1): 98-105. http://manu25.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_dzyzy/CN/abstract/abstract10369.shtml
[12] 郭邦梅, 权开兄. 基于ArcGIS的青海隆务河流域灾害风险性评价[J]. 地质与资源, 2019, 28(3): 289-292. http://manu25.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_dzyzy/CN/abstract/abstract8409.shtml
Guo B M, Quan K X. ArcGIS-based disaster risk assessment of Longwu River basin in Qinghai Province[J]. Geology and Resources, 2019, 28(3): 289-292. http://manu25.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_dzyzy/CN/abstract/abstract8409.shtml
[13] 温金梅, 杨龙, 苟敬, 等. 基于信息量法的地质灾害易发性评价——以重庆市巫山县县城为例[J]. 地质与资源, 2021, 30(2): 193-198, 192. http://manu25.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_dzyzy/CN/abstract/abstract10284.shtml
Wen J M, Yang L, Gou J, et al. Evaluation of geohazard susceptibility based on information method: A case study of Wushan County in Chongqing Municipality[J]. Geology and Resources, 2021, 30(2): 193-198, 192. http://manu25.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_dzyzy/CN/abstract/abstract10284.shtml
[14] 高萌萌, 李瑞敏, 徐慧珍, 等. 基于MapGIS建立的中国地质环境图系数据库[J]. 中国地质, 2019, 46(S2): 130-140.
Gao M M, Li R M, Xu H Z, et al. Database of geological environmental map system of China based on MapGIS[J]. Geology in China, 2019, 46(S2): 130-140.
[15] 郭芳芳, 杨农, 孟晖, 等. 地形起伏度和坡度分析在区域滑坡灾害评价中的应用[J]. 中国地质, 2008, 35(1): 131-143.
Guo F F, Yang N, Meng H, et al. Application of the relief amplitude and slope analysis to regional landslide hazard assessments[J]. Geology in China, 2008, 35(1): 131-143.
[16] 李华, 史文兵, 朱要强, 等. 贵州省水城县"7·23"灾难性滑坡形成机制研究[J]. 自然灾害学报, 2020, 29(6): 188-198. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZRZH202006020.htm
Li H, Shi W B, Zhu Y Q, et al. Study on the formation mechanism of "7·23" catastrophic landslide in Shuicheng County, Guizhou Province, China[J]. Journal of Natural Disasters, 2020, 29(6): 188-198. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZRZH202006020.htm
[17] 杨志华, 吴瑞安, 郭长宝, 等. 川西巴塘断裂带地质灾害效应与典型滑坡发育特征[J]. 中国地质, 2022, 49(2): 355-368. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DIZI202202001.htm
Yang Z H, Wu R A, Guo C B, et al. Geo-hazard effects and typical landslide characteristics of the Batang fault zone in the western Sichuan[J]. Geology in China, 2022, 49(2): 355-368. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DIZI202202001.htm
[18] 江新荣. 贵州不同海拔高度地形台面及其地貌组合特征[J]. 贵州师大学报(自然科学版), 1990(2): 12-16.
Jiang X R. Topographical table and its geomorphic combination characteristics at different altitudes in Guizhou[J]. Journal of Guizhou Normal University (Natural Sciences), 1990(2): 12-16. (in Chinese)
[19] 朱和书, 陈建书, 彭成龙, 等. 贵州水城地区二叠纪峨眉山玄武岩地质特征及其成矿响应探讨[J]. 贵州地质, 2019, 36(1): 37-48.
Zhu H S, Chen J S, Peng C L, et al. Geological characteristics and metallogenic response study of Permian Emeishan basalt in Shuicheng area, Guizhou Province[J]. Guizhou Geology, 2019, 36(1): 37-48.
[20] 孙书勤. 峨眉山玄武岩结构面类型及其工程效应研究[D]. 成都: 成都理工大学, 2011: 29, 31-35, 56-99.
Sun S Q. Study on the types of rock mass structural plane and engineering effects of Emeishan basalt[D]. Chengdu: Chengdu University of Technology, 2011: 29, 31-35, 56-99.
[21] 侯海峰, 杜庆安, 林建绥, 等. 贵州水城-纳雍地区峨眉山玄武岩风化壳离子吸附型稀土矿床地质特征及资源潜力[J]. 地质与勘探, 2019, 55(S1): 351-356.
Hou H F, Du Q A, Lin J S, et al. Geological characteristics and resource potential of ion adsorption rare earth deposits in weathering crust of Emeishan basalt in the Shuicheng-Nayong area, Guizhou[J]. Geology and Exploration, 2019, 55(S1): 351-356.
[22] 王伟, 杨瑞东, 鲍淼, 等. 贵州峨眉山玄武岩区风化壳与成矿关系[J]. 贵州大学学报(自然科学版), 2006, 23(4): 366-370. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GZDI200604009.htm
Wang W, Yang R D, Bao M, et al. Discussion on the mineralization associated with the weathering crust on E'meishan basalt in Guizhou Province, China[J]. Journal of Guizhou University (Natural Science Edition), 2006, 23(4): 366-370. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GZDI200604009.htm
[23] 李广信. 论土骨架与渗透力[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2016, 38(8): 1522-1528.
Li G X. On soil skeleton and seepage force[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2016, 38(8): 1522-1528.
-
图(1)
表(5)
计量
- 文章访问数: 1772
- PDF下载数: 96
- 施引文献: 0