基于多剖面法的“瓢形”沟谷渣堆稳定性分析

于妍妍, 赵毅, 方熠, 陆敏凤, 祝洁雯, 唐朝晖, 柴波. 基于多剖面法的“瓢形”沟谷渣堆稳定性分析[J]. 水文地质工程地质, 2025, 52(4): 192-201. doi: 10.16030/j.cnki.issn.1000-3665.202312013
引用本文: 于妍妍, 赵毅, 方熠, 陆敏凤, 祝洁雯, 唐朝晖, 柴波. 基于多剖面法的“瓢形”沟谷渣堆稳定性分析[J]. 水文地质工程地质, 2025, 52(4): 192-201. doi: 10.16030/j.cnki.issn.1000-3665.202312013
YU Yanyan, ZHAO Yi, FANG Yi, LU Minfeng, ZHU Jiewen, TANG Zhaohui, CHAI Bo. Stability analysis of slag heap in “scoop-shaped” valley area based on multi-profile residual thrust method[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology, 2025, 52(4): 192-201. doi: 10.16030/j.cnki.issn.1000-3665.202312013
Citation: YU Yanyan, ZHAO Yi, FANG Yi, LU Minfeng, ZHU Jiewen, TANG Zhaohui, CHAI Bo. Stability analysis of slag heap in “scoop-shaped” valley area based on multi-profile residual thrust method[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology, 2025, 52(4): 192-201. doi: 10.16030/j.cnki.issn.1000-3665.202312013

基于多剖面法的“瓢形”沟谷渣堆稳定性分析

  • 基金项目: 国家自然科学基金项目(4187071047)
详细信息
    作者简介: 于妍妍(1998—),女,硕士研究生,主要从事工程地质研究. E-mail:1502872631@qq.com
    通讯作者: 柴波(1981—),男,博士,教授,主要从事环境地质和工程地质方面的科研与教学工作. E-mail:chaibo@cug.edu.cn
  • 中图分类号: P642.3

Stability analysis of slag heap in “scoop-shaped” valley area based on multi-profile residual thrust method

More Information
  • 由于三面环山的基础优势,废弃矿渣大多选择堆积在周围高、中间低的“瓢形”场地。通过对“瓢形”沟谷区域地形及渣堆形态的分析认为,渣堆前缘存在应力集中现象,采用常规方法计算得到的渣堆稳定性可能存在稳定性系数偏高的问题,因此有必要针对“瓢形”堆渣场地提出一种改进的稳定性计算方法。考虑到“瓢形”场地“大肚子,小收口”的地形特点,基于剩余推力法提出改进的多剖面剩余推力法,并利用煤矸石材料进行不同长宽比和不同谷坡坡度的物理模型堆渣试验,以验证计算方法的合理性。试验结果表明,当沟谷长宽比在1~2之间且谷坡坡度大于材料的内摩擦角时,渣堆前缘出现应力集中现象,并且渣堆前缘的应力大小随谷坡坡度的增大而增大。分别采用传统剩余推力法(单剖面法)和多剖面法计算模型渣堆的稳定性系数,多剖面法的计算结果要小于单剖面法的计算结果,且多剖面法计算所得主剖面上剩余下滑力与监测数据基本一致,误差在5%以内。因此,多剖面剩余推力法在计算“瓢形”场地渣堆边坡稳定性时具有较高的可靠性,能够为“瓢形”弃渣场的风险防控和防灾减灾工程设计提供一定的参考依据和方法支撑。

  • 加载中
  • 图 1  深圳红坳排土场失稳前照片(据文献[13])

    Figure 1. 

    图 2  大冶寒山溪尾矿库

    Figure 2. 

    图 3  堆体条块划分平面示意图

    Figure 3. 

    图 4  条块受力示意图

    Figure 4. 

    图 5  沟谷模型沟底砌筑成型

    Figure 5. 

    图 6  沟谷模型坡面砌筑成型

    Figure 6. 

    图 7  检测装置布置图

    Figure 7. 

    图 8  堆填完毕的煤矸石堆

    Figure 8. 

    图 9  不同坡度渣堆中间主剖面监测结果(长宽比1.5∶1)

    Figure 9. 

    图 10  不同长宽比渣堆中间主剖面监测结果(坡度30°)

    Figure 10. 

    图 11  不同长宽比沟谷下滑区和抗滑区面积比例示意图

    Figure 11. 

    图 12  堆渣主剖面表面形态、沟底形态及高度差

    Figure 12. 

    图 13  不同方式所得主剖面剩余下滑力分布曲线图

    Figure 13. 

    表 1  煤矸石主要物理力学性质参数

    Table 1.  Main physical and mechanical property parameters of coal gangue

    参数 重度/(kN·m−3 休止角/(°) 黏聚力/kPa 内摩擦角/(°)
    数值 17.47 32.56 0 28.88
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1]

    周辰昕,李小倩,周建伟. 广西合山煤矸石重金属的淋溶实验及环境效应[J]. 水文地质工程地质,2014,41(3):135 − 141. [ZHOU Chenxin,LI Xiaoqian,ZHOU Jianwei. Leaching experiment and environmental effect of heavy metals of coal gangue in Heshan mining area,Guangxi Province[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology,2014,41(3):135 − 141. (in Chinese with English abstract)]

    ZHOU Chenxin, LI Xiaoqian, ZHOU Jianwei. Leaching experiment and environmental effect of heavy metals of coal gangue in Heshan mining area, Guangxi Province[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology, 2014, 41(3): 135 − 141. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [2]

    汪海滨,李小春,米子军,等. 黄土地基排土场滑坡演化机制研究[J]. 岩土力学,2011,32(12):3672 − 3678. [WANG Haibin,LI Xiaochun,MI Zijun,et al. Research on formation evolution mechanism of waste dumps landslides on loess foundation[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics,2011,32(12):3672 − 3678. (in Chinese with English abstract)] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7598.2011.12.023

    WANG Haibin, LI Xiaochun, MI Zijun, et al. Research on formation evolution mechanism of waste dumps landslides on loess foundation[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2011, 32(12): 3672 − 3678. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7598.2011.12.023

    [3]

    吴谦,毛雪松,刘龙旗,等. 某弃渣场边坡稳定性的可靠度分析[J]. 桂林理工大学学报,2017,37(3):475 − 480. [WU Qian,MAO Xuesong,LIU Longqi,et al. Stability reliability analysis of an abandoned dreg site slope[J]. Journal of Guilin University of Technology,2017,37(3):475 − 480. (in Chinese with English abstract)] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-9057.2017.03.013

    WU Qian, MAO Xuesong, LIU Longqi, et al. Stability reliability analysis of an abandoned dreg site slope[J]. Journal of Guilin University of Technology, 2017, 37(3): 475 − 480. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-9057.2017.03.013

    [4]

    龙艳梅,宋章,王玉峰,等. 基于物理模型试验的碎屑流流态化运动特征分析[J]. 水文地质工程地质,2022,49(1):126 − 136. [LONG Yanmei,SONG Zhang,WANG Yufeng,et al. An analysis of flow-like motion of avalanches based on physical modeling experiments[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology,2022,49(1):126 − 136. (in Chinese with English abstract)]

    LONG Yanmei, SONG Zhang, WANG Yufeng, et al. An analysis of flow-like motion of avalanches based on physical modeling experiments[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology, 2022, 49(1): 126 − 136. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [5]

    殷跃平. 山西襄汾县塔山矿区尾矿溃决泥流灾难[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报,2008,19(4):70. [YIN Yueping. Debris flow disaster caused by tailings bursting in Tashan mining area of Xiangfen County,Shanxi Province[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control,2008,19(4):70. (in Chinese)]

    YIN Yueping. Debris flow disaster caused by tailings bursting in Tashan mining area of Xiangfen County, Shanxi Province[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control, 2008, 19(4): 70. (in Chinese)

    [6]

    徐永强. 深圳光明新区“12•20” 余泥渣土受纳场滑坡[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报,2016,27(1):14. [XU Yongqiang. The “12•20” landslide of residual mud and muck receiving field in Guangming New District,Shenzhen[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control,2016,27(1):14. (in Chinese)]

    XU Yongqiang. The “12•20” landslide of residual mud and muck receiving field in Guangming New District, Shenzhen[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control, 2016, 27(1): 14. (in Chinese)

    [7]

    王文喜. 黄土基底排土场边坡稳定性分析与评价[D]. 阜新:辽宁工程技术大学,2007. [WANG Wenxi. Analysis and evaluation of slope stability in loess basement dumping site[D]. Fuxin:Liaoning Technical University,2007. (in Chinese with English abstract)]

    WANG Wenxi. Analysis and evaluation of slope stability in loess basement dumping site[D]. Fuxin: Liaoning Technical University, 2007. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [8]

    AHMAD AZIZI M,KARIM R,MARWANZA I,et al. Prediction of material volume of slope failure in nickel surface mine using limit equilibrium method 3D[J]. Indonesian Mining Professionals Journal,2019,1(1):43 − 48. doi: 10.36986/impj.v1i1.13

    [9]

    CHO Y C,SONG Y S. Deformation measurements and a stability analysis of the slope at a coal mine waste dump[J]. Ecological Engineering,2014,68:189 − 199. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2014.03.005

    [10]

    SHRUTHI B. Stability analysis of dump slope in open cast mines[J]. HELIX,2019,9(6):5706 − 5710. doi: 10.29042/2019-5706-5710

    [11]

    BARVOR Y J,BACHA S,CAI Qingxiang,et al. Surface mines composite slope deformation mechanisms and stress distribution[J]. Mining of Mineral Deposits,2020,14(4):1 − 16. doi: 10.33271/mining14.04.001

    [12]

    ZOU Ping,ZHAO Ximo,MENG Zhonghua,et al. Sample rocks tests and slope stability analysis of a mine waste dump[J]. Advances in Civil Engineering,2018,2018:6835709. doi: 10.1155/2018/6835709

    [13]

    YIN Yueping,LI Bin,WANG Wenpei,et al. Mechanism of the December 2015 catastrophic landslide at the Shenzhen landfill and controlling geotechnical risks of urbanization[J]. Engineering,2016,2(2):230 − 249. doi: 10.1016/J.ENG.2016.02.005

    [14]

    RAY A,RAI R,VISHWAKARMA A,et al. Biological stabilization of mine waste dump[C]//International Conference on Opencast Mining Technology & Sustainability. 2021.

    [15]

    NAYAK P K,DASH A K,DEWANGAN P. Investigating the effects of rainfall and groundwater on coal mine waste dump stability:A case study[J]. Journal of Mines,Metals and Fuels,2021,69(7):233 − 240.

    [16]

    高杨. 人工堆填体滑坡远程滑动机理研究——以深圳光明新区滑坡为例[D]. 北京:中国地质大学(北京),2018. [GAO Yang. The study on long run-out mechanism of artificial landfill landslide[D]. Beijing:China University of Geosciences,2018. (in Chinese with English abstract)]

    GAO Yang. The study on long run-out mechanism of artificial landfill landslide[D]. Beijing: China University of Geosciences, 2018. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [17]

    刘传正. 深圳红坳弃土场滑坡灾难成因分析[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报,2016,27(1):1 − 5. [LIU Chuanzheng. Genetic mechanism of landslide tragedy happened in Hong’ao dumping place in Shenzhen,China[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control,2016,27(1):1 − 5. (in Chinese with English abstract)]

    LIU Chuanzheng. Genetic mechanism of landslide tragedy happened in Hong’ao dumping place in Shenzhen, China[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control, 2016, 27(1): 1 − 5. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [18]

    孙朝燚,陈从新,郑允,等. 基于空间效应的弃渣场边坡稳定性方法探讨[J]. 西南交通大学学报,2019,54(1):97 − 105. [SUN Chaoyi,CHEN Congxin,ZHENG Yun,et al. Discussion on slope stability analysis method of abandoned dreg site based on spatial effect[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University,2019,54(1):97 − 105. (in Chinese with English abstract)]

    SUN Chaoyi, CHEN Congxin, ZHENG Yun, et al. Discussion on slope stability analysis method of abandoned dreg site based on spatial effect[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2019, 54(1): 97 − 105. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [19]

    李跃,杨永生,毛权生,等. 基于三维地质模型的排土场边坡整体稳定性探究[J]. 岩土力学,2013,34(增刊1):533 − 539. [LI Yue,YANG Yongsheng,MAO Quansheng,et al. Researches on general stability for dump slope based on three-dimensional geologic model[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics,2013,34(S1):533 − 539. (in Chinese)]

    LI Yue, YANG Yongsheng, MAO Quansheng, et al. Researches on general stability for dump slope based on three-dimensional geologic model[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2013, 34(S1): 533 − 539. (in Chinese)

    [20]

    卢坤林,朱大勇. 坡面形态对边坡稳定性影响的理论与试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2014,33(1):35 − 42. [LU Kunlin,ZHU Dayong. Theoretical and experimental study of effect of slope topography on its stability[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,2014,33(1):35 − 42. (in Chinese with English abstract)]

    LU Kunlin, ZHU Dayong. Theoretical and experimental study of effect of slope topography on its stability[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2014, 33(1): 35 − 42. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [21]

    DASH A K. Analysis of accidents due to slope failure in Indian opencast coal mines[J]. Current Science,2019,117(2):304 − 308. doi: 10.18520/cs/v117/i2/304-308

    [22]

    罗浩,霍宇翔,巨能攀,等. 弃渣场边坡的粒径分布特征及其失稳机制研究[J]. 水文地质工程地质,2020,47(1):69 − 79. [LUO Hao,HUO Yuxiang,JU Nengpan,et al. A study of the particle size distribution characteristics and instability mechanism of the slope of an abandoned slag yard[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology,2020,47(1):69 − 79. (in Chinese with English abstract)]

    LUO Hao, HUO Yuxiang, JU Nengpan, et al. A study of the particle size distribution characteristics and instability mechanism of the slope of an abandoned slag yard[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology, 2020, 47(1): 69 − 79. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [23]

    王光进,杨春和,张超,等. 超高排土场的粒径分级及其边坡稳定性分析研究[J]. 岩土力学,2011,32(3):905 − 913. [WANG Guangjin,YANG Chunhe,ZHANG Chao,et al. Research on particle size grading and slope stability analysis of super-high dumping site[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics,2011,32(3):905 − 913. (in Chinese with English abstract)] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7598.2011.03.044

    WANG Guangjin, YANG Chunhe, ZHANG Chao, et al. Research on particle size grading and slope stability analysis of super-high dumping site[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2011, 32(3): 905 − 913. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7598.2011.03.044

    [24]

    赖若帆. 弃渣场边坡的粒径分布特征及稳定性分析——以叙大铁路沿线弃渣场为例[D]. 成都:成都理工大学,2019. [LAI Ruofan. The separating characteristics of particle diameter and its stability analysis of the slagdump slope[D]. Chengdu:Chengdu University of Technology,2019. (in Chinese with English abstract)]

    LAI Ruofan. The separating characteristics of particle diameter and its stability analysis of the slagdump slope[D]. Chengdu: Chengdu University of Technology, 2019. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [25]

    何斌,汪洋. 滑坡稳定性计算中剩余推力法和简布法[J]. 安全与环境工程,2004,11(4):60 − 62. [HE Bin,WANG Yang. Residual thrust method and janbu method uesd to calculate landslide stability[J]. Safety and Environmental Engineering,2004,11(4):60 − 62. (in Chinese with English abstract)] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1556.2004.04.017

    HE Bin, WANG Yang. Residual thrust method and janbu method uesd to calculate landslide stability[J]. Safety and Environmental Engineering, 2004, 11(4): 60 − 62. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1556.2004.04.017

    [26]

    张年学,李晓,盛祝平,等. 多剖面合力法分析滑坡稳定性[J]. 工程地质学报,2017,25(5):1190 − 1204. [ZHANG Nianxue,LI Xiao,SHENG Zhuping,et al. Stability analysis of landslide using joint forces method on multiple profiles[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology,2017,25(5):1190 − 1204. (in Chinese with English abstract)]

    ZHANG Nianxue, LI Xiao, SHENG Zhuping, et al. Stability analysis of landslide using joint forces method on multiple profiles[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology, 2017, 25(5): 1190 − 1204. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [27]

    郑颖人,陈祖煜,王恭先,等. 边坡与滑坡工程治理[M]. 北京:人民交通出版社,2007. [ZHENG Yingren,CHEN Zuyu,WANG Gongxian,et al. Engineering treatment of slope & landslide[M]. Beijing:China Communications Press,2007. (in Chinese)]

    ZHENG Yingren, CHEN Zuyu, WANG Gongxian, et al. Engineering treatment of slope & landslide[M]. Beijing: China Communications Press, 2007. (in Chinese)

    [28]

    杨海平. 基于改进的传递系数法滑坡稳定性分析[J]. 水电能源科学,2013,31(5):138 − 139. [YANG Haiping. Landslide stability analysis based on improved transfer coefficient method[J]. Water Resources and Power,2013,31(5):138 − 139. (in Chinese with English abstract)]

    YANG Haiping. Landslide stability analysis based on improved transfer coefficient method[J]. Water Resources and Power, 2013, 31(5): 138 − 139. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [29]

    习常志,朱蕾,卿菁,等. 不平衡推力法与简布法的比较分析[J]. 湖北工业大学学报,2020,35(1):59 − 63. [XI Changzhi,ZHU Lei,QING Jing,et al. Comparative analysis of unbalanced thrust method and janbu method[J]. Journal of Hubei University of Technology,2020,35(1):59 − 63. (in Chinese with English abstract)] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-4684.2020.01.015

    XI Changzhi, ZHU Lei, QING Jing, et al. Comparative analysis of unbalanced thrust method and janbu method[J]. Journal of Hubei University of Technology, 2020, 35(1): 59 − 63. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-4684.2020.01.015

    [30]

    刘松玉,童立元,邱钰,等. 煤矸石颗粒破碎及其对工程力学特性影响研究[J]. 岩土工程学报,2005,27(5):505 − 510. [LIU Songyu,TONG Liyuan,QIU Yu,et al. Crushable effects on engineering mechanical properties of colliery wastes[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,2005,27(5):505 − 510. (in Chinese)] doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-4548.2005.05.004

    LIU Songyu, TONG Liyuan, QIU Yu, et al. Crushable effects on engineering mechanical properties of colliery wastes[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2005, 27(5): 505 − 510. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-4548.2005.05.004

    [31]

    中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 土工试验方法标准:GB/T 50123—2019[S]. 北京:中国计划出版社,2019. [Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China. Standard for geotechnical testing method:GB/T 50123—2019[S]. Beijing:China Planning Press,2019. (in Chinese)]

    Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China. Standard for geotechnical testing method: GB/T 50123—2019[S]. Beijing: China Planning Press, 2019. (in Chinese)

    [32]

    苏爱军. 滑坡稳定性评价原理与方法:条分法的改进[M]. 武汉:中国地质大学出版社,2008. [SU Aijun. Principle and method of landslide stability evaluation:improvement of slice method[M]. Wuhan:China University of Geosciences Press,2008. (in Chinese)]

    SU Aijun. Principle and method of landslide stability evaluation: improvement of slice method[M]. Wuhan: China University of Geosciences Press, 2008. (in Chinese)

  • 加载中

(13)

(1)

计量
  • 文章访问数:  33
  • PDF下载数:  11
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
收稿日期:  2023-12-08
修回日期:  2024-03-17
录用日期:  2024-03-18
刊出日期:  2025-07-15

目录