中国地质环境监测院
中国地质灾害防治工程行业协会
主办

四川省地质灾害气象风险预警“省市县一体化”建设探索与实践

肖智林, 陈高翔, 张浴阳, 屈伯强, 苏永超, 刘艳辉, 张涌. 四川省地质灾害气象风险预警“省市县一体化”建设探索与实践[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报, 2024, 35(2): 47-54. doi: 10.16031/j.cnki.issn.1003-8035.202312039
引用本文: 肖智林, 陈高翔, 张浴阳, 屈伯强, 苏永超, 刘艳辉, 张涌. 四川省地质灾害气象风险预警“省市县一体化”建设探索与实践[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报, 2024, 35(2): 47-54. doi: 10.16031/j.cnki.issn.1003-8035.202312039
XIAO Zhilin, CHEN Gaoxiang, ZHANG Yuyang, QU Boqiang, SU Yongchao, LIU Yanhui, ZHANG Yong. Construction and application of the “integration of provincial, urban, and county-wide” geo-hazard meteorological risk warning system in Sichuan Province[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control, 2024, 35(2): 47-54. doi: 10.16031/j.cnki.issn.1003-8035.202312039
Citation: XIAO Zhilin, CHEN Gaoxiang, ZHANG Yuyang, QU Boqiang, SU Yongchao, LIU Yanhui, ZHANG Yong. Construction and application of the “integration of provincial, urban, and county-wide” geo-hazard meteorological risk warning system in Sichuan Province[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control, 2024, 35(2): 47-54. doi: 10.16031/j.cnki.issn.1003-8035.202312039

四川省地质灾害气象风险预警“省市县一体化”建设探索与实践

详细信息
    作者简介: 肖智林(1970—),男,四川广安人,本科,高级工程师,主要从事地质灾害预警与防治等方面研究。E-mail:179217416@qq.com
    通讯作者: 陈高翔(1991—),男,四川凉山人,本科,工程师,主要从事地质灾害预警与防治等方面研究。E-mail:576540468@qq.com
  • 中图分类号: P694

Construction and application of the “integration of provincial, urban, and county-wide” geo-hazard meteorological risk warning system in Sichuan Province

More Information
  • 提升地质灾害气象风险预警预报能力是地质灾害综合防治体系建设的主要内容之一。四川省自2003年起率先开展地质灾害气象风险预警工作。在长期实践基础上,于2019年开始重点在预警模型分析和建立、系统设计与实现、分级预警运行模式等方面进行了研究,创建了地质灾害预警模型库、“省市县一体化”地质灾害气象风险预警互联系统及分级预警机制。基本实现了基于雨量数据传输、预警模型分析运算、预警信息发布等“省市县一体化”平台的互联互通及分级预警的闭环管理,初步解决了市县缺平台、缺经费、缺技术的三缺问题及多头发布预警信息对基层造成的干扰问题。2023年四川省成功避险的案例中地质灾害气象风险预警发挥作用的占86%,有效减少了地质灾害造成的人员伤亡和财产损失。

  • 加载中
  • 图 1  四川省地质灾害预警区划图

    Figure 1. 

    图 2  激发雨量-前期有效雨量临界降水判据

    Figure 2. 

    图 3  四川省地质灾害潜势度计算结果及分区

    Figure 3. 

    图 4  地质灾害“潜势度”灾害点密度分布情况

    Figure 4. 

    图 5  架构层次图

    Figure 5. 

    图 6  预警业务流程

    Figure 6. 

    图 7  7月26日20时—7月27日20时预报雨量

    Figure 7. 

    图 8  互联系统模型分析计算预警结果

    Figure 8. 

    图 9  会商研判最终修正预警结果

    Figure 9. 

    表 1  各预警区临界降雨阈值判据

    Table 1.  Critical rainfall threshold criterion for each early warning area

    预警
    分区
    预警等级 K B 预警
    分区
    预警等级 K B
    红色预警 −0.44 82.8 1 红色预警 −0.45 58.0
    橙色预警 −0.44 60.9 橙色预警 −0.45 51.5
    黄色预警 −0.44 43.7 黄色预警 −0.45 43.0
    1 红色预警 −1.24 138.9 2 红色预警 −0.34 80.4
    橙色预警 −1.24 92.4 橙色预警 −0.34 61.7
    黄色预警 −1.24 66.1 黄色预警 −0.34 43.3
    2 红色预警 −0.79 76.1 1 红色预警 −0.53 36.6
    橙色预警 −0.79 67.7 橙色预警 −0.53 35.5
    黄色预警 −0.79 56.1 黄色预警 −0.53 34.7
    1 红色预警 −0.23 160.4 2 红色预警 −0.38 60.5
    橙色预警 −0.23 70.1 橙色预警 −0.38 50.2
    黄色预警 −0.23 59.8 黄色预警 −0.38 43.2
    2 红色预警 −0.33 136.3 3 红色预警 −0.49 47.2
    橙色预警 −0.33 95.8 橙色预警 −0.49 46.0
    黄色预警 −0.33 58.4 黄色预警 −0.49 35.0
    红色预警 −0.50 51.6 1 红色预警 −0.15 36.2
    橙色预警 −0.50 44.0 橙色预警 −0.15 32.9
    黄色预警 −0.50 40.7 黄色预警 −0.15 27.1
    1 红色预警 −0.41 122.5 2 红色预警 −0.31 71.4
    橙色预警 −0.41 99.2 橙色预警 −0.31 58.5
    黄色预警 −0.41 76.1 黄色预警 −0.31 42.1
    2 红色预警 −1.42 171.3 1 红色预警 −1.31 45.9
    橙色预警 −1.42 132.6 橙色预警 −1.31 40.9
    黄色预警 −1.42 113.4 黄色预警 −1.31 40.4
    红色预警 −0.32 105.9 2 红色预警 −0.88 50.8
    橙色预警 −0.32 70.4 橙色预警 −0.88 49.6
    黄色预警 −0.32 51.4 黄色预警 −0.88 43.7
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 2  各潜势度分区内降水诱发因子量化赋值

    Table 2.  Quantitative assignment of precipitation-inducing factors in each potential degree zone

    龙门山
    断裂带
    有效雨量计算时间/d 3
    有效雨量/mm <100 100~120 120~200 200~250 250~300 ≥300
    归一化值(T 0.2 0.4 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
    川东 有效雨量计算天数/d 2
    有效雨量/mm <120 120~180 180~400 ≥400
    归一化值(T 0.2 0.4 0.7 1

    川南
    有效雨量计算天数/d 2
    有效雨量/mm <50 50~80 80~120 120~150 150~200 ≥200
    归一化值(T 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 0.9 1
    川西 有效雨量计算天数/d 3
    有效雨量/mm <30 30~50 50~80 80~100 ≥100
    归一化值(T 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.8 1
    川东北 有效雨量计算天数/d 2
    有效雨量/mm <80 80~100 100~150 150~250 ≥250
    归一化值(T 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.8 1
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 3  各潜势度分区内显式统计预警模型判据

    Table 3.  Explicit statistical early warning model criterion in each potential degree zone

    预警等级 潜势度分区
    预警指数(R
    龙门山 断裂带 川东 川南 川西 川东北
    不预警 ≤0.3 ≤0.3 ≤0.3 ≤0.1 ≤0.3
    黄色预警 0.3~0.6 0.3~0.6 0.3~0.6 0.1~0.3 0.3~0.6
    橙色预警 0.6~0.9 0.6~0.9 0.6~0.9 0.3~0.5 0.6~0.9
    红色预警 >0.9 >0.9 >0.9 >0.5 >0.9
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1]

    李媛,孟晖,董颖,等. 中国地质灾害类型及其特征——基于全国县市地质灾害调查成果分析[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报,2004,15(2):29 − 34. [LI Yuan,MENG Hui,DONG Ying,et al. Main types and characterisitics of geo-hazard in China:Based on the results of geo-hazard survey in 290 counties[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control,2004,15(2):29 − 34. (in Chinese with English abstract)] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-8035.2004.02.005

    LI Yuan, MENG Hui, DONG Ying, et al. Main types and characterisitics of geo-hazard in China: Based on the results of geo-hazard survey in 290 counties[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control, 2004, 15(2): 29 − 34. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-8035.2004.02.005

    [2]

    张君霞,黄武斌,李安泰,等. 甘肃省主要地质灾害精细化气象风险预警预报[J]. 干旱区地理,2023,46(9):1443 − 1452. [ZHANG Junxia,HUANG Wubin,LI Antai,et al. Fine meteorological risk early warning forecast of main geological disasters in Gansu Province[J]. Arid Land Geography,2023,46(9):1443 − 1452. (in Chinese with English abstract)]

    ZHANG Junxia, HUANG Wubin, LI Antai, et al. Fine meteorological risk early warning forecast of main geological disasters in Gansu Province[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2023, 46(9): 1443 − 1452. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [3]

    刘艳辉,唐灿,吴剑波,等. 地质灾害与不同尺度降雨时空分布关系[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报,2011,22(3):74 − 83. [LIU Yanhui,TANG Can,WU Jianbo,et al. Spatial and temporal distribution characteristics of geo-hazards and rainfall in different scales[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control,2011,22(3):74 − 83. (in Chinese with English abstract)]

    LIU Yanhui, TANG Can, WU Jianbo, et al. Spatial and temporal distribution characteristics of geo-hazards and rainfall in different scales[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control, 2011, 22(3): 74 − 83. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [4]

    刘传正,刘艳辉,温铭生,等. 中国地质灾害气象预警实践:2003—2012[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报,2015,26(1):1 − 8. [LIU Chuanzheng,LIU Yanhui,WEN Mingsheng,et al. Early warning for regional geo-hazards during 2003-2012,China[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control,2015,26(1):1 − 8. (in Chinese with English abstract)]

    LIU Chuanzheng, LIU Yanhui, WEN Mingsheng, et al. Early warning for regional geo-hazards during 2003-2012, China[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control, 2015, 26(1): 1 − 8. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [5]

    温铭生,刘传正,陈春利,等. 地质灾害气象预警与减灾服务[J]. 城市与减灾,2019(3):9 − 12. [WEN Mingsheng,LIU Chuanzheng,CHEN Chunli,et al. Meteorological early warning of geo-hazards and service of disaster reduction[J]. City and Disaster Reduction,2019(3):9 − 12. (in Chinese with English abstract)]

    WEN Mingsheng, LIU Chuanzheng, CHEN Chunli, et al. Meteorological early warning of geo-hazards and service of disaster reduction[J]. City and Disaster Reduction, 2019(3): 9 − 12. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [6]

    温铭生,王连俊,连建发,等. 区域地质灾害气象预警效果评价[J]. 工程地质学报,2011,19(6):839 − 843. [WEN Mingsheng,WANG Lianjun,LIAN Jianfa,et al. Effectiveness evaluation on meteorological early warning of regional geological hazards[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology,2011,19(6):839 − 843. (in Chinese with English abstract)]

    WEN Mingsheng, WANG Lianjun, LIAN Jianfa, et al. Effectiveness evaluation on meteorological early warning of regional geological hazards[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology, 2011, 19(6): 839 − 843. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [7]

    刘艳辉,刘传正,温铭生,等. 中国地质灾害气象预警模型研究[J]. 工程地质学报,2015,23(4):738 − 746. [LIU Yanhui,LIU Chuanzheng,WEN Mingsheng,et al. Study of early warning models for regional geo-hazards in China[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology,2015,23(4):738 − 746. (in Chinese with English abstract)]

    LIU Yanhui, LIU Chuanzheng, WEN Mingsheng, et al. Study of early warning models for regional geo-hazards in China[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology, 2015, 23(4): 738 − 746. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [8]

    刘艳辉,董力豪,黄俊宝,等. 基于RF和概率分级的滑坡临界降水阈值的确定方法[J]. 水利水电技术(中英文),2022,53(10):177 − 185. [LIU Yanhui,DONG Lihao,HUANG Junbao,et al. RF and probability grading-based determination method of landslide critical precipitation threshold[J]. Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering,2022,53(10):177 − 185. (in Chinese with English abstract)]

    LIU Yanhui, DONG Lihao, HUANG Junbao, et al. RF and probability grading-based determination method of landslide critical precipitation threshold[J]. Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering, 2022, 53(10): 177 − 185. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [9]

    刘艳辉,黄俊宝,肖锐铧,等. 基于随机森林的福建省区域滑坡灾害预警模型研究[J]. 工程地质学报,2022,30(3):944 − 955. [LIU Yanhui,HUANG Junbao,XIAO Ruihua,et al. Study on early warning model for regional landslides based on random forest in Fujian Province[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology,2022,30(3):944 − 955. (in Chinese with English abstract)]

    LIU Yanhui, HUANG Junbao, XIAO Ruihua, et al. Study on early warning model for regional landslides based on random forest in Fujian Province[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology, 2022, 30(3): 944 − 955. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [10]

    刘艳辉,方然可,苏永超,等. 基于机器学习的区域滑坡灾害预警模型研究[J]. 工程地质学报,2021,29(1):116 − 124. [LIU Yanhui,FANG Ranke,SU Yongchao,et al. Machine learning based model for warning of regional landslide disasters[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology,2021,29(1):116 − 124. (in Chinese with English abstract)]

    LIU Yanhui, FANG Ranke, SU Yongchao, et al. Machine learning based model for warning of regional landslide disasters[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology, 2021, 29(1): 116 − 124. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [11]

    缪亚敏,朱阿兴,杨琳,等. 滑坡危险度评价对BCS负样本采样的敏感性[J]. 山地学报,2016,34(4):432 − 441. [MIAO Yamin,ZHU Axing,YANG Lin,et al. Sensitivity of BCS for sampling landslide absence data in landslide susceptibility assessment[J]. Mountain Research,2016,34(4):432 − 441. (in Chinese with English abstract)]

    MIAO Yamin, ZHU Axing, YANG Lin, et al. Sensitivity of BCS for sampling landslide absence data in landslide susceptibility assessment[J]. Mountain Research, 2016, 34(4): 432 − 441. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [12]

    缪亚敏. 滑坡危险度评价中的负样本采样方法研究[D]. 南京:南京师范大学,2016. [MIAO Yamin. A new approach to generating absence samples for landslide susceptibility assessment[D]. Nanjing:Nanjing Normal University,2016. (in Chinese with English abstract)]

    MIAO Yamin. A new approach to generating absence samples for landslide susceptibility assessment[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Normal University, 2016. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [13]

    刘艳辉,苏永超. 四川青川县区域地质灾害气象风险预警模型研究[J]. 工程地质学报,2019,27(1):134 − 143. [LIU Yanhui,SU Yongchao. Early-warning model of regional geological disasters based on meteorological factor in Qingchuan County,Sichuan Province[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology,2019,27(1):134 − 143. (in Chinese with English abstract)]

    LIU Yanhui, SU Yongchao. Early-warning model of regional geological disasters based on meteorological factor in Qingchuan County, Sichuan Province[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology, 2019, 27(1): 134 − 143. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    [14]

    刘艳辉,张振兴,苏永超. 地质灾害承灾载体脆弱性评价方法研究[J]. 工程地质学报,2018,26(5):1121 − 1130. [LIU Yanhui,ZHANG Zhenxing,SU Yongchao. Case study of vulnerability evaluation for geo-hazards bearing capacity of a region[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology,2018,26(5):1121 − 1130. (in Chinese with English abstract)]

    LIU Yanhui, ZHANG Zhenxing, SU Yongchao. Case study of vulnerability evaluation for geo-hazards bearing capacity of a region[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology, 2018, 26(5): 1121 − 1130. (in Chinese with English abstract)

  • 加载中

(9)

(3)

计量
  • 文章访问数:  380
  • PDF下载数:  41
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
收稿日期:  2023-12-30
修回日期:  2024-01-25
录用日期:  2024-03-04
刊出日期:  2024-04-25

目录