川东北元坝西部须家河组二段优质储层展布特征研究

黄彦庆, 肖开华, 王爱, 林恬, 王濡岳. 2023. 川东北元坝西部须家河组二段优质储层展布特征研究. 沉积与特提斯地质, 43(3): 489-500. doi: 10.19826/j.cnki.1009-3850.2021.12007
引用本文: 黄彦庆, 肖开华, 王爱, 林恬, 王濡岳. 2023. 川东北元坝西部须家河组二段优质储层展布特征研究. 沉积与特提斯地质, 43(3): 489-500. doi: 10.19826/j.cnki.1009-3850.2021.12007
HUANG Yanqing, XIAO Kaihua, WANG Ai, LIN Tian, WANG Ruyue. 2023. Distribution of high-quality reservoir of the second member of Xujiahe Formation in western Yuanba area, northeastern Sichuan Basin. Sedimentary Geology and Tethyan Geology, 43(3): 489-500. doi: 10.19826/j.cnki.1009-3850.2021.12007
Citation: HUANG Yanqing, XIAO Kaihua, WANG Ai, LIN Tian, WANG Ruyue. 2023. Distribution of high-quality reservoir of the second member of Xujiahe Formation in western Yuanba area, northeastern Sichuan Basin. Sedimentary Geology and Tethyan Geology, 43(3): 489-500. doi: 10.19826/j.cnki.1009-3850.2021.12007

川东北元坝西部须家河组二段优质储层展布特征研究

  • 基金项目: 中国石油化工股份有限公司科技开发部项目“川东北须家河组储层评价与甜点预测技术”(P19012-2)、“须家河组气藏储量评价及开发目标优选”(P18089-4)联合资助
详细信息
    作者简介: 黄彦庆(1980—),男,博士,高级工程师,油气藏评价。E-mail:huangyq.syky@sinopec.com
  • 中图分类号: TE122;

Distribution of high-quality reservoir of the second member of Xujiahe Formation in western Yuanba area, northeastern Sichuan Basin

  • 川东北元坝地区须家河组二段致密砂岩气资源潜力巨大,但储量探明率低、测试效果差异大,主要原因之一是致密砂岩储层非均质性强、优质储层分布规律不清。本文充分利用测录井、岩心及相关分析化验等资料,在分砂组刻画沉积微相展布的基础上,开展了须二段沉积演化过程、储层特征及其分布研究。结果表明:(1)元坝西部须二段经历了辫状河三角洲-滨浅湖-辫状河三角洲演化过程,沉积控制了砂体规模、粒度和矿物成分的空间变化;(2)须二段砂岩类型多样,整体致密,为低孔、低渗储层;储层物性与砂岩粒度,长石、石英和方解石胶结物含量等因素密切相关,这些因素主要受沉积和后期成岩作用控制;(3)须二段发育块状中粒长石岩屑砂岩和交错层理中粒石英砂岩两类有利岩石相,前者自西北向东南逐渐减薄、呈条带状展布,后者呈不连续土豆状,主体分布于西南部地区。

  • 加载中
  • 图 1  川东北元坝地区须二段沉积期物源及综合柱状图(据淡永,2011;略改)

    Figure 1. 

    图 2  川东北元坝西部须二段常见沉积构造类型及植物化石

    Figure 2. 

    图 3  川东北元坝西部须二段重点砂组沉积微相展布图(a -Tx2(下2),b -Tx2(下1))

    Figure 3. 

    图 4  川东北元坝西部须二段砂岩分类三角图(样品共计446个)

    Figure 4. 

    图 5  元坝西部须二段不同类型砂岩孔隙类型与胶结作用

    Figure 5. 

    图 6  川东北元坝西部须二段岩心分析孔隙度与粒径(左)和长石含量(右)交会图

    Figure 6. 

    图 7  川东北元坝西部须二段不同岩性孔隙演化曲线(据李军等,略修改)

    Figure 7. 

    图 8  川东北元坝西部须二段不同岩石相平均物性直方图

    Figure 8. 

    图 9  川东北元坝西部须二段不同岩石相敏感测井曲线交会图

    Figure 9. 

    图 10  川东北元坝西部须二段测试井射孔段有利岩石相厚度与测试产量交汇图

    Figure 10. 

    图 11  川东北元坝西部须二段重点砂组中粒长石岩屑砂岩厚度图(a - Tx2(下2),b - Tx2(下1)砂组)

    Figure 11. 

    图 12  川东北元坝西部Tx2(下1)砂组石英砂岩厚度图

    Figure 12. 

    表 1  川东北元坝西部须二段各类沉积微相的岩性和测井曲线特征

    Table 1.  Lithology and log characteristics of sedimentary microfacies of the second member of Xujiahe Formation in western Yuanba area

    沉积微相 岩性特征 测井曲线特征 典型曲线
    水下分流河道 厚层砂岩,以中粒(长石)岩屑砂岩为主,少量中粒岩屑石英砂若和细粒(长石)岩屑砂岩 中幅微齿化钟形、箱形或
    上钟下箱复合形,顶底突
    变接触或底突变接触
    席状砂 薄层砂岩,以细粒岩屑砂岩和
    粉砂岩为主
    低-中幅,曲线形态多为
    低频背景上的小漏斗形
    分流间湾 炭质泥岩为主,夹粉
    砂岩和煤层
    高频齿化、低幅,位于
    水下分流河道之上
    前三角洲泥 岩性较纯,以泥岩为主 微齿化、低幅平直,GR、
    DEN高值,AC低值
    滨浅湖滩坝 细、中粒石英砂岩 高幅箱形或漏斗形,GR
    低值,较分流河道低;
    CNL、DEN低值,AC中-高值
    滨浅湖泥 稳定分布的炭质泥岩,
    夹薄层粉、细粒石英砂岩
    高频齿化、低幅,位于
    滨浅湖滩坝上下
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 2  川东北元坝西部Tx2(下2)砂组不同地区砂体发育特征统计表

    Table 2.  Statistical table of mineral composition of the second member of Xujiahe Formation in different areas of western Yuanba area

    元坝西部平均厚度/m砂地比/%水下分流河道砂岩碎屑矿物含量/%
    地层砂岩石英长石岩屑
    西北部64.6553.2882.2746.815.829
    东南部55.0137.1667.5654.86.528.23
     注:地层厚度和砂地比数据依据西北部21口井,东南部32口井;矿物成分据西北部262个样品,东南部98个样品。
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 3  川东北元坝西部须二段有利岩石相测井识别标准

    Table 3.  Log characteristic of high-quality lithofacies of the second member of Xujiahe Formation in western Yuanba area

    有利岩石相测井解释标准(GR/API, RD/Ω·m, CNL/%, DEN/(g·cm−3))
    中粒长石岩屑砂岩51≤GR<68 && RD<56 &&DEN<DEN1
    中粒石英砂岩GR<45 && CNL<4.8 &&DEN>2.52
    注:表中DEN1=−0.0187×CNL+2.86065
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1]

    陈波, 沈均均, 郝景宇, 等, 2012. 川东北元坝地区须家河组石英砂岩沉积与储层特征[J]. 沉积学报, 30(1): 92-100 doi: 10.14027/j.cnki.cjxb.2012.01.004

    Chen B, Shen J J, Hao J Y, et al, 2012. Characteristics of quartz sandstones and its reservoir significance of Xujiahe Formation in Yuanba area, northesatern Sichuan Basin[J]. ACTA SEDIMENTOLOGICA SINICA, 30(1): 92-100. doi: 10.14027/j.cnki.cjxb.2012.01.004

    [2]

    程立雪, 王威, 岳全玲, 等, 2016. 川东北地区须二段石英砂岩储层特征差异性[J]. 成都理工大学学报(自然科学版), 43(2): 207-215 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-9727.2016.02.07

    Cheng L X, Wang W, Yue Q L, et al, 2016. Differences of quartz sandstone reservoir characteristics for the Member 2 of Xujiahe Formation in northeast Sichuan Basin, China[J]. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology (Science & Technology Edition), 43(2): 207-215. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-9727.2016.02.07

    [3]

    淡永, 2011. 川东北须家河组物源分析与沉积体系研究[D]. 成都: 成都理工大学, 39−42

    Dan Y, 2011. Analyses of the provenance and the depositional systems of Xujiahe Formation in northeast of Sichuan Basin[D]. Chengdu: Chengdu University of Technology, 39−42.

    [4]

    郭旭升, 胡东风, 黄仁春, 等, 2020. 四川盆地深层-超深层天然气勘探进展与展望[J]. 天然气工业, 40(5): 1-14 doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2020.05.001

    Guo X S, Hu D F, Huang R C, et al, 2020. Deep and ultra-deep natural gas exploration in the Sichuan Basin: Progress and prospect [J]. Natural Gas Industry, 40(5): 1-14. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2020.05.001

    [5]

    郝靖宇, 杜红权, 吴采西, 2015. 四川盆地元坝地区须二段石英滩坝特征及其发育的控制因素[J]. 天然气勘探与开发, 38(1): 1-4 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-3177.2015.01.001

    Hao J Y, Du H Q, Wu C X, 2015. Quartzose-bar sandstone reservoir of Xujiahe 2 Member in Yuanba area, Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Exploration and Development, 38(1): 1-4. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-3177.2015.01.001

    [6]

    何志勇, 刘海涛, 肖伟, 2014. 川东北YB地区须家河组裂缝特征及主控因素[J]. 断块油气田, 21(1): 32-35

    He Z Y, Liu H T, Xiao W, 2014. Fracture characteristics and main controlling factors of Xujiahe Formation reservoir in YB area, northeastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Fault-block Oil & Gas Field, 21(1): 32-35.

    [7]

    贾爽, 李宏涛, 肖开华, 2014. 元坝地区须二段下亚段储层特征及优质储层主控因素[J]. 东北石油大学学报, 38(5): 15-22 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-4107.2014.05.003

    Jia S, Li H T, Xiao K H, 2014. Reservoir characteristics and main controlling factors of high quality reservoir in the lower 2th Member of Xujiahe Formation in Yuanba area[J]. Journal of Northeast Petroleum University, 38(5): 15-22. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-4107.2014.05.003

    [8]

    李军, 胡东风, 邹华耀, 等, 2016. 四川盆地元坝-通南巴地区须家河组致密砂岩储层成岩-成藏耦合关系[J]. 天然气地球科学, 27(7): 1164-1178 doi: 10.11764/j.issn.1672-1926.2016.07.1164

    Li J, Hu D F, Zou H Y, et al, 2016. Coupling relationship between reservoir diagenesis and gas accumulation in Xujiahe Formation of Yuanba- Tongnanba area, Sichuan Basin, China[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 27(7): 1164-1178. doi: 10.11764/j.issn.1672-1926.2016.07.1164

    [9]

    隆辉, 邓飞涌, 廖小丽, 等, 2018. 四川盆地南部花果山地区嘉陵江组储层特征与成岩作用[J]. 沉积与特提斯地质, 38(3): 41-50 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-3850.2018.03.005

    Long H, Deng F Y, Liao X L, et al, 2018. Reservoir characteristics and diagenesis of the Jialingjiang Formation in the Huaguoshan region, southern Sichuan Basin[J]. Sedimentary Geology and Tethyan Geology, 38(3): 41-50. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-3850.2018.03.005

    [10]

    罗龙, 高先志, 孟万斌, 等, 2017. 深埋藏致密砂岩中相对优质储层形成机理—以川西坳陷新场构造带须家河组为例[J]. 地球学报, 38(06): 930-944

    Luo L, Gao X Z, Meng W B, et al, 2017. The formation mechanism of the relatively high- quality reservoir in tight sandstones with deep burial: a case study of Xujiahe Formation in Xinchang structural belt of western Sichuan Depression[J]. Acta Geoscientica Sinica, 38(06): 930-944.

    [11]

    MIALL A D, 1985. Architecture⁃element analysis: a new method of facies analysis applied to fluvial deposits[J]. Earth⁃Science Reviews, 22(4): 261-308.

    [12]

    MUÑOZ A, RAMOS A, SÁNCHEZ⁃MOYA A, et al, 1992. Evolving fluvial architecture during a marine transgression: Upper Buntsandstein Triassic, central Spain[J]. Sedimentary Geology, 75(3−4): 257-281. doi: 10.1016/0037-0738(92)90096-A

    [13]

    裘亦楠, 1990. 储层沉积学研究工作流程[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 31(1): 85-90

    Qiu Y N, 1990. A proposed flow- diagram for reservoir sedimentological study[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 31(1): 85-90.

    [14]

    汪正江, 汪泽成, 余谦, 等, 2021. 川东北新元古代克拉通裂陷的厘定及其深层油气意义[J]. 沉积与特提斯地质, 41(3): 361-375 doi: 10.19826/j.cnki.1009-3850.2021.06003

    Wang Z J, Wang Z C, Yu Q, et al, 2021. Reconfirmation of Neoproterozoic intra- cratonic rift in northeast Sichuan Basin and its significance of deep oil and gas[J]. Sedimentary Geology and Tethyan Geology, 41(3): 361-375. doi: 10.19826/j.cnki.1009-3850.2021.06003

    [15]

    王爱, 钟大康, 刘忠群, 等, 2021. 深层致密砂岩储层特征及物性控制因素—以川东北元坝西地区须二下亚段为例[J]. 沉积学报, DOI: 10.14027/j.issn.1000-0550.2020.124.

    Wang A, Zhong D K, Liu Z Q, et al, 2021. Characteristics of deep tight sandstone reservoirs and their controlling factors of physical properties: A case study of the Xu-2 Member in the western Yuanba area of the northeastern Sichuan Basin, China[J]. Acta Sedimentalogica Sinica. DOI: 10.14027/j.issn.1000-0550.2020.124.

    [16]

    王一帆, 徐胜林, 张兵, 等, 2020. 川西坳陷西充-梓潼地区下沙溪庙组沉积微相特征[J]. 沉积与特提斯地质, 40(1): 35-44 doi: 10.19826/j.cnki.1009-3850.(2020)01-0035-10

    Wang Y F, Xu S L, Zhang B, et al, 2020. Sedimentary microfacies in the Lower Shaximiao Formation in the Xichong- Zitong region, western Sichuan depression[J]. Sedimentary Geology and Tethyan Geology, 40(1): 35-44. doi: 10.19826/j.cnki.1009-3850.(2020)01-0035-10

    [17]

    夏杰, 钟怡江, 林良彪, 等, 2014. 川东北元坝地区上三叠统须家河组二段砂体充填特征及展布规律[J]. 科学技术与工程, 14(14): 161-166 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1815.2014.14.030

    Xia J, Zhong Y J, Lin L B, et al, 2014. Sand- bodies filling characteristics and distribution rule of member 2 Xujiahe Formation in Yuanba area northeastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 14(14): 161-166. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1815.2014.14.030

    [18]

    张昌民, 尹太举, 1996. 河南栗圆扇三角洲沉积建筑结构分析[M]. 西安: 西北大学出版社.

    Zhang C M, Yin T J, 1996. Structural analysis of sedimentary structures in liuli fan delta, Henan province[M]. Xi’an: Northwestern University Press.

    [19]

    张春, 蒋裕强, 王立恩, 等, 2013. 川东北地区须家河组二段储层差异性分析[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 35(2): 29-36

    Zhang C, Jiang Y Q, Wang L E, et al, 2013. Analysis of reservoir differences of Member 2 of the Xujiahe Formation in northeast Sichuan Basin[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University( Science& Technology Edition), 35(2): 29-36.

    [20]

    张莉, 邹华耀, 郝芳, 等, 2017. 川东北元坝地区须家河组储层特征与超致密成因探讨[J]. 地质学报, 91(9): 2105 − 2118.

    Zhang L, Zou H Y, Hao F, et al, 2017. Characteristics and densification causes and of highly-Tight sandstone of the Xujiahe Formation(T3x2) in the Yuanba area, northeastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 91(9): 2015 − 2118.

    [21]

    中石化勘探南方分公司, 2011. 元坝气田元坝2~元坝22井区须二下亚段气藏新增天然气控制储层报告[R].

    Sinopec Exploration South Branch, 2011. Report of new gas controlled reservoirs in the lower sub-member of Xu2 gas Reservoir in Yuanba 2 ~ Yuanba 22 well area of Yuanba Gas Field [R].

    [22]

    朱筱敏, 2008. 沉积岩石学[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 282-286

    Zhu X M, 2008. Sedimentary petrology[M], Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 282-286.

    [23]

    邹才能, 朱如凯, 吴松涛, 等, 2012. 常规与非常规油气聚集类型、特征、机理及展望—以中国致密油和致密气为例[J]. 石油学报, 33(2): 173-187 doi: 10.7623/syxb201202001

    Zou C N, Zhu R K, Wu S T, et al, 2012. Types, characteristics, genesis and prospects of conventional and unconventional hydrocarbon accumulations: taking tight oil and tight gas in China as an instance[J]. ACTA PETROLEI SINICA, 33(2): 173-187. doi: 10.7623/syxb201202001

  • 加载中

(12)

(3)

计量
  • 文章访问数:  1617
  • PDF下载数:  193
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
收稿日期:  2021-09-22
修回日期:  2022-11-14
刊出日期:  2023-09-30

目录